European Journal of Taxonomy 200: 1—45
http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2016.200
BY
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
ISSN 2118-9773
www. europeanj ournaloftaxonomy. eu
2016 • Huber B.A. et al.
Research article
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:404329BA-FD12-4F24-ABB6-0AC78AllDE54
New leaf- and litter-dwelling species of the genus Pholcus
from Southeast Asia (Araneae, Pholcidae)
Bernhard A. HUBER 1 *, Joseph K.H. KOH 2 , Amir-Ridhwan M. GHAZALI 3 , Kamil A.
BRAIMA 4 , Olga M. NUNEZA 5 , Charles LEH MOI UNG 6 , Booppa PETCHARAD 7
l * Alexander Koenig Research Museum of Zoology, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
2 National Biodiversity Centre, National Parks Board, IB Cluny Road, Singapore 259598.
3 Centre for Research and Consultancy, Unitar International University, Malaysia.
4 University of Malaya, Kuala Fumpur, Malaysia.
5 Department of Biological Sciences, Mindanao State University - Iligan Institute of Technology,
Tibanga, Iligan City 9200, Philippines.
6 Sarawak Museum, Jalan Tun Abang Haji Openg, 93566 Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.
7 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University,
Hat Yai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand.
* Corresponding author: b .huber@zfmk. de
6 Email: charl 1
[email protected]
1 urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 33607F 65-19BF-4DC9-94FD-4BB 88CED455F
2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:DA9CA194-2A90-41BD-8109-D8E536F23C0C
3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:EA038837-AA7B-49F0-8012-2B23C36F1605
4 um:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A9BD39AB-FD69-4740-AlDA-845D4F3B232B
5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D14FCCC-F148-4293-9F23-0EB5A4119305
6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:BF48A807-815E-41E4-BCC6-F3A3FAEDBC9E
7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:E1480A4E-3FA8-441C-A803-515B8AE7860D
Abstract. We describe eight new species of the genus Pholcus , and document their microhabitats. Four
species are assigned to the previously described Pholcus ethagala group: P. tanahrata Huber sp. nov.,
P. uludong Huber sp. nov., and P. bukittimah Huber sp. nov. from the Malay Peninsula, and P. barisan
Huber sp. nov. from Sumatra. These species are all litter-dwellers that build domed sheet webs on the
undersides of large dead leaves on the ground. The other four species are assigned to newly created
species groups: the P. tambunan group with two species from northern Borneo: P. tambunan Huber
sp. nov. and P. bario Huber sp. nov.; and the P. domingo group with two species from the Philippines,
Mindanao: P. domingo Huber sp. nov. and P. matutum Huber sp. nov. These latter four species are leaf-
dwellers that build barely visible silk platforms tightly attached to the undersides of live leaves. The
1
European Journal of Taxonomy 200 : 1 —45 ( 2016 )
main rationale for this paper is to provide part of the taxonomic and natural history background for
upcoming phylogenetic and evolutionary (microhabitat shifts) analyses.
Keywords. Pholcus , Southeast Asia, taxonomy, microhabitat, ultrastructure.
Huber B.A., Koh J.K.H., Ghazali A.-R.M., Braima K.A., Nuneza O.M., Leh Moi Ung C. & Petcharad B. 2016.
New leaf- and litter-dwelling species of the genus Pholcus from Southeast Asia (Araneae, Pholcidae). European
Journal of Taxonomy 200: 1-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2016.200
Introduction
Pholcidae occupy a wide range of microhabitats, particularly in tropical forests. Some prefer leaf litter,
some live in larger sheltered spaces among rocks and logs and in caves, some build their webs freely
among vegetation, and some are found on the undersides of live leaves up to several meters above ground.
While some genera are homogeneous in this respect (e.g., all Ninetinae seem to be ground-dwellers; all
Calapnita Simon, 1892 seem to be leaf-dwellers), others include representatives from various different
microhabitats (e.g., Belisana Thorell, 1898; Mesabolivar Gonzalez-Sponga, 1998; Metagonia Simon,
1893; Modisimus Simon, 1893; Smeringopus Simon 1890; see Huber 2005, 2012, 2015 and Huber
et al. 2005, 2010). This implies that evolutionary microhabitat shifts have occurred, both among and
within genera. Several such shifts have recently been documented in some detail (e.g., Dimitrov et al.
2013; Huber et al. 2015), but our general understanding of the patterns is still rudimentary because it
requires good data about both microhabitat and phylogeny, and at least one of them is often missing or
incomplete.
Fig. 1 . Known distributions of the Pholcus ethagala group (Malay Peninsula and Sumatra; Sri Lankan
species not shown), of the P. tambunan group (Borneo) and of the P. domingo group (Philippines).
2
HUBER B.A. et al., Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Of particular interest in this respect is the genus Pholcus Walckenaer, 1805. Almost every microhabitat
accessible to Pholcidae in general is occupied by specific representatives of this large genus. Most species
groups in Pholcus that appear well supported are homogeneous with respect to their microhabitat, but
relationships among groups do not seem to correlate with microhabitat preferences and in some cases even
closely related species occupy different microhabitats (Dimitrov et al. 2013; Huber & Dimitrov 2014).
This suggests multiple convergent shifts of microhabitat in Pholcus alone. Preliminary phylogenetic
data suggest that the story may be even more complicated. Several genera currently considered close to
Pholcus , such as Calapnita Simon, 1892; Leptopholcus Simon, 1893; Micropholcus Deeleman-Reinhold
& Prinsen, 1987; Micromerys Bradley, 1877; Panjange Deeleman-Reinhold & Deeleman, 1983; etc.
(the Pholcus group of genera in Huber 2011) may actually be nested within a paraphyletic Pholcus
(Huber 2011; A. Valdez-Mondragon, B.A. Huber & D. Dimitrov, unpublished data). If this proves to
be correct, then these mostly leaf-dwelling taxa may represent numerous additional microhabitat shifts
within this large taxonomic group (currently comprising some 400 described species).
The present paper focuses on Pholcus in Southeast Asia (Fig. 1) and is one of several recent contributions
providing the taxonomic and natural history background for an upcoming analysis of microhabitat shifts
in Pholcidae. Of particular interest in this respect is the Pholcus ethagala group because previous cladistic
analyses (Huber 2011) have suggested a close relationship between this group (whose Southeast Asian
representatives turn out to be litter-dwelling; e.g., Figs 2-9) and the leaf-dwelling genus Panjange.
The other two species groups treated below are also ‘untypical’ Pholcus (e.g., they both lack an uncus
on the male genital bulb) and might previously have been considered to represent new genera, but
preliminary analyses of molecular data (A. Valdez-Mondragon, B.A. Huber & D. Dimitrov, unpublished
data) strongly support their inclusion in Pholcus , i.e., a close relationship with more ‘typical’ Pholcus.
We deliberately do not dwell on phylogenetic aspects in this paper as all species treated below will be
included in the comprehensive molecular phylogeny to be published in 2017.
Material and methods
Most of the material studied herein was collected during recent expeditions to the Philippines (Feb-
Mar. 2014), northern Borneo (Jul.-Aug. 2014), and the Malay Pe nin sula (Feb.-Mar. 2015). This
material is currently deposited at the following institutions: Mindanao State University - Iligan Institute
of Technology, Iligan (MSU-IIT), Philippines; Museum of Zoology, University of Malaya, Kuala
Fumpur (MZUM), Malaysia; Princess Maha Chakri Sirinthorn Natural History Museum, Prince of
Songkla University, Hat Yai (PSUZC), Thailand; Sarawak Museum, Kuching (SMK), Malaysia; and
Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn (ZFMK), Germany. Further material came
from the Am erican Museum of Natural History, New York (AMNH); and the Netherlands Centre for
Biodiversity Naturalis, Feiden (RMNH).
Methods and terminology used are as in Huber (2011). Measurements are in mm unless otherwise
specified. Eye measurements are approx. ± 5 pm. Epigyna were cleared in warm NaOH solution and
stained with chlorazol black. For SEM photos, specimens were dried in hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS)
(Brown 1993), and photographed with a Hitachi S-2460 scanning electron microscope. SEM data are
presented within the descriptions but are not based on the holotype specimens described. Focality
coordinates are in round brackets when copied from labels and original publications or when received
directly from collectors, in square brackets when originating from some other source (such as online
gazetteers, Google Earth, etc.). The distribution map was generated with ArcMap 10.0.
Abbreviations
a = appendix
ATE = anterior lateral eye(s)
3
European Journal of Taxonomy 200 : 1—45 ( 2016 )
ALS
AME
a.s.l.
b
e
h
L/d
P
PME
tr
anterior lateral spinneret(s)
anterior median eye(s)
above sea level
genital bulb
embolus
hinge
length/diameter
procursus
posterior median eye(s)
trochanter
Results
Taxonomy
Class Arachnida Cuvier, 1812
Order Araneae Clerck, 1757
Family Pholcidae C.L. Koch, 1851
Pholcus Walckenaer, 1805
Pholcus Walckenaer 1805: 80. Type species by (assumed) monotypy: Aranea phalangioides Fuesslin,
1775.
Pholcus -Huber 2011: 124-126.
Pholcus ethagala species group
Diagnosis
This group (proposed in Huber 2011) includes medium-sized, long-legged spiders (body length ~3.0-
4.5, male leg 1 1 ength:~30^40); distinguished from similar species groups in Pholcus (P. minang and
P. kerinci groups proposed in Huber 2011, and P. buatong group proposed in Huber et al. 2016) by
combination of following characters: elongate abdomen slightly angular or pointed dorso-posteriorly
(Figs 5, 32); six eyes (in contrast to P. kerinci group; only the dubious P. vesculus Simon, 1901 with
eight eyes); male eye triads on stalks (Figs 39, 48, 77-80; in contrast to P. kerinci group); male chelicerae
with distinct proximal apophyses in frontal position (Figs 12, 17, 69, 74; in contrast to P. kerinci and
P. buatong groups), without distal apophyses (in contrast to P. minang group); male palpal trochanter with
short retrolateral apophysis and longer to very long ventral apophyses (Figs 11, 16, 68, 73; short only in
P. gombak Huber, 2011); male palpal patella dorsally not bulging (in contrast to P. buatong group); palpal
tarsus with dorsal elongation (Figs 11, 68; except P. phui Huber, 2011 and P. barisan Huber sp. nov.),
bulb with large and often complex appendix and weakly sclerotized embolus, without uncus; procursus
highly complex, with dorsal (sometimes rather prolateral) process and hinged distal element; epigynum
weakly sclerotized, with small ‘knob’ (Figs 13, 18, 70, 75; in contrast to P. buatong group).
Description - amendments
The original description (Huber 2011) is still largely valid. The following can be added: clypeus usually
unmodified but with pair of small processes in P. barisan Huber sp. nov. (Fig. 80); male palpal femur
ventrally very variable, from barely modified (P. barisan Huber sp. nov.; Fig. 73) to distinct processes
(P. ethagala Huber, 2011; P. phui Huber, 2011; P. ledang Huber, 2011; P. gombak Huber, 2011). Genital
bulb without uncus but in some species with small sclerite that originates from proximal bulbal sclerite
(arrows in Figs 15, 25, 67) and might be homologous to the uncus present in most other Pholcus groups.
4
HUBER B.A. et al., Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Tibia 1 in males 6-10; tibia 1 L/d-80-105; tibia 2/tibia 4 usually about 1.05-1.15, in P. uludongHubcr
sp. nov. 1.00. Male gonopore usually with four epiandrous spigots (Figs 46, 57; the three spigots in the
specimen figured in Huber 2011: fig. 803 is probably an individual exception). Tarsus 4 comb-hairs of
the simplified Pholcus- type (cf. Huber & Fleclcenstein 2008), with four lateral tines (Figs 28, 50).
Composition
The P. ethagala group now includes ten species: two species on Sri Tanka (P. ethagala ; P. maturata
Huber, 2011), seven species on the Malay Peninsula (P. phui ; P. vesculus ; P. tanahrata Huber sp. nov.;
P. uludong Huber sp. nov; P. gombak\ P. ledang', P. bukittimah Huber sp. nov.) and one species on
Sumatra (P. barisan Huber sp. nov.). The poorly known P. vesculus is assigned tentatively and probably
misplaced (see Huber 2011). Originally, P. schwendingeri Huber, 2011 was also assigned tentatively to
this group; it has recently been transferred to the newly created P. buatong group (Huber et al. 2016).
Natural history
The seven species newly observed in the field (Malay Peninsula and Sumatra) were mostly found on
the undersides of large dead leaves on the ground. This is in contrast to the two Sri Fankan species
that supposedly live on live leaves (at least P. ethagala ; Huber 2011). Very few specimens of the
newly observed species were also found under logs (P. ledang) and in bamboo sheaths and under rocks
(P. gombak). The availability of suitable large leaves on the forest floor strongly influenced spider
abundance. Webs consisted of small domed sheets closely attached to the leaf surface. When disturbed,
the spiders barely reacted; they vibrated only for a short time at low amplitude or were not seen to
vibrate at all. Two egg-sacs (of two species) were parasitized by Idris Foerster, 1856 (Scelionidae,
Baeini) wasps (Figs 33-35, 62). For further information see individual descriptions below.
Distribution
The P. ethagala group is known from Sri Fanka (see Huber 2011; not treated herein and not shown in
Fig. 1) and from Southeast Asia (Malay Peninsula, Sumatra; Fig. 1).
Pholcus phui Huber, 2011
Figs 2-3
Pholcus phui Huber, 2011: 178-180, figs 749-752, 779-780, 809-813 (c?$).
Diagnosis
Easily distinguished from most similar known relatives (other species of the P. ethagala group on the
Malay Peninsula) by morphology of male palps (figs 809-810 in Huber 2011; procursus with two
distinctive dorsal processes and curved distal process; large appendix distally with whitish element and
with sclerotized element set with small scales), and by details of female internal genitalia (figs 812-813
in Huber 2011; distinctive pair of anterior lateral structures; roundish pore plates close together).
New material examined
THAIFAND: 2 1 ?, 1 juv., ZFMK (Ar 15691), and 1 $, 1 ?, PSUZC, Narathiwat Province, Hala
Bala Wildlife Sanctuary, ‘site 3’ (5.808°N, 101.823°E), 220 m a.s.l., forest near road, leaf litter, 2 Mar.
2015 (B.A. Huber, B. Petcharad); 4 $ $, 3 juvs, in absolute ethanol, ZFMK (Mai 309), same data.
Description - amendments
Tibia 1 in three newly collected males: 9.3, 9.6, 9.7; tibia 2/tibia 4 length: 1.08.
5
European Journal of Taxonomy 200 : 1—45 ( 2016 )
Natural history
All specimens were collected within a small swampy area in the forest that was characterized by
numerous large dead leaves on the ground. Almost each of the largest leaves had an adult Pholcus
phui on its lower surface, while the more numerous smaller leaves were mostly either unoccupied or
occupied by juveniles. No further specimens were found during three days of collecting in various parts
of the forest.
Figs 2-9. Live specimens. 2-3. Pholcus phui Huber, 2011, Hala Bala, $ and $ with egg-sac.
4-7. P. tanahrata Huber sp. nov., Cameron Highlands, S, penultimate S, and §. 8-9. P. uludong Huber
sp. nov., Ulu Dong, <f and $.
6
HUBER B.A. et al.. Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Pholcus tanahraia Huber sp. nov.
urn: lsid: zoobank, org: act:F930688A-BB3D-4FEB-9F CE-3 AB42FDF 5 8 ID
Figs 4-7, 10-14, 77, 81-83
Diagnosis
Easily distinguished from most similar known relatives (other species of the P. ethagala group on the
Malay Peninsula) by morphology of male palps (Figs 10-11; procursus with two distinctive dorsal
processes, each with bifid tip), and by details of female internal genitalia (Figs 13, 14; pair of anteriorly
converging lateral sclerites visible through cuticle; elongate parallel pore plates).
Etymology
The species is named for Tanah Rata, the town close to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Material examined
Holotype
MAFAYSIA: ZFMK (Ar 15692), Pahang, Cameron Highlands (4.460°N, 101.392°E), 1200 m a.s.l.,
forest along ‘trail 9\ leaf litter, 25 Feb. 2015 (B.A. Huber); adult 26 Feb. 2015; fixed 28 Feb. 2015.
Other material
MAFAYSIA: 1 §, ZFMK, together with holotype; 1 ZFMK (Ar 15693), same data, adult 1 Mar. 2015;
died while molting; fixed 2 Mar. 2015; 4 juvs, in absolute ethanol, ZFMK (Mai 283), same data as
holotype.
Description
Male (holotype)
Measurements. Total body length 3.9, carapace width 1.05. Teg 1: 38.5 (8.9 + 0.5 + 9.0 + 18.0 + 2.1),
tibia 2: 5.4, tibia 3: 3.3, tibia 4: 4.8; tibia 1 F/d: 103. Distance PME-PME 570 pm, diameter PME
125 pm, distance PME-AFE ~35 pm; AME absent.
Color. Carapace ochre-yellow with light brown triangular mark posteriorly, ocular area, eye stalks and
clypeus light brown, some irregular back pigment in AME area; sternum whitish, labium brown; legs
ochre-yellow with darker brown patellae and tibia-metatarsus joints; abdomen ochre-gray with some
dark marks dorsally and laterally, monochromous ventrally.
Body. Habitus as in Figs 4-5; ocular area raised, each triad on long stalk (Fig. 77); carapace without
median furrow; clypeus unmodified; sternum wider than long (0.76/0.52), unmodified.
Chelicerae. As in Fig. 12, with single pair of frontal proximal apophyses directed towards median;
without distal modification; without stridulatory ridges.
Palps. As in Figs 10-11; coxa unmodified; trochanter with very long curved retrolatero-ventral apophysis
and small weakly sclerotized retrolateral process; femur with indistinct retrolatero-dorsal hump
proximally and ventral hump more distally; tarsus with large rounded elongation; procursus complex,
proximal part with large ventral ‘knee’ and complex dorsal and prolateral processes; hinged distal part
with distinctive flat dorsal process and whitish areas retrolaterally and prolaterally, transparent processes
prolaterally; bulb with very large appendix, long slender embolus, with small uncus-like process partly
sclerotized as continuation of proximal bulbal sclerite (hidden by bulb in Fig. 10).
7
European Journal of Taxonomy 200 : 1—45 ( 2016 )
Legs. Without spines and curved hairs; few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at
3%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on other tibiae; tarsus 1 with apparently >30
pseudosegments, very indistinct except distally.
Figs 10-14. Pholcus tanahrata Huber sp. nov. (ZFMK, Ar 15692). 10-11. Left male palp, prolateral and
retrolateral views. 12. Male chelicerae, frontal view. 13-14. Cleared female genitalia, ventral and dorsal
views. Scale bars: 10-11, 13-14 = 0.5 mm; 12 = 0.3 mm.
8
HUBER B.A. et al.. Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Male (variation)
Tibia 1 in other male: 9.7; this second male died while molting and is thus very pale; genitalia identical
to holotype.
Female
In general similar to male but eye triads not on stalks and much closer together than in male (PME-PME
distance: 230 pm); clypeus and ocular area frontally dark brown. Tibia 1 in 1 female: 6.7. Epigynum
weakly sclerotized (Fig. 81), ‘knob’ at posterior rim also weakly sclerotized; distinctive internal sclerites
converging anteriorly (Fig. 13); internal genitalia as in Figs 14, 82, 83.
Natural history
All specimens were found under large dead leaves on the ground. Such leaves were very rare at the type
locality, which explains the low number of specimens despite several hours of intensive search.
Distribution
Known from type locality in Malaysia only (Fig. 1).
Pholcus uludong Huber sp. nov.
um:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B379B03A-5BA0-4FEF-816D-DE9C3E6068A9
Figs 8-9, 15-31, 78, 84-86
Diagnosis
Easily distinguished from most similar known relatives (other species of the P. ethagala group on the
Malay Peninsula) by morphology of male palps (Figs 15-16; procursus with large flat dorsal process;
large appendix distally with two rounded sclerotized elements set with small scales; relatively straight
trochanter apophysis similar only to P. phui ), by large anterior square-shaped structure in female internal
genitalia, and by elongate anteriorly converging pore plates (Figs 18-19).
Etymology
The species name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
Material examined
Holotype
MALAYSIA: 3, ZFMK (Ar 15694), Pahang, Ulu Dong, ‘site 2’ (3.937°N, 102.032°E), 190 m a.s.l.,
forest near river, leaf litter, 21 Feb. 2015 (B.A. Huber, A.R.M. Ghazali, K.A. Braima).
Other material
MALAYSIA: 7 SS, 6 5 ?, ZFMK (Ar 15695-96), and 1 3, 1 $, MZUM, same data as holotype; 1 juv.
in absolute ethanol, ZFMK (Mai 261), same data; 2 33, 2 ZFMK (Ar 15697), Ulu Dong, ‘site
V (3.942°N, 102.027°E), 190 m a.s.l., forest near river, leaf litter, 20 Feb. 2015 (B.A. Huber, A.R.M.
Ghazali, K.A. Braima); 2^5,1 juv., in absolute ethanol, ZFMK (Mai 250).
Description
Male (holotype)
Measurements. Total body length 3.7, carapace width 1.05. Leg 1: 32.4 (7.6 + 0.4 + 7.7 + 14.8 + 1.9),
tibia 2: 4.3, tibia 3: 2.9, tibia 4: 4.3; tibia 1 L/d: 88. Distance PME-PME 520 pm, diameter PME 115 pm,
distance PME-ALE ~35 pm; AME absent.
9
European Journal of Taxonomy 200 : 1—45 ( 2016 )
Color. Carapace ochre-yellow with light brown median V-mark, clypeus light brown, ocular area not
darkened; sternum ochre-yellow with slightly darker margins; legs ochre-yellow with darker brown
patellae and tibia-metatarsus joints; abdomen ochre-gray with small black marks dorsally and laterally.
Figs 15-19. Pholcus uludong Huber sp. nov. (ZFMK, Ar 15695-96). 15-16. Left male palp, prolateral
and retrolateral views; arrow points at uncus-like process of proximal bulbal sclerite. 17. Male
chelicerae, frontal view. 18-19. Cleared female genitalia, ventral and dorsal views. Scale bars: 15-16,
18-19 = 0.5 mm ; 17 = 0.3 mm
10
HUBER B.A. et al.. Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Body. Habitus as in Fig. 8; ocular area raised and each triad on long stalk (Figs 20, 78); carapace without
median furrow; clypeus unmodified; sternum wider than long (0.70/0.54), unmodified. AFS with one
widened, one pointed, and six smaller cylindrically-shaped spigots (Fig. 29).
Chelicerae. As in Fig. 17, with single pair of frontal proximal apophyses; without distal modification;
without stridulatory ridges.
Palps. As in Figs 15-16, 22; coxa unmodified; trochanter with very long straight retrolatero-ventral
apophysis and small retrolateral apophysis; femur with dorsal and ventral rounded processes; procursus
Figs 20-25. Pholcus uludong Huber sp. nov., SEM micrographs (ZFMK, Ar 15695-96). 20-21. Male
and female prosomata, frontal views. 22. Right male palp, retrolateral view. 23. Right procursus and
bulb, dorsal view. 24-25. Feft bulb with appendix and embolus, prolateral and prolatero-dorsal views;
arrow points at uncus-like process of proximal bulbal sclerite. Scale bars: 20, 22 = 300 pm; 21, 23 = 200
pm; 24-25 = 100 pm.
11
European Journal of Taxonomy 200 : 1—45 ( 2016 )
very complex, proximal part with large dorsal flat process with serrated rim (Figs 23, 27); with hinged
distal elements; bulb with large appendix (Figs 24-25), long slender embolus, and two rounded processes
at base of appendix, one partly sclerotized as continuation of proximal bulbal sclerite.
Legs. Without spines and curved hairs; few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 3%;
prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on other tibiae; tarsus 1 with ~30 pseudosegments,
indistinct and apparently irregular. Tarsus 4 comb-hairs as in Fig. 28.
Figs 26-31. Pholcus uludong Huber sp. nov., SEM micrographs (ZFMK, Ar 15695-96). 26. Male ocular
area, dorsal view. 27. Dorsal process of right procursus. 28. Comb-hairs on male tarsus 4. 29-30. Male
and female ALS. 31. Epigynum, ventral view. Scale bars: 26, 31 = 200 pm; 27 = 60 pm; 28-30 = 20 pm.
12
HUBER B.A. et al., Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Male (variation)
Tibia 1 in 9 other males: 6.3-7.8 (mean 7.1).
Female
In general similar to male (Fig. 9) but eye triads not on stalks and much closer together than in male
(Fig. 21; PME-PME distance: 195 pm); clypeus darker brown. Tibia 1 in 9 females: 5.3-5.7 (mean 5.5).
Epigynum weakly sclerotized and strongly bulging plate (Fig. 84), only posterior rim slightly more
sclerotized, with small elongate ‘knob’ (Figs 18, 31); internal genitalia with large anterior square-shaped
sclerite visible through cuticle and pair of weakly sclerotized folds more laterally (Figs 19, 85-86). AES
as in male (Fig. 30).
Natural history
All specimens were found under large dead leaves on the ground. They barely reacted to disturbance.
Distribution
Known from type locality in Malaysia only (Fig. 1).
Pholcus gombak Huber, 2011
Figs 32-35, 39M7
Pholcus gombak Huber, 2011: 180-183, figs 757-760, 784-785, 819-822 ((?$).
Diagnosis
Easily distinguished from most similar known relatives (other species of the P. ethagala group on the
Malay Peninsula) by morphology of male palps (figs 819-820 in Huber 2011; short ventral trochanter
apophysis; procursus proximal part with prolateral rather than dorsal process, with large retrolatero-
ventral whitish area, with distinctive complex tip), and by details of female internal genitalia (figs 821-
822 in Huber 2011; pore plates widening anteriorly).
New material examined
MAFAYSIA: 3 9 ? ?, ZFMK (Ar 15698-99), and 1 $, 1 $, MZUM, Selangor, Kemensah (3.222°N,
101.793°E), 230 m a.s.l., forest along stream, leaf litter, 19 Feb. 2015 (B.A. Huber, A.R.M. Ghazali,
K.A. Braima, M. Muslimin); 1 $, 4 $ $, in absolute ethanol, ZFMK (Mai 247), same data; 2 $$, 2 $ §,
ZFMK (Ar 15700), Selangor, Fraser’s Hill (3.660°N, 101.743°E), 730 m a.s.l., forest near road, leaf
litter, 21 Feb. 2015 (B.A. Huber, A.R.M. Ghazali, K.A. Braima); 1 $, 3 juvs, in absolute ethanol, ZFMK
(Mai 262), same data; 8 $$, 8 $ §, ZFMK (Ar 15701-02), and 1 $, 1 $, MZUM, Perak, Gunung Fiang
(3.795°N, 101.533°E), 250 m a.s.l., forest along river, leaf litter, 22 Feb. 2015 (B.A. Huber, A.R.M.
Ghazali, K.A. Braima); 3 $ $, 2 juvs, in absolute ethanol, ZFMK (Mai 267), same data; 1 $, in absolute
ethanol, ZFMK (Mai 305), same data, with parasitized egg-sac, wasps eclosed on 1 Mar. 2015.
Description - amendments
Whitish area on procursus set with many small cuticular pointed processes (Fig. 45), procursus proximal
part with prolateral rather than dorsal process (asterisk in Fig. 41). Appendix with prolateral groove and
dense cover of small scales (Figs 42M3). Male gonopore with four epiandrous spigots (Fig. 46). AES
with one large widened, one pointed, and six smaller cylindrically-shaped spigots (Fig. 44). Tibia 1 in
13 males: 6.8-8.6 (mean 7.8); in 17 females: 5.4-6.6 (mean 6.1).
13
European Journal of Taxonomy 200 : 1 —45 ( 2016 )
Natural history
Most specimens were found under large dead leaves on the ground. At Kemensah, they also lived in
bamboo sheaths and in sheltered spaces under rocks. The egg-sac of one female from Gunung Liang was
parasitized by Idris wasps (Figs 33-35).
Figs 32-38. Live specimens. 32-35. Pholcus gombak Huber, 2011, Kemensah (32) and Gunung Liang
(33-35), S, $ with parasitized egg-sac seven days before eclosion of wasps (33), one day before eclosion
(34), and at eclosion (35). 36-38. P. ledang Huber, 2011, Gunung Ledang, S and $ with egg-sac.
14
HUBER B.A. et al.. Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Figs 39^7. Pholcus gornbak Huber, 2011, SEM micrographs (ZFMK, Ar 15701-02). 39-40. Male and
female prosomata, frontal views. 41. Left procursus; asterisk marks large prolatero-dorsal process. 42-
43. Right appendix and embolus, prolateral and prolatero-distal views. 44. Female ALS. 45. Cuticular
processes on whitish retrolateral area of left procursus. 46. Male gonopore. 47. Epigynum, ventral view.
Scale bars: 39—40 = 300 pm; 41, 47 = 200 pm; 42, 43 = 100 pm; 44 = 20 pm; 45 = 10 pm; 46 = 30 pm.
15
European Journal of Taxonomy 200 : 1—45 ( 2016 )
Pholcus ledang Huber, 2011
Figs 36-38, 48-58
Pholcus ledang Huber, 2011: 180, figs 753-756, 781-783, 814-818 ($$).
Diagnosis
Easily distinguished from most similar known relatives (other species of the P. ethagala group on the
Malay Peninsula) by morphology of male palps (figs 814-815 in Huber 2011, Fig. 54; procursus with
Figs 48-53. Pholcus ledang Yluber, 2011, SEM micrographs (ZFMK, Ar 15704-05). 48-49. Male and
female prosomata, frontal views. 50. Comb hairs on male tarsus 4. 51-52. Right appendix and embolus,
prolateral and distal views. 53. Female ALS. Scale bars: 48 = 300 pm; 49 = 200 pm; 50 = 10 pm;
51-52 = 100 pm; 53 = 20 pm.
16
HUBER B.A. et al ., Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
distinctive pair of retrolateral ridges and complex distal elements), and by details of female internal
genitalia (figs 817-818 in Huber 2011; large U-shaped anterior sclerite; small oval pore plates far apart).
New material examined
MALAYSIA: 5 7 ??, 2 juvs, ZFMK (Ar 15703-05), and 1 S, 1 ?, MZUM, Johor, Gunung
Ledang, forest near Puteri Falls (2.355°N, 102.635°E), 110 m a.s.l., leaf litter, 17-18 Feb. 2015 (B.A.
Huber); 1 <$, 4 5 ?, 1 juv., in absolute ethanol, ZFMK (Mai 237, Mai 242), same data.
Description - amendments
Whitish area on procursus set with many small cuticular pointed processes (Fig. 56). Appendix with
prolateral groove and dense cover of small scales (Figs 51, 52). Male gonopore with four epiandrous
spigots (Fig. 57). ALS with one large widened, one pointed, and six smaller cylindrically-shaped spigots
(Fig. 53). Tibia 1 in 5 males: 6.6-7.7 (mean 7.1); in 8 females: 5.0-6.0 (mean 5.5). Tarsus 4 comb-hairs
as in Fig. 50.
Natural history
Specimens were found under tree logs and under dead leaves on the ground. They barely moved when
disturbed, other than a short burst of low-amplitude vibration.
Figs 54-58. Pholcus ledang Huber, 2011, SEM micrographs (ZFMK, Ar 15704-05). 54. Left procursus,
retrolateral view. 55. Right procursus, distal view. 56. Cuticular processes on whitish retrolateral
area of left procursus. 57. Male gonopore. 58. Epigynum, ventral view. Scale bars: 54, 58 = 200 pm;
55 = 100 pm; 56 = 10 pm; 57 = 30 pm.
17
European Journal of Taxonomy 200 : 1—45 ( 2016 )
Pholcus bukittimah Huber sp. nov.
um:lsid:zoobank.org:act:93CDF3AF-2A6D-4AFE-926B-3FE43BBD495E
Figs 59-62, 67-71, 79, 87-89
Diagnosis
Easily distinguished from most similar known relatives (other species of the P. ethagala group on
the Malay Peninsula) by morphology of male palps (Figs 67-68; extremely long curved male palpal
trochanter apophysis; procursus with slender dorsal process and long whitish retrolateral area), and by
details of female internal genitalia (Figs 70-71; anterior triangular sclerite; semicircular pore plates;
posterior rectangular structure).
Figs 59-66. Live specimens. 59-62. Pholcus bukittimah Huber sp. nov., Dairy Farm, penultimate
and $ with partly parasitized egg-sac. 63-66. P. barisan Huber sp. nov., Bukit Barisan, f and $ $ with
variably expanded abdomens.
18
HUBER B.A. et al ., Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Etymology
The species is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
Material examined
Holotype
SINGAPORE: 3, ZFMK (Ar 15706), Bukit Timah, Dairy Farm Nature Park (1.360°N, 103.778°E),
50 m a.s.l., leaf litter near Wallace Trail, 15 Feb. 2015 (B.A. Huber, J.K.H. Koh).
Other material
SINGAPORE: 1 3, 1 ?, ZFMK (Ar 15707), same data as holotype; 2 §§, in absolute ethanol,
ZFMK (Mai 212, Mai 256), same data.
Description
Male (holotype)
Measurements. Total body length 3.5, carapace width 0.95. Teg 1: 29.5 (6.9 + 0.4 + 7.0 + 13.4 + 1.8),
tibia2: 4.0, tibia 3: 2.5, tibia4: 3.9; tibia 1 F/d: 84. Distance PME-PME 440 pm, diameter PME 115 pm,
distance PME-AFE ~35 pm; AME absent.
Color. Carapace pale ochre-yellow with light brown median V-mark posteriorly, clypeus light brown,
ocular area not darkened; sternum whitish; legs ochre-yellow with darker brown patellae and tibia-
metatarsus joints; abdomen gray with some black marks dorsally and laterally.
Body. Habitus as in Figs 59-60; ocular area raised and each triad on long stalk (Fig. 79); carapace
without median furrow; clypeus unmodified; sternum wider than long (0.62/0.48), unmodified.
Chelicerae. As in Fig. 69, with single pair of frontal proximal apophyses; without distal modification;
without stridulatory ridges.
Palps. As in Figs 67-68; coxa unmodified; trochanter with very long curved retrolatero-ventral apophysis
and small weakly sclerotized retrolateral process; femur with indistinct ventral humps proximally and
distally; tarsus with large rounded elongation; procursus complex, proximal part with distinctive dorsal
process; hinged distal part with large whitish area retrolaterally and transparent fringed processes
prolaterally; bulb with very large appendix, long slender embolus, and small uncus-like process partly
sclerotized as continuation of proximal bulbal sclerite.
Fegs. Without spines and curved hairs; few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at
2%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on other tibiae; tarsus 1 pseudosegments very
indistinct, apparently irregular.
Male (variation)
Tibia 1 in other male: 7.7.
Female
In general similar to male (Fig. 62) but eye triads not on stalks and much closer together than in male
(PME-PME distance: 200 pm); clypeus and ocular area frontally dark brown, with pair of small black
marks in area of AME (but without lenses). Tibia 1 in 1 female: 5.8. Epigynum weakly sclerotized
(Fig. 87), only posterior rim slightly more sclerotized, with small dark ‘knob’ (Fig. 70); large anterior
triangular internal sclerite visible through cuticle; internal genitalia as in Figs 71, 88-89.
19
European Journal of Taxonomy 200 : 1—45 ( 2016 )
fa'***'
a vV
' m
-
.. -V
: fa
Figs 67-71. Pholcus bukittimah Huber sp. nov. (ZFMK, Ar 15706-07). 67-68. Left male palp, prolateral
and retrolateral views; arrow points at uncus-like process of proximal bulbal sclerite. 69. Male chelicerae,
frontal view. 70-71. Cleared female genitalia, ventral and dorsal views. Scale bars: 67-68,70-71 = 0.5 mm;
69 = 0.3 mm
20
HUBER B.A. et al ., Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Natural history
All specimens were found in an area of the forest where large dead leaves on the ground were abundant.
They built their domed webs closely attached to the undersides of the leaves. A few eggs in an egg-sac
of one female were parasitized by Idris wasps (Fig. 62).
Distribution
Known from type locality in Singapore only (Fig. 1).
Pholcus barisan Huber sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:20779D81-A780-4FBD-92F6-78BD201FE319
Figs 63-66, 72-76, 80, 90-92
Diagnosis
Easily distinguished from most similar known relatives (representatives of the P. ethagala group on the
Malay Peninsula) by morphology of male palps (Figs 72-73; very long dorsal process of procursus;
relative straight male palpal trochanter apophysis similar to P. uludong Huber sp. nov. and P. phui but
shorter; shape of relatively small appendix), by modified male clypeus (pair of small dark processes;
Fig. 80), by male eye stalks directed more towards lateral (Fig. 80), and by details of female internal
genitalia (Figs 75, 76; anterior undulating sclerite; large posterior semicircular structure).
Etymology
The species name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
Material examined
Holotype
INDONESIA: $, ZFMK (Ar 15708), Sumatra, Fampung, Bukit Barisan (5.528°S, 104.424°E), 550-
600 m a.s.l., forest near road, leaf litter, 24 Oct. 2009 (S. Sutono).
Other material
INDONESIA: 6 $¥, 3 juvs, ZFMK (Ar 15709), same data as holotype; 4 55, 1 juv., in absolute
ethanol, ZFMK (Ind 153), same data.
Description
Male (holotype)
Measurements. Total body length 3.3, carapace width 0.9. Teg 1: 33.2 (7.6 + 0.4 + 7.7 + 15.6 + 1.9),
tibia2: 4.5, tibia 3: 2.6, tibia4: 4.0; tibia 1 F/d: 96. Distance PME-PME 510 pm, diameter PME 100 pm,
distance PME-AFE ~30 pm; AME absent.
Color. Carapace pale ochre-yellow with large dark brown mark posteriorly, dark median line, ocular
area, stalks and clypeus also dark brown; irregular black marks in place of AME; sternum whitish; legs
ochre-yellow with darker brown to black patellae and tibia-metatarsus joints; abdomen ochre-gray with
some darker marks dorsally and laterally.
Body. Habitus as in Figs 63-64; ocular area raised, each triad on long stalk directed laterad and dorsad
(Fig. 80); carapace without median furrow; clypeus with pair of small dark processes at rim; sternum
wider than long (0.60/0.53), unmodified.
Chelicerae. As in Fig. 74, with single pair of frontal proximal apophyses; without distal modification;
without stridulatory ridges.
21
European Journal of Taxonomy 200 : 1—45 ( 2016 )
Figs 72-76. Pholcus barisan Huber sp. nov. (ZFMK, Ar 15708-09). 72-73. Left male palp, prolateral
and retrolateral views. 74. Male chelicerae, frontal view. 75-76. Cleared female genitalia, ventral and
dorsal views. Scale bars: 72-73, 75-76 = 0.5 mm; 74 = 0.3 mm.
22
HUBER B.A. et al. , Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Figs 77-80. Male prosomata, frontal views. 77. Pholcus tanahrata Huber sp. nov. 78. P uladong Huber
sp. nov. 79. P. bukittimah Huber sp. nov. 80. P. barisan Huber sp. nov.
Figs 81-86. Epigyna, ventral views, and cleared female genitalia, ventral and dorsal views. 81-
83. Pholcus tanahrata Huber sp. nov. (ZFMK, Ar 15692). 84-86. P. uludong Huber sp. nov. (ZFMK,
Ar 15696).
23
European Journal of Taxonomy 200 : 1—45 ( 2016 )
Palps. As in Figs 72-73; coxa with indistinct ventral hump; trochanter with very long almost straight
retrolatero-ventral apophysis and small retrolateral process; femur with indistinct retrolateral hump;
tarsus without dorsal elongation; procursus complex, proximal part with distinctive dorsal process
forming retrolateral groove distally, ventral side heavily sclerotized, dorsal side semitransparent; hinged
distal part with large prolatero-dorsal flap and weakly sclerotized prolateral process lying parallel to
procursus; bulb with rather simple appendix, long slender embolus, without uncus.
Legs. Without spines and curved hairs; few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at
3%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on other tibiae; tarsus 1 pseudosegments very
indistinct, apparently irregular.
Female
In general similar to male (Figs 65-66) but eye triads not on stalks and much closer together than in
male (PME-PME distance: 240 pm); dark posterior mark on carapace smaller than in male, without
median dark line on carapace; with pair of small black marks in area of AME (but without lenses);
clypeus unmodified and only in upper third dark brown. Tibia 1 in 6 females: 6.0-6.9 (mean 6.4).
Some females (and juveniles) with laterally strongly widened abdomen (Fig. 65). Epigynum weakly
Figs 87-92. Epigyna, ventral views, and cleared female genitalia, ventral and dorsal views. 87-
89. Pholcus bukittimah Huber sp. nov. (ZFMK, Ar 15707). 90-92. P. barisan Huber sp. nov. (ZFMK,
Ar 15709).
24
HUBER B.A. et al.. Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
sclerotized (Fig. 90), with small ‘knob’ at posterior rim (Fig 75); internal anterior arc undulating, visible
through cuticle; internal genitalia as in Figs 76, 91-92.
Natural history
All specimens were found under large dead leaves on the ground. They hung in domed sheet webs
closely attached to the leaf surface. They barely moved when disturbed and were not seen to vibrate.
Distribution
Known from type locality in Sumatra only (Fig. 1).
Pholcus tambunan species group
Diagnosis
The two species included in this group are medium-sized, long-legged spiders (body length ~4, male leg 1
length: -35^10), distinguished from other species groups in Pholcus by combination of the following
characters: elongate abdomen angular dorso-posteriorly (Figs 94, 98); six eyes; male chelicerae with
distinctive distal apophyses (flat sclerites without modified hairs; Figs 103, 108, 120); most palpal
structures unusually long (in particular genital bulb; Figs 101, 121); male bulb without uncus; epigynum
weakly sclerotized, scape directed towards anterior with terminal ‘knob’ (Figs 104, 123); female internal
genitalia with pair of highly distinctive three-layered telescopic tubes (Figs 105, 124).
Description
See individual descriptions of the two very similar species below.
Composition
Only the two species described below.
Natural history
Both species were found on the undersides of live leaves where they built very fine webs tightly attached
to the leaf surface. Both species were frequently seen to share their webs with cecidomyiid flies. For
further information, see descriptions below.
Distribution
The P tambunan group is restricted to northern Borneo (Fig. 1).
Pholcus tambunan Huber sp. nov.
um:lsid:zoobank.org:act:5FD747F9-A402-4C77-BFC0-B26BDCDB10B5
Figs 93-96, 101-119, 125-127
Diagnosis
Easily distinguished from most similar known relative (P. bario Huber sp. nov.) by morphology of
male palps (Figs 101-102; shorter trochanter apophysis; wider femur; distinctive structures on tip of
procursus), by different shapes of frontal cheliceral apophyses (Fig. 103), and by shorter epigynal scape
(Figs 104, 119).
Etymology
The species is named for Tambunan, the town close to the type locality; noun in apposition.
25
European Journal of Taxonomy 200: 1 —45 (2016)
Material examined
Holotype
MALAYSIA-BORNEO: <$, ZFMK (Ar 15710), Sabah, Crocker Range between Kota Kinabalu and
Tambunan, S-slope, forest along river (5.783°N, 116.339°E), 1430-1480 m a.s.l., on underside of leaf,
3 Aug. 2014 (B.A. Huber, S.B. Huber).
Other material
MALAYSIA-BORNEO: 4 33 ,3 $ $, ZFMK (Ar 15711-12), and 1 3 ,1 ?, SMK, same data as holotype;
2 $ J, 3 juvs, in absolute ethanol, ZFMK (Bor 172), same data. 2 SS, 1 §, ZFMK (Ar 15713), Crocker
Range between Kota Kinabalu and Tambunan, N-slope, forest along river (5.834°N, 116.336°E), 1600
m a.s.l., undersides of leaves, 3 Aug. 2014 (B.A. Huber, S.B. Huber); 2 $ $, in absolute ethanol, ZFMK
(Bor 167), same data; 2 <$<$, 14 §?, 1 juv., ZFMK (Ar 15714-15), Mt. Kinabalu, forest along Silau
Silau Trail (6.010-6.017°N, 116.537-116.543°E), 1550-1650 m a.s.l., on undersides of leaves, 6 Aug.
2014 (B.A. Huber, S.B. Huber); 4 55, 2 juvs, in absolute ethanol, ZFMK (Bor 212), same data; 1 S,
Figs 93-100. Live specimens. 93-96. Pholcus tambunan Huber sp. nov., Crocker Range, c?, penultimate
S, and 5 with egg-sac. 97-100. P. bario Huber sp. nov., Bario, S and 5 with egg-sac.
26
HUBER B.A. et al ., Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Figs 101-105. Pholcus tamhunan Huber sp. nov. (ZFMK, Ar 15711-12). 101-102. Left male palp,
prolateral and retrolateral views. 103. Male chelicerae, frontal view. 104-105. Cleared female genitalia,
ventral and dorsal views. Scale bars: 101-102, 104-105 = 0.5 mm; 103 = 0.3 mm.
27
European Journal of Taxonomy 200 : 1—45 ( 2016 )
Figs 106-113. Pholcus tambunan Huber sp. nov., SEM micrographs (ZFMK, Ar 15711, 15715).
106-107. Male and female prosomata, frontal views. 108. Right male cheliceral apophysis. 109. Right
procursus, retrolateral view. 110. Left procursus, prolateral view. 111. Proximal parts of left appendix
and embolus. 112. Male ocular area, dorsal view. 113. Comb-hairs on male tarsus 4. Scale bars: 106—
107, 112 = 200 pm; 108 = 20 pm; 109-111 = 100 pm; 113 = 10 pm.
28
HUBER B.A. et al.. Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
1 5, AMNH, Mt. Kinabalu, 1550 m a.s.l., 24 Jul. 1980 (C.L. & RR. Deeleman); 1 RMNH, same data
but river trail, 27 Apr. 1979; 3 1 $, RMNH, same data but river trail, 21-25 Aug. 1980; 1 c?, 1 ?,
RMNH, same data but 1-5 May 1991.
Assigned tentatively
MALAYSIA-BORNEO: 1 ? (abdomen only), RMNH, Sepilok, 25 km E Sandakan [5.87°N, 117.94°E],
1 Oct. 1980 (P. Zborowski).
Description
Male (holotype)
Measurements. Total body length 4.1, carapace width 1.0. Leg 1: 37.3 (8.8 + 0.4 + 8.8 + 17.0 + 2.3),
tibia 2: 5.6, tibia 3: 3.3, tibia 4: 5.0; tibia 1 L/d: 100. Distance PME-PME 450 pm, diameter PME 130
pm, distance PME-ALE ~35 pm; no trace of AME.
Color. Carapace whitish with dark median mark widening anteriorly and including ocular area and
clypeus in upper part and laterally; sternum whitish; legs pale ochre-yellow with dark brown patellae and
Figs 114-119. Pholcus tambunanHuber sp. nov., SEM micrographs (ZFMK, Ar 15711,15715). 114. Male
left palpal tarsal organ. 115. Tip of left embolus. 116. Male gonopore. 117. Base of trichobothrium on
male palpal tibia. 118. Female ALS. 119. Epigynum, ventral view. Scale bars: 114, 118 = 20 pm; 115 =
50 pm; 116 = 40 pm; 117 = 8 pm; 119 = 200 pm.
29
European Journal of Taxonomy 200: 1—45 (2016)
tibia-metatarsus joints; abdomen pale ochre-gray with black marks dorsally and laterally, monochromous
ventrally.
Body. Habitus as in Figs 93-94; ocular area slightly raised, each triad on additional short stalk directed
towards lateral (Fig. 106); carapace without median furrow; clypeus unmodified; sternum wider than
long (0.70/0.54), unmodified. Gonopore with four epiandrous spigots (Fig. 116).
Chelicerae. As in Fig. 103, with distinctive pair of frontal apophyses (large flat plates, distally drawn out
into small tip; Fig. 108) and rounded lateral humps; without modified hairs; without stridulatory ridges.
Palps. As in Figs 101-102; coxa unmodified; trochanter with strong ventral apophysis; femur cylindrical,
with indistinct prolateral hump proximally; tibia with distinctively elevated dorso-distal rim; tarsal organ
as in Fig. 114; procursus with strong ventral ‘knee’, with distinctive small prolateral sclerotized process
at 1/3 length, distal half with large whitish area retrolaterally, tip complex with distinctive sclerites
(Figs 109, 110); bulb elongated, long appendix with distinctive prolateral process provided with small
teeth, further teeth along ventral rim, proximal processes of appendix ‘guiding’ embolus between them
(Fig. Ill); embolus long and weakly sclerotized, tip as in Fig. 115.
Legs. Without spines and curved hairs; few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 2%;
prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on other tibiae; tarsus 1 pseudosegments not seen in
dissecting microscope. Tarsus 4 comb-hairs as in Fig. 113.
Male (variation)
Tibia 1 in 7 other males: 8.2-9.3 (mean 8.6).
Female
In general similar to male (Fig. 96) but carapace mark only in posterior half; ocular area dark as in
male but clypeus light. Eye triads much closer together than in male (Fig. 107; PME-PME distance:
265 pm). Dark marks on abdomen less distinct or even absent. Tibia 1 in 18 females: 6.2-7.2 (mean 6.7).
Epigynum weakly sclerotized (Fig. 125), wide transversal plate with scape directed towards anterior
(Fig. 104); dark internal arch and lateral posterior structures visible through cuticle; internal genitalia as
in Figs 105, 126, 127, with pair of highly distinctive three-layered telescopic tubes. ALS with one large
widened, one pointed, and six smaller cylindrically-shaped spigots (Fig. 118). The female from Sepilok
is assigned tentatively because no male is known from this locality.
Natural history
The spiders were found on the undersides of live leaves about 50-200 cm above the ground. They
built barely visible silk platforms directly attached to the leaf surface rather than the ‘usual’ pholcid
domes. Several webs were occupied (in addition to the spider) by large numbers of Diptera (probably
Cecidomyiidae, not collected).
Distribution
Known from three localities in northeastern Borneo (Sabah) (Fig. 1; but note that the single specimen
from Sepilok is assigned tentatively).
30
HUBER B.A. et al.. Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Pholcus bario Huber sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D680CB67-1525-4263-B8D4-8E44E587C51E
Figs 97-100, 121-124, 128-130
Diagnosis
Easily distinguished from most similar known relative (P. tambunan Huber sp. nov.) by morphology of
male palps (Figs 121-122; longer trochanter apophysis; more slender femur; distinctive structures on
tip of procursus), by different shapes of frontal cheliceral apophyses (Fig. 120), and by longer epigynal
scape (Fig. 123).
Etymology
The species name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
Material examined
Holotype
MALAYSIA-BORNEO: S, ZFMK (Ar 15716), Sarawak, Bario, forest along river W of town (3.736°N,
115.437-115.443°E), 1150-1250 m a.s.l., on underside of leaf, 30 Jul. 2014 (B.A. Huber, S.B. Huber).
Other material
MALAYSIA-BORNEO: 2 $$, 2 § §, ZFMK (Ar 15717-18), same data as holotype; 2 $ $, in absolute
ethanol, ZFMK (Bor 232), same data.
Description
Male (holotype)
Measurements. Total body length 3.9, carapace width 0.9. Leg 1: 34.5 (8.1 + 0.4 + 8.2 + 15.5 + 2.3),
tibia 2: 5.3, tibia 3: 3.2, tibia 4: 4.7; tibia 1 L/d: 104. Distance PME-PME 370 pm, diameter PME 95 pm,
distance PME-ALE ~35 pm; no trace of AME.
Color. Carapace whitish with dark median mark widening anteriorly and including ocular area and
clypeus in upper part and laterally; sternum whitish; legs pale ochre-yellow with dark brown patellae and
tibia-metatarsus joints; abdomen pale ochre-gray with black marks dorsally and laterally, monochromous
ventrally.
Body. Habitus as in Figs 97-99; ocular area slightly raised, each triad on additional short stalk directed
towards lateral (Fig. 120); carapace without median furrow; clypeus unmodified; sternum wider than
long (0.64/0.52), unmodified.
Chelicerae. As in Fig. 120, with distinctive pair of frontal apophyses (large flat curved plates) and small
rounded lateral humps; without modified hairs; without stridulatory ridges.
Palps. As in Figs 121-122; coxa unmodified; trochanter with strong ventral apophysis; femur cylindrical,
with two small retrolateral humps proximally and small ventral hump at half length; procursus with strong
ventral ‘knee’, with distinctive small prolateral sclerotized process at A length (arrow in Fig. 121), distal
half with large whitish area retrolaterally, tip complex with distinctive sclerites; bulb elongated, long
appendix with distinctive prolateral process provided with small teeth, further teeth along ventral rim,
proximal processes of appendix ‘guiding’ embolus between them; embolus long and weakly sclerotized.
Legs. Without spines and curved hairs; few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 2%;
prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on other tibiae; tarsus 1 pseudosegments not seen in
dissecting microscope.
31
European Journal of Taxonomy 200: 1—45 (2016)
Figs 120-124. Pholcus bario Huber sp. nov. (ZFMK, Ar 15717-18). 120. Male prosoma, frontal view.
121-122. Left male palp, prolateral and retrolateral views; arrow points at prolateral finger-shaped
process of procursus. 123-124. Cleared female genitalia, ventral and dorsal views. Scale bars: 120,
123-124 = 0.3 mm; 121-122 = 0.5 mm
32
HUBER B.A. et al ., Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Male (variation)
Tibia 1 in 2 other males: 7.8, 8.0.
Female
In general similar to male (Fig. 100) but carapace mark only in posterior half; ocular area dark as in male
but clypeus light. Eye triads closer together than in male (PME-PME distance: 230 pm). Dark marks on
abdomen less distinct. Tibia 1 in 2 females: 6.6 (both). Epigynum weakly sclerotized (Fig. 128), wide
transversal plate with long scape directed towards anterior (Fig. 123); dark internal arch and lateral
posterior structures visible through cuticle; internal genitalia as in Figs 124, 129, 130, with pair of highly
distinctive three-layered telescopic tubes.
Natural history
All specimens were found in one small section of forest along a small river. No further specimens were
found in two days of intensive search. They built barely visible webs on the undersides of live leaves,
and often shared webs with large numbers of Diptera (Cecidomyiidae, in ZFMK).
Distribution
Known from type locality in northern Borneo (Sarawak) only (Fig. 1).
Figs 125-130. Epigyna, ventral views, and cleared female genitalia, ventral and dorsal views. 125-
127. Pholcus tambunan Huber sp. nov. (ZFMK, Ar 15712). 128-130. P. bario Huber sp. nov. (ZFMK,
Ar 15718).
33
European Journal of Taxonomy 200: 1—45 (2016)
Pholcus domingo species group
Diagnosis
The two species included in this group are medium-sized, long-legged spiders (body length -4.5, male
leg 1 length:-3 5M-0), distinguished from similar P. kerinci group by bipartite appendix (sclerotized
retrolateral and whitish prolateral part; Figs 140, 150, 157), by shape of procursus (presence of dorsal
process; absence of distal spine-lilce process; Figs 141, 158), and by dorsal trichobothrium of male
palpal tibia in ‘usual’ position (i.e., at -45% of tibia length, versus 55-60% in R kerinci group); from
other species groups in Pholcus by combination of the following characters: elongate abdomen angular
dorso-posteriorly (Fig. 139); eight eyes; male chelicerae almost unmodified (indistinct lateral humps
proximally; Fig. 142); male genital bulb without uncus; epigynum weakly sclerotized, with numerous
transversal folds (Figs 143, 156, 159).
Description
See individual descriptions of the two very similar species below.
Composition
Only the two species described below.
Natural history
Both species were found on the undersides of live leaves where they built very fine webs tightly attached
to the leaf surface. For further information, see description of P. domingo Huber sp. nov. below.
Distribution
The P. domingo group is restricted to Mindanao (Fig. 1).
Pholcus domingo Huber sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:DE8B7640-CDlE-469F-B43B-BF319FEB156E
Figs 131-137, 140-156, 161-163
Diagnosis
Distinguished from most similar known relative (P. matutum Huber sp. nov.) by morphology of male
palps (Figs 140-141; longer procursus with shorter dorsal process; appendix with long rod-shaped main
branch); females of these two species are difficult to separate (internal genitalia relatively shorter in
P. matutum Huber sp. nov.; compare Figs 144 and 160).
Etymology
The species name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
Material examined
Holotype
P HI LIPPINES: 3, ZFMK (Ar 15719), Mindanao, Bulcidnon Prov., Santo Domingo (7.782°N,
125.397°E), 560 m a.s.l., forest remnant along brook, on leaf, 8-9 Feb. 2014 (B.A. Huber, E. Mondejar).
Other material
PHILIPPINES: 9 33 , 9 55, 2 juvs, ZFMK (Ar 15720-21), and 1 (?, 1 ?, MSU-IIT, same data as
holotype; 2 33 , 5 $$, in absolute ethanol, same data, ZFMK (Phi 287); 1 $ with parasitized egg-sac,
in absolute ethanol, ZFMK (Phi 286), same data; 5 33 , 4 55, 1 juv., ZFMK (Ar 15722), near Santo
34
HUBER B.A. et al.. Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Domingo, Malangob (7.789°N, 125.384°E), 570 m a.s.l., forest along brook, on leaves, 9 Feb. 2014
(B.A. Huber, E. Mondejar).
Assigned tentatively
PHILIPPINES, Mindanao: 1 3, 1 $, ZFMK (Ar 15723), Bukidnon Prov., CEDAR (Center for
Ecological Development and Recreation) (8.251°N, 125.034°E), 760 m a.s.l., forest along river, on
Figs 131-139. Live specimens and dorsal color patterns, Pholcus domingo group. 131-137. Pholcus
domingo Huber sp. nov., 3 and $ with parasitized egg-sac from Santo Domingo (131-132), habitus of
S3 from Santo Domingo (133) and Mt. Mupo (134), and carapace dorsal views, $ and $ from Santo
Domingo (135-136) and $ from Mt. Mupo (137). 138-139. P. matutum Huber sp. nov., Mt. Matutum,
3 and $ with egg-sac.
35
European Journal of Taxonomy 200: 1—45 (2016)
leaves, 16 Feb. 2014 (B.A. Huber, E. Mondejar); 1 5,3 juvs, in absolute ethanol, ZFMK (Phi 249),
same data; 2 SS, 3 §§, 2 juvs, ZFMK (Ar 15724), and 2 SS, MSU-IIT, same locality, 15 Nov. 2014
(E.P. Mondejar); 1 3 5?, ZFMK (Ar 15725), Davao del Sur Prov., Malagos Watershed (7.184°N,
125.415°E), 390 m a.s.l., forest along river, on leaves, 14 Feb. 2014 (B.A. Huber, E. Mondejar); 1 1 §,
Figs 140-144. Pholcus domingo Huber sp. nov. (ZFMK, Ar 15720-21). 140-141. Left male palp,
prolateral and retrolateral views. 142. Male chelicerae, frontal view. 143-144. Cleared female genitalia,
ventral and dorsal views. Scale bars: 140-141 = 0.5 mm; 142-144 = 0.3 mm
36
HUBER B.A. et al ., Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
1 juv. (identity of juvenile uncertain), in absolute ethanol, ZFMK (Phi 260), same data; 1 $, ZFMK (Ar
15726), Davao City, MarilogDistr., Epol Falls, ‘site r(7.456°N, 125.237°E), llOOma.s.l., 1 Dec. 2014
(M.A. Responte); 1 S, ZFMK (Ar 15727), Fanao del Sur Prov., Marawi City, Mt. Mupo (8.018°N,
124.301°E), 20 Nov. 2014 (N.U. Elias); 2 $$, 4 §§, 6 juvs, ZFMK (Ar 15728), Maguindanao Prov.,
Dimapatoy Watershed (7.141°N, 124.202°E), 17 Dec. 2014 (N.U. Elias).
Description
Male (holotype)
Measurements. Total body length 4.5, carapace width 0.9. Feg 1: 35.9 (8.6 + 0.4 + 8.7 + 16.6 + 1.6),
tibia 2: 5.4, tibia 3: 3.0, tibia 4: 4.5; tibia 1 F/d: 107. Distance PME-PME 250 pm, diameter PME
100><120 pm, distance PME-AFE ~30 pm; distance AME-AME 40 pm, diameter AME 15 pm.
Color. Carapace pale ochre with pair of dark marks near median line posteriorly, ocular area also dark,
clypeus pale ochre; sternum grey-brown, with light mark behind labium; legs ochre-yellow with dark
brown patellae and tibia-metatarsus joints; abdomen pale ochre-gray with black marks dorsally and
laterally, monochromous ventrally except pair of small brown spots in book-lung area.
Body. Habitus as in Figs 131 and 133; ocular area slightly raised, each triad on additional short hump
(Fig. 148); carapace without median furrow; clypeus unmodified; sternum wider than long (0.60/0.50),
unmodified. Gonopore with four epiandrous spigots (Fig. 152).
Chelicerae. As in Fig. 142, barely modified, with indistinct lateral humps proximally, without distal
modification, without modified hairs; without stridulatory ridges.
Figs 145-147. Pholcus domingo Huber sp. nov., tips of left procursi, retrolateral views. 145. Dimapatoy
(ZFMK, Ar 15728). 146. Santo Domingo (type locality) (ZFMK, Ar 15720). 147. Mt. Mupo (ZFMK,
Ar 15727). Scale bar = 0.3 mm.
37
European Journal of Taxonomy 200: 1—45 (2016)
Figs 148-156. Pholcus domingo Huber sp. nov., SEM micrographs (ZFMK, Ar 15720-21). 148. Male
prosoma, frontal view. 149. Tip of left procursus, prolateral view. 150. Left bulb and appendix, prolatero-
distal view. 151. Right male palp, retrolatero-distal view. 152. Male gonopore. 153. Comb-hairs on male
tarsus 4. 154. Right appendix, retrolateral view. 155. Female ALS. 156. Epigynum, ventral view. Scale
bars: 148, 151 = 200 pm; 149-150, 156 = 100 pm; 152 = 30 pm; 153, 155 = 10 pm; 154 = 60 pm.
38
HUBER B.A. et al ., Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Palps. As in Figs 140-141; coxa unmodified; trochanter with very long curved ventral apophysis;
femur with ventral and retrolatero-dorsal processes; tibia very large (relative to femur); procursus rather
simple, with strong ventral ‘knee’ and distinctive dorsal process distally (Fig. 149); bulb with long
semitransparent embolus and large sclerotized process (putative appendix) densely covered with scales
on retrolateral surface (Figs. 151, 154), with lighter prolateral branch proximally (Fig. 150).
Fegs. Without spines and curved hairs; few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 3%;
prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on other tibiae; tarsus 1 with >20 pseudosegments,
only distally a few fairly distinct. Tarsus 4 comb-hairs as in Fig. 153.
Male (variation)
Dorsal process of procursus varies considerably among localities: in comparison to males from type
locality (Santo Domingo; Fig. 146), it is slightly more slender in male from Malagos; considerably
stronger and longer in male from Mt. Mupo (Fig. 147; males from CEDAR intermediate between males
from type locality and male from Mt. Mupo); almost absent in males from Dimapatoy (Fig. 145). Male
from Mt. Mupo also with slightly different appendix (distal part of sclerotized main branch slightly
longer). Males from Dimapatoy with slightly shorter trochanter apophysis. All specimens other than
those from Santo Domingo are therefore assigned tentatively to this species. Sternum in most males
examined either monochromous whitish or whitish with a few darker marks posteriorly; only one male
from Malangob, male from Malagos, and male from Mt. Mupo like holotype; male from Mt. Mupo with
more complex carapace pattern (Fig. 137; similar to females from other localities). Tibia 1 in 15 other
males: 7.4-9.0 (mean 8.2).
Female
In general similar to male but sternum always dark brown and carapace pattern different: in most females
posterior half with light brown to orange pattern (Fig. 136), one female from Dimapatoy with pattern like
male holotype. Eye triads slightly closer together than in males (PME-PME distance: 200 pm). Tibia 1
in 19 females: 6.0-7.0 (mean 6.6). Epigynum very simple, weakly sclerotized (Fig. 161), with transverse
ridges and finger-shaped posterior ‘knob’ (Figs 143, 156); internal genitalia as in Figs 144, 162, 163.
AES with one large widened, one pointed, and six smaller cylindrically-shaped spigots (Fig. 155). The
single female specimen from Epol Falls is assigned tentatively because no males are known from this
locality.
Natural history
At Santo Domingo and CEDAR, the spiders were found in very fine, barely visible webs tightly attached
to the leaf surface of live leaves about 50-200 cm above the ground. The same kinds of leaves were also
occupied by two species of Calapnita , and sometimes a Pholcus and a Calapnita were seen sharing a
leaf. When disturbed, the Pholcus just remained still, with their bodies pressed against the leaf; when
disturbed with more insistence, they ran away on the leaf or even let themselves down on a silk line.
In the egg-sac of one female from the type locality, most eggs were parasitized by a parasitic wasp
(Fig. 132).
Distribution
Known from several localities in Mindanao (Fig. 1; but note that specimens from most localities are
assigned tentatively).
39
European Journal of Taxonomy 200: 1—45 (2016)
Pltolcus matutum Huber sp. nov.
um:lsid:zoobank.org:act:CCCB3C54-30E8-4792-A4AC-F8A3A80DF703
Figs 138-139, 157-160, 164-166
Diagnosis
Distinguished from most similar known relative (P. domingo Huber sp. nov.) by morphology of male
palps (Figs 157-158; shorter procursus with longer dorsal process; shorter and more pointed appendix);
females of these two species are difficult to separate (internal genitalia relatively longer in P. domingo
Huber sp. nov.; compare Figs 144 and 160).
Etymology
The species name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
Material examined
Holotype
PHIFIPPINES: ZFMK (Ar 15729), Mindanao, Mt. Matutum, Kawit Forest, ‘site V (6.338°N,
125.104°E), 950 m a.s.l., along brook, on leaf, 13 Feb. 2014 (B.A. Huber, E. Mondejar).
Other material
PHIFIPPINES: 4 4 ??, 1 juv., ZFMK (Ar 15730-31), and 1 S, 1 MSU-IIT, same data as
holotype; 2 §?, 3 juvs, in absolute ethanol, in ZFMK (Phi 269), same data; 1 $, RMNH, Mindanao,
Davao, Mt. Apo Nature Reserve [~7.03°N, 125.40°E?], 800 m a.s.l., on wild coffee leaf in secondary
forest, 26 Apr. 1982 [R. Deeleman],
Description
Male (holotype)
Measurements. Total body length 4.4, carapace width 0.9. Teg 1: 36.9 (8.8 + 0.4 + 8.8 + 17.3 + 1.6),
tibia 2: 5.4, tibia 3: 3.2, tibia 4: 4.6; tibia 1 F/d: 108. Distance PME-PME 260 pm, diameter PME
100><120 pm, distance PME-AFE ~30 pm; distance AME-AME 50 pm, diameter AME 15 pm.
Color. Carapace pale ochre, without dark pattern (only small internal medio-posterior structure visible
through cuticle), ocular area also dark, clypeus pale ochre, only proximally darker; sternum whitish; legs
ochre-yellow with dark brown patellae and tibia-metatarsus joints; abdomen pale ochre-gray with black
marks dorsally and laterally, monochromous ventrally except pair of small brown spots in book-lung
area.
Body. Habitus as in Fig. 138; ocular area slightly raised, each triad on additional short hump; carapace
without median furrow; clypeus unmodified; sternum wider than long (0.60/0.50), unmodified.
Chelicerae. As in P. domingo Huber sp. nov. (cf. Fig. 142), barely modified, with indistinct lateral
humps proximally.
Palps. As in Figs 157-158; coxa unmodified; trochanter with very long curved ventral apophysis;
femur with ventral and retrolatero-dorsal processes (slightly different shapes than in P. domingo Huber
sp. nov.); tibia very large (relative to femur); procursus rather simple, with strong ventral ‘knee’ and
distinctive long dorsal process distally; bulb with long semitransparent embolus and large sclerotized
process (putative appendix) densely covered with scales on retrolateral surface, with lighter prolateral
branch proximally (appendix with more pointed tip than in P. domingo Huber sp. nov.; prolateral branch
with more rounded tip).
40
HUBER B.A. et al.. Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Legs. Without spines and curved hairs; few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 3%;
prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on other tibiae; tarsus 1 with >20 pseudosegments,
only distally a few fairly distinct.
Male (variation)
Some males with pair of small darker marks posteriorly on carapace (similar to P. domingo Huber
sp. nov.). Tibia 1 in 5 other males: 8.3-9.3 (mean 8.7).
Figs 157-160. Pholcus matutum Huber sp. nov. (ZFMK, Ar 15730-31). 157-158. Left male palp,
prolateral and retrolateral views. 159-160. Cleared female genitalia, ventral and dorsal views. Scale
bars: 157-158 = 0.5 mm ; 159-160 = 0.3 mm
41
European Journal of Taxonomy 200: 1—45 (2016)
Female
In general similar to male (Fig. 139), carapace pattern different: most females with two pairs of light
brown to orange marks, one pair near median line posteriorly, one pair laterally; one female with same
carapace pattern as P. domingo Huber sp. nov. (posterior half of carapace largely covered by light brown
to orange pattern). Eye triads slightly closer together than in males (PME-PME distance: 230 pm).
Tibia 1 in 4 females: 6.6, 6.9, 6.9, 7.2. Sternum whitish as is males (not brown as in P. domingo Huber
sp. nov. females). Epigynum very simple, weakly sclerotized (Fig. 164), with transverse ridges and
finger-shaped posterior ‘knob’ (Fig. 159); internal genitalia as in Figs 160, 165, 166.
Natural history
The spiders were found in very fine, barely visible webs tightly attached to the leaf surface of live leaves.
Distribution
Known from two localities in southern Mindanao (Fig. 1). The single female specimen from Epol Falls
assigned tentatively to P. domingo Huber sp. nov. might actually belong to this species.
Figs 161-166. Epigyna, ventral views, and cleared female genitalia, ventral and dorsal views. 161-163.
Pholcus domingo Huber sp. nov. (ZFMK, Ar 15721). 164-166. P. matutum Huber sp. nov. (ZFMK, Ar
15731).
42
HUBER B.A. et al., Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Discussion
None of the species described above is a ‘typical’ Pholcus , i.e., none of them belongs to what has
been described as the “core group” of Pholcus (Huber 2011). Most representatives of this core
group are characterized by the combination of two characters: a heavily sclerotized epigynal plate,
and male chelicerae with proximal frontal apophyses. All species described above have very weakly
sclerotized epigyna, and they lack proximal frontal apophyses on the male chelicerae (the apophyses in
representatives of the P. ethagala group are considered homologues of the proximal lateral apophyses,
a synapomorphy of Pholcinae; Huber 2011). This requires some justification for why we assign these
species to Pholcus.
A first cladistic analysis of Pholcus (Huber 2011) has brought some structure into this large taxon (at that
time 254 species; now almost 350 species), and it provided strong support for a group of genera close
to Pholcus (the Pholcus group of ten genera). At the same time, it also highlighted some fundamental
problems with Pholcus and its closest relatives. It suggested that Pholcus is a paraphyletic group and
that at least some of the closely related genera like Panjange , Leptopholcus , Micropholcus , Micromerys ,
Calapnita , and Uthina Simon, 1893 may in fact be nested within Pholcus , more closely related to some
‘basal’ groups of Pholcus than to the core group. Taxonomic consequences (synonymization of existing
genera and/or creation of new genera) were not implemented because the cladistic analysis seemed
too preliminary to justify such formal decisions. The same reasoning lies behind our decision to place
the new species in Pholcus , especially the two new species groups (the Pholcus ethagala group was
already described in Huber 2011): these new taxa do clearly not belong to any of the nine genera closely
related to Pholcus , and creating new genera for them might unnecessarily complicate future taxonomic
decisions without adding to our current understanding of relationships. At some point a split of Pholcus
will probably be necessary, but in our view this should be based on a large phylogenetic analysis, ideally
including molecular data, all species groups of Pholcus , and a large sample of the nine closely related
genera. Such an analysis is currently in progress (A. Valdez-Mondragon, B.A. Huber & D. Dimitrov,
unpublished data).
Interestingly, the taxonomic problem with Pholcus is largely an Indomalayan problem, and it seems to be
closely related to evolutionary shifts of microhabitat. All Afrotropical species groups, the single Nearctic
species group, and all Palaearctic species groups of Pholcus are quite unambiguous representatives of
the core group of Pholcus (Huber 2011). Within this core group, the large majority of species occupy
large sheltered spaces among rocks, logs, buttresses, etc.; very few species occupy the leaf litter and
ground substrate (e.g., P. kribi Huber, 2011 in Cameroon; some members of the P. opilionoides group
in North Africa, Huber 2011) or live leaves (e.g., the P. taarab group in East Africa and the P. debilis
group in Central Africa; Huber 2011). Even these ecologically exceptional species and species groups
are unambiguous representatives of the core group of Pholcus.
By contrast, the nine species groups assigned tentatively to Pholcus are all Indomalayan: P. andulau
group, P. buatong group, P. domingo group, P. ethagala group, P. halabala group, P. kerinci group,
P. krabi group, P. minang group, P. tambunan group (Huber 2011; Huber et al. 2016; herein). Most of the
species included in these species groups occupy either the leaf litter of live leaves; exceptions are a few
cave- and rock-dwelling species such as P. hurau Huber, 2011; P. diopsis Simon, 1901; P. kuhapimuk
Huber, 2016; P. khaolek Huber, 2016; P. sudhami Huber, 2011; and P. buatong Huber, 2016 (Huber
2011; Huber et al. 2016). Three of the problematic genera possibly nested within Pholcus are also
leaf-dwelling and Indomalayan (partly reaching Australia): Calapnita , Panjange , and Micromerys. A
possible explanation to be tested in future phylogenetic analyses is that Pholcus in Southeast Asia has
a longer history of leaf-dwelling than in tropical Africa, resulting in more conspicuous deviations from
the ‘typical’ morphology of Pholcus , which in turn obscured relationships and prompted researchers to
43
European Journal of Taxonomy 200: 1—45 (2016)
create possibly unjustified new genera. Future large scale analyses of Pholcus should thus continue to
focus on Indomalayan taxa.
Acknowledgements
We thank David Court, Venus Saksongmuang, Mustakiza Muslimin, Eddie P. Mondejar, and Samuel
B. Huber for accompanying us in the field; Mae A. Responte, Eddie P. Mondejar, and Noray a U. Elias
for contributing specimens from their own research; our Thai drivers Usman Hayee-Aarwae, Jeerabute
Suwannatut, and Preesha Petsout and our Philippine driver Vicente Bulongon for bringing us safely to
all requested places; Bjorn Rulik for identifying the flies found in pholcid webs; Sara Bumrungsri for
supporting our permit requests in Thailand; Noraishah Mydin Abdul Aziz for facilitating field work
in Malaysia; the Sarawak Museum Department for assistance in field logistics; the National Research
Council of Thailand (NRCT), the Singapore National Parks Board (Permit No. NP/RP15-003a), the
Sarawak Forest Department (Permit No. NCCD.907.4.4 JLD. 10-211, Park Permit No. 174/2014) and
the Philippine Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) CARAGA, DENR Region
X, and DENR Region XI, for issuing permits; and the German Research Foundation for financial support
(DFG Project HU 980/11-1).
References
Brown B.V. 1993. A further chemical alternative to critical-point-drying for preparing small (or large)
flies. Fly Times 11: 10.
Dimitrov D., Astrin J.J. & Huber B.A. 2013. Pholcid spider molecular systematics revisited, with new
insights into the biogeography and the evolution of the group. Cladistics 29: 132-146. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1111/i. 1096-0031.2012,00419.x
Huber B.A. 2005. High species diversity, male-female coevolution, and metaphyly in Southeast Asian
pholcid spiders: the case of Belisana Thorell, 1898 (Araneae, Pholcidae). Zoologica 155: 1-126.
Huber B.A. 2011. Revision and cladistic analysis of Pholcus and closely related taxa (Araneae,
Pholcidae). Bonner zoologische Monographien 58: 1-509.
Huber B.A. 2012. Revision and cladistic analysis of the Afrotropical endemic genus Smeringopus
Simon, 1890 (Araneae: Pholcidae). Zootaxa 3461: 1-138.
Huber B.A. 2015. Small scale endemism in Brazil’s Atlantic Forest: 14 new species of Mesabolivar
(Araneae, Pholcidae), each known from a single locality. Zootaxa 3942: 1-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/
zootaxa.3942.1.1
Huber B.A., Dimitrov D. 2014. Slow genital and genetic but rapid non-genital and ecological
differentiation in a pair of spider species (Araneae, Pholcidae). Zoologischer Anzeiger 253: 394M03.
http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.jcz.2014.04.001
Huber B.A., Fischer N. & Astrin J.J. 2010. High level of endemism in Haiti’s last remaining forests: a
revision of Modisimus (Araneae: Pholcidae) on Hispaniola, using morphology and molecules. Zoological
Journal of the Linnean Society 158: 244-299. http://dx.doi.Org/10.llll/j.1096-3642.2009.00559.x
Huber B.A. & Fleckenstein N. 2008. Comb-hairs on the fourth tarsi in pholcid spiders (Araneae,
Pholcidae). Journal of Arachnology 36: 232-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1636/CSh07-71.1
Huber B.A., Nuneza O.M. & Leh Moi Ung C. 2015. Revision, phylogeny, and microhabitat shifts in the
Southeast Asian spider genus Aetana ( Araneae, Pholcidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 162: 1-78.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/eit.2015.162
44
HUBER B.A. et al. , Southeast Asian leaf- and litter-dwelling Pholcus
Huber B.A., Petcharad B., Leh Moi Ung C., Koh J.K.H. & Ghazali A.R.M. 2016. The Southeast
Asian Pholcus halabala species group (Araneae, Pholcidae): new data from field observations and
ultrastructure. European Journal of Taxonomy 190: 1-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2016.19Q
Huber B. A., Rheims C.A. & Brescovit A.D. 2005. Two new species of litter-dwelling Me tagonia spiders
(Araneae, Pholcidae) document both rapid and slow genital evolution. Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 86:
33—40. http://dx.doi.Org/10.llll/i.0001-7272.2005.00184.x
Walckenaer C.A. 1805. Tableau des araneides ou caracteres essentiels des tribus, genres, families et
races que renferme le genre Aranea de Linne, avec la designation des especes comprises dans chacune
de ces divisions. Imprimerie De Dentu, Paris.
Manuscript received: 25 January 2016
Manuscript accepted: 17 February 2016
Published on: 26 May 2016
Topic editor: Rudy Jocque
Desk editor: Kristiaan Hoedemakers
Printed versions of all papers are also deposited in the libraries of the institutes that are members of the
EJT consortium: Museum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France; Botanic Garden Meise, Belgium;
Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium; Natural History Museum, London, United
Kingdom; Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium; Natural History Museum of
Denmark, Copenhagen, De nm ark.
45