|
She
“AR NAUTILUS
Volume 134, Number
, : April 9, 2020
ISSN 0028-1344
A quarterly devoted
to malacologt
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
José H. Leal
The Bailey-Matthews National
Shell Museum
3075 Sanibel-Captiva Road
| Sanibel, FL 33957 USA
EDITOR EMERITUS
M. G. Harasewych
Department of Invertebrate Zoology
National Museum of
Natural History
Smithsonian Institution
Washington, DC 20560 USA
CONSULTING EDITORS
Rudiger Bieler
Department of Invertebrates
Field Museum of
Natural History
Chicago, IL 60605 USA
Arthur E. Bogan
North Carolina State Museum of
Natural Sciences
Raleigh, NC 27626 USA
Philippe Bouchet
Laboratoire de Biologie des
Invertébrés Marins et Malacologie
Muséum National d Histoire Naturelle
55, rue Buffon
Paris, 75005 FRANCE
Robert H. Cowie 3
Center for Conservation Research
and Training
University of Hawaii
3050 Maile Way, Gilmore 409
Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
Kenneth A. Hayes
Department of Biology
Howard University
Washington, DC 20001 USA
Steffen Kiel
Department of Paleobiology
Swedish Museum of Natural History
Box 50007
104 05 Stockholm, SWEDEN
Harry G. Lee
4132 Ortega Forest Drive
Jacksonville, FL 32210 USA
Charles Lydeard
Biodiversity and Systematics
Department of Biological Sciences
University of Alabama
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
Bruce A. Marshall
Museum of New Zealand
Te Papa Tongarewa
P.O. Box 467
Wellington, NEW ZEALAND
Paula M. Mikkelsen
Paleontological Research
Institution
1259 Trumansburg Road
Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
Diarmaid O Foighil
Museum of Zoology and Department
of Biology
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079 USA
Gustav Paulay
Florida Museum of Natural History
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611-2035 USA
Gary Rosenberg
Department of Mollusks
The Academy of Natural Sciences
1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway
Philadelphia, PA 19103 USA
Elizabeth Shea
Mollusk Department
Delaware Museum of
Natural History
Wilmington, DE 19807 USA
Angel Valdés
Department of Malacology
Natural History Museum
of Los Angeles County
900 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
Geerat J. Vermeij
Department of Geology
University of California at Davis
Davis, CA 95616 USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION
The subscription rate for volume
134 (2020) is US $65.00 for
individuals, US $102.00 for
institutions. Postage outside the
United States is an additional US
$10.00 for regular mail and US
$28.00 for air delivery. All orders
should be ac companied by payment
and sent to: THE NAUTILUS, P.O.
Box 1580, Sanibel, FL 33957, USA,
(239) 395-2233.
Change of address: Please inform
the publisher of your new address at
least 6 weeks in advance. All
communications should include both
old and new addresses (with zip
codes) and state the effective date.
THE NAUTILUS (ISSN 0028-1344)
is published quarterly by The Bailey-
Matthews National Shell Museum,
3075 Sanibel-Captiva Road, Sanibel,
FL 33957.
Periodicals postage paid at Sanibel,
FL, and additional mailing offices.
POSTMASTER: Send address
changes to: THE NAUTILUS
P.O. Box 1580
Sanibel, FL 33957
CONTENTS
Ni, an Oe Ree Oe en Ore
f ways Volume 134, Number 1
f \ é
f ’ April 9, 2020
| ~ SEP-O7 2022 4
,- veruvrcee J ISSN 0028-1344
G. Thomas Watters
Megan L. Smith
David J. Sneddon
Anton E. Oleinik
Alexander B. Modys
Angelina M. Tetu
Shugian Zhang
Suping Zhang
Kazutaka Amano
RESEARCH NOTE
Tarcilla Carvalho de Lima
Cléo Dilnei de Castro Oliveira
MOL S NObC ose oseocscesusdanvoveineesss
DAT ei rc per Sem!
The subfamily Abbottellinae (Gastropoda: Annulariidae): origins,
associations, ancuackeview Ol tine llispaniolan Taxa 20m .ce.deees ge tecyue tonsa tresesnadk st
Cittarium pica (Linnaeus, 1758) (Gastropoda: Trochoidea: Tegulidae) in
Oy Nae Cover ed ca GeO Te | Gk: RE «REET meet a tPA Wee eR Mor Ory PE tae td reine ive mee. One a
Two new species of genus Bathyacmaea from deep-sea chemosynthetic
areas in the western Pacific (Gastropoda: Pectinodontidae) ..........0.. cesses
A new Paleocene species of Myonera (Bivalvia: Cuspidariidae) from eastern
Hokkailo, northem,apatr 20D. SUAS, . Wak, SRN a Aue CR A. ee EE
Unusual shaping: The defecation behavior in Cochlorina aurisleporis
(Briguiere, 1792) (Gastropoda: abulimamticas ratty: selena, mores alee,
CCCHC CEEOL CCH E EHEC H HEHEHE HHH HHH HH HEHH HHH HHH SEH HHS HEHEHE HH HE HH HHT OHHH LOH EE HH HHH HEH HEH HEHEHE HHO HHS HEE HH HET E HHH EHH HH OTHE HEHE HHH HH EH HEHEHE HED
CCCCC HCE LE TEE HEHEHE HO HEHEHE HOH HOHE HEHEHE HOHE THEE HEH OHO HEHE SETHE HOHE EEE HEHEHE EEO HEHEHE HEHEHE HEE H EHH HHO EHH TEHO HHO HEHEHE HORE OHE EEO OE OEE
THE NAUTILUS 134(1):1-34, 2020
Page |
The subfamily Abbottellinae (Gastropoda: Annulariidae): origins,
associations, and a review of the Hispaniolan taxa
G. Thomas Watters
Megan L. Smith
David J. Sneddon
Museum of Biological Diversity
Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology
Ohio State University
Columbus, OH 43212 USA
[email protected]
ABSTRACT
The subfamily Abbottellinae of the Annulariidae has been
recognized as a speciose group in northern Hispaniola. This
study, using phylogenetic (COI, 12S, H3), radular, and con-
chological characteristics, compared this group to other non-
Hispaniolan annulariids to determine their wider associations
and potential origin. Results indicate that the subfamily is related
to the eastern Cuban Annularisca sensu lato and that genus
should be moved to the Abbottellinae. The group dates from the
time when eastern Cuba and northern Hispaniola were in close
contact prior to tectonic movement. This is the first such zoo-
geographic connection reported for the family. The subfamily is
not related to any Jamaican taxa tested. The Abbottellinae also
do not occur on the southern Tiburon/Barahona peninsulas of
Hispaniola, which has a different geologic history from the north.
The eastern Cuban and Bahamian genus Opisthosiphon sensu
lato was also shown to be a member of the subfamily. The
nominal genus Abbottella is further divided into new genera
based on these results. The new genera Abbottipoma, Are-
nabbottella, Microabbottella, and Preclaripoma are described.
The new species Rolleia simonaikeni is described, and Petasi-
poma is synonomized with Rolleia.
Additional Keywords: Zoogeography, phylogenetics, Cuba,
Hispaniola, new taxa, terrestrial gastropods, land snails
INTRODUCTION
The land snail family Annulariidae is an exclusively
Caribbean/Central American group. For its limited geo-
graphic distribution it is extremely speciose with >700
recognized taxa (Watters, 2006). The major centers of di-
versity are Cuba, Hispaniola, and Jamaica. The snails are
strict calciphiles and many species are highly endemic to a
particular mountain range, mogote, or outcrop. Of these, the
genus Abbottella was phylogenetically identified as a discrete
1
In absentia
clade apart from other annulariids by Skomrock (2014) and
Watters and Larson (2017). Watters (2016b) formally raised
the clade to subfamily level (Abbottellinae) based on ad-
ditional radular and shell morphology characteristics.
However, the questions of the origin of the subfamily and its
relationships to other annulariids remained unanswered.
In all of the various schemes for higher annulariid
systematics (Watters, 2006) subfamilies are distributed
across the geographic range of the family — only the
Abbottellinae, as previously understood, were endemic to
a single portion of Hispaniola. Yet it may have been
derived from elsewhere. In the Paleogene, proto-Central
America was connected to Cuba and non-Tiburon His-
paniola, an association that may have lasted until the
Eocene (Chakrabarty, 2006) or Miocene (Pindell, 1994)
and provided ample time for faunal exchange. Since this
time, these islands drifted east to their present positions,
separating 20 to 25 million years ago (Pindell, 1994) and
taking their snail faunas with them to further evolve in
isolation. Buskirk (1985), reviewing the distributions of
numerous groups of terrestrial animals (including snails)
and pollen, also suggested a radiation from North and
proto-Central America to the Greater Antilles by the
Eocene. This would suggest a possible origin or con-
nection for the abbottellines in Cuba or Jamaica.
This study examines the Abbottellinae based on phylo-
genetic, radular, and shell morphological consider-
ations. In particular, membership to the subfamily is
sought outside of Hispaniola in an attempt to deter-
mine: 1) if the group is indeed endemic to Hispaniola;
2) where might the origin of the group reside; and 3) what
is its relation to the other subfamilies. Potential candidates
are drawn from Cuba, Jamaica, and elsewhere based on
similarities in shell morphology and radulae. Of particular
interest are the similar-appearing Annularia of Jamaica and
Annularisca of Cuba. In addition, the relationships between
the recognized abbottelline genera are also examined.
Abbreviations used in the text are: ANSP, Academy of
Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; BMSM,
Page 2
Bailey-Matthews National Shell Museum, Sanibel, Flor-
ida, USA; GTW, collection of the author, Columbus,
Ohio, USA; MNHN, Muséum national d’Histoire
naturelle, Paris, France; NHMUK, Natural History
Museum, London, UK; OSUM, Ohio State University
Museum of Biological Diversity, Columbus, Ohio,
USA; UF, Florida Museum of Natural History,
Gainesville, Florida, USA; USNM, National Museum
of Natural History, Washington, DC, USA; ZMB,
Zoologisches Museum Berlin, Federal Republic of
Germany. Numbers in ( ) after catalog numbers refer
to the number of specimens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
To evaluate the phylogenetic placement of the Abbottel-
linae and to understand relationships among genera within
Abbottellinae, we collected molecular sequence data
from 19 individuals from Abbottellinae and 28 individ-
uals from Annulariidae and Pomatiidae (Appendix1). We
also downloaded data from 53 individuals from GenBank
(NCBI nucleotide database) (Appendix1). As outgroups,
we used Pomatias elegans (Miiller, 1774) and Tudorella
ferruginea (Lamarck, 1822) from Pomatiidae, and, as a
more distant outgroup, Littorina littorea (Linnaeus,
1758) from Littorinidae. Samples collected for this study
were stored in ethanol after collection, and DNA was
extracted from foot tissues of preserved specimens using
Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kits (Qiagen Hiden,
Germany) following the manufacturers standard proto-
col. A region of the mitochondrial gene 12S was se-
quenced using primers developed by Watters and Larson
(2017). A region of cytochrome oxidase 1 (COI) was
sequenced using universal invertebrate primers
LCOI490 and HCO2198 (Folmer et al. 1994). The
nuclear gene histone 3 (H3) was amplified using primers
H3aF and H3aR (Colgan et al., 1998). PCR products
were cleaned using ExoSAP-IT (Thremofisher Scien-
tific) and sent to the Ohio State University Biomedical
Research Tower for sequencing. Chromatograms were
assembled in Geneious v6.1.7 (Kearse et al., 2012) and
edited by eye when necessary. Sequences were aligned
using the MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004) algorithm imple-
mented in Geneious (Kearse et al., 2012) using default
parameters.
The best model of nucleotide substitution and par-
titioning scheme was determined using PartitionFinder
v2.1.1 (Lanfear et al., 2016). We used a greedy search
scheme, considered all models of nucleotide substitu-
tion, and performed model selection using corrected
AIC. A maximum-likelihood tree was inferred for COI
using RAxML v8.2.10 (Stamatakis, 2014) as imple-
mented on the Cipres Science Gateway (Miller et al.,
2015). We used the partitioning scheme determined by
PartitionFinder and the GTR model with Gamma rate
variation. We used 100 bootstrap replicates to assess
confidence in the inferred relationships. To infer a
posterior distribution of gene trees, we used Bayesian
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Inference in MrBayes v3.2.2 (Ronquist et al, 2012). We
used the partitioning scheme and models determined by
PartitionFinder. Two independent analyses were run for
5,000,000 generations over four chains, sampling every
1,000 generations. We discarded 25% of runs as burn-in, and
we assessed convergence using Tracer v1.6.0 (Rambaut and
Drummond, 2007).
To infer a more robust hypothesis of relationships
between groups, we used a concatenated dataset in-
cluding the mitochondrial COI and 12S genes and the
nuclear gene H3. While this dataset included fewer
taxa than the COI dataset, it included a larger data
matrix. Given that many taxa within Abbottellinae and
those grouping with Abbottellinae in the COI gene
tree could be included in this dataset and that rela-
tionships between these groups were not well resolved
using COI (see Results), we analyzed this dataset in an
attempt to further resolve relationships between these
groups. While we acknowledge that a coalescent-based
analysis would have been ideal (Edwards et al., 2016),
given the limited sampling (2 independent loci, not
sampled in all specimens), only a concatenation ap-
proach was possible for this study. All samples for
which at least two of the three genes were sequenced
were retained for this analysis. As above, we used
PartitionFinder to select the best model and parti-
tioning scheme, RAxML to infer a maximum likelihood
tree, and MrBayes to infer the posterior distribution of
trees under Bayesian inference.
Descriptions and measurements were based on shells
oriented with the spire up and the aperture facing the
viewer. Measurements are for adult shells unless noted
otherwise. Length was measured from the tip of the
protoconch (or teleoconch of decollate specimens) to
the opposite anterior-most extension of the outer lip.
Subsets of the largest and smallest adult specimens
were selected by eye from all available specimens and
measured to determine the minimum and maximum
lengths. The number of whorls was determined using
the 1 D method of Van Osselaer (1999).
Detailed redescriptions, accounts, and translated
original descriptions of species previously covered can
be found in Watters (2013, 2016b) and are not du-
plicated here. Distribution maps are Google’ ™ Earth
Pro. Image Landsat. © 2019 DigitalGlobe. Data: SIO,
NOAA, US Navy, NGA, GEBCO.
RESULTS
Our final COI alignment included 82 individuals and
582 base pairs. The concatenated alignment of COI,
12S, and H3 included 50 individuals and 1,351 base
pairs. For COI, the best scheme determined using AIC
in PartitionFinder included three partitions (first,
second, and third codon positions). The best models of
nucleotide substitution were TVM+G, TRN+I1+G,
and GTR+I for the first, second, and third codon
positions, respectively. The best scheme identified by
G.T. Watters et al., 2020
PartitionFinder for the concatenated dataset included
seven partitions: One for each codon position of COI
and H3 (for a total of six) and a single partitioning
scheme for 12S. The best models inferred by Parti-
tionFinder were TRN, JC+I, K81UF+G, GTR+G,
HKY+G, TRN+G, and GTR+I for the first, second,
0.39/59
1194
6.96/61
1798
0.99/96 a .
0. 9 Gems Wt
(84 ploBostyids retro
us
1/100
1/100
USDA _Iber994_01 Tudorelia ferruginea
O8
$436d Xenopomea spinosossimum
USDA_O7FRA03_01 Pomatias elegans
Page 3
and third codon positions of H3, 12S, and the first,
second, and third codon positions of COI, respectively.
Abbottellinae was recovered as a monophyletic group
(BS = 100, pp = 1.0) under both maximum likelihood and
Bayesian inference of the COI gene tree (Figure 1), but
there was not strong support for the relationship of this
7064d Diplopoma crenuiatum (Antigua)
-_ KX496717 Chondropoma pupitorme (Anguilla)
Figure 1. Maximum Likelihood tree based on COI. The numbers above the branches are posterior probability/ bootstrap support
values. Support values are only shown for branches with either > 70 bootstrap support or >0.90 posterior probabilities. Taxa from the
DR are highlighted in blue, taxa from Cuba are highlighted in yellow, taxa from the Bahamas are highlighted in green, taxa from Florida
are highlighted in orange, and taxa from Jamaica are highlighted in purple. The Abbottellinae are labelled.
Page 4
group to other sampled individuals. Within Abbot-
tellinae, there were three moderately-to-well sup-
ported groups. One included Abbottella moreletiana,
Abbottella crataegus, and Abbottella domingoensis
(BS= 100, pp = 1.0). A moderately supported group
(BS=73, pp = 0.91) included Abbottipoma abbotti,
Abbottipoma crossei, and Lagopoma lagopoma. The
third group included Arenabbottella sosuaensis, Are-
nabbottella rosaliae, Arenabbottella mellosa, and
Leiabbotella galaxius (BS = 67, pp = 0.92). The
placements of Meganiphe rhecta, Rolleia oberi, and
Preclaripoma thompsoni with respect to other
Abbottellinae were not well resolved in either analysis.
The Bayesian analysis supported a group including the
Hispaniolan abbottellines, Annularisca, Opisthosiphon,
and Parachondria dentatus (BS = 59, pp = 0.99).
The maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses of
the concatenated dataset (Figure 2) also recovered the
Abbottellinae as a monophyletic group (BS = 100,
pp = 1.0). The same groups within Abbottellinae
supported by the COI dataset were recovered with the
concatenated dataset, and Meganiphe rhecta was re-
covered as sister to the group containing Leiabbottella
galaxius, Arenabbottella rosaliae, and Arenabbottella
sosuaensis (BS = 94, pp = 1.0). There was support
(BS=75, pp = 0.98) for a clade including the
Abbottellinae, Annularisca, Opisthosiphon, and Par-
achondria dentatus, but, as with the COI dataset, we
could not resolve the relationships between these
6.92/80
1/466
1/100
G2
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
groups. There was also moderate support (BS = 62,
pp = 0.96) for the other Parachondria as sister to this
clade.
DISCUSSION
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS
The results of this study indicate that the Abbottellinae
represents a distinct group well-supported by phylo-
genetic, radular, and conchological analyses. Though
results were originally limited to the Abbottella-like
taxa of Hispaniola, evidence presented here indicates
this subfamily also includes the eastern Cuban
Annularisca and Opisthosiphon. No abbottelline was
found to cluster with any Tiburon/Barahona penin-
sular (e.g., Chondropomella, Chondropomium, Cly-
donopoma, Superbipoma) or Jamaican taxa.
Phylogenetic analyses supported the monophyly of
Abbottellinae, based on the species included in this
study. Future work should evaluate additional Abbot-
tellinae to further test monophyly of the group. How-
ever, given that this is the first attempt at a molecular
phylogeny in this group and samples for DNA analyses
are limited for some species, these results are promising.
Results also supported the monophyly of the genera
Abbottella and Arenabbottella. The results presented
here do not support the monophyly of Abbottipoma with
respect to Lagopoma, and future work should include
1/700
USDA_O7FRAO3_01 Pomatias elegans
USDA_iberf9A_01 Tudorelia ferruginea
Figure 2. Maximum Likelihood tree based on the concatenated dataset. The numbers above the branches are posterior probability/
bootstrap support values. Taxa from the DR are highlighted in blue, taxa from Cuba are highlighted in yellow, taxa from the Bahamas are
highlighted in green, taxa from Florida are highlighted in orange, and taxa from Jamaica are highlighted in purple. The Abbottellinae are
labelled.
G.T. Watters et al., 2020
additional representatives from Lagopoma to evaluate
the monophyly of this group.
The Jamaican genera Annularia Schumacher, 1817,
Colobostylus Crosse and Fischer, 1888, and Adamsiella
Pfeiffer, 1851, were not found to be related to the
Abbottellinae in this study. Although Annularia taxa have
a similar shell form to abbottellines, the similarity is ap-
parently due to convergence.
Cuban Annularisca, Bajaman and Cuban Opisthosi-
phon, and Parachondria dominguensis from Key West
grouped with Abbottellinae in this study. However, we
were unable to resolve the relationships between these
groups and Abbottellinae, either with the COI dataset,
or with the concatenated dataset with more infor-
mation. Both trees include a polytomy with Annu-
larisca, Opisthosiphon, and Parachondria dentatus.
Future work with additional loci may be necessary to
resolve these relationships.
SYSTEMATICS
Torre and Bartsch (1941) finely divided a large group of
similar Cuban species into several subgenera, all of
which they placed under Annularia Schumacher, 1817.
Annularia is now considered a Jamaican endemic ge-
nus. Their subgeneric taxa were differentiated by minor
differences in the strength of the sculpture and form of
the lip. These taxa included: Annularella, Annularisca,
Annularosa, Chondropomatus, all Henderson and
Bartsch, 1920, and Annularex and Lugarenia, both
Torre and Bartsch, 1941. Watters (2006) consolidated
all of these under the genus Annularisca, although
Lugarenia is probably not related. They are all endemic
to eastern Cuba. In addition to being phylogenetically
sister to the Hispaniolan abbottellines, they share the
same “Mitten” type radula (see below), similar oper-
cular structure, and shell sculpture. Annularisca shell
forms are very similar to Abbottella but consistently
differ from those of other annulariids: low turbinoid,
non-decollate, openly umbilicate shells. Cuban Annu-
larisca species appear to be larger versions of Hispa-
niolan abbottellines (Figures 3-7). With the exception
of Lugarenia, all of these Cuban taxa are here moved to
the Abbottellinae.
Opisthosiphon was found to be part of the Abbot-
tellinae clade as well. This genus (and its various sub-
genera) are widespread in eastern Cuba and _ the
Bahamas, with numerous nominal species. Watters
(2006) reduced the ten subgenera of previous workers to
three. No species are known from Hispaniola, Puerto
Rico, or Jamaica. It is probable that the genus originated
in Cuba and has dispersed throughout the Bahamas by
rafting. Opisthosiphon have “breathing” devices—
structures that allow the animal to communicate with the
outside when the operculum is withdrawn. This device
varies from a simple pore to (more often) a short re-
flected siphon or snorkel. However, Opisthosiphon
shares the “Mitten” type radula with abbottellines. It
differs from the rest of the abbottellines in the following
Page 5
ways: the rhytidopomine operculum (pin-wheel exten-
sions across the operculum rather than the single spiral
lamellum of other abbottellines); the shells are decol-
lated in Opisthosiphon but entire in the remainder of
other abbottellines; the shell shape of Opisthosiphon is
pupoid in overall shape rather than depressed turbinoid.
Given the diversity of Opisthosiphon species in neigh-
boring eastern Cuba, it is peculiar that none exist in
Hispaniola. It is possible they did at one time but have
been extirpated.
Opisthosiphon has been included in the Rhytidopo-
minae, a heterogeneous group (as envisioned by Hen-
derson and Bartsch, 1920) of Cuban taxa that Watters
(2006) placed under the Chondropomatinae — a scheme
that can no longer be maintained based on these results.
The type genus is Rhytidopoma Sykes, 1901, based on
the Cuban Cyclostoma rugulosum Pfeiffer, 1839, which
resembles Opisthosiphon and has a breathing device as
well. No Rhytidopoma taxa were available for this study.
This presents a potential problem in the taxonomy of the
Abbottellinae. If Rhytidopoma is part of the Abbottella
clade, the nomen Rhytidopominae Henderson and
Bartsch, 1920, would have precedence over Abbottel-
linae Watters, 2016. Future studies involving additional
Cuban taxa may well show that not only Abbottella and
Opisthosiphon, but Rhytidopoma and similar groups
such as Ramsdenia Preston, 1913, and Cubadamsiella
Torre and Bartsch, 1941, are related in one clade under
Rhytidopominae that spans northern Hispaniola, eastern
Cuba, and the Bahamas. Representative members of
Opisthosiphon are shown in figures 8-12.
The Floridian Parachondria dentatum (Say, 1825)
grouped here with Opisthosiphon although it lacks a
breathing device. As noted by Watters (2016a), “Para-
chondria” is a wide-ranging catch-all group that un-
doubtedly contains numerous unrelated taxa in unnamed
genera; the type of the genus is Jamaican. Parachondria
dentatum is very similar to Opisthosiphon and is here
considered a relative of that group lacking a siphon; it
may require a new generic name.
ZOOGEOGRAPHY
The Hispaniolan Abbottellinae do not occur in the
Tiburon/Barahona peninsulas, which have a different
geological history and a unique annulariid fauna apart
from the remainder of northern Hispaniola, here
designated Hispaniola(N). Occupying two different
tectonic plates, the Tiburon Peninsula and Hispa-
niola(N) have been colliding since perhaps the Oli-
gocene (van Benthem et al., 2013) but have exchanged
very few annulariid genera. Based on the results
presented here, the abbottellines are more closely
related to taxa from eastern Cuba than they are with
those from the Tiburon Peninsula, with which they
share the island. This is the first such zoogeographic
connection reported for the family.
Central to the understanding of this zoogeographic
puzzle is the geologic history of the Caribbean. Eastern
Page 6 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
20 x 24
Figures 3-21. Annularisca, Opisthosiphon, radular types, distribution maps of genera. 3-7. Representative Cuban Annularisca. 3.
Annularisca mayariensis (Torre and Bartsch, 1941). GTW 14027a, Cantera de Mella, 11.7 mm diameter. 4. Annularisca auricoma putre
(Pfeiffer, 1863). GTW 7175a, Tortuguilla, 11.8 mm diameter. 5. Annularisca heynemanni (Pfeiffer, 1864). GTW 14026a, Maisi,
14.2 mm diameter. 6. Annularisca victoris (Torre and Bartsch, 1941). GTW 7163d, Maisi, 12.1 mm diameter. 7. Annularisca mackinlayi
(Pfeiffer, 1859). GTW 14458a, Yateras, 11.7 mm diameter. 8-12. Representative Opisthosiphon. 8. Opisthosiphon moreletianum (Petit,
1850). GTW 7141b, Isla de Juventud, Cuba, 14.8 mm length. 9. Opisthosiphon berryi Clapp, 1919. GTW 7076a, Paso Gunaja, Cuba,
8.4mm length. 10. Opisthosiphon paredonense Torre and Henderson, 1921. GTW 8050a, Paso de Los Paredones, Cuba, 10.3 mm length.
11. Opisthosiphon pupoides velazquexi Torre and Bartsch, 1941. GTW 7140c, Isla de Juventud, Cuba, 13.8 mm length. 12. Opisthosiphon
cucullatum Torre and Bartsch, 1941. GTW 16588a, Calvario, Cuba, 16.4 mm length. 13-17. Radular types. R — rachidian; L— lateral; IM —
inner marginal; OM — outer marginal. Bar = 100w. 13. Glove — Halotudora sumichrasti (Crosse and Fischer, 1874). Mexico. 14. Hook —
Chondropomium marmoreum (Watters and Duffy, 2010). Dominican Republic. 15. Mitten — Arenabbottella rosaliae (Pfeiffer, 1858).
Dominican Republic. 16. Mitten — Annularisca roemeri (Pfeiffer, 1864). Cuba. 17. Mitten — Opisthosiphon bahamense (Pfeiffer, 1865).
Bahamas. 18-21. Distribution maps of genera. 18. white — Abbottipoma; blue — Abbottella; red — Meganiphe. 19. white — Arenabbottella.
20. white — Rolleia; red — Microabbottella. 21. white — Leiabbottella; red — Lagopoma; blue — Preclaripoma.
G.T. Watters et al., 2020
Cuba and Hispaniola(N) were connected beginning with
the Oligocene (Rosen, 1976; Judd, 2001; Ottenwalder,
2001), with Puerto Rico connected with eastern His-
paniola(N) from the middle Eocene to lower Miocene
(Ottenwalder, 2001). When these were contiguous
during the middle Cenozoic it formed an emergent
pathway for dispersal from eastern Cuba (then a separate
island from the remainder of Cuba) to the Cordillera
Septentrional in northern Hispaniola and eastward to
Puerto Rico. As a result, most of the terrestrial snail
groups in Puerto Rico (van der Schalie, 1948) also occur
in eastern Cuba. Most Hispaniolan abbottellines are
endemic to the northern Cordillera Septentrional and its
extension into the Samana Peninsula. Similarly, the
Cuban Annularisca inhabits the Sierra Maestra, the
eastern mountain range, which is tectonically related to
the Cordillera Septentrional and was an avenue for
dispersal to Hispaniola(N)—but not to the Tiburon/
Barahona peninsulas.
Cuba has been a “hot-spot” for annulariids with much
of the diversity of this family apparently originating on
that island. Containing nearly 300 of the approximately
700 recognized species, the Cuban taxa are some of the
most diverse and probably encompass multiple unique
lineages. The central location of the island, its complex
geologic history of being at least three distinct islands,
and evidence of being at least partially emergent since
the middle Eocene (Graham, 2003) gives support to this
island as a major center for annulariid origination and
dispersal.
In Hispaniola the northern Cordillera Septentrional is
separated from the Cordillera Central to the south by
the Cibao Basin (Oligocene—Pliocene) (Edgar, 1991). The
Cordillera Central is largely metamorphic and supports
very few of these calciphilic snails. South of the Cordillera
Central is the Sierra de Neiba, which although composed
of limestone has no Abbottellinae. Clearly the granitic
Cordillera Central acts as a barrier to dispersal from the
northern Cordillera Septentrional to the southern Sierra
de Neiba, and the Sierra de Neiba is the gateway to the
Tiburon/Barahona peninsulas.
Some abbottelline groups are endemic to the Samana
Peninsula of eastern Hispaniola(N), which is of late-
Miocene or early-Pliocene origin (inundated until
Miocene (Joyce, 1991)). This modern day peninsula was
an island even in historic times (Ross, 1921). Gabb (1873:
161) noted “the Gran Estero which separates Samana
from the main-land was a century ago a navigable
channel, but is now entirely closed. It is said to have been
closed by drift and mud from the [Rio] Yuna.” Cochran
(1941: 2) commented: “Almost within the memory of the
oldest inhabitant, Samanad Peninsula was an island sep-
arated from the main body of Hispaniola by a rapidly
filling strait, in which pirate vessels were said to have lain
in wait for richly laden merchantmen sailing for Europe.”
It is likely that some of the Abbottellinae evolved on
that island rather than being invaders from the mainland
and have never left (e.g., Abbottipoma, Lagopoma,
Microabbottella).
Page 7
SYSTEMATICS
Annulariidae Henderson and Bartsch, 1920
Type Genus: Annularia Schumacher, 1817.
Description: Shells to 42 mm in length, planispiral to
high-spired, often with reflected lip at maturity. Spire
typically decollate. Many taxa wholly or partially solute.
Shell sculpture usually present, rarely produced into short
spines or serrations. Spiral sculpture usually as cords or
threads, axial sculpture as lamellae. In some Cuban and
Bahamian taxa breathing devices are developed, varying
from simple punctures to elaborate internal or external
siphons. Operculum present, varying from paucispiral to
multispiral. Operculum often with calcareous deposit that
may take the form of erect spiral lamellae, overlapping
plates, or pin-wheel-like extensions. Very few species with
obvious periostracum consisting of bristle-like projections.
Animals with bifid snout and foot longitudinally bisected
into lateral lobes. Locomotion ditaxic between lobes of foot.
Snout produced into two short accessory tentacles that
continuously sample substrate. Sexes separate.
Taenioglossate radula with rachidian, single pair of
laterals, and two pairs of marginals. Rachidian and lateral
teeth usually unicuspid, very rarely multicuspid. Inner
marginal multicuspid. Outer marginal pectinate.
Remarks: The taenioglossate radula of annulariids is very
conservative and only the inner marginal is of sufficient
variability to be systematically informative. This tooth is
categorized here as either a Glove, a Mitten, or a Hook
based on its overall shape. The Glove type has a broad
inner marginal tooth divided into blunt, shallowly
indented cusps of varying strength and number
(Figure 13). The Hook radula has a blunt, triangular tooth
with weak cusps along the distal margin and a pronounced
basal hook on the proximal side (Figure 14). The Mitten
type has an elongated triangular tooth characterized by a
single, small basal tooth on the distal side, rarely ac-
companied by weak serrations along the remainder of the
distal margin (Figure 15). The Glove type is by far the
most common radular type seen in >100 annulariid
species examined (Watters, unpubl.). In contrast the
Mitten type is the only radula found in the Abbot-
tellinae (as here defined), including Annularisca
(Figure 16) and Opisthosiphon (Figure 17). The Hook
type is unique to a few genera (e.g., Clydonopoma)
isolated on the Tiburon Peninsula of Hispaniola.
These snails spend an inordinate amount of time
making more snails. Pairs are often found in a mating
position even during dormant periods, with the male
attached to the female on her right side. There appears to
be a distinct sexual color dimorphism in some species
(e.g., Rolleia oberi).
Many annulariids are highly endemic (Watters, 2017).
The entire distribution of some species may consist of
only a few kilometers (or less) of suitable habitat.
Goodfriend and Mitterer (1988, 1993) found that
Page 8
terrestrial snails in Jamaica have had relatively long
spans of endemism, remaining in a single locality for
thousands of years. They suggested that many ter-
restrial snails, at least in Jamaica, have persisted in
place from the Late Pleistocene to the present
(Goodfriend and Mitterer, 1988, 1993). Similarly,
many of the main lineages within Annulariidae ap-
parently have persisted for long periods of time and are
the result of the separation and emergence of the
major landmasses followed by the fragmentation of
populations into discrete, isolated species.
Abbottellinae Watters, 2016
Description: Shells to 15 mm in diameter, pupoid to
turbinoid to planispiral, with reflected lip at maturity.
Spire decollate only in Opisthosiphon and relatives. Some
taxa partially or completely solute. Shell sculpture usually
present, varying from smooth to pustulose to short spines
or serrations. Spiral sculpture, when present, of cords or
threads, axial sculpture, when present, as lamellae.
Operculum present, as multispiral, single, erect, calcar-
eous plate or with pin-wheel ribs across surface in
Opisthosiphon and relatives. Very few species with per-
iostracum consisting of bristle-like projections. Radula
taenioglossate, of Mitten type.
Remarks: In contrast to most annulariids, most abbot-
telline species normally have a nondecollated spire.
But like other annulariids abbottellines may suspend
themselves from mucus strands when at rest. This
behavior has been found in numerous annulariid
groups from many localities. It is not found in the sister
group Pomatiidae and it must be a very ancient be-
havioral trait unique to the Annulariidae.
Key to Hispaniola Genera
1) Shell sculptureless or having only weak spiral cords in
patan loi lheiiliey Bart ea 5 Mania a eet call hhh ade ada eo 2
1) Sloe tl) aatiamar Gyettyl o el Ue ll ee e dae late ad oe 3
2) Outer lip narrowly expanded ......... Leiabbottella
2) Outer lip widely expanded ........... Preclaripoma
3) Axial sculpture of widely spaced, prominent, erect,
Re slices Lanes ey 1 iia t Pat eel Stok: Meganiphe
DB) Amar ectniire MOL asasiye LF) .< tx Adina. 28 19 4
4) SeuIplure spiny OF Serrated ost ih i... 408s ees bog eae 5
AONE IO Be BORE (2 a Pane. aa Bie ef. a's * ayes 6
5) Shell nearly planiepiral www, or) .haew Hs. ie Abbottella
Dt Shela bined: es ALB! Abbottipoma
6) Outer lip notched and enrolled ......... Lagopoma
SCN ORS Met [C\/ nh Oe, ae ee a ees
7) Axial sculpture tightly packed, forming almost
continuous layer, with prominent spiral keels
Wael. fae” SE eee, Microabbottella
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
FOTO OcIUNTe UCL \C2e 6: ON clare WC ay a a gn Gee eS 8
8) Spiral sculpture weaker than axial sculpture .......
Nice beet MEER rpc ler, neater asi AM, we « Rolleia
8) Spiral sculpture stronger than axial sculpture .......
Roe REE Se ARR ot RUT, Meine Pane iene Arenabbottella
Genus Abbottella Henderson and Bartsch, 1920
Type Species: Chondropoma moreletianum Crosse,
1873, by original designation.
Description: Shell small (ca. 8-15 mm in diameter),
depressed to planispiral, widely-umbilicate. Non-
decollate. Widely expanded, often fimbriated or un-
dulating outer lip, auriculate. Axial and spiral sculpture
forming sharp cusps or serrations at their intersec-
tions. Multispiral operculum with erect or reflected,
single calcified spiral lamella.
Distribution: Central Dominican Republic from the
south coast to the Majugual area and the southern shore of
Samana Bay (but apparently absent from the Samana
Peninsula); only a single species has been found in Haiti
(Figure 18).
Remarks: An undescribed species is known from a single
specimen from San Pedro de Mecoris.
Etymology: William Louis Abbott (1860-1936), Amer-
ican physician, ornithologist, field naturalist, and patron of
the United States National Museum, now National Mu-
seum of Natural History (USNM).
Key to Species
1) Sculpture of very fine spiral cords and axial lamellae,
forming minute denticies, Maiti... ..2...... haitensis
1) Sculpture coarse, forming denticles or thorny points,
Iowa meaneheptNG hemos nade’... ss: 2
2) Final whorl with 40-80 axial lamellae, sculpture mi-
VVUS) Waele 210 eee Meee ey ee domingoensis
2) Final whorl <50 axial lamellae, sculpture thorny .... 3
3) Final whorl! with 30-40 axial lamellae, spiral opercular
lamella reflected back over base ......... craetegus
3) Final whorl! with 40-50 axial lamellae, spiral opercular
lamellatoblique jit erect. j.4) 452 -. moreletiana
Abbottella crataegus Watters, 2016
(Figures 18, 29-28)
CCHRESONYMY
Abbottella crataegus Watters, 2016: 116-117, figs.
aaa 29.
Type Material: Holotype: UF 216138; Paratypes: UF
216138(5), from the type locality.
G.T. Watters et al., 2020
Type Locality: “5 km W of Majagual, Monte Plata
Province, Dominican Republic.”
Distribution and Habitat: Known only from the
limestone outcrops near Majugual and Guaragao. This is
the western part of the Cevicos Formation composed of
karsted, massive limestone of upper Miocene—lower
Pliocene age (Draper and Lewis, 1991). All specimens
seen were found between 100—260 m elevation. Entire
distribution may be <80 km”. Snails live on mesic
limestone outcrops.
Etymology: L. crataegus, a flowering thorny plant, a
masculine noun in apposition.
Abbottella domingoensis Bartsch, 1946
(Figures 18, 29-36)
CHRESONYMY
Abbottella moreletiana gabriella Bartsch, 1946: 146, 148,
pl. 25, figs. 4-6; Watters, 2006: 362.
Abbottella moreletiana wetmorei Bartsch, 1946: 146, 148,
pl. 26, figs. 8-10.
Abbottella moreletiana domingoensis Bartsch, 1946: 147,
pl. 25, figs. 1-3; Watters, 2006: 361-362.
Abbottella (Abbottella) moreletiana domingoensis (Crosse,
1873): Watters, 2006: 362.
Abbottella (Abbottella) moreletiana gabriella Bartsch,
1946: Watters, 2006: 83, 362; Watters, 2016b: 114-116
[in synonymy of A. domingoensis |.
Abbottella (Abbottella) moreletiana wetmorei Bartsch,
1946: Watters, 2006: 83, 362.
Abbottella (Abbottella) domingoensis (Crosse, 1873):
Watters, 2016b: 114-116, figs 9-16, 30.
Type Material: Abbottella moreletiana domingoensis
Bartsch, 1946: Bartsch (1946) listed USNM 504118 as
the holotype; this is now USNM 504117. Abbottella
moreletiana gabriella Bartsch, 1946: Holotype: USNM
504124. Abbottella moreletiana wetmorei Bartsch,
1946: Holotype: USNM 504119.
Type Locality: Abbottella moreletiana domingoensis
Bartsch, 1946: ““Santo Domingo,” probably Santo Domi-
ngo City.” Abbottella moreletiana gabriella Bartsch, 1946:
“San Gabriel Isle, Samana Bay.” Abbottella moreletiana
wetmorei Bartsch, 1946: “Pelican Keys, San Lorenzo Bay,
Samana Bay, Dominican Republic.”
Distribution and Habitat: This species is found in the
eastern end of the Cordillera Septentrional and the
northern Cordillera Oriental in the Rio Yuna valley and
its tributaries; also in the low hills of the Los Ranchos
Formation in the Sierra de El Seibo extending south to
Santo Domingo and Boca Chica. It has been found under
rocks and rubble on mesic limestone ridges where it is
Page 9
locally common. All specimens seen were found below
320 m elevation.
Remarks: Abbottella moreletiana gabriella Bartsch, 1946,
is known only from San Gabriel Isle, just east of Boca del
Infierno, possibly from the San Gabriel Cave (Angel Cave).
Abbottella moreletiana wetmorei Bartsch, 1946, is known
from the Pelican Keys. Both are here regarded as stunted
forms of A. domingoensis. The name Abbottella domingoensis
Bartsch, 1946, is here chosen as the valid name despite the
page precedence of these two forms.
Etymology: Abbottella moreletiana domingoensis
Bartsch, 1946: from Santo Domingo. Abbottella
moreletiana gabriella Bartsch, 1946: from San Gabriel
Isle. Abbottella moreletiana wetmorei Bartsch, 1946:
Frank Alexander Wetmore (1886-1978), American orni-
thologist at Smithsonian Institution.
Abbottella haitensis Bartsch, 1946
(Figures 18, 37-39)
CHRESONYMY
Abbottella haitensis Bartsch, 1946: 143, 145-146, pl. 24,
figs. 10-12.
Abbottella (Abbottella) haitensis Bartsch, 1946: Watters,
2006-783) 287-255.
Type Material: Holotype: USNM 504111.
Type Locality: “|Haiti] on the road to Grand Bois, 4
miles north of Thomazeau, at an elevation of 1,000 feet.”
We have not located this Grand-Bois.
Distribution and Habitat: Known only from the type
locality without habitat information.
Remarks: This species is a mystery. It occurs so far from
other Abbottella that it is tempting to believe it was
mislocalized. However it was collected by the eminent field
naturalist W.L. Abbott. The holotype label reads “1920” and
Abbott was known to have collected in Haiti in 1920.
It is also possible this species belongs to a different
genus. The pustulose sculpture is rather different from
the spinose sculpture of the other Abbottella. The species
also has some characteristics of Rolleia. Do not confuse
with the similarly named Rolleia haitensis Bartsch, 1946.
Preserved material was not available.
Etymology: William Louis Abbott (1860-1936),
American physician, ornithologist, field naturalist, and
patron of the United States National Museum, now
National Museum of Natural History (USNM).
Abbottella moreletiana moreletiana (Crosse, 1873)
(Figures 18, 40-43, 46)
Page 10 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Figures 22-39. Abbottella. 22-28. Abbottella crataegus Watters, 2016. 22-24. Holotype, UF 216138 (12.0 mm diameter). 25.
GTW 16492b (11.0 mm diameter). 26. Live individual (photo S. Aiken ©). 27. Mating pair (photo ©S. Aiken). 28. Distribution map.
29-36. Abbottella domingoensis Bartsch, 1946. 29, 30. Abbottella moreletiana domingoensis Bartsch, 1946. Holotype, USNM 504117
(12.2 mm diameter). 31, 32. UF 216133 (15.2 mm diameter). 33. Abbottella moreletiana gabriella Bartsch, 1946: Holotype, USNM
504124 (8.6 mm diameter). 34. Abbottella moreletiana wetmorei Bartsch, 1946: Holotype, USNM 504119 (7.0 mm diameter). 35.
Mating pair (photo S. Aiken ©). 36. Distribution map. 37-39. Abbottella haitensis Bartsch, 1946. 37, 38. Holotype, USNM 504111
(12.7 mm diameter). 39. Distribution map.
G.T. Watters et al., 2020
CHRESONYMY
Choanopoma moreletiana Crosse, 1873: 354; Crosse,
1874: 85, pl. 3, figs. 3, 3a; Pilsbry, 1933: 130; Watters,
2006:361.
Choanopoma moreletianum Crosse, 1873: Pfeiffer, 1876:
160-161; Kobelt, 1880: 277; Crosse, 1891: 168.
Tudorae |sic| moreletianae |sic] (Crosse, 1873): Arango,
1884: 211.
Abbottella moreletiana (Crosse, 1873): Henderson and
Bartsch, 1920: 75; Thiele, 1931: 134; Abbott, 1989: 53;
Watters, 2016b: 112, 114, figs. 1-8, 29.
Choanopoma (Abbotella |sic]) moreletianum Crosse,
1873: Clench and Aguayo, 1937: 67.
Chondropoma moreletianum (Crosse, 1874): Bartsch,
1946: 143.
Abbottella moreletiana moreletiana (Crosse, 1873):
Bartsch, 1946: 147, pl. 25, figs. 10-12.
Abbottella (Abbottella) moreletiana moreletiana (Crosse,
1873): Watters, 2006: 361-362.
Type Material: Holotype: ANSP 14166, not figured in
online database; from the Bland collection, collected by
Gabb.
Type Locality: “In regione Dominicanum insulae Haiti,
Antillarum.” Restricted by Watters (2016b) to “Sabana de
la Mar, Hato Major Province, Dominican Republic.”
Distribution and Habitat: It occurs on the southern
side of Samana Bay, including the nearshore Lower and
Upper Orange keys, from approximately Boca del Infierno
to Sabana de la Mar in Samana and Hato Major provinces
in the Los Haitises Limestone. This corresponds to the
eastern part of the Cevicos Formation, composed of
he
Page 11
karsted, massive limestone blocks of Upper Miocene-
Lower Pliocene age (Lebron and Mann, 1991). It is found
in mesic forests in association with wet limestone cliffs,
where it may be locally abundant. Its range may be
<100 km”.
Etymology: Named after Pierre Marie Arthur Morelet
(1809-1892), French naturalist and conchologist working
in Central America, Africa, and Europe.
Abbottella moreletiana kriegeri Bartsch, 1946
(Figures 44-46)
CHRESONYMY
Abbottella moreletiana kriegeri Bartsch, 1946: 146, pl. 24,
figs. 4-6.
Abbottella (Abbottella) moreletiana kriegeri Bartsch,
1946: Watters, 2006: 83, 362; Watters, 2016b: 112.
Type Material: Holotype: USNM 504115.
Type Locality: “North side of the Samana Peninsula on
the center of the south side of San Juan Bay, Dominican
Republic.” Based on Gabb’s 1873 description and map,
this apparently is the bay at Playa de Limon north of El
Limén. However, Abbottella is not known from the
Samana Peninsula and this locality remains suspicious.
Distribution and Habitat: Known only from the pos-
sibly erroneus type locality without habitat infromation.
Remarks: We suspect this is a stunted form of A. mor-
eletiana and the actual provenance is the south side of
46
Figures 40-46. Abbottella. 40-43. Abbottella moreletiana moreletiana (Crosse, 1873). 40. Choanopoma moreletiana Crosse, 1873.
Crosse, 1874: 85, pl. 3, figs. 3, 3a. 41-43. UF 216190 (12.3 mm diameter). 44, 45. Abbottella moreletiana kriegeri Bartsch, 1946.
Holotype, USNM 504115 (10.0 mm diameter). 46. Distribution map.
Page 12
Samana Bay. Further collections will be needed to verify
this. Preserved material was not available.
Etymology: Herbert William Krieger (1889-1970),
American anthropologist at the Smithsonian Institution,
collector of the type.
Genus Abbottipoma new genus
Type Species: Abbottella abbotti Bartsch, 1946.
Description: Shell small (ca. 6-10 mm in diameter),
turbinoid, with spiral keels and minutely serrated or spiny
sculpture, outer lip expanded and/or fimbriated or en-
rolled. Operculum as in family.
Distribution: Endemic to the eastern half of the Samana
Peninsula in mesic areas with limestone outcrops (Figure 18).
Etymology: Abbottella abbotti, the type species +
-poma, a standard suffix for many annulariids.
Key to Species
1) Sculpture of coarse spines, outer lip deeply fimbriated
Eeablet a, wlan rhe WAN A 2 eld dean ee hs tee abbotti
1) Sculpture of minute serrations, outer lip not deeply
EESTI ON CES (2 0 ML pie kee a ae COO Pere ey ERY erg ee
2) Anterior margin of outer lip enrolled ......... gabbi
2) Anterior margin of outer lip not enrolled .... crossei
Abbottipoma abbotti (Bartsch, 1946)
(Figures 18, 47-54)
CHRESONYMY
Abbottella abbotti Bartsch, 1946: 143, 154-155, pl. 27,
figs. 10-12.
Abbottella (Abbottella) abbotti Bartsch, 1946: Watters,
2006: 83, Watters, 2013: 11, figs. 3 A-E, 7 F.
Type Material: Holotype: USNM 504108. The type is a
worn specimen that does not show the characteristic spiny
sculpture.
Type Locality: “Near Laguna, Samana Bay” [? Punta
Laguna Salada, probable error for Samana Peninsula, see
Watters, 2013].
Distribution and Habitat: This narrowly endemic
species occurs in the Sierra de Samana of the Cordillera
Septentrional in the E] Valle and the Las Galeras areas on
the northeast coast of the peninsula. A record from Cayo
Levantado (GTW 10829a) seems unlikely and needs
confirmation. Snails live below 50 m elevation on and at
the base of limestone walls in cool, shaded areas with
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
abundant mosses and other vegetation. It may occur
in <10 km”. At El Valle it lives within a few hundred
meters of the beach in association with Lagopoma lago-
poma, Helicina salleana Pfeiffer, 1852, and the very large
pleurodontid Caracolus excellens (Pfeiffer, 1853).
Remarks: This species has been observed suspending
itself by a mucus thread(s) from limestone outcrops.
Etymology: William Louis Abbott (1860 —1936), Ameri-
can physician, ornithologist, field naturalist, and patron of
the United States National Museum, now National Mu-
seum of Natural History (USNM).
Abbottipoma crossei (Pilsbry, 1933)
(Figures 18, 55-62)
CCHRESONYMY
Choanopoma crossei Pilsbry, 1933: 130, pl. 7, figs. 5, 5a, 6.
Abbottella crossei (Pilsbry, 1933): Bartsch, 1946: 144, 153,
pl. 27, figs. 13-15.
Abbottella gabbi pilsbryi Bartsch, 1946: 152-153, pl. 27,
figs. 7-9.
Hales crossei (Pilsbry, 1933): Baker, 1964: 169.
Abbottella (Abbottella) crossei (Pilsbry, 1933): Watters,
2006: 83, 222; Watters and Duffy, 2010a: 2; Watters,
2013: 14, figs. 3 S-W, 7 G.
Abbottella (Abbottella) gabbi pilsbryi Bartsch, 1946:
Watters, 2006: 83, 269.
? Abbottella (Abbottella) harpeza Watters and Duffy,
2010a: 1-2, figs. 1-3.
Type Material: Choanopoma crossei Pilsbry, 1933:
Holotype: ANSP 7951; Paratype: ANSP 373769(1). The
type lot of A. gabbi contained two species, gabbi and
crossei. Pilsbry (1933) designated Crosse’s figured spec-
imen of the lot as the type of A. gabbi. Abbottella gabbi
pilsbryi Bartsch, 1946: Holotype: USNM 504099.
Abbottella harpeza Watters and Duffy, 2010: Holotype:
UF 420731.
Type Locality: Choanopoma crossei Pilsbry, 1933:
“Santo Domingo.” Restricted by Watters (2013) to “4 km
E of Samana, Samanaé Province, Dominican Republic.”
Abbottella gabbi pilsbryi Bartsch, 1946: “in a cave on the
Rio Seco near Samana, Samana Bay, Dominican Re-
public.” Abbottella harpeza Watters and Duffy, 2010: “Isla
Beata,” probably in error for Samana Peninsula.
Distribution and Habitat: This species inhabits the
coastal limestone bluffs of the eastern Samana Peninsula
in the Sierra de Samana including Cayo Levantado.
Specimens have been found on limestone outcrops in
fields and on cliffs and stone walls, often abundant; oc-
casionally arboreal. All specimens seen were found below
50 m elevation.
G.T. Watters et al., 2020 Page 13
Figures 47-70. Abbottipoma. 47-54. Abbottipoma abbotti (Bartsch, 1946). 47, 48. Holotype, USNM 504108 (6.0 mm diameter).
49-51. GTW 10829b (7.1 mm diameter). 52. Mating pair. 53. Live individual. 54. Distribution map. 55-62. Abbottipoma crossei (Pilsbry,
1933). 55, 56. Choanopoma crossei Pilsbry, 1933. Holotype, ANSP 7951 (7.5 mm diameter, photo courtesy of ANSP). 57, 58. Abbottella
gabbi pilsbryi Bartsch, 1946. Holotype, USNM 504099 (7.5 mm diameter). 59. Abbottella (Abbottella) harpeza Watters and Dutty, 2010.
Holotype, UF 420731 (7.1 mm diameter). 60, 61. GTW 9432a (7.3 mm diameter). 62. Distribution map. 63-70. Abbottipoma gabbi
(Crosse, 1873). 63. Choanopoma gabbi Crosse, 1873. Crosse, 1874: 84, pl. 3, fig. 2. 64-66. Syntype, MNHN 2000-5452 (7.4 mm diameter,
photo courtesy of Manuel Caballer, MNHN). 67-69. Julian Joseph coll. (6.3 mm diameter, photos ©S. Aiken). 70. Distribution map.
Page 14
Remarks: Abbottella harpeza Watters and Duffy,
2010, was described from Isla Beata. This now seems
very unlikely, being far out of the range of all other
abbottellines, and probably represents a mislocalized
specimen. Additional study at Isla Beata is needed to
confirm this.
Etymology: Choanopoma crossei Pilsbry, 1933: Joseph
Charles Hippolyte Crosse (1826-1898), French con-
chologist, editor of the Journal de Conchyliologie.
Abbottella gabbi pilsbryi Bartsch, 1946: Henry Augustus
Pilsbry (1862-1957), American conchologist, Academy of
Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Abbottella harpeza
Watters and Duffy, 2010: L. harpeza, a thorny bush, a
thicket.
Abbottipoma gabbi (Crosse, 1873)
(Figures 18, 63-70)
CHRESONYMY
Choanopoma gabbi Crosse, 1873: 353-354; Crosse, 1874:
84, pl. 3, fig. 2; Pfeiffer, 1876: 159; Kobelt, 1880: 277;
Crosse, 1891: 168; Henderson and Bartsch, 1920: 75:
Pilsbry, 1933: 129-130, pl. 7, figs. 1-4; Fischer-Piette,
1950: 80.
Abbottella gabbi (Crosse, 1873): Henderson and Bartsch,
1920; 75:
Abbottella gabbi gabbi (Crosse, 1873): Bartsch, 1946: 144,
152, pl. 26, figs. 5-7.
Abbottella (Abbottella) gabbi gabbi (Crosse, 1873): Wat-
ters, 2006: 83, 269.
Type Material: Syntype: MNHN 2000-5452 (Only
one specimen mentioned in database, number of ad-
ditional specimens unknown). This specimen is a worn
example.
Type Locality: “in regione Dominicanum insulae Haiti,
Antillarum.” Restricted here to “near E] Salto del Limén,
central Samana Peninsula, Samana Province, Dominican
Republic.”
Distribution and Habitat: This unlocalized species was
recently rediscovered after nearly 150 years at El Salto del
Lim6n in the central Samana Peninsula. It was found in
“soil/leaf litter around coral/limestone boulders along the
edge of the forest path” to the waterfall (J. Joseph, 2017,
pers. comm. ).
Remarks: The combination of the enrolled anterior
portion of the outer lip, purple apex, and strong, spiral,
fimbriated carinations is unique. Preserved material was
not available.
Etymology: William More Gabb (1839-1878), American
geologist and paleontologist who surveyed in Hispaniola.
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Genus Arenabbottella new genus
Type Species: Abbottella sosuaensis Bartsch, 1946.
Description: Shells small (6-11 mm in diameter), tur-
binoid, sculpture of minute pustules or weak serrations on
more-or-less well-developed spiral cords often forming
weak keels, cords often prominent in umbilicus, suture
channeled, outer lip expanded, often auriculate. Lip may
be folded or rolled abaperturely to varying degrees.
Sculpture is often arranged in axial “blocks” probably
representing growth lines.
Distribution: This is the most widely distributed abbot-
telline group, occurring around the eastern half of the
island on the northern slopes of the Cordillera Septen-
trional from Luperon to the Samana Peninsula and around
the southeastern lowlands from Las Lagunas de Nisibon to
San Cristobal, including Isla Saona (Figure 19). Snails live
under leaf litter and limestone rubble, from open fields to
mesic forests.
Remarks: This is the most speciose of the Hispaniolan
abbottelline genera. Based on conchological features and
distributional patterns, there seems to be a split below
Samana Bay between a northern and a southern group of
species but none of the northern species were available for
phylogenetic study. These two groups may yet be found to
constitute different genera.
Etymology: L. arenosus, full of sand + Abbottella; in
reference to the sandy sculpture of the shells.
Key to Species
The questionable taxa Choanopoma adolfi Pfeiffer,
1852, and Cyclostoma tentorium Pfeiffer, 1850, are not
included.
1) Columellar side of outer lip enrolled... samanaensis
1) Columellar side of outer lip not enrolled ........ 2
2 Outer No Memomated "tamer can akan-a 8: rosaliae
2) vine mle Net nermio ten mies. cence 2 s,m. 3
3) Shell with a prominent central, serrated keel .........
LG se tbe’ 5 ee ealted Se ene a he RR NR ce Wah calliotropis
S) sliell wathout-a prominent keel | iaee (tue - 4
4) ‘Outer lip narrowly expanded: <i.4i2:.5. 82 asian. - 5
Mistery. wide Wexpanded: aqt.cek eee ee. 8
5) Sculpture nearly obsolete, shell with a metallic sheen
a ae eae a sales Vataicon ecb rata aot GRAS co Cis EE ad eo es nitens
Dec OMe WM as OVE 5 nan pak cet cen + ayaa ates Sat 6
6) Final whorl with ca. 120 axial lamellae, shell usually
‘00? Ae eh eae ang al Gicgte hue R Lets ERea wk es cae milleacantha
6) Final whorl with <100 axial lamellae, shell usually
BOMOOMREGIOVE 5... van wuts veer e oe kaha f
G.T. Watters et al., 2020
8) Sculpture nearly obsolete except for umbilicus, shells
rather smooth: | bo) sapye ue ene =e Ree 9
9) Strong spiral cords present in umbilicus ........ 10
10) Shell pale yellow with brown spots, suture with white,
TANCOMOCeme les). a) eae ect ek een oe mellosa
10) Shell brown without spots, suture lacking white,
TAMCOUM COMICS Ta 4. ennui hey Wai ee newcombi
Strong spiral cords absent from umbilicus ...... 12
Strong spiral cords present in umbilicus ........ 13
11)
iy
12) Shell pale brown or yellow, sculpture fine .... wilhelmi
12)
Shell dark brown or white, sculpture coarse .......
13) Spiral cords not all of uniform strength, outer lip
RAC Gee Goro g gir as eo aman, 2 anchezi
13) Spiral cords approximately the same strength, outer
lo marowlemmatded: 2n aun Gee sosuaensis
Arenabbottella adolfi (Pfeiffer, 1852)
(Figures 19, 71, 72)
CHRESONYMY
Choanopoma adolfi Pfeiffer, 1852a: 167; Pfeiffer, 1853:
117-118; Adams and Adams, 1856: 296; Hjalmarson
and Pfeiffer, 1858: 139: Pfeiffer, 185Sb: 102; Kobelt,
1880: 277; Crosse, 1891: 166.
Cyclostoma (Choanopoma) adolfi (Pfeiffer,
Pfeiffer, 1854a: 142.
Cyclostoma adolfi (Pfeiffer, 1852): Pfeiffer, 1854c: pl. 48,
figs. 5-8; Pfeiffer, 1854d: 371.
Choanopoma adolphi |sic| Pfeiffer, 1852: Bland, 1861:
355; Pfeiffer, 1865: 111; Pfeiffer, 1876: 161.
Cyclostoma adolphi |sic| (Pfeiffer, 1852): Reeve, 1862: pl.
22, fig. 146.
Abbottella adolphi |sic| (Pfeiffer, 1852): Henderson and
Bartsch, 1920: 75.
Abbottella adolphi adolphi |sic| (Pfeiffer, 1852): Bartsch,
1946: 143, 149-150, pl. 26, fig. 4.
Abbottella (Abbottella) adolft adolfi (Pfeiffer, 1852):
Watters, 2006: 83, 130.
Abbottella adolft (Pfeiffer, 1852): Watters and Duffy,
201.0a:-2.
non Abbottella (Abbottella) cf. adolft adolfi (Pfeiffer, 1852):
Watters, 2013: 13, figs. 3 F-L 9 D [= A. mellosa].
1852):
Type Material: The type has apparently been lost. Many
of Pfeiffer’s types were probably destroyed by Allied
Page 15
bombing of the Museum Naradone in Szczecin, Poland, in
WW ILI.
Type Locality: “Habitat in insula Haiti.”
Distribution and Habitat: Known only from the unlo-
calized type locality without habitat information.
Remarks: Pfeiffer (1854: pl. 48, figs. 5-8) and Reeve
(1862: pl. 22, fig. 146) illustrated it but it cannot be
confidently identified from these figures. It is here
considered a nomen dubium.
Etymology: Probably Emil Adolf Rossmassler (1805?-1867),
German conchologist.
Arenabbottella aenea (Watters, 2010)
(Figures 19, 76—79)
CHRESONYMY
Abbottella (Abbottella) aenea Watters, 2010: 16-17, text fig.,
pl. 1, figs. 1-4; Watters, 2013: 13, figs. 3 N-R, 8 C.
Type Material: Holotype: UF 434777; Paratype: UF
434778(1); Paratypes: BMSM_ 17971(2); Paratypes:
OSUM 35490(2), all from the type locality.
Type Locality: “Dominican Republic, La Altagracia
Province, Punta Cana.”
Distribution and Habitat: Known only from the type
locality. Specimens were found under moldy leaf litter.
Remarks: Preserved material was not available.
Etymology: L. aeneus, copper.
Arenabbottella calliotropis (Watters, 2013)
(Figures 19, 80-83)
CHRESONYMY
Abbottella (Abbottella) calliotropis Watters, 2013: 3, figs. 1
Rate BO 7 ea.
Type Material: Holotype: UF 456810; Paratypes: UF
216131(59), from the type locality.
Type Locality: “Dominican Republic, La Altagracia
Province, along Rio Yuna, 2 km S of La Guana. ca. 18.79°
IN GGT” We”
Distribution and Habitat: Under limestone rubble
in fields on the easternmost outcrops of the cordillera
in La Altagracia Province in the area of Higiiey and Las
Lagunas de Nisibon.
Page 16 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
91
Figures 71-91. Arenabbottella. 71, 72. Arenabbottella adolft (Pfeiffer, 1852).'71. Choanopoma adolfi Pfeiffer, 1852. Pfeiffer, 1854c:
pl. 48, fig. 8. 72. Cyclostoma adolphi [sic] (Pfeiffer, 1852): Reeve, 1862: pl. 22, fig. 146. 73. Arenabbottella newcombi (Crosse, 1873).
Syntype, MNHN 5436 (photo courtesy of MNHN). 74, 75. Arenabbottella tentorium (Pfeiffer, 1850). 74. Cyclostoma tentorium
Pfeiffer, 1850. Pfeiffer, 1854b: pl. 38, fig. 18. 75. Cyclostoma tentorium Pfeiffer, 1850. Reeve, 1862: pl. 22, fig. 145. 76-79. Are-
nabbottella aenea (Watters, 2010). 76-78. GTW 14181a (6.5 mm diameter). 79. Distribution map. 80-83. Arenabbottella calliotropis
(Watters, 2013). 80-82. Holotype, UF 456810 (7.5 mm diameter). 83. Distribution map. 84-87. Arenabbottella dichroa (Watters,
2013). 84-86. Holotype, UF 456801 (9.9 mm diameter). 87. Distribution map. 88-91. Arenabbottella mellosa (Watters and Dutfty,
2010). 88-90. GTW 7020c (5.0 mm diameter). 91. Distribution map.
G.T. Watters et al., 2020
Remarks: Preserved material was not available.
Etymology: Gr. kallos, beauty + Gr. trope, a turning.
Arenabbottella dichroa (Watters, 2013)
(Figures 19, 84-87)
CHRESONYMY
Abbottella (Abbottella) dichroa Watters, 2013: 6-7, figs. 1
K-@75-@. 771.
Type Material: Holotype: UF 456801; Paratypes: UF
216112(31), from the type locality.
Type Locality: “Dominican Republic, Samana Province,
just E of El Limon, 10 km E of Las Terrenas, at sea level.
ca. 19.29° N, -69.44° W.”
Distribution and Habitat: Known from the north coast
of the Sierra de Samana of the Cordillera Septentrional
from the western Samana Peninsula to Nagua on lime-
stone hills in mesic, shaded forests.
Remarks: This species is peculiar in having two color
morphs in the same population: white or brown. This may
be due to sexual dimorphism. Preserved material was not
available.
Etymology: Gr. di-, two + Gr. chroa, color of the skin; in
reference to the two color morphs.
Arenabbottella mellosa (Watters and Duffy, 2010)
(Figures 19, 88-91)
CHRESONYMY
Abbottella (Abbottella) mellosa Watters and Duffy, 2010a:
2, figs. 4-6; Watters, 2013: 8, fig. 1 T.
Abbottella (Abbottella) cf. adolft adolfi (Pfeiffer, 1852):
Watters, 2013: 13, figs. 3 F-I, 9 D.
Type Material: Holotype: UF 420729; Paratype: OSUM
32477(1), from the type locality.
Type Locality: “Dominican Republic, Los Brazos, near
Sostia.”
Distribution and Habitat: Known only from three adjacent
outcrops: Loma Catalina and Loma Blanca near Sostia and
the outcrop near Rio San Juan on the northern coast. All
specimens seen were found below 70 m elevation.
Remarks: Rare, well-preserved specimens have perios-
tracal hairs.
Etymology: L. mellosa, honey-colored.
Page 17
Arenabbottella milleacantha (Watters and
Duffy, 2010)
(Figures 19, 92-95)
CCHRESONYMY
Abbottella (Abbottella) milleacantha Watters and Duffy,
2010a: 2-3, figs. 7-9; Watters, 2013: 4, 7, 13, 14, figs. 3
XB BR 77H:
Type Material: Holotype: UF 420728; Paratype: OSUM
32478(1), from the type locality.
Type Locality: “Dominican Republic, northeast Isla
SaAoOna
Distribution and Habitat: This species occurs on Isla
Saona and the adjacent coast from San Pedro de Macoris
to Bavaro in sub-mesic to mesic forests along limestone
ridges under blocks and in leaf litter; also in caves.
Remarks: Preserved material was not available.
Etymology: L. mille, thousand + Gr. akantha, thorn,
prickle.
Arenabbottella newcombi (Crosse, 1873)
(Figure 73)
CHRESONYMY
Choanopoma newcombi Crosse, 1873: 352-353; Crosse,
1874: 82, pl. 3, figs. 1, la; Pfeitter, 1876: 160; Kobelt,
1880: 277: Crosse, 1891: 167-168; Fischer-Piette,
1950: 79-80.
Abbottella newcombi (Crosse, 1873): Henderson and
Bartsch, 1920: 75; Bartsch, 1946: 143, 144-145, pl. 24,
figs. 7-9.
Abbottella (Abbottella) newcombi (Crosse, 1873): Watters,
YO0G. 83, 31 ls Watters, 2013) 13.
Type Material: Syntype: MNHN 5436.
Type Locality: “in regione Dominicanum insulae Haiti,
Antillarum.”
Distribution and Habitat: Known only from the unlo-
calized type locality.
Comparison with Other Species: Based on two spec-
imens, this is a relatively smooth, brown shell with a deep
suture and lacking keels.
Remarks: Bartsch’s (1946) specimens were received
from Newcomb but with only “Santo Domingo” as their
provenance, undoubtedly referring to the country rather
than the city. Although clearly a member of this group it
has not been collected since its description.
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Figures 92-113. Arenabbottella. 92-95. Arenabbottella milleacantha (Watters and Duffy, 2010). 92-94. Holotype, UF 420728
(7.5 mm diameter). 95. Distribution map. 96-99. Arenabbottella nitens (Watters, 2013). 96-98. Holotype, UF 456806 (7.8 mm
diameter). 99. Distribution map. 100-103. Arenabbottella rosaliae (Pfeiffer, 1858). 100-102. UF 216191 (9.2 mm diameter). 103.
Distribution map. 104-107. Arenabbottella samanensis (Bartsch, 1956). 104, 105. Holotype, USNM 504090 (10.6 mm diameter).
106. GTW 7085c (8.7 mm diameter). 107. Distribution map. 108-113. Arenabbottella sanchezi (Bartsch, 1946). 108. Abbottella
anchezi Bartsch, 1946. Holotype, USNM 504092 (9.1 mm diameter). 109. Abbottella adolphi peninsularis Bartsch, 1946. Holotype,
USNM 504095 (9.8 mm diameter). 110-112. UF 216154 (9.1 mm diameter). 113. Distribution map.
G.T. Watters et al., 2020
Etymology: Wesley Newcomb (1808-1892), American
physician, conchologist, Hawaiian temperance leader.
Arenabbottella nitens (Watters, 2013)
(Figures 19, 96-99)
CHRESONYMY
Abbottella (Abbottella) nitens Watters, 2013: 7, figs. 1 P-S,
5 Ry Seok
Type Material: Holotype: UF 456806; Paratypes: UF
456808(15), from the type locality.
Type Locality: “Dominican Republic, La Altagracia
Province, 16 km S of Higiiey, at 100 m. ca. 18.46° N,
— 68.715 We
Distribution and Habitat: Known only from the type
locality under rocks among boulders, on a limestone bluff
west of Highway 4.
Remarks: Preserved material was not available.
Etymology: L. niteo, shine, glitter, in reference to the
metallic sheen of most specimens.
Arenabbottella rosaliae (Pfeiffer, 1858)
(Figures 15, 19, 100-103)
CHRESONYMY
Choanopoma rosaliae Pfeiffer in Hjalmarson and Pfeiffer,
1858: 139-140; pl. a figs. 4-6: Bland, 1861: 355;
Pfeiffer, 1865: 111; Pfeiffer, 1876: 161; Kobelt, 1880: 277;
Crosse, 1891: 166; Pilsbry, 1933: 130.
Abbottella rosaliae (Pfeiffer, 1858): Henderson and
Bartsch, 1920: 75; Bartsch, 1946: 144, 155, pl. 27,
figs. 4-6.
Abbottella (Abbottella) rosaliae (Pfeiffer, 1858): Watters,
2006: 83, 447; Watters, 2013: 14-16, figs. A A-OK.
Type Material: Not located, presumed lost.
Type Locality: “In insulae Haiti.” Restricted by Watters
(2013) to “Dominican Republic, Puerto Plata Province,
Loma Catalina.”
Distribution and Habitat: This species is known only
from Loma Catalina, an outcrop of the Cordillera Sep-
tentrional southeast of Sostia, occurring in ca. 100 km”.
Much of this area is contained in the Parque Nacional E]
Choco. All specimens seen were found between 30-280 m
elevation on limestone bluffs.
Remarks: This species possesses a periostracum although
it is lost in most specimens. On fresh examples this
periostracum forms short bristles at the junctures of the
Page 19
axial and spiral sculptures. In general, a periostracum
appears to be very rare in the Annulariidae.
Etymology: Unknown, the identity of Rosalie has been
lost to time.
Arenabbottella samanensis (Bartsch, 1946)
(Figures 19, 104-107)
CHRESONYMY
Abbottella samanensis Bartsch, 1946: 143, 148-149, pl.
25, figs. 7-9.
Abbottella (Abbottella) samanensis Bartsch, 1946: Watters,
2006: 83, 460; Watters, 2013: 16, figs. 4 F-I, 9 B.
Type Material: Holotype: USNM 504090.
Type Locality: “Cape Samana, Dominican Republic.”
Distribution and Habitat: Samand Peninsula in the
Sierra de Samana of the Cordillera Septentrional. Live
snails have been found in leaf litter.
Remarks: Preserved material was not available.
Etymology: From the Samana Peninsula.
Arenabbottella sanchezi (Bartsch, 1946)
(Figures 19, 108-113)
CHRESONYMY
Abbottella sanchezi Bartsch, 1946: 143, 149, pl. 26,
figs. 1-3.
Abbottella adolphi |sic| peninsularis Bartsch, 1946:
150-151, pl. 26, figs. 14-16.
Abbottella (Abbottella) adolft peninsularis Bartsch, 1946:
Watters, 2006: 83, 130; Watters, 2013: 6, 13, figs, 3 J-L,
8 H.
Abbottella (Abbottella) sanchezi Bartsch, 1946: Watters,
2006: 83, 460; Watters, 2013: 6, 8, 13, 16, 17, figs. 4
EN. oC.
Type Material: Abbottella sanchexi Bartsch, 1946: Ho-
lotype: USNM 504092. Abbottella adolphi peninsularis
Bartsch, 1946: Holotype: USNM 504095.
Type Locality: Abbottella sanchexi Bartsch, 1946: “2
miles northwest of SAnchez, Dominican Republic.”
Abbottella adolphi peninsularis Bartsch, 1946: “On the
trail from Samana to Rio San Juan, Samana Peninsula.”
Distribution and Habitat: The species is found in the
Sierra de Samana from at least SAnchez to Los Cacaos in
the south and Las Terrenas in the north. Found in as-
sociation with limestone boulders, leaf litter, and talus in
mesic forests and near caves. All specimens seen were
found below 320 m elevation.
Page 20
Remarks: Bartsch (1946) differentiated A. sanchezi
and A. a. peninsularis based on differences in spire
height. Both fall within the range of variation of a
single species. This species may exhibit color dimor-
phism, probably sexual. Abbottella sanchezi is here
chosen as the valid name for the taxon.
Etymology: Abbottella sanchezxi Bartsch, 1946: from
Sanchez, Dominican Republic. Abbottella adolphi pen-
insularis Bartsch, 1946: from the Samana Peninsula.
Arenabbottella sosuaensis (Bartsch, 1946)
(Figures Os; Lt4—aehk7)
CHRESONYMY
Abbottella sosuaensis Bartsch, 1946: 143, 151, pl. 26, figs.
112.
Abbottella (Abbottella) sosuaensis Bartsch, 1946: Watters,
2006: 83, 489-490; Watters, 2010: 17; Watters, 2013: 6,
17, 18, figs. 4 O-S, 9 E.
Type Material: Holotype: USNM 336768.
Type Locality: “Sostia, 16 miles east of Puerto Plata,
Dominican Republic.”
Distribution and Habitat: This species is found on the
northern slopes of the Cordillera Septentrional from
Luperon to Rfo San Juan under rocks along rolling
limestone hills, pastures, and under limestone rubble at
the base of cliffs; it may be locally common. It does not
occur at El] Valle as reported by Watters (2013). All
specimens seen were found below 100 m elevation.
Etymology: From Sostia, Dominican Republic.
Arenabbottella tenebrosa (Watters, 2013)
(Figures 16113)
CHRESONYMY
Abbottella (Abbottella) tenebrosa Watters, 2013: 6, 8, figs.
1 U-Y, 8 B.
Type Material: Holotype: UF 456796; Paratypes: UF
456797(15); Paratypes: OSUM 37271(12); Paratypes:
BMSM 17937(16), all from the type locality.
Type Locality: “Dominican Republic, Puerto Plata
Province, El] Choco, near Cabarete. ca. 19.74° N,
—{),42° W”
Distribution and Habitat: This species is found from
the limestone outcrops of El Choco near Cabarete to just
west of Rio San Juan. All specimens seen were found
below 20 m elevation.
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Etymology: L. tenebrosus, dark, gloomy, in reference to
the shell color.
PArenabbottella tentorium (Pfeiffer, 1850)
(Figures 74, 75)
CHRESONYMY
Cyclostoma tentorium Pfeiffer, 1850: 77; Pfeifter,
1854b: 284, pl. 38, figs. 16-18; Reeve, 1862: pl. ines
fig. 145.
Choanopoma tentorium (Pfeiffer, 1850): Pfeiffer, 1851:
155; Pfeiffer, 1852a: 168; Pfeiffer, 1852b: 27; Pfeiffer,
1853: 118; Adams and Adams, 1856: 296; Pfeiffer,
1858b: 102; Bland, 1861: 355; Pfeiffer, 1865: 111;
Pfeiffer, 1876: 161; Kobelt, 1880: 277: Crosse,
1891: 167.
Abbottella (Abbottella) tentorium (Pfeiffer, 1850): Watters,
2006: 83, 505.
non Abbottella tentorium (Pfeiffer, 1850): Henderson and
Bartsch, 1920: 75; Bartsch, 1946: 144, 153, pl. 27, figs.
1l— 3 [= PA. wetmorei|.
Type Material: Not located, presumed lost.
Type Locality: “in insula Haiti.”
Remarks: Pfeiffer’s 1850 description of “Interdum
rubro-punctata” does not conform to any known
Abbottella. Reeve’s 1862 figure seems to show this feature
more so than does Pfeiffer’s 1854 figure. At 6.5 mm in
diameter only M. diadema and A. urbana are smaller.
Bartsch’s 1946 specimen (his pl. 27, figs. 1-3) from an
unknown locality does not seem to be the same species
and lacks any red spots; it appears to be a pale specimen
of A. wetmorei. This may possibly be an earlier name for
A. urbana.
Etymology: L. tentorium, a tent, a noun in apposition.
Arenabbottella urbana (Watters, 2012)
(Figures 19, 122-128)
CHRESONYMY
Abbottella (Abbottella) urbana Watters, 2012: 1, 3, figs.
1-3; Watters, 2016: 115-166.
Type Material: Holotype: UF 446061; Paratype: OSUM
36509(1), from the tdype locality.
Type Locality: “Parque Central, off José Contreras
Blvd., N of the Loteria barrio of western Santo Domingo,
Distrito Nacional, Dominican Republic, 18.44 N
—69.97 W.”
2
Distribution and Habitat: Known from Parque Central/
Parque Mirador del Sur in downtown Santo Domingo
G.T. Watters et al., 2020 Page 21
Figures 114-135. Arenabbottella. 114-117. Arenabbottella sosuaensis (Bartsch, 1946). 114, 115. Holotype, USNM 336768
(7.0 mm diameter). 116. UF 218136 (6.9 mm diameter). 117. Distribution map. 118-121. Arenabbottella tenebrosa (Watters, 2013).
118-120. Holotype, UF 456796 (8.9 mm diameter). 121. Distribution map. 122-128. Arenabbottella urbana (Watters, 2012).
122-124. Holotype, UF 446061 (4.9 mm diameter). 125. Distribution map. 126. Live individual (photos ©S. Aiken). 127. Mating pair
(photos ©S. Aiken). 128. Type locality in Parque Central in Santo Domingo. 129-135. Arenabbottella wilhelmi (Pteitter, 1858). 129.
Choanopoma wilhelmi Pfeiffer in Hjalmarson and Pfeiffer, 1858: pl. 2, fig. 3. 130. UF 216150 (8.0 mm diameter). 131. Live individual
suspended from mucus thread. 132-134. UF 216150 (8.5 mm diameter). 135, Distribution map.
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Figures 136-157. Lagopoma, Leiabbottella, Meganiphe, Microabbottella. 136-141. Lagopoma lagopoma Bartsch, 1946. 136-137.
Holotype, USNM 356198 (5.0 mm diameter). 138. GTW 10081a (9.7 mm diameter). 139. Live individual. 140. Radula (bar=100,).
141. Distribution map. 142-145. Leiabbottella galaxius Watters, 2010. 142-144. Paratype, OSUM 35491 (8.4 mm diameter). 145.
Distribution map. 146-153. Meganiphe rhecta Thompson, 1978. 146-148. Paratype, GTW 8227a (10.6 mm diameter). 149-150.
GTW 11371b (8.0 mm diameter). 151. Distribution map. 152. Live individual (photo ©S. Aiken). 153. Habitat (photo ©S. Aiken).
154-157. Microabbottella diadema (Watters, 2013). 154-156. Holotype, UF 456814 (6.0 mm diameter). 157. Distribution map.
G.T. Watters et al., 2020
(Figure 128), among vacant lots in Boca Chica to the
east, and almost to Peravia Province to the west. It is
likely that this species historically occurred along the
southern extent of Santo Domingo Province, which is
now heavily developed. It still exists in remaining pockets
of suitable habitat scattered throughout the region, in-
cluding local land fills. It has been found under limestone
rubble.
Etymology: L. urbana, of a city.
Arenabbottella wilhelmi (Pfeiffer, 1858)
(Figures 19, 129-135)
CHRESONYMY
Choanopoma wilhelmi Pfeiffer in Hjalmarson and
Pfeiffer, 1858: 139, pl. 2, figs. 1-3; Bland, 1861: 355;
Pfeiffer, 1865: 110-111: Pfeiffer, 1876: 161; Kobelt,
1880: 277; Crosse, 1891: 165-166.
Abbottella wilhelmi (Pfeiffer, 1858): Henderson and
Bartsch, 1920: 75; Bartsch, 1946: 143, 144, pl. 24,
figs. 1-3.
Abbottella (Abbottella) wilhelmi (Pfeiffer, 1858): Watters,
2006: 83, 549; Watters, 2013: 13, 16, 17, figs. ATX. 6 WD.
Type Material: Not located, presumed lost.
Type Locality: “In insulae Haiti.” Pfeiffer continued that
it “was collected under stones in moist places near Puerto
Plata” [German translation].
Distribution and Habitat: This species occurs on the
northern slopes of the Cordillera Septentrional from
Puerto Plata to Nagua, including Pico Isabel de Torres,
Loma Blanca at El Choco, and the north side of the
outcrop between Rio San Juan and Cabrera. Individuals
are found from cloud forests to open, disturbed areas
under limestone rubble.
Remarks: This species has been found suspending itself
from mucus threads (Figure 131).
Etymology: Probably Rudolph Wilhelm Dunker
(1809-1885), German conchologist.
Genus Lagopoma Bartsch, 1946
Type species: Lagopoma lagopoma Bartsch, 1946, by
original designation.
Description: Shells small (ca. 9 mm in diameter),
depressed turbinoid, sculpture of minute pustules on
more-or-less weak spiral cords, cords more prominent
in umbilicus, suture channeled, outer lip expanded,
auriculate. Lip folded posteriorly and conspicuously
notched. Radula as in subfamily (Figure 140).
Page 23
Distribution: Samana Peninsula of Dominican Republic
(Figure 21). Snails live under leaf litter, limestone rubble,
and on wet outcrops in mesic forests.
Remarks: Bartsch (1946) established Lagopoma as a
monotypic genus characterized by a folded and notched
outer lip. The enrolled lip also occurs in Arenabbottella
samanaensis and Abbottipoma gabbi. In this study
Lagopoma was found to be sister to Abbottipoma, and like
that genus is endemic to the Samana Peninsula.
Lagopoma lagopoma Bartsch, 1946
(Figures 21, 136-141)
CHRESONYMY
Lagopoma lagopoma Bartsch, 1946: 142-143, pl. 23, figs.
1-3; Watters, 2006: 92, 324; Watters, 2013: 18, figs. 4
¥—-CC. SE.
Type Material: Holotype: USNM 356198 (2 specimens
in lot, holotype listed as 5.0 mm long specimen).
Type Locality: “Laguna, 4 miles N of Samana, Samana
Province, Dominican Republic.”
Distribution and Habitat: Occurs on the limestone
outcrop of the Sierra de Samana that occupies the north-
eastern-most prominence, from El Valle to Loma Trav-
esada. This species is found in association with A. abbotti.
Comparison with Other Species: This species is
characterized by the peculiar folded auricle and notched
outer lip.
Arenabbottella samanaensis and Abbottipoma gabbi oc-
casionally have a similar auricle but lack the notch.
Etymology: Sp. lago, lake, lagoon + -poma, a standard
ending for annulariid genera. The type was collected at
Laguna.
Leiabbottella Watters, 2010
Type species: Leiabbottella galaxius Watters, 2010, by
original designation.
Description: Shells small (ca. 10 mm in diameter), nearly
planispiral, sculptureless except for microscopic axial
threads and faint spiral ridges in umbilicus, outer lip
narrowly expanded.
Distribution: Endemic to an outcrop of the Villa Trina
Formation of the Rio San Juan complex (Figure 21).
Remarks: In this phylogenetic study Leiabbottella gal-
axius, the type species, was a weakly supported member
of the Arenabbottella clade. Conchologically it is very
dissimilar from Arenabbotella species. At the risk of
Page 24
perpetuating a possibly paraphyletic genus, we maintain
Leiabbottella as a distinct genus pending further study.
However, other smooth- shelled taxa previously assigned
to Leiabbottella (soluta and thompsoni) are unrelated and
are reassigned to the new genus Preclaripoma. Con-
chologically they differ primarily in the greatly expanded
outer lip, which is very narrow in L. galaxius. The lack of
shell sculpture appears to be convergent between the two
groups.
Etymology: G. leios, smooth + Abbottella.
Leiabbottella galaxius Watters, 2010
(Figures 21, 142-145)
CHRESONYMY
Leiabbottella galaxius Watters, 2010: 17-19, pl. 1, figs. 5,
6; Watters, 2013: 10, 18-19, figs. 2 J—L, 8 F.
Type Material: Holotype: UF 434779; Paratype: UF
434780(1); Paratypes: BMSM 17972(2); Paratype: OSUM
35491(1), all from the type locality.
Type Locality: “Dominican Republic, Samana Province,
Samand Peninsula, along Rt. 5 between Santa Barbara
de Samana and Sanchez, in the southern foothills of the
Sierra de Samana.” However, subsequent extensive col-
lections in the area of the original type locality have failed
to find this species. All other records place it exclusively
on an outcrop of the Villa Trina Formation between Rio
San Juan and Cabrera. It seems certain that the original
type locality was a mislabled lot and in error. The type
locality is here corrected to “outcrop 0.5 km NNE of Caro
Clara, Maria Trinidad Sdénchez Province, Dominican
Republic.”
Distribution and Habitat: Endemic to an outcrop of the
Villa Trina Formation of the Rio San Juan complex, an
area < 150 km7. This is undifferentiated limestone, silt-
stone, and marl of Upper Miocene—Lower Pliocene age
(Draper et al., 1991). All specimens seen were found from
sea level to 30 m elevation. At Abreu, individuals were
found within several meters of the sea at <1 m elevation.
Etymology: Gr. galaxius, an allusion to having the ap-
pearance of the Milky Way Galaxy.
Genus Meganiphe Thompson, 1978
Type Species: Meganiphe rhecta Thompson, 1978, by
original designation.
Description: Shell small (8-10 mm in diameter), tur-
binate, whorls adnate, nondecollate. Moderately wide
umbilicus. Axial sculpture of distantly spaced, greatly
expanded, erect and undulating lamellae, ca. 12-14 on
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
final whorl. Spiral sculpture absent. Aperture circular, lip
greatly expanded rather evenly but less so facing body
whorl, barely separated from body whorl, composed of
numerous greatly expanded lamellae, gently reflected
abaperturally, undulating, weakly auriculate. Operculum
multispiral with erect, calcareous lamella that is reflected
to form almost flat plate. Radula as in subfamily.
Distribution: Endemic to Loma del Puerto (Figures 18,
153fig10).
Remarks: Meganiphe is apparently a narrowly endemic,
monotypic genus. It is most closely related to Rolleia, which
occurs in the same high elevation habitats. This appears to be
an oftshoot of Rolleia with exaggerated sculpture.
Etymology: L. mega, giant + G. nipha, snowtlake.
Meganiphe rhecta Thompson, 1978
(Figures 19, 146-153)
CHRESONYMY
Meganiphe rhecta Thompson, 1978: 43-48, figs. 1-4;
Abbott, 1989: 53; Watters, 2006: 92, 441-442: Aiken,
2018: 4-9.
Type Material: Holotype: UF 22745; Paratypes: UF
22746(1), 22747(1); Paratype: USNM 711132(6); Para-
type: GTW 8227a(1).
Type Locality: “Dominican Republic, Puerto Plata
Province, Loma del Puerto, Yaroa, 700 m elevation.” This
site appears to be on the border between Santiago and
Puerto Plata provinces.
Distribution and Habitat: This beautiful species is
apparently endemic to Loma del Puerto. This is a
portion of the La Piedra Member of the Villa Trina
Formation. It is characterized by massive, cliff-forming
reefal limestone of Upper Miocene—Lower Pliocene age
(Zoeten et al., 1991). The habitat is a 700-800 m ele-
vation, nearly inaccessible ridge in a cloud forest, on
limestone blocks with lichens, moss, and ferns (Aiken,
2018, and figures).
Remarks: Shells may be banded or not. This species co-
occurs with the lizard Anolis distichus ignigularis Mertens,
1939, which may be predaceous on them (Aiken, 2018).
Etymology: Gr. rhecta, brittle. Meganiphe rhecta —
Brittle Giant Snowflake.
Genus Microabbottella new genus
Type species: Abbottella (Abbottella) diadema Watters,
2013.
G.T. Watters et al., 2020
Description: Shell minute (4-6 mm in diameter), tur-
binate, whorls adnate except just before lip. Umbilicus
wide. Protoconch of ca. 1.5 minutely pustulose whorls but
demarcation between protoconch and teleoconch not
well- defined. Teleoconch of 2.5—2.75 whorls. Axial
sculpture of numerous, crowded, low lamellae. Spiral
sculpture present only as keels. The axial sculpture on
keels forms very dense, finely serrate edge. Aperture
double, circular, solute from final whorl. Inner lip smooth,
narrowly exserted. Outer lip slightly expanded, consisting
of numerous fused lamellae, with two low auricles 180°
apart. Operculum multispiral with oblique, erect, cal-
careous lamella. Radula and anatomy unknown.
Distribution: Endemic to Loma Travesada (Figure 20).
Remarks: This genus has the smallest shells of any
abbottellines and has the fewest number of teleoconch
whorls (<3); the shells are also among the smallest known
annulariids. The curious combination of tightly packed
axial sculpture and prominent spiral cords is unlike any
other annulariid. Currently this is a monotypic genus.
Although preserved material was not available for phy-
logenetic work, the unique conchological features indicate
a genus apart from other abbottellines. Its apparently very
limited range on a single hill in the eastern—most Samana
Peninsula suggests it may have evolved in isolation there
when the peninsula was still an island.
Etymology: L. micro, very small + Abbottella.
Microabbottella diadema (Watters, 2013)
(Figures 20, 154-157)
CHRESONYMY
Abbottella (Abbottella) diadema Watters, 2013: 4, 6, figs. 1
F-J,5 P, 7B.
Type Material: Holotype, UF 456814; Paratypes: UF
456815(5), from the type locality.
Type Locality: “Dominican Republic, Samana Province,
Cabo Cabron, at 280 m. ca. 19.34° N, -69.25° W.”
Distribution and Habitat: Known only from the type
locality at the isolated Loma Travesada of the Sierra de
Samana under limestone boulders on a slope in virgin rain
forest; abundant. It may occur in <10 km”.
Etymology: Gr. diadema, headband, crown.
Genus Preclaripoma new genus
Type Species: Leiabbottella thompsoni Watters, 2013.
Description: Shells large for subfamily (9-15 mm in
diameter), nearly planispiral, sculptureless except for
Page 25
microscopic axial threads and faint spiral ridges in um-
bilicus. Outer lip greatly expanded. Operculum as in
subfamily.
Distribution: The few records indicate isolated localities
in the Cordillera Septentrionale and the Los Haitises of
the Majugual area (Figure 21).
Remarks: Originally considered members of Leiabbot-
tella, results here indicate these taxa are unrelated to that
genus and constitute a new taxon. The lack of sculpture
seen in Leiabbottella and Preclaripoma is convergent.
Preclaripoma is weakly supported as a sister group of
Abbottella. These are very rare species in collections.
Etymology: L. preclarus, very beautiful, splendid +
-poma.
Key to Species
1) Whorls ca. 3X as high as wide, outer lip barely adnate
to preceding whorls Sas. ee ah See soluta
1) Whorls ca. 4X as high as wide, outer lip broadly adnate
£0: ECE CIS AVTIOM pines ogee aah aaa thompsoni
Preclaripoma soluta (Pfeiffer, 1852)
(Figures 21, 158-161)
CHRESONYMY
Choanopoma solutum “Richard” Pfeiffer, 1851: 155 [no-
men nudum]; Adams and Adams, 1856: 296; Hjalmarson
and Pfeiffer, 1858: 138-139; Bland, 1861: 355; Pfeiffer,
1865: 110; Pfeiffer, 1876: 160; Crosse, 1891: 169.
Choanopoma? solutum “Richard:” Pfeiffer, 1852a: 167;
Pfeiffer, 1853: 117; Pfeiffer, 1858b: 102.
Cyclostoma solutum (“Richard”): Pfeiffer, 1854b: 295, pl.
39, figs. 8-10; Pfeiffer, 1858a: 188.
Cyclostoma (Choanopoma) solutum “Richard” Pfeiffer,
1852: Shuttleworth, 1856: 261-263, 270.
Cyclostoma solutum “Richard” Pfeiffer, 1852: Reeve,
1862: pl. 23, figs. 160a,b.
Choanopoma solutum “Richard” Pfeiffer, 1852: Kobelt,
1880: 277.
Abbottella solutum (Pfeiffer, 1852): Henderson and
Bartsch, 1920: 75.
Choanopoma (Abbotella |sic]) solutum “Richard” Pfeiffer,
1852: Clench and Aguayo, 1937: 67.
Incertipoma solutum (Pfeiffer, 1852): Bartsch, 1946: 171,
173-174, pl. 30, figs. 2-4.
Rolleia ? soluta (Pfeiffer, 1852): Watters, 2006: 93,
487-488.
Leiabbottella soluta (Pfeiffer, 1852): Watters, 2010: 18, 19:
Watters, 2013: 9, 11, 17, figs. 2 F-I, 7 D; Aiken, 2018: 7.
Type Material: > NHMUK, not located, but in Cuming
collection, fide Shuttleworth, 1856: 262.
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Figures 158-176. Preclaripoma, Rolleia. 158-161. Preclaripoma soluta (Pfeiffer, 1852). 158-160. GTW 16924a (13.5 mm di-
ameter). 161. Distribution map. 162-169. Preclaripoma thompsoni (Watters, 2013). 162-164. Holotype, UF 456799 (13.7 mm
diameter). 165-166. Aiken coll. (13.4 mm diameter, photo ©S. Aiken). 167. Aiken coll. (12.9 mm diameter, photo ©S. Aiken). 168.
Live individual (photo ©S. Aiken). 169. Distribution map. 170-172. Rolleia bombardopolensis (Bartsch, 1946). 170-171. Holotype,
USNM 504085 (7.1 mm diameter). 172. Distribution map. 173-176. Rolleia haitensis Bartsch, 1946. 173-175. Holotype, USNM
504088 (12.0 mm diameter, photo courtesy of USNM). 176. Distribution map.
G.T. Watters et al., 2020 Page 27
Figures 177-199. Rolleia. 177-179. Rolleia martensi (Maltzan, 1888). 177-178. Possible syntype: ZMB 40725 (15 mm diameter,
photo courtesy Malacological Collection, Museum fiir Naturkunde Berlin, Leibniz Institute for Research in Evolution and Biodiversity
at the Humboldt University, photography L. Maitas). 179. Distribution map. 180-187. Rolleia oberi Watters and Duffy, 2010.
180-182. Holotype UF 434775, 10.3 mm diameter. 183. GTW 14180b (7.3 mm diameter). 184. GTW 14180b (8.6 mm diameter). 185.
Live individual (photo ©S. Aiken). 186. Mating pair suspended on mucous threads (photo ©S. Aiken). 187. Distribution map. 188-191.
Rolleia paradoxa (Watters, 2013). 188-190. Holotype, UF 456812 (7.8 mm diameter). 191. Distribution map. 192-199. Rolleia
simonaikeni new species. 192-194. Holotype, OSUM 46107 (9.6 mm diameter). 195. Paratype, UF 525639 (9.0 mm diameter). 196.
Paratype, BMSM 128507 (10.6 mm diameter). 197. Hyperstrophic individual (8.2 mm length, photo ©S. Aiken). 198. Mating pair
(photo ©S. Aiken). 199. Distribution.
Page 28
Type Locality: “Island of Santo Domingo.” Originally
restricted by Watters (2012) to “the southern edge of Los
Haitises Mountains, N of Majagual, ca. 12 km NW of
Sabana Grande de Boya, Monte Plata Province, Do-
minican Republic.” However, this was found to be a
different species described as Leiabbottella thompsoni
Watters, 2013. The type locality was corrected by Watters
(2013) to “Ydsica Abajo, Puerto Plata Province, Domin-
ican Republic.”
Distribution and Habitat: Known only from the region
of Loma del Puerto near Lajas de Yaroa and Gurabito de
Yaroa in the Cordillera Septentrional, between Puerto
Plata and Santiago de Los Caballeros; ca. 500-900 m
elevation. It lives in the soil under rocks (Aiken, 2018).
Remarks: This species occurs at higher elevations than P.
thompsoni, up to at least 900 m.
Etymology: L. solutus, dissolved; possibly used here to
refer to the openly coiled whorls.
Preclaripoma thompsoni (Watters, 2013)
(Figures 21, 162-169)
CHRESONYMY
Leiabbottella thompsoni Watters, 2013: 9-11, 17, 18, figs.
DM ag
Type Material: Holotype: UF 456799; Paratypes: UF
2,36225(91), from the type locality.
Type Locality: “Dominican Republic, Monte Plata
Province, 5 km N of Majagual [Majugual], at 150 m. ca.
19,09° N, —69.83° W.”
Distribution and Habitat: Found in the karstic region of
Los Haitises between the Cordillera Central and the
Cordillera Oriental around Guaragao and Majugual on
and at the base of limestone knolls and in ravines in mesic
forests under debris and leaf litter. The Majugual region is
the western part of the Cevicos Formation, composed of
karsted, massive limestone blocks of Upper Miocene—
Lower Pliocene age (Draper and Lewis, 1991). All
specimens seen were found between 100-320 m eleva-
tion. Locally common.
Etymology: Named for the late Dr. Fred Thompson,
Curator, UF, who collected the types.
Genus Rolleia Crosse, 1891
Type Species: Cyclotus martensi Maltzan, 1888, by
original designation.
Petasipoma Bartsch, 1946, is a synonym.
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Description: Shell medium-sized for family (8-15 mm in
diameter), depressed to turbinoid, terminal portion of final
whorl solute from previous whorl and may be deflected
anteriorly. Axial sculpture of numerous close-set, very fine
threads or low lamellae. Spiral sculpture as weak cords that
may be limited to umbilicus or may be entirely absent.
Outer lip widely expanded in most species.
Distribution: Specimens are very rare in collections
and the ranges of the species are not well-known. All
appear to be upland species in the Massif du Nord and
Montagnes Noires of Haiti and the Cordillera Sep-
tentrional of the Dominican Republic (Figure 20).
These highlands are largely unexplored and _ nearly
impenetrable. Given the amount of endemism in this
group, it is to be expected that other species un-
doubtedly await discovery.
Remarks: The Haitian species may be unrelated to those
from the Dominican Republic. Paradoxa and bom-
bardopolensis also may constitute a separate genus but
require additional material.
Etymology: Hermann Rolle (f. 1887-1911), German
shell dealer.
Key to Species
1) Operculum fits within aperture, spiral sculpture absent
Ol Preset Om ly Ai) UIMMOHICHG, Quint 0.8 a. eee ae 2
1) Operculum too large to fit in aperture, spiral sculpture
Gl WeAKICOUGS OVEL WHOTIS: oo). per ne sarees oon oe
2) Shell nearly smooth, final portion of last whorl widely
CCIE Sone ale A a gee et Re a a martensi
2) Shell with coarser axial sculpture, final portion of last
Seal LAO Ay? SOM e aga bay hayes, ah) Seay ae ee 3
3) Outerdip Marrow expanded <i. wk ed es haitensis
3) Outer lig witelycxman@e@ yc ke. eld los wins 4
4) Axial sculpture close-set and barely separated by width
ORIEL 2 (lpn ane a ee eR as Se ee oberi
4) Axial sculpture separated by gaps several times wider
‘eld VOOR TIGUo 0 Mae el aee eee e ae simonaikeni
5) Outer lip widely expanded and notched .... paradoxa
5) Outer lip narrowly expanded and complete ........
Pe ta RIND fo OR Soh nS bombardopolensis
Rolleia bompardopolensis (Bartsch, 1946)
(Figures 20, 170-172)
CHRESONYMY
Petasipoma bombardopolense Bartsch, 1946: 138-139, pl.
21, figs. 4-6.
Abbottella (Petasipoma) bombardopolensis (Bartsch,
1946): Watters, 2006: 84, 179.
Abbottella (Gundlachtudora) bompardopolensis (Bartsch,
1946): Watters, 2013: 17-18, figs. 1 DD, $81.
G.T. Watters et al., 2020
Type Material: Holotype: USNM 504085 (2 specimens
in lot, holotype listed as 6.5 mm long specimen).
Type Locality: “Crevices in rocks in a ravine a little west
of Bombardopolis, Haiti.”
Distribution and Habitat: Rolleia bombardopolensis is
known from Bombardopolis and Terre Neuve in the
western-most extent of the Cordillera Centrale in Haiti.
Its habitat is unknown.
Remarks: The structure of the operculum, which is
nearly flat and cannot be withdrawn into the aperture,
separates this from all other abbottellines except R.
paradoxa. The shell sculpture of both is consistent with
Rolleia and the species occupy the known range of Rolleia
but their assignment here is highly conjectural. No suit-
able preserved material was available. The opercular
features are here considered a species-level characteristic.
The Cuban species decolorata Pfeiffer, 1859, is main-
tained in Bartsch’s subgenus Gundlachtudora but prob-
ably belongs to the Abbottellinae as well.
Etymology: From Bombardopolis, Haiti.
Rolleia haitensis Bartsch, 1946
(Figures 20, 173-176)
CHRESONYMY
Rolleia haitensis Bartsch, 1946: 140, 141-142, pl. 23, figs.
7-9; Watters, 2006: 93, 288; Watters and Dufty, 2010b:
187, figs. To: Watters, 2013: 20. 22: figs. es ee
Type Material: Holotype: USNM 504088.
Type Locality: “Ennery, Haiti.”
Distribution and Habitat: It is known from the Mon-
tagnes Noires range of Haiti. Its habitat is unknown.
Remarks: It is possible that more than one species has
been treated under this name.
Etymology: From Haiti.
Rolleia martensi (Maltzan, 1888)
(Figures 20, 177-179)
CHRESONYMY
Cyclotus martensi Maltzan, 1888: 179.
Rolleia martensi (Maltzan, 1888): Crosse, 1891:
163-164; pl. a fig. 4. Wenz, 1939: 550, fig. 1471;
Bartsch, 1946: 140-141, pl. 23, figs. 4-6; Watters,
2006: 93, 349; Watters and Duffy, 2010b: 187, figs.
10, 11; Watters, 2013: 20.
Rolleia martensii |sic| (Maltzan, 1888): Thiele, 1929: 134.
Page 29
Type Material: Possible syntype: ZMB 40725.
Type Locality: “Sanssouci in parte meridionali insulae
Haiti.” Bartsch (1946: 141) gave “Plaisance, the type lo-
cality.” This is incorrect; the Sans-Souci Palace is located
in Milot, 27 km east of Plaisance.
Distribution and Habitat: This rarely seen species is
found in the Massif du Nord and Montagnes Noires of
Haiti. Habitat information is lacking.
Etymology: Karl Eduard von Martens (1831-1904),
German conchologist at Museum fiir Naturkunde, Berlin.
Rolleia oberi Watters and Duffy, 2010
(Figures 20, 180-187)
CHRESONYMY
Rolleia oberi Watters and Duffy, 2010b: 185, 187, figs. 1-6;
Watters, 2013: 20, 22, figs. 5 G-N, 8 G; Aiken, 2018: 7.
Type Material: Holotype: UF 434775; Paratypes: UF
434776(3); Paratypes: BMSM_ 17970(2); Paratypes:
OSUM 35489(2), all from the type locality.
Type Locality: “On road half way between Santiago de
los Caballeros and Puerto Plata, E] Puerto, La Has, Puerto
Plata Province, Dominican Republic, at 830-1000 m in
the Cordillera Septentrional.” This road is Carretera
Turistica Gregorio Luperon.
Distribution and Habitat: This species is probably
limited to the area of Loma del Puerto between Puerto
Plata and Santiago de Los Caballeros in the Cordillera
Septentrional. All specimens seen were found between
700-800 m elevation on limestone outcrops in cloud forest.
Remarks: As with a few other abbottellines (and heli-
cinids), this species is found in two different colors —
brown and yellow/white. This may be a sexual charac-
teristic with males being the yellow/white morph. This
species has been observed suspending itself from mucus
thread(s) (Figure 186).
Etymology: Jim Ober, collector of the types.
Rolleia paradoxa (Watters, 2013)
(Figures 20, 188-191)
CHRESONYMY
Abbottella (Gundlachtudora) paradoxa Watters, 2013: 8,
9, 18, figs. 1 Z-CC, 9 F.
Type Material: Holotype: UF 456812; Paratypes: UF
456813(22), from the type locality.
Page 30
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Type Locality: “Dominican Republic, Santiago Province,
Loma Diego de Ocampo, at 1200 m. ca. 19.62° N, -'70.76° W.”
Distribution and Habitat: Known only from Loma
Diego de Ocampo of the Cordillera Septentrional, on
limestone rocks on the mountain crest in dense forest with
thick vegetative debris, mosses, and epiphytes. Loma
Diego de Ocampo is located north of Santiago de Los
Caballeros and is the highest point of the Cordillera
Septentrional at 1,200 m.
Remarks: Watters (2013) placed this species under
Gundlachtudora based on opercular features. However,
the shell sculpture is unlike that genus but more similar to
Rolleia. See Remarks under Rolleia bombardopolensis.
Etymology. L. paradoxus, strange, contrary to expectation.
Rolleia simonaikeni new species
(Figures 20, 192-199)
CHRESONYMY
Rolleia sp. Aiken, 2018: figs. top of p. 8.
Description: Shell small (largest specimen seen,
11.0 mm in diameter including outer lip; smallest seen,
8.0 mm in diameter including outer lip; holotype 9.6 mm in
diameter including outer lip), depressed turbinoid, widely
umbilicate. Whorls adnate except for just behind outer lip.
Nuclear whorls 1.5, smooth, minute, white or brown,
weakly demarcated from teleoconch whorls. Teleoconch
whorls 3. Axial sculpture of minute, low, erect lamellae
(90-100 on final whorl), evenly produced all around, more
or less evenly distributed but closer set near lip, with mi-
croscopic threads between some lamellae. Spiral sculpture
absent. Aperture deflected anteriorly. Outer lip very
broadly expanded, narrower facing umbilicus, just touching
previous whorl, somewhat concave posteriorly, composed
of numerous fused lamellae, with wide posterior auricle.
Inner lip round, exserted, projecting beyond outer lip. Shell
white or pale tan with ca. 9 spiral bands of smudged tan
spots or dashes that show through into aperture. Oper-
culum not preserved with specimens but based on pho-
tographs of live animals (Aiken, 2018), composed of single,
reflected spiral lamella. Radula unknown. Preserved ma-
terial was not available for phylogenetic analysis.
Type Material: Holotype: OSUM 46107 (9.6 mm in
diameter); Paratypes: UF 525639(1), 9.0 mm in diam-
eter; BMSM 128507 (1), 10.6 mm in diameter.
Additional Material: GTW 17281a(1); Aiken coll. (29),
all from the type locality.
Type Locality: Dominican Republic, Santiago Province,
Loma del Puerto, 1.4 km NNW of Lajas de Yaroa.
Distribution and Habitat: Known only from a crevice
in a single house-sized limestone block on Loma del
Puerto at 685 m elevation in a cloud forest. This is a
portion of the La Piedra Member of the Villa Trina
Formation. It is characterized by massive, cliff-forming,
reefal limestone of Upper Miocene—Lower Pliocene age
(Zoeten et al., 1991).
Remarks: This species may occupy the narrowest range
of any annulariid, having been found only in a single
fissure on a single small outcrop (Aiken, 2018). It is also
unique in having the only known dextral hyperstrophic
example recorded for the family (Figure 197).
Etymology: Named for Simon Aiken (UK), collector of the
types and generous contributor to this and other studies.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank J. Slapcinsky (UF) and R. Herschler
(retired, USNM) for access to their invaluable collections.
Z. Feher (Hungary), S. Aiken (UK), J. Joseph (UK), A.
Gettleman (USA), H. Rhode (USA), G. Duffy (USA), M.
Coltro (Brazil), A.F. Velazquez (Cuba), R. Fernandez-
Garcés (Cuba), L. and J. Kremer (USA), and R. Hooks
(Dominican Republic) generously donated valuable ma-
terial used in this review. S. Aiken graciously allowed us to
use many of his excellent photographs. B. Kemminoe
(OSU) assisted with SEM preparations. Molecular work
was carried out on the equipment and in the laboratory
space of B.C. Carstens (Department of Evolution,
Ecology and Organismal Biology, OSU). Funding for
portions of the project were generously donated by L. and
J. Kremer.
LITERATURE CITED
Abbott, R.T. 1989. Compendium of andshells. American Mal-
acologists, Inc., Burlington, MA. 240 pp.
Adams, H. and A. Adams. 1856. The genera of Recent Mollusca,
arranged according to their organization, 2. J. Van Voorst,
London. Parts 25-28: pp. 285-412, pls. 97-112.
Aiken, S. 2018. Kingdom of the snowflake shell. America
Conchologist 46(4): 4-9.
Arango y Molina, R. 1884. Description of new species of ter-
restrial Mollusca of Cuba. Proceedings of the Academy of
Natural Sciences of Philadelphia for 1884: 211-212.
Baker, H.B. 1964. Type land snails in the Academy of Natural
Sciences of Philadelphia. Part HI. Limnophile and tha-
lassophile Pulmonata. Part IV. Land and fresh-water Pro-
sobranchia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural
Sciences 116: 149-193.
Bartsch, P. 1946. The operculate land mollusks of the family
Annulariidae of the island of Hispaniola and the Bahama
Archipelago. Bulletin of the U.S. National Museum 192:
264 pp., 38 pls.
Benthem, S. van, R. Govers, W. Spakman, and R. Wortel. 2013.
Tectonic evolution and mantle structure of the Caribbean.
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 118: 3019-3036.
Bishop, M.J. 1979. A new species of Caracolus (Pulmonata:
Camaenidae) from the Oligocene of Nebraska and the
G.T. Watters et al., 2020
biotic history of the American camaenid land snails. Zoo-
logical Journal of the Linnean Society 67: 269-284.
Bland, T. 1861. On the geographical distribution of the genera
and species of land shells of the West India Islands; with a
catalogue of the species of each island. Annals of the Ly-
ceum of Natural History of New York 7: 335- 361.
Buskirk, R.E. 1985. Zoogeographic patterns and tectonic history
of Jamaica and the northern Caribbean. Journal of Bio-
geography 12: 445-461.
Chakrabarty, P. 2006. Systematics and historical biogeography of
Greater Antillean Cichlidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and
Evolution 39: 619-627.
Clench, W.J. and C.G. Aguayo. 1937. Notes and descriptions of
some new land and freshwater mollusks from Hispaniola.
Memorias de la Sociedad Cubana de Historia Natural
“Felipe Poey” 11(2): 61-76, pl. 7.
Cochran, D.M. 1941. The herpetology of Hispaniola. Bulletin of
the U.S. National Musuem 177: vii + 398 pp.
Colgan, D.J., A. McLauchlan, G.D.F. Wilson, S.P. Livingston,
G.D. Edgecombe, J. Macaranas, G. Cassis, and
M.R. Gray. 1998. Histone H3 and U2 snRNA DNA sequences
and arthropod molecular evolution. Australian Journal of
Zoology 46: 419-437.
Crosse, H. 1873. Diagnoses molluscorum novorum, ex insula Haiti
dicta oriundorum. Journal de Conchyliologie 21: 352-356.
Crosse, H. 1874. Description de mollusques terrestres nouveaux
provenent de l’ile de Haiti. Journal de Conchyliologie 22:
82-89, pls. 1, 3.
Crosse, H. 1891. Faune malacologique terrestre et fluviatile de
ile de Saint-Domingue. Journal de Conchyliologie 39:
735210.
Draper, G. and J.F. Lewis. 1991. Geologic maps of the central
Dominican Republic. Pls. 2a, b, [in:] Mann, P., Draper, G.
and J.F. Lewis. 1991. Geology and tectonic development of
the North American-Caribbean Plate boundary in Hispa-
niola. Geological Society of America Special Paper 262. 401
pp.. 5 maps.
Draper, G., F. Nagle, and P.R. Renne. 1991. Geology, structure,
and tectonic development of the Rio San Juan Complex,
northern Dominican Republic. Pp. 77-95, [in:] Mann, P.,
Draper, G. and J.F. Lewis. 1991. Geology and tectonic
development of the North American-Caribbean Plate
boundary in Hispaniola. Geological Society of America
Special Paper 262. 401 pp., 5 maps.
Edgar, N.T. 1991. Structure and geologic development of the
Cibao Valley, northern Hispaniola. Pp. 281-299, [in:]
Mann, P., G. Draper, and J.F. Lewis. 1991. Geology and
tectonic development of the North American- Caribbean
Plate boundary in Hispaniola. Geological Society of
America Special Paper 262. 401 pp., 5 maps.
Edgar, R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment
method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC
Bioinformatics 5: 113.
Edwards, S.V., Z. Xi, A. Janke, B.C. Faircloth, J.E. McCormack,
T.C. Glenn, B. Zhong, S$. Wu, E.M. Lemmon, A.D. Leaché,
L. Liu, and C.C. Davis. 2016. Implementing and testing the
multispecies coalescent model: a valuable paradigm for
phylogenomics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 94:
447-462.
Fischer-Piette, E. 1950. Liste des types décrits dans le Journal de
Conchyliologie et conservés dans la collection de ce journal.
Journal de Conchyliologie 90: 8-23, 65-82, 149-180.
Folmer, O., W.R. Hoeh, M.B. Black, and R.C. Vrijenhoek. 1994.
Conserved primers for PCR amplification of mitochondrial
Page 31
DNA from different invertebrate phyla. Molecular Marine
Biology and Biotechnology 3: 294— 299.
Gabb, W.M. 1873. On the topography and geology of Santo
Domingo. Transactions of the American Philosophical
Society 15: 49-259, maps.
Goodfriend, G.A. and R.M. Mitterer. 1988. Late quaternary land
snails from the north coast of Jamaica: local extinctions and
climatic change. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
Palaeoecology 63: 293-311.
Goodfriend, G.A. and R.M. Mitterer. 1993. A 45,000-yr record
of a tropical lowland biota: the land snail fauna from cave
sediments at Coco Ree, Jamaica. Geological Society of
America Bulletin 105: 18-29.
Graham, A. 2003. Geohistory models and Cenozoic paleo-
environments of the Caribbean region. Systematic Botany
283 10-00!
Henderson, J.B. and P. Bartsch, 1920. A classification of the
American operculate land mollusks of the family Annular-
iidae. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 58: 49-82.
Hjalmarson, J. and L. Pfeiffer. 1858. Beitrige zur Fauna von
Westindien. Malakozoologische Blatter 5: 135-155, pl. 2.
Joyce, J. 1991. Blueschist metamorphism and deformation on
the Samana Peninsula; a record of subduction and collision
in the Greater Antilles. Pp. 47-76, [in:] Geology and tec-
tonic development of the North American- Caribbean Plate
boundary in Hispaniola. Mann, P., G. Draper, and J.F.
Lewis. Geological Society of America Special Paper 262.
401 pp., 5 maps.
Judd, W.S. 2001. Phylogeny and biogeography of Lyonia sect.
Lyonia (Ericaceae). Pp. 63-75, [in:] C.A. Woods and F.E.
Sergile.Biogeography of the West Indies. gpd eqn “CRC
Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
Kearse, M., R. Moir, A. Wilson, S. Stones-Havas, M. Cheung, S.
Sturrock, S. Buxton, A. Cooper, S. Markowitz, C. Duran, T.
Thierer, B. Ashton, P. Meintjes, and A. Drummond. 2012.
Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop
software platform for the organization and analysis of se-
quence data. Bioinformatics 28: 1647-1649.
Kobelt, W. 1880. Die geographische Verbreitung der Mol-
lusken. Jahrbiicher der Deutschen Malakozoologischen
Gesellschaft nebst Nachrichtsblatt 7(3): 241-286.
Lanfear, R., P.B. Frandsen, A.M. Wright, T. Senfeld, and B.
Calcott. 2016. PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting
partitioned models of evolution for molecular and mor-
phological phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and
Evolution. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260
Lebron, M.C. and P. Mann. 1991. Geologic map of the southern
Dominican Republic. Pl. 4, [in:] Mann, P., G. Draper, and
].F. Lewis. 1991. Geology and tectonic development of the
North American-Caribbean Plate boundary in Hispaniola.
Geological Society of America Special Paper 262. 401 pp., 5
maps.
Maltzan, KE. von. 1888. Diagnosen neuer Landschnecken von
Haiti, gesammelt von Hermann Rolle 1887-1888.
Nachrichtsblatt der deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft
20; FFT-182:
Miller, M.A., T. Schwartz, B.E. Pickett, et al. 2015. A RESTful
API for Access to Phylogenetic Tools via the CIPRES
Science Gateway. Evolutionary Bioinformatics 11: 43-48.
DOI. 10.4137/EBO.S21501.
Ottenwalder, J.A. 2001. Systematics and biogeography of the
West Indian genus Solenodon. Pp. 253-329, [in:] C.A.
Woods and F.E. Sergile.Biogeography of the West Indies.
9°4 ed.. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
Page 32
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Pfeiffer, L. 1850. Beschreibung neuer Landschnecken von
Cuba. Zeitschrift fiir Malakozoologie 7(5): 65-80.
Pfeiffer, L. 1851. Conspectus emendatus generum et specierum
Cyclostomaceorum. Zeitschrift fiir Malakozoologie
8(9): 129-144; 8(10): 145-160; 8(11): 161-176; 8(12): 177-178.
Pfeiffer, L. [post Aug., but before Dec.] 1852a. Monographia
pneumonoporum viventum. Cassellis, T. Fischer. 435 pp.
Pfeiffer, L. 1852b. Conspectus cyclostomaceorum emendatus et
auctus. Pneumonopomorum monographie prodromus. T.
Fischer, Cassellis. pp. 1-50, addenda.
Pfeiffer, L. 1853. Catalogue of Phaneropneumona, or terrestrial
operculated Mollusca, in the British Museum.
British Museum, London. 324 pp.
Pfeiffer, L. [27 June] 1854a. Descriptions of twenty-four new
species of land shells, collected by M. Sallé on the island of
St. Domingo, from Mr. Cuming’s collection. Proceedings of
the Zoological Society for 1852 (20): 138-144, pl. 13.
Pfeiffer, L. 1854b. Die gedeckelten Lungenschnecken. (Heli-
cinacea et Cyclostomacea). Systematisches Conchylien-
Cabinet von Martini und Chemnitz (Kiister ed.). Part 19.
Installment 133: pls. 37-42, pp. 269-308.
Pfeiffer, L. 1854c. Die gedeckelten Lungenschnecken. (Heli-
cinacea et Cyclostomacea). Systematisches Conchylien-
Cabinet von Martini und Chemnitz (Kiister ed.). Part 19.
Installment 136: pls. 43-48, pp. 309-356.
Pfeiffer, L. 1854d. Die gedeckelten Lungenschnecken. (Heli-
cinacea et Cyclostomacea). Systematisches Conchylien-
Cabinet von Martini und Chemnitz (Kiister ed.). Part 19.
Installment 137: pls. 49, 50, pp. 357-400.
Pfeiffer, L. [Dec.] 1858a. Zur Molluskenfauna der Insel Cuba.
Malakozoologische Blatter 5: 173-196
Pfeiffer, L. 1858b. Monographia pneumonopomorum viventium,
Supplementum primum. Theodor Fischer, Cassellis. 249 pp.
Pfeiffer, L. 1865. Monographia pneumonopomorum viventium.
Supplementum secundum. Theodor Fischer, Cassellis. 284 pp.
Pfeiffer, L. 1876. Monographia pneumonopomorum viventium,
accedente fossilium enumeratione. Supplementum tertium,
monographiae auriculaceorum. Parte secunda auctum. T.
Fischer, Cassel. x+479 pp.
Pilsbry, H.A. 1933. Santo Domingo land mollusks collected by
Samuel C. Pease, 1932, and by A.A. Olsson, 1916.
Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences 85: 121-162,
Ise-6= Lil;
Pindell J.L. 1994. Evolution of the Gulf of Mexico and the
Caribbean. Pp.13-39 [In:] Donovan, S.K. and T.A. Jackson,
Caribbean geology, an introduction. The University of the
West Indies Publishers’ Association, Kingston.
Rambaut, A. and A.J. Drummond. 2007. Tracer vl. 6 http://
beast.bio. ed. ac. uk.
Reeve, L.A. 1862. Monograph of the genus Cyclostoma. Con-
chologica Iconica, 13. Reeve and Co., London. pls. 18-23.
Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., Van Der Mark, P., Ayres, D. L.,
Darling, A., Héhna, S., Larget, B., Liu, L., Suchard,
M.A. & J.P. Huelsenbeck. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian
phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large
model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539-542.
Rosen, D.E. 1976. A vicariance model of Caribbean biogeog-
raphy. Systematic Biology 24: 431-464.
Ross, C.P. 1921. Geology of the Province of Samana. Pp.
181-185 [in:] A geological reconnaissance of the Domini-
can Republic. Geological Survey of the Dominican Re-
public, Memoirs, 1. U.S. Geological Survey.
Shuttleworth, R.J. 1856. Essai critique sur quelques espéces du
Genre Cyclostoma. Journal de Conchyliologie 5: 261-272.
Skomrock, N. 2014. The biogeography of the Caribbean land
snail family Annulariidae. Master of Science Thesis, De-
partment of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology,
Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Stamatakis, A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic
analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bio-
informatics 30.9: 1312-1318.
Thiele, J. 1931. Handbuch der Systematischen Weichtierkunde.
Gustav Fischer, Jena. Pt. 2: pp. 377-778.
Thompson, F.G. 1978. A new genus of operculate land snails
from Hispaniola with comments on the status of family
Annulariidae. The Nautilus 92: 41-54.
Torre, C. de la and P. Bartsch. 1941. The Cuban operculate land
mollusks of the family Annulariidae, exclusive of the sub-
family Chondropominae. Proceedings of the U.S. National
Museum 89(3096): 131-385, pls. BoM.
van der Schalie, H. 1948. The land and fresh-water mollusks of
Puerto Rico. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zo-
ology, University of Michigan 70: 1-134.
Van Osselaer, C. 1999. Counting shell whorls. Remarks. Apex 14:
30-42.
Watters. G.T. 2006. The Caribbean landsnail family Annular-
iidae. A revision of the higher taxa and catalog of the
species. Backhuys Publ., Leiden. 584 pp.
Watters, G.T. 2010. New taxa of Annulariidae from Dominican
Republic (Gastropoda: Littorinoidea). Visaya 31: 16-20.
Watters, G.T. 2012. Hispaniolan Annulariidae (Gastropoda),
primarily from the Barahona Peninsula: New taxa and
notes. The Nautilus 126: 1-14.
Watters, G.T. 2013. New taxa and distributional notes on
Abbottella and related taxa (Gastropoda: Littorinoidea:
Annulariidae). Zootaxa 3646(1): 1-22.
Watters, G.T. 2016a. Review of the Hispaniolan Parachondria
(Chondropomorus) complex (Gastropoda: Littorinoidea:
Annulariidae). Zootaxa 4127(2): 245-275.
Watters, G.T. 2016b. The Abbottella moreletiana complex in
Hispaniola: distributional notes, a new species, and the
recognition of a new subfamily (Annulariidae: Abbottelli-
nae). Journal of Conchology 42: 111-117.
Watters, G.T. 2017. A review of Weinlandipoma (Gastropoda, Lit-
torinoidea, Annulariidae) from the Tiburon Peninsula of His-
paniola: imperiled local endemics. Basteria 81(4—6): 65-89.
Watters, G.T. and G. Duffy. 2010a. New species of Annulariidae
(Gastropoda) from the Bahamas and Dominican Republic.
Novapex 11: 1-12.
Watters, G.T. and G. Duffy. 2010b. Rolleia oberi, new species —
first record of the genus from the Dominican Republic,
with a lectotype designation of Cyclotus martensi Maltzan,
1888 (Gastropoda: Annulariidae). The Nautilus 124:
1355-1678
Watters, G.T. and P. Larson. 2017. A revision of the Hispaniolan
genera Chondropomella, Chondropomium, and Clydono-
poma (Gastropoda: Annulariidae), with the recognition of a
new genus, Superbipoma: phylogenetic, radular, and con-
chological evidence. The Nautilus 131: 163-201.
Wenz, W. 1939. Gastropoda. Handbuch der Palaozoologie. 6(3).
Allgemeiner Teil und Prosobranchia. Gebriider Born-
traeger, Berlin. Pp. 484-720.
de Zoeten, R., Draper, G. and P. Mann. 1991. Geologic map of
the northern Dominican Republic. Pl. 1, [in:] Mann, P.,
Draper, G. and J.F. Lewis. 1991. Geology and tectonic
development of the North American-Caribbean Plate
boundary in Hispaniola. Geological Society of America
Special Paper 262. 401 pp., 5 maps.
G.T. Watters et al., 2020 Page 33
Appendix 1. Specimens used in phylogenetic study. DR = Dominican Republic.
Appendix 1
Taxon GenBank (COIJ/ 12S/ H3) Source Accession Locale
Abbottella crataegus (Watters, 2016)
Abbottella moreletiana (Crosse, 1873)
Abbottella domingoensis (Bartsch, 1946)
Abbottella domingoensis (Bartsch, 1946)
Abbottipoma abbotti (Bartsch, 1946)
Abbottipoma abbotti (Bartsch, 1946)
Abbottipoma crossei (Bartsch, 1946)
Abbottipoma crossei (Bartsch, 1946)
Arenabbottella mellosa (Watters and Dufty, 2010)
Arenabbottella rosaliae (Pfeiffer, 1858)
Arenabbottella rosaliae (Pfeiffer, 1858)
Arenabbottella rosaliae (Pfeiffer, 1858)
Arenabbottella sosuaensis (Bartsch, 1946)
Arenabbottella sosuaensis (Bartsch, 1946)
Adamsiella ignilabris (Adams, 1849)
Annularia anomala (Adams, 1850)
Annularia chittyi (Adams, 1849)
Annularia fimbriatula (Sowerby, 1825)
Annularia fumbriatula (Sowerby, 1825)
Annularia fimbriatula (Sowerby, 1825)
Annularia hilliana hilliana (Adams, 1845)
Annularia hilliana leporilabre (Adams, 1851)
Annularia lima (Adams, 1845)
Annularia lincina (Linnaeus, 1758)
Annularia lincinella (Lamarck, 1822)
Annularia mitus (Pfeiffer, 1852)
Annularia pisum (Adams, 1849)
Annularia scabricula (Sowerby, 1843)
Annularia triplopoma (Baker, 1934)
Annularisca hendersoni (Torre and Bartsch, 1941)
Annularisca victoris (Torre and Bartsch, 1941)
Annularisca victoris (Torre and Bartsch, 1941)
Chondropoma laetum (Poey, 1857)
Chondropoma oculeum (Watters and Dutty,
2010)
Chondropoma pupiforme (Sowerby, 1843)
Chondropoma sp.
Chondropoma sp.
Chondropomella magnifica (Pfeiffer, 1852)
Chondropomella magnifica (Pfeiffer, 1852)
Chondropomium weinlandi (Pfeiffer, 1862)
Chondropomium weinlandi (Pfeiffer, 1862)
Chondropomium weinlandi (Pfeiffer, 1862)
Chondropomium weinlandi (Pfeiffer, 1862)
Chondropomium weinlandi (Pfeiffer, 1862)
Chondropomium weinlandi (Pfeiffer, 1862)
MT119707/ NA/ NA
MT119681/ MT119719/
MT119733
MT119706/ MT119717/
MT119734
MT119705/ MT119718/ NA
MT119695/ MT119723/ NA
MT119696/ MT119724/ NA
GTW 16492c
GTW 707l1¢g
GTW 1649Ic
GTW 16491b
GTW 10829b
GTW 10829c
MT119691/ MT119726/
MT119730
MT119692/ NA/ NA
MT119679/ NA/ NA
MT119713/ NA/ NA
MT119711/ NA/ NA
MT119698/ MT119721/
MT119731
MT119699/ NA/ NA
MT119687/ NA/ NA
]Q964718/ JQ990572/ N
]Q964706/ ]Q990560/ N
]Q964705/ JQ990559/ N
A
A
A
]Q964707/ JQ990561/ NA
1Q964708/ ]Q990562/ NA
1Q964709/ ]Q990563/ NA
1Q964710/ ]Q990564/ NA
A
A
]Q964711/ J]Q990565/ N
]Q964712/ ]Q990566/ N
MT119690/ NA/ NA
]Q964713/ ]Q990567/ N
]Q964714/ J]Q990568/ N
]Q964716/ ]Q990570/ N
ae ae ge
]Q964717/ ]Q990571/ N
1Q964763/ ]Q990616/ N
MT119683/ NA/ NA
KX496697/ NA/ NA
KX496694/ NA/ NA
MT119684/ NA/ NA
KX496717/ NA/ NA
KX496702/ NA/ NA
KX496704/ NA/ NA
KX863609/ NA/ NA
KX863610/ KX863590/ NA
KX863598/ KX863577/ NA
KX863599/ KX863578/ NA
KX863600/ KX863579/ NA
KX863601/ NA/ NA
KX863602/ KX863581/ NA
KX863611/ KX863591/ NA
MT119712/ MT119722/ NA
GTW 9432b
GTW 9432c
GTW 7020f
GTW 16507b
GTW 16507c
GTW 16507a
GTW 13728c
GTW 13728f
GTW 7244¢
ANSP:]BS263-01
USDA:97]25-01
ANSP-]JBS148-01
USDA:97J1-01
ANSP-JBS378-01
ANSP-]BS253A-01
N
ANSP:JBS133-01
ANSP:JBS1-01
ANSP:]BS398-01
GTW 9209d
ANSP:]BS99-01
ANSP:]BS188-02
ANSP:]BS595-01
ANSP: ]JBS69B-01
ANSP:CO35B-01
GTW 7163e
GTW 7163e
GTW 15040a
GTW 7166d
UF 48724
GTW 15050a
GTW 15046a
OSUM 42368
OSUM 42358
OSUM 42362
OSUM 42363
OSUM 42378
OSUM 42361
OSUM 42377
OSUM 42359
Majugual, DR
Boca del Infierno, DR
Rio Naranjo, DR
Puerto Bonito, DR
El Valle, DR
El Valle, DR
Anadel, DR
Talanquera, DR
Rio San Juan, DR
Cabarete, DR
Monkey Jungle, DR
Sostia, DR
Cabarete, DR
Sostia, DR
Windsor Cave, Jamaica
Manchester Parish,
Jamaica
St. Elizabeth Parish,
Jamaica
St. Elizabeth Parish,
Jamaica
Hanover Parish, Jamaica
St. Ann Parish, Jamacica
Clarendon Parish, Jamaica
Manchester Parish,
Jamaica
St. Elizabeth Parish,
Jamaica
St. Catyherine Parish,
Jamaica
Rio Cobre, Jamaica
St. Catyherine Parish,
Jamaica
Portland Parish, Jamaica
St. Elizabeth Parish,
Jamaica
Trelawny Parish, Jamaica
Holguin, Cuba
Playa El] Baga, Cuba
Playa El Baga, Cuba
Velasco, Cuba
Pedernales, DR
Anguilla
Rafael Freyre, Cuba
Guardalavaca, Cuba
Puerto Escondido, DR
Bartolomé, DR
Bombita, DR
Bombita, DR
Bartolomé, DR
Galindo Adrento, DR
El Limén, DR
Bartolomé, DR
(Continued)
Page 34
Appendix 1. (Continued)
Appendix 1
Taxon
Chondropomium weinlandi (Pfeiffer, 1862)
Chondropomium weinlandi (Pfeiffer, 1862)
Clydonopoma bartschi (Watters, 2012)
Clydonopoma nobile (Pfeiffer, 1852)
Clydonopoma nobile (Pfeiffer, 1852)
Clydonopoma poloense (Bartsch, 1946)
Clydonopoma pumilum (Watters and Duffy,
2010)
Colobostylus retrorsa ( Adams, 1850)
Colobostylus retrorsa ( Adams, 1850)
Crossepoma marmoreum (Watters and Dufty,
2010)
Crossepoma vermiculatum domingoense (Bartsch,
1946)
Crossepoma vermiculatum domingoense (Bartsch,
1946)
Crossepoma vermiculatum domingoense (Bartsch,
1946)
Crossepoma vermiculatum domingoense (Bartsch,
1946)
Crossepoma vermiculatum domingoense (Bartsch,
1946)
Crossepoma vermiculatum vermiculatum
(Bartsch, 1946)
Diplopoma crenulatum (Poteiz and Michaud,
1838)
Lagopoma lagopoma (Bartsch, 1946)
Leiabbottella galaxius Watters, 2010
Preclaripoma thompsoni (Watters, 2013)
Meganiphe rhecta Thompson, 1978
Opisthosiphon bahamensis (Pfeiffer, 1865)
Opisthosiphon caguanense (Torre and Bartsch,
1941)
Parachondria clenchi (Bartsch, 1946)
Parachondria canescens (Pfeiffer, 1852)
Parachondria dentatus (Say, 1825)
Parachondria gettlemani (Watters, 2012)
Parachondria pilsbryi (bartsch, 1946)
Parachondria trachyderma (Pilsbry, 1933)
Pomatias elegans (Miiller, 1774)
Pomatias elegans (Miiller, 1774)
Rolleia oberi Watters and Duffy, 2010
Superipoma asymmetricum (Pilsbry, 1933)
Superbipoma superbum (Henderson and
Simpson, 1902)
Tessaripoma alyshae (Watters and Duffy, 2010)
Tudorella ferruginea (Lamarck, 1822)
Tudorella sulcata (Draparnaud, 1805)
Tudorella sulcata (Draparnaud, 1805)
Xenopoma spinosossimum Torre and Bartsch,
194]
GenBank (COIJ/ 12S/ H3)
KX863613/ KX863593/ NA
KX863618/ KX863597/ NA
MT119703/ NA/ NA
KX496730/ NA/ NA
KX863603/ KX863582/ NA
KX863604/ KX863583/ NA
KX496677/ NA/ NA
MT119704/ NA/ MT119744
JQ964715/ JQ990569/ NA
MT119686/ NA/ NA
KX863614/ NA/ NA
KX863605/ KX863584/ NA
KX863606/ KX863585/ NA
KX863607/ NA/ NA
KX863608/ NA/ NA
MT119682/ NA/ MT119735
MT119680/ NA/ NA
MT119694/ MT119725/ NA
MT119700/ NA/ MT119732
MT119708/ NA/ NA
MT119697/ MT119720/
Maia 729
MT119688/ MT119727/
MT119738
MT119715/ MT119728/ NA
MT119714/ NA/ MT119748
MT119678/NA/NA
MT119689/ NA/ MT119746
MT119702/ NA/ MT119737
MT119710/ NA/ MT119750
MT119709/ NA/ MT119747
JQ964789/ JQ990643/ NA
KX496707/ NA/ NA
MT119701/ NA/ NA
KX863615/ NA/ NA
KX86361/ KX863592/ NA
MT119685/ NA/ NA
JQ964788.1/ JQ990642/ NA
GQ370447/ NA/ NA
GQ370448/ NA/ NA
MT119693/ NA/ NA
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Source Accession
OSUM 42379
OSUM 42364
GTW 14630e
GTW 7089b
OSUM 42366
OSUM 42372
GTW 7172b
GTW 15700a
ANSP:]BS147-01
GTW 7170i
OSUM 42380
OSUM 42373
OSUM 42367
OSUM 42374
OSUM 42376
GTW 7088b
GTW 7064d
GTW 10081b
GTW 13813b
GTW 16493e
GTW 113871b
GTW 8707e
GTW 16595a
GTW 16518b
GTW 179e
GTW 8709f
GTW 14626b
GTW 16505b
GTW 16495f
USDA_O7FRA03-
Ol
OSUM 43254
GTW 14180b
OSUM 42369
OSUM 42360
GTW 7169c
USDA: Iber99A-01
RES1,2,3
ROU1,2,3
GTW 9436d
Locale
Bartolomé, DR
Bombita, DR
Hispaniolan Pine Biome,
DR
Virgen de San Rafael, DR
Virgen de San Rafael, DR
Carbon de Polla, DR
Las Mercedes, DR
Ivy Store, Jamaica
Clarendon Parish, Jamaica
Cabo Rojo, DR
Oviedo, DR
Carbon de Polla, DR
Rio Palomino, DR
Cabral, DR
E] Limén, DR
Oviedo, DR
Antigua
El Valle, DR
Caro Clara, DR
Majugual, DR
Loma del Puerto, DR
Great Exuma, Bahamas
Cayo Coco, Cuba
Talanquera, DR
Holguin, Cuba
Key West, USA
Virgen de San Raphael, DR
La Isabella, DR
Cabrera, DR
Aquitaine, France
Ortilos, Hungary
La Cumbre, DR
Puerto Escondido, DR
Bartolomé, DR
Puerto Alejandro, DR
Balearic Islands, Spain
Resquiadou, France
Roucas-Blanc,France
Cueto, Cuba
THE NAUTILUS 134(1):35, 2020 Page 39
Editor's Note
G. Thomas Watters, February 28, 1953—October 10, 2019
The previous article, headed by G. Thomas Watters of the Museum of Biological Diversity at Ohio State University, had
been reviewed and was being revised when Tom was diagnosed with cancer in June 2019. Tom left us in October 2019,
after fighting the malignancy for four months. Co-authors Megan L. Smith and David J. Sneddon carefully completed the
revision and sent the final copy for publication earlier this year.
Tom was a Consulting Editor for The Nautilus, wrote frequently in the journal, and was a strong supporter of the
journal’s publisher, the Bailey-Matthews National Shell Museum, since its inception. In a recent conversation about Tom
with citizen scientist and common friend Harry G. Lee, he offered that Tom was a multidisciplinary malacologist in the
best tradition of American workers such as Dall, Gould, Pilsbry, and Clench, who were equally proficient and productive
working with marine, freshwater, and terrestrial mollusks. Tom will be sorely missed as a husband, father, scientist and
professor at his alma mater, Ohio State University. I will also miss him as a personal friend and an advocate for this journal.
José H. Leal, Editor
The Nautilus
Bailey-Matthews National Shell Museum
Figure 1. G. Thomas Watters at work as an R. Tucker Abbott Visiting Curator in the Bailey-Matthews National Shell Museum
collection, in 2008. Photo by José H. Leal.
THE NAUTILUS 134(1):36-44, 2020
Page 36
Cittarium pica (Linnaeus, 1758) (Gastropoda: Trochoidea:
Tegulidae) in southeastern Florida
Anton E. Oleinik
Alexander B. Modys
Angelina M. Tetu
Department of Geosciences
Florida Atlantic University
Boca Raton, FL 33431
[email protected]
ABSTRACT
Fossil and subfossil specimens of the West Indian Top Shell,
Cittarium pica (Linnaeus, 1758) are found in the Pleistocene
rocks and Holocene Native American middens in southeastern
Florida. The occurrence of both living and fossil C. pica cor-
responds to hard substrate, represented by rocks exposed both
above and below the water level. Pleistocene specimens are
found in the Miami Limestone in Miami-Dade County and, for
the first time, in the Anastasia Formation in Martin County. In
both localities, C. pica are found in the vicinity of Pleistocene
rocky shorelines. The same pattern is found for Holocene oc-
currences from archeological digs. Absence of C. pica in
southern Florida today is likely related to the elimination of
suitable habitats during the Holocene marine transgression.
Additional Keywords: Rocky habitats, Pleistocene, Holocene
transgression, southern Florida
INTRODUCTION
The trochoidean gastropod, Cittarium pica (Linnaeus,
1758), also known as the West Indian Top Snail, currently
prospers in multiple tropical and subtropical areas of the
western Atlantic: Mexico, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia,
Venezuela, Bahamas, Cuba, Cayman Islands, Jamaica,
Bermuda, Haiti, and Dominican Republic. The northern
limits of the species distribution in the western Atlantic are
considered to be Bermuda, northern Bahamas (Abacos and
Bimini), and the Florida Keys. The larvae of C. pica are
lecitotrophic, with a life span of 3 to 14 days (Bell, 1992;
Hadfield, et al., 1997). From a dispersal standpoint, the
larvae survive long enough to reach Bermuda from the
northern Bahamas (Robertson, 2003; Olson and Hearty,
2013). The population of C. pica in Bermuda had suffered
periodic extinctions during historical times. These have been
attributed to human over-collecting. The animal’s flesh is
widely used for food throughout the West Indies (Olson and
Hearty, 2013). Artificial reintroductions have been performed
several times with very limited success, and harvesting of
the species is now illegal in Bermuda (Robertson, 2003).
Whereas over-collecting might have played a significant role
in eliminating or severely limiting the C. pica population in
Bermuda, Olson and Hearty (2013) suggested temperature
as the primary natural limiting factor for that northernmost
recorded marginal habitat of C. pica in the western Atlantic
during the Holocene and Pleistocene.
While common in the Bahamas today, this species is
nearly absent along the southeastern Florida coast
(Martin, Palm Beach, and Dade counties), at the same
geographical latitude (Figure 1). It is regarded as “rarely”
occurring, or having a “dynamic population” in the Florida
Keys (Monroe County), and has occasionally even been
designated as “locally extinct” in Florida (Abbott, 1974;
Robertson, 2003; Olson and Hearty, 2013). Several
reintroductions of C. pica to the Florida Keys from the
Bahamas have been attempted between the years 1930
and 1960, presumably from Cay Sal Bank, Bahamas, with
limited degrees of success (Clench and Abbott, 1943;
Clench, 1961; Abbott, 1976; Edwards, 1982). Stephenson
and Stephenson (1950) did not mention C. pica in their
study of the Florida Keys intertidal ecology. Voss and Voss
(1960) suggested that all specimens found in the Florida
Keys were accidentally brought from the Bahamas and
Cuba by fisherman, and suggested the absence of “proper
habitats” for the species in the Florida Keys.
All published observations on the ecology of C. pica,
clearly suggest that the occurrence, survival, and successful
reproduction of the species in the western Atlantic is
strongly dependent on the presence of rocky intertidal
habitats. These habitats can be comprised of rock of any
origin, but must have abundant exposed surfaces both below
and above sea level. It also appears that the rocky habitat,
protected or unprotected, must be facing the “open sea”
(Herrera et al., 2012; Debrot, 1990; Bandel and Wedler,
1987; Vermeij, 1972, 1973; Randall, 1964; Robertson,
2003; Houbrick, 1968; Redfern, 2001; Humfrey, 1975;
Urosa,1972). The reference to the “open sea” is likely
related to an additional limiting factor for the successful
A.E. Oleinik et al., 2020
N
Pinellas
County
Melbourne
Hillborough
.\ County |
eee | Martin County
X , Charlotte —
q { $ County |
\X West Palm Beach
| Palm Beach County
|
|
Ft. Lauderdale |
RTE ORE TOs ae County
(
Monroe | : '
Miami
County Miami-Dade
| County
Marathon ~ %
oS Wi. i
Key West gS™ © “Meare
0 50 100 150
_—
eh ei
Page 37
30°N:
Pleistocene, Anastasia
Formation, Stuart,
House of Refuge
Holocene, archeological
sites, from Hillsboro
Inlet to Singer Island
Pleistocene, Miami
limestone, Miami
Key Largo
Holocene, Tequesta 25°N
Indians middens
Plantation Key
iy fe
We
Recent colony at
East Sister Rock
off Marathon
80°W
Figure 1. Occurrence of Cittarium pica in Florida (Pleistocene through Recent).
survival of C. pica populations mentioned in the literature—a
low tolerance of the species to freshwater intru-
sions. Such a pattern is documented along northern
Colombia where there are dwindling populations of
otherwise abundant C. pica. Studied areas in Colombia
were not subjected to extreme harvesting, and have the
necessary rocky intertidal habitats for this species to
survive. However, low salinity in these regions was
Page 38
correlated with the animal’s failure to thrive (Herrera
et al., 2012). Freshwater input such as river flow will
most likely negatively affect any C. pica habitat. Low
salinity can, potentially, be a localized limiting factor,
which would be more important next to large land-
masses with river discharge. The Florida Peninsula is a
large landmass compared to most Caribbean Islands.
However, lack of suitable habitats makes it difficult to
assess the importance of reduced salinity as a factor
limiting C. pica populations in Florida.
As with the majority of marine gastropods, the size
distribution of Cittarium pica increases with distance from
the shoreline. Juveniles are known to flourish closer to the
shore, in the intertidal zone, while mature C. pica are able
to survive in subtidal areas (Humfrey,1975; Robertson,
2003). Juvenile C. pica are particularly dependent on rocky
surfaces within the intertidal zones, attaching themselves to
rock surfaces during their most vulnerable developmental
stages (Urosa,1972). Cittarium pica reach sexual maturity
at a shell length (diameter) of 32-34 mm. Adult C. pica
grow much larger shells, often exceeding 100 mm (Rob-
ertson, 2003). It has also been noted that specimens of C.
pica living in wave-exposed habitats have a smaller average
shell size, and reach maturity at smaller shell sizes, than in
sheltered habitats. This has been attributed to lower rates
of survival and growth, mainly due to higher activity of
shell-drilling and crushing predators in open habitats ex-
posed to wave action (Debrot, 1990).
Fossils of C. pica in the western Atlantic are known from
rocks no older than the Pleistocene. A well-documented
Pleistocene record of C. pica in Bermuda goes back to
the Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 11, approximately 400,000
ybp (Epstein and Lowenstam, 1953; Richards et al, 1969;
Olson and Hearty, 2013). In Jamaica, C. pica is recorded
from the late Pleistocene, Last Interglacial (Donovan and
Littlewood, 1993), presumably MIS 5. Pleistocene occur-
rences in southeastern Florida were cited as “quite common”
by Abbott and Morris (1995). However, the only published
record that provides details on locality is the occurrence in the
Miami Limestone mentioned by Halley and Evans (1983).
The presence of fossils in “subrecent”, probably Holocene
deposits, was noted for Cuba, Aruba, Curagao, and Barbados
(Weisbord, 1962). Numerous shells of the C. pica were found
in the southeastern Florida and Florida Keys in the late
Holocene Tequesta (Native American tribe) middens, (Gog-
gin, 1944; Wheeler et al, 2002) (Figure 1). The focus of this
paper is to examine Pleistocene through Recent occurrences
of C. pica in southeastern Florida, with reference to its habitat,
in order to evaluate factors potentially controlling the occur-
rence and distribution of the species in south Florida.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Four complete (UF 307072-UF 307074, UF 317477) and
three fragmented specimens of C. pica were collected
from an outcrop of Miami Limestone at the intersection of
First Avenue (Kagoshima Boulevard) and 13 Street
(Coral Way), in Coral Gables, Florida (25°45.733’ N,
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
80°11.716’ W) by the senior author. The outcrop is about
5.5 m above the present sea level, with an exposed thickness
of approximately 3 m. A shell lag deposit of smaller mollusks
co-occurs with larger shells of C. pica. Halley and Evans
(1983) listed bryozoan fragments, a small bivalve Donax sp.,
as well as several fossilized corals (Porites sp., Siderastrea sp.
and Montastraea cavernosa) at this outcrop (Figure 1). A
single specimen of C. pica (UF 307071) was collected by the
senior author at the base of the 3.5 m high beach cliff of the
Anastasia formation in Stewart, Martin County (27°12/00.59"
N, 80°09'56.05” W). The locality is known as the “House of
Refuge” (Lovejoy, 1998) (Figure 1). At this location, the rock
is a tan-colored, sandy, and a poorly sorted planar-bedded
coquina with granular texture and abundant shell hash.
Shells of C. pica are easily identifiable by their shape, and
preserved characteristic black and white color pattern. All
collected shells had broken apertures, and were abraded to
various degrees (Figures 2-9), indicating reworking in a
nearshore zone.
All fossil specimens illustrated in this article (Figures _
2-9) are deposited in the Florida Museum at the Uni-
versity of Florida in Gainesville (UF). During the summers
of 2018 and 2019 the senior author conducted a number of
boat-based surveys of all the localities in the Florida Keys
where living C. pica had been collected between 1973 and
1975 (Abbott, 1976). These localities were: yacht basin at
Marathon (24°42'12.42” N:; 81°05'39.17” W), East Sister
Rock off Marathon (24°41'12.93” N; 81°04'28.37” W),
Molasses Keys (24°41'08.67" N; 81°11/17.34” W), and the
ocean side of the Ohio-Missouri Keys channel (24°40'32.64"
N; 81°14'20.79” W). The surveys recorded the presence or
absence of live C. pica and/or dead shells, the type of habitat/
substrate, the water temperature at the time of collecting,
depth of occurrence, the size of observed individuals, and
their approximate number.
Museum collections worldwide were searched for the
fossil and recent records of C. pica in Florida. Institutional
acronyms used are: UF: Florida Museum of Natural
History, Gainesville; USNM: National Museum of Nat-
ural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC;
OPM: Okinawa Prefectural & Art Museum, Okinawa,
Japan; OMNH: Osaka Museum of Natural History,
Osaka, Japan; CM: Carnegie Museum of Natural History,
Pittsburgh; MCZ: Museum of Comparative Zoology,
Harvard University, Cambridge; ZMB Moll: Museum fiir
Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany, RMNH.MO & ZMA.
MOL: Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
GEOLOGIC SETTING
The late Pleistocene formations of southern Florida, Miami
Limestone, Anastasia Formation, and upper part of the Key
Largo Limestone were deposited during the Sangamonian
interglacial period, also referred to as Marine Isotope Stage
5e (MIS 5e) dated at approximately 125,000 ybp. In southern
Florida, within this timeframe, sea level was estimated to be
approximately 6.7 m above that of today (Hickey et al., 2010).
This warm period lasted approximately 10 ka (Shackleton,
A.E. Oleinik et al., 2020
Page 39
Figures 2-5. Cittarium pica, UF307072, Pleistocene, Sangamonian, Miami Limestone, Miami. Figures 6-9. Cittarium pica,
UF307071, Pleistocene, Sangamonian, Anastasia Formation, Stuart.
1969). Uranium-series dating (Th?°/U*4) of oolite samples
from the Miami Limestone yielded ages of approximately
130,000 ybp. These results are contemporaneous with the
uppermost part of the Key Largo Limestone (Osmond et al,
1965; Broeker & Thurber, 1965).
The Miami Limestone (Sanford, 1909) has been sub-
divided into three distinct facies: the bryozoan facies, the
mottled facies and the bedded facies. Of these three, the
mottled and the bedded facies are confined to the topo-
graphic high of the Atlantic Coastal Ridge, where they are
exposed in a vertical succession (Evans, 1982). Shells of C.
pica were found in one of the outcrops of the bedded facies.
The locality and the facies were described as the “islands on
the shoals”, and the occurrence of C. pica was recorded by
Halley and Evans (1983). The locality consists of a layer of
carbonate conglomerate on top of an erosional surface, and
overlain by low-angle seaward-dipping beds. The low dip
angles (5—18°) of these beds are indicative of a low-angle
beach berm. The conglomerate deposits contain fragments
of reworked corals: Porites sp., Siderastrea sp., and Mon-
tastrea sp., as well as cemented fragments of the cross-
bedded Miami Limestone. This indicates that these pieces
were already cemented and were incorporated into a beach
or nearshore deposit in a fully cemented state. These facies
of the Miami Limestone are interpreted as deposited at or
near the shoreline, in the proximity of islands composed of
cemented oolitic limestone (Halley and Evans, 1983).
The Anastasia Formation (Sellards, 1912) is considered
to be the youngest lithified deposit along Florida’s
southeastern coast (Perkins, 1977; Petuch, 2007). It
consists of interbedded quartz sand, and coquina lime-
stone, cemented by quartz and calcite cement. There are
also whole and fragmented remains of mollusks, por-
iferans, bryozoans, arthropods, echinoderms, and some
vertebrate remains (Scott, 1991; DuBar, 1974; Portell
et al., 2003). Both U7*4/Th?”” dating (Osmond et al., 1970)
and amino-acid racemization dating of contained bivalve
fragments (Mitterer,1974) yielded a date of deposition of
approximately 110,000 ybp. It should be noted that
younger radiocarbon dates (8500-9000 ybp) for the
Anastasia Formation were obtained from Anastasia Island
in northeastern Florida (Murphy, 1973). It is therefore
possible that parts of the Anastasia Formation, especially
to the north, are diachronous to the Anastasia Formation
rocks in the south. The Anastasia Formation is exposed
along the coastline of Florida from St. Augustine in the
north, to Boca Raton in the south (Scott, 1991; Lovejoy,
1998). It is also widely exposed underwater, at depths
of 3-7 m in Broward and Palm Beach counties. The
Anastasia Formation in Martin and Palm Beach counties
forms the foundation of the Atlantic Coastal Ridge. South
of Palm Beach County, it grades into the oolitic Miami
Limestone. Thickness of the Anastasia Formation varies
from 5.5 m of surface exposure in Palm Beach County, to
37.8 m in a subsurface section in Brevard County (Parker
et. al, 1955; DuBar, 1974). The depositional environment
of the Anastasia Formation in coastal outcrops is tradi-
tionally interpreted as a high-energy offshore sand bar,
Page 40
which was later cemented and exposed as beachrock
(DuBar, 1974; McNeill, 1985; Lovejoy, 1987).
RESULTS
Pleistocene specimens of C. pica from southern Florida
(Figures 2-9) were only found at locations where geologic
evidence indicates the existence of a hard rock substrate
or exposure, at or near the site of collection. Specimens
from the Miami Limestone attain a size of up to 60 mm in
diameter and 58 mm in height, suggesting that they
represented adults or young adults. No museum records
of Pleistocene or older specimens of C. pica were located.
Specimens collected from the Pleistocene in Bermuda are
stored at the Yale Peabody Museum, Invertebrate Pale-
ontology Division. Cittarium pica in the Miami Limestone
co-occur with Diodora listeri, both diagnostic of hard
rocky substrates. Halley and Harris (1979) concluded that
the rocky islands, made from cemented oolite, had formed
late in the depositional history of the Miami Limestone
before the sea-level fall during MIS2. Alternatively, the
islands could have been exposed above the sea level, as a
result of minor sea-level fall during MIS 5. Formation of
hard substrates composed of lithified skeletal sand along
the coastal zone could have occurred simultaneously to
the north, in Palm Beach County, as a result of similar
processes, forming the coquinoid limestone of the
Anastasia Formation (Figure 14). The specimen of C. pica
found in situ in the coquinoid limestone of the Anastasia
Formation in Martin County supports that conclusion. It
is also the northernmost Pleistocene specimen of C. pica
found in southeastern Florida.
A survey in the summers of 2018-2019 of the localities
in the Florida Keys reported to have living populations of
C. pica by Abbott (1976) revealed that only one such
population still persists, the one along the western side
of East Sister Rock off Marathon, (24°41'12.82” N;
81°04'29.22” W) (Figure 1). The majority of the observed
specimens, both living and dead, were 9-10 cm in di-
ameter, but one small, juvenile specimen (3 cm in di-
ameter) was found dead. The presence of multiple living
adult specimens in July of 2019, suggests the existence of a
breeding population at this locality. All live specimens
found at East Sister Rock were observed at a depth of 1-2
m, on broad underwater rock exposures of the Key Largo
Limestone along the western side of East Sister Rock
(Figures 10, 11). At least some of these rocks could
have been artificially placed there to enhance shoreline
protection.
Very fresh, dead shells of Cittarium pica were also
recorded in the Dry Tortugas, in the vicinity of Fort
Jefferson (Figures 12, 13). Shells of C. pica were carried
by land hermit crabs, Coenobita clypeatus (Fabricius,
1787) just as happens in Bermuda. Museum records
contain shells of C. pica from Dry Tortugas, particularly
from the Bush Key, that were collected from Native
American middens (UF 9588, 9591-9598). Although live
C. pica were not observed in the Dry Tortugas, the
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
freshness of shells carried by C. clypeatus suggest the
likelihood of a live C. pica colony in that area.
DISCUSSION
Temporal patterns of extinction and recolonization of C.
pica in Bermuda (32° N) during the Quaternary clearly
indicate that temperature was a main factor determining
survival of this species at the northernmost extent of its
range.
This trend corresponds well to climate changes during
the glacial-interglacial stages. Cold sea-surface tempera-
tures during the glacial periods, and the onset of cold sea-
surface temperatures (SST) after MIS 5e made Bermuda
uninhabitable for C. pica. The appearance of C. pica
during the warmer interglacial (MIS 11, 9, 5, and 1) clearly
demonstrates the dependence of this species on warm
tropical waters. It was also noted that lowering of sea level
during glacial stages (MIS 12, 10, 8, 6, and 2) helped to
form extensive, exposed rocky surfaces at sea level,
resulting in creation of an ideal habitat for C. pica (Olson
and Hearty, 2013). Cittarium pica re-appeared in Ber-
muda in the 17 and 18™ centuries (MIS1), only to be
apparently exterminated by humans for food (Clench and
Abbott, 1943; Robertson, 2003; Olson and Hearty, 2013).
Low winter water temperatures are not likely to be a
contributing factor to the near absence of C. pica in
southeastern Florida today. This species inhabits areas at
the same latitude and with similar temperature ranges in
the Bahamas. The sea surface temperatures range from
23.1°C (January) to 30.8°C (August) for West End, Grand
Bahama Island, Bahamas, and from 23°C (January) to
30°C (August) in Key West, Florida (World Sea Tem-
peratures, 2019). This is similar to a temperature toler-
ance range of the C. pica throughout the western Atlantic.
The average monthly sea temperatures recorded in
Lameshur Bay, St. John, during the C. pica growth period
(Summer) ranged from 26.7 to 29.9°C (Randall, 1964).
Winter temperatures can occasionally fall to 19°C in parts
of southern Florida, but not for extended periods of time.
Coastal areas off Miami-Dade, Palm Beach and Martin
Counties are also not affected by summer upwelling in the
Straits of Florida (Taylor and Stewart, 1959; Smith, 1981;
Pitts and Smith, 1992). The presence of a living colony of
C. pica on hard rock substrate at East Sister Rock, off
Marathon also suggests that the low winter temperatures
in southern Florida are most likely not an obstacle for the
successful survival of this species. The major difference
between southeastern Florida and the western Bahamas is
not in sea surface temperature but in the presence of
abundant exposed and shallow submerged rocky habitats
in the Bahamas that are absent in Florida. Today, C. pica
commonly occur in Bimini, Bahamas at 25° N (the same
latitude as Miami, Florida), and up to 27° N, in Abaco,
Bahamas. All occurrences in the Bahamas are on intertidal
to subtidal exposed rocks, a preferred habitat of this
species (Abbott, 1974). Abbott (1976) and Edwards
(1983) had commented on several living populations of
A.E. Oleinik et al., 2020
12
Page 41]
13
Figures 10-11. Live Cittarium pica (Linnaeus,1758) at the East Sister Rock, off Marathon F lorida Keys, photo taken July 2019.
Figures 12-13. Very freshly dead shells of the Cittarium pica in Fort Jefferson, Dry Tortugas, Florida, carried by land hermit crabs
Coenobita clypeatus. Photo by Scott Oropeza in August 2019, courtesy of Dale Bittner.
C. pica that were either purposefully, or accidentally
introduced by man or, possibly, arrived as floating larvae.
Edwards (1983), referring to a letter from William
J. Clench, stated that live C. pica were brought from the
Cay Sal Bank, Bahamas, and released at Marathon in the
early 1950 by Richard Decker and Al Pflueger. Pre-
sumably, the population on East Sister Rock observed by
the senior author, had survived since that time. The
living C. pica population on East Sister Rock in Mara-
thon, although the only one directly observed by the
senior author, may not be the only one in existence in
Florida. Examination of the museum records, revealed
an occurrence pattern that may suggest the presence of
live C. pica in Florida, north of Florida Keys, on rocky
substrates. Apart from outright erroneous museum lo-
cality data like “India” (OPM 702791, 702792), “USA
Texas” (OMNH KJ29), “Indonesia” (ZMB Moll 92203),
“Tanzania, Zanzibar” (ZMA.MOLL.99822), “Chile” (CM
#62.23049), and one confirmed erroneous record from
Saint Petersburg, Florida (RMNH.MOL. 296543, Ste-
ven van der Mije, pers. comm, Nov. 2019), all records
from Florida fall into two broad categories. In the first
category are shells collected from Native American
middens. The majority of these were collected in Dry
Tortugas (Bush Key) and some in the southwestern
Florida, in Collier (UF 234620) and Sarasota (MCZ
282977) counties. In the second category are fresh and/
or live collected shells. Most of these are from the Lower
Keys, Monroe County: Big Pine Key (UF 122094), Bahia
Honda Key (UF 52197), Sawyers Key (UF 153286), Boca
Chica Key (USNM 1410655), Little Duck Key (2008, UF
434273), Monroe County (?), between Cape Sable and
Cape Romano (UF 321485. There are also two records in
this category that may suggest survival of C. pica on the
rocky bottom as far north as Jupiter, Palm Beach County
(UF 153287), and Pinellas County, NW of Tarpon
Springs (UF 9589) in southwestern Florida (Figure 1).
The same specimen from Jupiter (UF 153287), collected
Page 42
in 1946 was considered to be subfossil or fossil. It has been
described as “chalky with loss of the dark pigmentation in
their shells, which was replaced by a muted brown color”
(Clench and Abbott, 1943; Robertson, 2003), yet reported
as “unabraded possibly live collected” (John Slapcinsky,
pers. comm, Dec 2019). Specimens from Pinellas County
(UF9589), on the other hand, look fresh and were collected
as a bycatch by sponge fisherman (John Slapcinsky, pers.
comm. Dec. 2019). Specimens of C. pica sometimes found
on the beach throughout Broward and Palm Beach
counties were usually interpreted as eroded recent shells,
possibly brought from the Bahamas. A specimen of similar
preservation was found by the first author of this paper at
Pompano Beach in 2018.
The Holocene MIS 1 records of C. pica in Florida
comes from archeological digs of the Tequesta Natives
middens on Plantation Key (24°N), and as far north on the
southeastern coast of Florida as Boca Raton and Boynton
Beach, at 26°N (Goggin, 1944; Wheeler et al, 2002)
(Figure 1). Based on the ceramics, the archeological sites
in Boca Raton and Boynton Inlet, have been dated to the
Glades I and II periods, ~ 2500-800 ybp (Wheeler et al,
2002). Goggin (1948) noted that C. pica occurrences at
the archeological sites between Hillsboro Inlet and Singer
Island correspond to areas of rocky outcrops along the
shoreline, and observed that the abundance of C. pica
shells in southeastern Florida sites, and their proximity to
the rocky shorelines is an indication that shells were
collected locally for food, and not obtained by trade from
the Florida Keys or the Caribbean.
HOULOCENS
ee
PLE to see
See ee
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Sea level fall during the late Pleistocene (MIS 2) had
exposed broad areas of Pleistocene shallow shelf, and
aided further cementation of Pleistocene bedrock units,
including both the Miami Limestone to the south and the
Anastasia Formation to the north. The shoreline once
again moved seaward. Subsequent Holocene transgres-
sion flooded and currently conceals rocks of the age that
might contain more fossils of C. pica. Alternatively, C.
pica might have been absent from Florida during MIS2
because of the colder water temperatures during the Last
Glacial Maximum.
The Holocene sea-level rise following the Younger Dryas
event, however, did not reach levels as high as during the
Sangamonian Interglacial (MIS 5). Although an extensive
rocky shoreline comprised of coastal cliffs, known today as
the Anastasia Formation exists along the southeastern
Florida coastline, the cliffs are typically located above the
mean high tide and separated from the underwater out-
crops of the Anastasia Formation by extensive sand fields.
Holocene transgression also brought in a large amount of
transgressive sand to the eastern Florida coast (Hine, 2013).
The sand washed ashore, created today’s southeastern
Florida beaches, while simultaneously covering large por-
tions of the Anastasia Formation in areas immediately above
and below the tide line. All beaches of southeastern Florida
are underlain by Pleistocene bedrock. As the sea-level
gradually rose, transgressive sand gradually buried the ex-
posed hard substrates formed by both the Miami Limestone
and the Anastasia Formation, gradually splitting and
eliminating the remaining habitats of C. pica along the
MIS 1
Rising sea level deposit transgressive
sands that formed continuous
and extensive beaches. Sand
gradually buries the submerged
portions of limestone exposures
along the shoreline.
Exposed rocks are located
above or at high tide line.
Cittarium pica habitat is gradually
eliminated
shells found throughout Holocene
Tequesia indian middens near local
rock exposures.
MIS 2
Lowering of the sea-leve! during the
the glacial maximum. Cementation of
oolitic imestone and coquinoid
limestone of the Miami and Anastasia
formations. Cilttarium pica fossils
not found.
MIS 5
High stand sea-level during the
Sangamonian Interglacial
ieee OER aan ae Exposed limestone islands
‘il : provided hard substrate and
habitat for Cittarium pica
Figure 14. Diagram of the Pleistocene and Holocene sea-level changes related to Cittarium pica habitats in southern Florida.
A.E. Oleinik et al., 2020
southeastern Florida coast. That process continued throughout
the Holocene, with dwindling colonies of C. pica surviving
at suitable rocky habitats until completely buried by sand
(Figure 14). The absence of C. pica along the south-
eastern coast of Florida today, therefore, is most likely a
result of elimination of suitable habitats by sand burial,
during the Holocene transgression.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors express gratitude to Mr. Dale Bittner of Key
West, Florida for invaluable assistance with surveys of
Recent colonies of C. pica in the Florida Keys, infor-
mation, and photos of C. pica shells from Dry Tortugas.
Authors wish to thank Gustav Paulay and John Slapcinsky
of the Florida Museum, Jochen Gerber at the Field
Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Steven van der Mije
of the Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden, Nether-
lands, and Timothy A. Pearce of the Carnegie Museum,
Pittsburgh, for their assistance with museum specimen
data. Authors are also grateful to Roger Portell, Jerry
Harasewych, Smithsonian Institution, and Riidiger Bieler,
Field Museum of Natural History, for the constructive
review of the manuscript and helpful comments.
LITERATURE CITED
Abbott, R.T. and P.A. Morris. 1995. A Field Guide to Shells:
Atlantic and Gulf Coasts and the West Indies. Peterson
Field Guide series 3 Ed. 4 Houghton Mifflin, Boston,
xxxiiit+ 350 pp, 74 pls.
Abbott, R.T. 1974. American Seashells: The Marine Mollusca of
the Atlantic and Pacific Coasts of North America. Ed. 2. Van
Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 663 p, 24 pls.
Abbott, R.T. 1976. Cittarium pica (Trochidae) in Florida. The
Nautilus 90: 24.
Bandel K. and E. Wedler. 1987. Hydroid, amphineuran and
gastropod zonation in the littoral of the Caribbean Sea,
Colombia. Senckenbergiana Maritima 19: 1-129.
Bell, L.J. 1992. Reproductions and larval development of the
West Indian topshell, Cittarium pica (Trochidae) in the
Bahamas. Bulletin of Marine Science 51: 250-266.
Broeker, W.S. and D.L. Thurber. 1965. Uranium-series dating
of corals and oolites from Bahamian and Florida Keys
limestones. Science 149: 58-60.
Clench, W.J. 1961. Land and freshwater mollusks of Caicos,
Turks, ragged Islands and islands on the Cay Sal Bank,
Bahamas. Occasional Papers on Mollusks. Harvard Uni-
versity 2(26): 229-259.
Clench W.J. and R.T. Abbott. 1943. The genera Gaza and
Livonia in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia 1(12): 9.
Debrot, A.O. 1990. Survival, growth, and fecundity of the West
Indian topshell, Cittarium pica (Linnaeus), in various rocky
intertidal habitats of the Exuma Cays, Bahamas. The Ve-
liger 33: 363-371.
Donovan S.K. and D.T.]. Littlewood. 1993. The benthic mollusk
faunas of two contrasting reef paleosubenvironments:
Falmouth Formation (late Pleistocene, Last Interglacial),
Jamaica. The Nautilus 107: 33-42.
DuBar, J. R. 1974. Summary of the Neogene stratigraphy
of southern Florida. In: Oaks R. Q., Jr, DuBar J. R. (Eds.)
Post-Miocene Stratigraphy Central and Southern Atlantic
Page 43
Coastal Plain. Utah State Cooke University Press, Logan,
Utah, pp. 206-231.
Edwards, C.E. 1982. More about Cittarium pica (Linnaeus,
1758). Of Sea & Shore 12(3):169-170.
Epstein, S. and H.A. Lowenstam. 1953. Temperature-shell-
growth relations of Recent and interglacial Pleistocene
shoal-water biota from Bermuda. Journal of Geology
61(5): 424-438.
Evans, C.C. 1982. Aspects of the Depositional and Diage-
netic History of the Miami Limestone: Control of Pri-
mary Sedimentary Fabric Over Early Cementation and
Porosity Development. Unpublished Master’s Thesis,
University of Miami.
Goggin, J.M. 1944. Archeological investigations on the Upper
Florida Keys. Tequesta: The Journal of the Historical As-
sociation of Southern Florida 1(4): 13-35.
Goggin, J.M. 1948. Florida archeology and Recent ecological
changes. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
OSGw22 £238.
Hadfield, M.G., M.F. Strathmann, and R.R. Strathmann. 1997.
Ciliary currents of non-feeding veligers in putative clades of
gastropods. Invertebrate Biology 116: 313 —321.
Halley, R.B. and P.M. Harris. 1979. Fresh-water cementation of
a 1000-year old oolite. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 49:
969-988.
Halley, R.B. and C.C. Evans. 1983. The Miami Limestone, a
Guide to Selected Outcrops and their Interpretations (With
a Discussion of Diagenesis in the Formation). Miami
Geological Society, 67 pp.
Herrera, T.C., B.T. Restrepo, and J. Rosique. 2012. Some as-
pects of the bioecology of the West Indian topshell Cit-
tarium pica (Mollusca: Gasteropoda) in the Darien
Colombian Caribbean. Boletin Cientifico. Centro de
Museos. Museo de Historia Natural 16(2): 162-172.
Hickey, T. D.,. A.C. Hine, E.A.. Shinn pStks Kruse sane) FZ.
Poore. 2010. Pleistocene Carbonate Stratigraphy of South
Florida: Evidence for High-Frequency Sea-Level cyclicity.
Journal of Coastal Research 26: 605-614.
Hine, A.C. 2013. Geologic History of Florida; Major Events that
Formed the Sunshine State. University Press of Florida,
229 pp.
Houbrick, J. [Richard S]. 1968. A survey of the littoral marine
mollusks of the Caribbean cost of Costa Rica. The Veliger
hie Aa
Humfrey, M. 1975. Sea Shells of the West Indies; A Guide to the
Marine Mollusks of the Caribbean. Taplinger, New York, 351
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae. Editi
decima, reformata. Holmiae, Regnum Animale, 1, 824 pp.
Lovejoy, D.W. 1987. The Anastasia Formation in Palm Beach
and Martin counties, Florida. In: Maurrasse, J.M.R. (Ed.)
Symposium on South Florida Geology. Miami Geological
Society Memoir 3: 58 —72.
Lovejoy, D.W. 1998. Classic Exposures of the Anastasia For-
mation in Martin and Palm Beach Counties, Florida:
Guidebook for Combined Southeastern Geological Society
and Miami Geological Society Field Trip, 31 pp.
McNeill, D.F. 1985. Coastal geology and the occurrence of
beachrock: Central Florida Atlantic Coast. Part I. Geo-
logical Society of America Annual Meeting Guidebook,
Field Trip 4, 27 pp.
Mitterer, R.M. 1974. Pleistocene stratigraphy in southern
Florida based on amino acid diagenesis in fossil Mercenaria.
Geology 2: 425-428.
Page 44
Murphy, J.M. 1973. Holocene Diagenesis of the Anastasia
Formation. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Duke University,
Durham, 104 pp.
Olson, S.L. and P.J. Hearty. 2013. Periodicity of extinction and
recolonization of the West Indian topshell Cittarium pica in
the Quaternary of Bermuda (Gastropoda: Trochoidea).
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 110: 235-243.
Osmond, J.K., ].R. Carpenter, and H.L. Windom. 1965. oye
age of the Pleistocene corals and oolites of Florida. Journal of
Geophysical Research 70: 1843 —1847.
Osmond, J.K., J.P. May, and W.F. Tanner. 1970. Age of the Cape
Kennedy barrier and lagoon complex. Journal of Geo-
physical Research 75: 468 —479.
Parker, G.G., N.D. Hoy, and M.C. Schroeder. 1955. Geology.
In: Parker, G.G., G.E. Ferguson, S.K. Love, et al. (Eds.)
Water Resources in Southeastern Florida. U.S. Geological
Survey Water-Supply Paper 1255: 57-125.
Perkins, R.D. 1977. Depositional framework of Pleistocene
rocks in south Florida. In: Enos P., and R.D. Perkins (Eds.)
Quaternary Sedimentation in South Florida. Geological
Society of America Memoir 147: 131-198.
Petuch, E.J. 2007. The Geology of the Everglades and Adjacent
Areas. CRC Press, 212 pp.
Pitts, P.A. and N.P. Smith. 1992. An Investigation of Summer
Upwelling Across Central Florida’s Atlantic Coast: The Case
for Wind Stress Forcing. Journal of Coastal Research 13:
105=1 10:
Portell, R.W., R.L. Turner R. L., and J.L. Beerensson. 2003.
Occurrence of the Atlantic ghost crab Ocypode quadrata from
the Upper Pleistocene to Holocene Anastasia Formation of
Florida. Journal of Crustacean Biology 23: 712-722.
Randall, H.A. 1964. A study of the growth and other aspects of
biology of the West Indian topshell, Cittarium pica (Lin-
naeus). Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Ca-
ribbean 14: 424-443.
Redfern, C. 2001. Bahamian Seashells: A Thousand Species from
Abaco, Bahamas. Bahamianshells.com, Boca Raton, 280 pp.
Robertson, R. 2003. The edible West Indian “whelk” Cittarium
pica (Gastropoda: Trochidae): Natural history with new
observations. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural
Sciences of Philadelphia 153: 27-47.
Richards, H.G., R.T. Abbott, and T. Skymer. 1969. The marine
Pleistocene mollusks of Bermuda. Notulae Naturae,
Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 425: 1-10.
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Sanford, S. 1909. Topography and geology of southern Florida.
Florida Geological Survey 97 Annual Report: 177-231.
Scott, T.M. 1991. A geological overview in Florida. In: Scott,
T.M, G.M. Lloyd, and G. Maddox (Eds.) Florida’s Ground
Water Quality Monitoring Program Hydrogeological Net-
work. Florida Geological Survey Special Publication 32:
aan
Sellards, E.H. 1912. The soils and other surface residual ma-
terials of Florida: Florida Geological Survey Fourth Annual
Report: 1-79.
Shackleton, N.J. 1969. The Last Interglacial in the marine and
terrestrial records. Proceeding of the Royal Society London
B 174 3aslo#
Smith N.P. 1981. An Investigation of seasonal upwelling along
the Atlantic Coast of Florida. In: Nihoul, J.C.J. (Ed.)
Ecohydrodynamics: Proceedings of the 12" international
Liége Colloquium on Ocean Hydrodynamics: 79-98.
Stephenson, T.A. and A. Stephenson. 1950. Life between tide-
marks in North America. I. The Florida Keys. Journal of
Ecology 38: 354-402.
Taylor, C.B. and H.B. Stewart. 1959. Summer Upwelling along
the East Coast of Florida. Journal of Geophysical Research
6455-40) |
Urosa, L.J. 1972. Zonacion en un sector de la costa sur del Golfo
de Cariaco, Venezuela. Lagena, Instituto Oceanogrdfico,
Universisdad de Oriente, Cumana, 30: 3-8.
Vermeij, G.J. 1972. Intraspecific shore-level size gradients in
intertidal molluscs. Ecology 53: 693-700.
Vermeij, G.J. 1973. West Indian molluscan communities in the
rocky intertidal zone: A morphological approach. Bulletin of
Marine Science 23: 351-386.
Voss, G.L. and N.A. Voss. 1960. An ecological survey of the
marine invertebrates of Bimini, Bahamas, with a con-
sideration of their zoogeographical relationships. Bul-
letin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean 10:
96—1 16,
Weisbord, N.E. 1962. Late Cenozoic gastropods from northern
Venezuela. Bulletins of American Paleontology 49 (193):
1-672, 48 pls.
Wheeler, R.J., W.J. Kennedy, and J.P. Pepe. 2002. The ar-
chaeology of coastal Palm Beach County. Florida An-
thropologist 55(3-4): 12-49.
World Sea Temperatures, 2019 https:/Avww.seatemperature.org/
north-america/united-states/florida/
THE NAUTILUS 134(1):45-50, 2020
Page 45
Two new species of genus Bathyacmaea trom deep-sea
chemosynthetic areas in the western Pacific (Gastropoda:
Pectinodontidae)
Shugqian Zhang"
Suping Zhang’
Laboratory of Marine Organism Taxonomy and Phylogeny
Institute of Oceanology
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Qingdao 266071, CHINA
[email protected]
museum @qdio.ac.cn
ABSTRACT
Two new species of the genus Bathyacmaea Okutani, Tsuchida and
Fujikura, 1992 are described and illustrated from deep-sea che-
mosynthetic areas in the western Pacific. Bathyacmaea austrina
new species, sampled from hydrothermal vents in Okinawa Trough
at depths of 1314-1374 m, is closely related to Bathyacmaea secunda
Okutani, Fujikura, and Sasaki, 1993 in having a rounded shell
outline, but differs in having beaded shell sculpture. Bathyacmaea
brevidentata new species, collected from a methane seep area in
the South China Sea, is most similar to Bathyacmaea lactea Zhang,
Zhang, and Zhang, 2016 in having a thick shell with regularly-spaced
concentric growth lines, but can be separated from it by having a
highly arched shell with a concave aperture margin. Phylogenetic
reconstruction based on partial sequences of COI also support their
placements within Bathyacmaea.
Additional Keywords: Patellogastropoda, chemosynthetic envi-
ronment, COI
INTRODUCTION
The genus Bathyacmaea is a small group of deep-sea
limpet that are restricted to chemosynthetic environments
in the western Pacific. To date, a total of seven species
have been described from various localities (see Table 1).
Of them, two species, Bathyacmaea secunda Okutani,
Fujikura, and Sasaki, 1993 and Bathyacmaea tertia Sasaki,
Okutani, and Fujikura, 2003 are found in the Okinawa
Trough, and one species, Bathyacmaea lactea Zhang,
Zhang, and Zhang, 2016, is from South China Sea.
Several limpet specimens were collected during an
expedition to deep-sea chemosynthetic areas at Okinawa
! Also: Center for Ocean Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Qingdao, 266071, CHINA; and University of Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, CHINA
Trough and South China Sea in 2016 by Institute of
Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IOCAS).
Observations of the shell and radula morphology revealed
that they represent two undescribed species belonging to
the genus Bathyacmaea Okutani, Tsuchida, and Fujikura,
1992. In this article, we describe and illustrate these two
species as new to science, and compare them to their
related congeners.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The specimens studied were collected during several dives of
the ROV Faxian (based on mother ship R/V KExvE). The
specimens were then fixed in 99.5% ethanol soon after
collection. For study, shells and soft parts were examined
under light microscopy, and the radulae by both light and
scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For SEM studies,
radular sacs were extracted via gross dissection, cleaned using
10% NaOH for 2-3 hours, rinsed in distilled water, air-dried,
coated with gold, and examined using scanning electron
microscopy. Two specimens of each species were selected
for amplification of the partial COI sequences. As a result,
two sequences from Bathyacmaea brevidentata new
species, and one sequence from Bathyacmaea austrina
new species, were obtained and have been deposited in
GenBank (accession numbers: MK341688, MN180052—
MN180053). Sequencing and phylogenetic methods follow
that of Zhang and Zhang (2017). Type materials are de-
posited at the Marine Biological Museum, Chinese Acad-
emy of Sciences (MBM CAS), Qingdao, China.
SYSTEMATICS
Family Pectinodontidae Pilsbry, 1891
Genus Bathyacmaea Okutani, Tsuchida, and Fujikura,
1992
Page 46
Table 1.
Species
Bathyacmaea austrina new species
Bathyacmaea becki Zhang and Zhang, 2017
Bathyacmaea jonassoni Beck, 1996
Bathyacmaea lactea Zhang, Zhang, and Zhang, 2016
Bathyacmaea nipponica Okutani, Tsuchida, and Fujikura, 1992
Bathyacmaea secunda Okutani, Fujikura, and Sasaki, 1993
Bathyacmaea brevidentata new species
Bathyacmaea subnipponica Sasaki, Okutani, and Fujikura, 2003
Bathyacmaea tertia Sasaki, Okutani, and Fujikura, 2003
Type Species: Bathyacmaea nipponica Okutani, Tsuchida,
and Fujikura, 1992.
Bathyacmaea austrina new species
(Figures 1-9)
Description: SHELL (Figures 1-5), patelliform, of me-
dium size for genus, up to 16.6 mm long, thick (ca. 0.8 mm
above aperture margin in holotype), semitransparent.
Outline nearly rounded, longer slightly than wide, width
91-99% (mean 95%) of length. Profile low for genus,
height 19-32% (mean 27%) of shell length. Apex slightly
anterior to center, moderately eroded, protoconch not
preserved. All slopes straight. External surface whitish,
sculpture consisting of undulated concentric growth lines,
forming prominent beads at intersections with developed
axial ribs. Aperture margin convex at sides, slightly
reflected.
SOFT PARTS (Figure 9): Animal with tapering tentacles,
eyes absent. Head stout and rounded, without oral lap-
pets. Mantle edge smooth, with no papillae. Ctenidium
bipectinate and large. Intestine blackish in color. Gonad
situated at posterior end of visceral mass. Urogenital
papilla digitiform, relatively long, situated right-anteriorly
to visceral mass. Pericardium whitish, triangular, situated
left-anteriorly to corner of visceral mass.
RaADULA (Figures 6-8): Formula 0+1+0+1+0. Rachidian
tooth vestigial, represented by a longitudinal, ridge-like
structure. Rachidian basal plate wider than long. Lateral
tooth ca. 180 wm long, with a straight, stout shaft, tip
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
List of species of Bathyacmaea from vent/seep habitats (species arranged in alphabetical order)
Distribution
Okinawa Trough, 1314-1374 m, vent
Manus Back-Arc Basin, 1714-1853 m, vent
Edison Seamount, 1483 m, vent
South China Sea, 1132 m, seep
Off Hatsushima, Sagami Bay, 1110-1200 m, seep
Okinawa Trough, 700-1430 m, vent
South China Sea, 1120 m, seep
Nankai Trough, 1100 m, seep
Okinawa Trough, 996-1000 m, vent
divided into three cusps. All three cusps outwardly bent,
innermost and middle cusps spoon-shaped and subequal in
size, outermost one thin, narrow, with an acute tip.
Type Locality: Daiyon Yonaguni Knoll, Okinawa Trough,
DAP 51" -Ni22°A9 Fat "13 74m depth.
Type Material: Holotype: MBM286516, collection
number: RY16097, 25 Aug. 2016. Paratypes 1-5, MBM
286517, collected together with holotype at type locality.
Paratypes 6-8, MBM 286518, Izena Hole, Okinawa
Trough, 27°16" N, 127°05' E, 1314 m, 23 Aug. 2016. For
measurements, see Table 2.
Distribution and Habitat: Okinawa Trough, from two
hydrothermal vent sites, Daiyon Yonaguni Knoll and Izena
Holesite, 1314-1374 m, attached on black rocks and shells
of Bathymodiolus platifrons Hashimoto and Okutani, 1994.
Etymology: Latin austrina, the southern part of a geo-
graphic unit, used in apposition, and referring to the type
locality, located in the southernmost part of the Okinawa
Trough.
Remarks: Bathyacmaea austrina new species was
collected from two hydrothermal vent sites, Daiyon
Yonaguni Knoll and Izena Hole, both in the Okinawa
Trough. At the Izena Hole site, another species of the
genus, Bathyacmaea secunda Okutani, Fujikura, and
Sasaki, 1993, was also sampled, at a depth of 1328 m. The
two species are very similar by having a rounded shell
outline. However, Bathyacmaea secunda has a smoother
Table 2. Shell measurements (in mm) and ratios of Bathyacmaea austrina new species.
Length (L) Height (H) Width (W) H/L ratio W/L ratio
Holotype 16.6 45 16.0 0.27 0.96
Paratype | 12) 3.8 Es 0.32 0.98
Paratype 2 ae ig 13.5 0.19 0.95
Paratype 3 12.3 3.8 vis 7 Odd 0.95
Paratype 4 16.3 4.0 16.1 0.25 ().99
Paratype 5 11.9 Bud Lae 0.27 0.95
Paratype 6 11.0 a 10.0 252 0.91
Paratype 7 iy BZ 10.3 0.29 ().92
Paratype 8 10.4 2.0 9.8 0.19 0.94
Average 129 | i aie 0.27 0.95
S. Zhang and S. Zhang, 2020
Figures 1-8. Bathyacmaea austrina new species. 1-3. Holotype, MBM286516, length 16.6 mm. 4-5. Paratype 1, MBM286517,
length 12.0 mm. 6. Dorsal view of intact radular segment. 7-8. Rachidian region, showing the single lateral tooth and the vestigial rachidian
teeth.
Page 48
gon
Figure 9. Dorsal view of the soft parts of Bathyacmaea aus-
trina new species, 5 mm. Abbreviations: a: anus; bet: bipectinate
ctenidium; dg: digest gland; ebv: efferent branchial vein; fg: fore
gut; gon: gonad; h: head; in: intestine; pe: pericardium; pm: pallial
margin; sm: shell muscle; ugp: urogenital papilla.
sculpture, and the outermost cusp of lateral tooth is re-
markable broad with a truncated tip. Although Bathy-
acmaea nipponica Okutani, Tsuchida, and Fujikura, 1992
and Bathyacmaea subnipponica Sasaki, Okutani, and
Fujikura, 2003 both have beaded shell sculptures, their
oval shell with high profile, and distinctive radular features
can readily separate them from Bathyacmaea austrina
new species.
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Bathyacmaea brevidentata new species
(Figures 10-17) |
Description: SHELL (Figures 10-13) patelliform, of
medium size for genus, up to 13.7 mm long, thick (ca.
0.9 mm above aperture margin in holotype). Outline
elongated-oval, longer than wide, width 75-80% (mean
78%) of length. Profile high for genus, height 36-56%
(mean 27%) of shell length. Apex heavily eroded, situated
at anterior ~40% of shell length, protoconch not pre-
served. All slopes slightly convex. External surface whitish,
sculpture consisting of thin concentric growth lines.
Aperture margin concave at sides.
Sort Parts (Figures 16-17): Head rounded, stout. Cephalic
tentacles short, tapering. Eyes and oral lappets absent. Foot
sole large, ovate in shape, anterior pedal gland lacking, no
obvious epipodium; mantle edge with numerous papillae.
Ctenidium bipectinate and large. Intestine grayish in color.
Gonad situated at posterior end of visceral mass. Uro-
genital papilla digitiform, short, with a broad, triangular
base, situated right-anteriorly to visceral mass. Pericardium
whitish, situated left-anteriorly to corner of visceral mass.
RapDuLa (Figures 14-15): Formula 0+1+0+1+0. Rachi-
dian tooth vestigial. Rachidian basal plate arched, wider
than long. Lateral tooth ca. 150 wm long, with a straight,
broad shaft, tip divided into three cusps. Innermost cusp
outwardly bent, with a truncated tip; middle one largest,
spoon-shaped; outermost one straight, with a truncated tip.
Type Locality: A methane seep area at OE INI IS Sa
in 1120 m depth, South China Sea.
Type Material: Holotype: MBM286519, collection
number: RY16123, 25 Aug. 2016; Paratypes 1-10,
MBM286520, collected together with holotype at type
locality. For measurements, see Table 3.
Distribution and Habitat: Only known from the type
locality, where they were attached on black rocks and
shells of Bathymodiolus platifrons.
Etymology: The specific epithet combines the Latin
brevis, short, and dentata, toothed, an allusion to the short
lateral teeth on the radula of this species.
Table 3. Shell measurements (in mm) and ratios of Bathyacmaea brevidentata new species.
Length (L) Height (H)
Holotype 13,7 seh
Paratype 1 12.8 5.6
Paratype 2 12.3 D4
Paratype 3 pe 5.0
Paratype 4 11.8 ay
Paratype 5 11.9 5A
Paratype 6 11.6 52
Paratype 7 Te Dial
Paratype 8 Nt Be) %, 1
Paratype 9 is Ue 4.5
Paratype 10 9.8 ie
Average 1.7 ome
Width (W) H/L ratio W/L ratio
GEG 0.56 0.80
9.7 0.44 0.76
9.4 0.44 0.76
9.0 0,43 0.78
9.4 0.48 0.80
9.4 0.45 0.79
8.8 O45 0.76
9.0 0.45 0.79
8.9 (0.44 0.77
7.9 0.43 0.75
7.8 0.36 0.80
9.1 0.45 (0.78
S. Zhang and S. Zhang, 2020 Page 49
one
a
Figures 10-15. Bathyacmaea brevidentata new species. 10-12. Holotype, MBM286519, length 13.7 mm. 13. Paratype 2,
MBM286520, length 12.3 mm. 14-15. Radula. 14. Single lateral tooth under light microscope; 15. Intact radula segment.
Remarks: Bathyacmaea brevidentata new species re-
sembles Bathyacmaea lactea Zhang, Zhang, and Zhang, 2016 ae) 88238588-1 Bathyacmaca nipponica
— s
from the same locality in having a thick shell with thin, 002
ag MIN180053 Bathyacrnaea brevidentata new species
100 | L IMIN180052 Bathyacrnaea brevidentata new species
+00 MK341688 Bathyacmaea austrina new species
eoewsehyjeg
MG253685.1 Bathyacrnaea beck
59 100
MG253686.1 Bathyacrnaea lactea
KC970665.1 Pectinodonia arientalis
55
KC990594.1 Pectinodanta marnnovichi
KC990591.1 Pectinodonta aupoura
na ¢
aoe
AB238589.1 Pectinodonta rhyssa
Figures 16-17. Dorsal and lateral views of soft part of
Bathyacmaea brevidentata new species, 8.7 mm. Abbrevi-
ations. a: anus; bet: bipectinate ctenidium; dg: digest gland; f Figure 18. Neighbor-joining tree for Pectinodontidae based
foot; gon: gonad; in: intestine; pe: pericardium; pm: pallial on suitable COI sequences from GenBank and this study.
margin; sm: shell muscle; ugp: urogenital papilla. Numbers above branches indicate the bootstrap values.
FJ977752.1 Paralepetapsis sp.
Page 50
regularly spaced concentric growth lines. From the new
species, however, Bathyacmaea lactea differs in having a
lower, broader shell (width/length 82-87% vs. 75-80%), and
distinctive radular features (e.g., rachidian tooth represented
by a longitudinal ridge, lateral tooth with much longer shaft,
outermost cusp of lateral tooth with an acute tip, etc.).
MOLECULAR ANALYSES.
The NJ tree shows that Bathyacmaea brevidentata new
species falls within Bathyacmaea in which, together with
Bathyacmaea nipponica, it forms a well-supported sister
clade to Bathyacmaea austrina new species, Bathy-
acmaea lactea Zhang, Zhang, and Zhang, 2016, and Bath-
yacmaea becki Zhang and Zhang, 2017 (see Figure 18). With
available molecular data, the analysis of a 638-bp fragment of
the COI gene resulted in merely a 0.6% pairwise distance
between Bathyacmaea brevidentata new species and
Bathyacmaea nipponica, whereas the pairwise distance be-
tween Bathyacmaea austrina new species and Bathy-
acmaea nipponica is 2%. Typically, the interspecific pairwise
differences in COI of marine gastropods is above 3% (Meyer
and Paulay, 2005). Morphologically, however, the new
species are evidently different from Bathyacmaea nipponica.
The partial COI sequence seems not to be practical for
species delimitation in the genus, as in the previous case
between Bathyacmaea lactea and Bathyacmaea becki (see
Zhang and Zhang, 2017). These morphologically distinct
species are quite different from each other, not only in shell
morphology, but also in radular features, indicating that there
should be sufficient generic diversity and evolutionary depth
to generate such morphological differences. This requires
further study to find the relevant genes.
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to express our sincere thanks to the crews
of R/V KExuE for their cooperation during the survey. This
research was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (grant number 41606162) and Key
Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS (QYZDB-
SSW-DQC036).
LITERATURE CITED
Beck, L.A. 1996. Morphology and anatomy of new species of
neolepetopsid, acmaeid, fissurellid and pyropeltid limpets
from Edison Seamount off Lihir Islands (West Pacific).
Archiv fiir Molluskenkunde 125: 87-103.
Meyer, C.P. and G. Paulay. 2005. DNA barcoding: error rates
based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biology 3: e422.
Okutani, T., K. Fujikura, and T. Sasaki. 1993. New taxa and new
distribution records of deep sea gastropods collected from or
near the chemosynthetic communities in the Japanese waters.
Bulletin of National Science Museum series A 19: 123-143.
Okutani, T., E. Tsuchida, and K. Fujikura. 1992. Five bathyal
gastropods living within or near the Calyptogena-community
of the Hatsushima Islet, Sagami Bay. Venus 51: 137-148.
Sasaki, T., T. Okutani, and K. Fujikura. 2003. New taxa and
new records of patelliform gastropods associated with
chemoautosynthesis-based communities in Japanese wa-
ters. The Veliger 46: 189-210.
Zhang, S.Q., J.L. Zhang, and S.P. Zhang. 2016. A new species of
Bathyacmaea_ (Gastropoda: Pectinodontidae) from a
methane seep area in the South China Sea. The Nautilus
OO) ele
Zhang, $.Q. and S.P. Zhang. 2017. Bathyacmaea becki, a new
species of pectinodontid limpet (Gastropoda: Pectino-
dontidae) from a hydrothermal vent of the Manus Back-Arc
Basin. The Nautilus 131: 217-225.
THE NAUTILUS 134(1):51-56, 2020
Page 51
A new Paleocene species of Myonera (Bivalvia: Cuspidariidae) from
eastern Hokkaido, northern Japan
Hiroshi Kurita
Department of Geology
Faculty of Science
Niigata University
Niigata 950-2181, JAPAN
Kazutaka Amano
Department of Geoscience
Joetsu University of Education
1 Yamayashiki
Joetsu 943-8512, JAPAN
[email protected]
ABSTRACT
The cuspidariid bivalve, Myonera inouei new species, is de-
scribed from a Paleocene (upper Selandian) calcareous con-
cretion probably derived from the Tomikawa Sandstone and
Conglomerate Member in eastern Hokkaido, northern Japan.
This is the oldest record of this genus. Myonera inouei possibly
lived in upper bathyal depths. It provides another example of
taxa of deep-sea origin in the Paleocene. The senior author,
Kazutaka Amano, is the single author of the new species.
Additional Keywords: Marine, fossil, deep-sea origin
INTRODUCTION
Deep-sea predatory bivalves of the Cuspidariidae are
the most diversified group among the septibranch
bivalves, and include 19 genera and 254 species
(Morton and Machado, 2019). According to the pre-
vious studies, the oldest unequivocal fossil record of
Cuspidariidae was a Maastrichtian species of Cuspi-
daria Nardo, 1840 (Runnegar, 1974; Heinberg, 1979)
although there are some doubtful records from Tri-
assic and Jurassic brackish sediments (Harper et al.,
2002). Recently, a probably cuspidariid new genus,
Neuquemya, has been proposed from the lower Jurassic
(Pliensbachian) shallow-sea deposits in Argentina
(Damborenea, 2019). From the above, it is uncertain
whether Cuspidariidae had a shallow water origin or
not. In her description of two new species of Car-
diomya Adams, 1864 from the upper Eocene to lower
Oligocene Keasy Formation in Oregon, Hickman
(2014) discussed the radiation that Cuspidariidae has
undergone in the deep sea during the Cenozoic.
Other than Cuspidaria and Cardiomya, few fossils of
other cuspidariids have been recorded from Cenozoic
deposits. Within the family, only two fossil species of
Myonera have been recorded: Myonera sp. from the
lower Oligocene Makah Formation in Washington State,
USA (Goedert, 1995) and M. osawanoensis (Tsuda, 1959)
from the lower Miocene Kurosedani Formation in
Toyama Prefecture, central Honshu, Japan (Tsuda, 1959)
and the middle Miocene Arakawa Formation in Saitama
Prefecture, central Honshu, Japan (Kurihara, 1999).
We have found a new species of Myonera from the
Paleocene Tomikawa Sandstone and Conglomerate
Member of Tomikawa Formation (Nishijima, 1964) in
eastern Hokkaido, northern Japan. We describe this new
species and discuss its evolutionary significance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A floating calcareous concretion yielding a new species of
Myonera was collected from a locality 550 m upstream in
a small creek, a tributary of the Mokawaruppu River
(43°3'36” N, 143°40'47”" E; Figure 1). This concretion
consists of calcareous sandy mudstone without any plant
fragments. In outcrops around this locality, dark gray
mudstone including calcareous concretions is intercalated
with conglomerates. According to the geological map by
Nishijima (1964), this locality corresponds to the Tomi-
kawa Sandstone and Conglomerate Member of the
Tomikawa Formation of the Nemuro Group.
Three specimens of an unknown Myonera species were
extracted from the calcareous concretion in association
with Parathyasira sp., Procardia sp., Cochlodesma? sp.
and Epilucina? sp. Dinoflagellate cysts were picked from
the same concretion for age determination. Taxonomic
allocation of dinoflagellate cysts follows Fensome et al.
(2008), where complete bibliographic references were
provided. The sample was treated successively with HCl
and HF to eliminate carbonate and silicate minerals. Then
heavy liquid zinc bromide (specific gravity 2.0) was used to
concentrate organic particles from the residues after the
acid treatment.
We used digital calipers (Mitsutoyo Company, model
CD-20) to measure specimens of Myonera species to the
first decimal place. All specimens of Myonera species are
deposited at the National Museum of Nature and Science,
Tsukuba (NMNS).
Page 52
on
"Wn,
Kawaruppu
a
AISNE TANG Loca
: f :
KawaruppuR.
lity SNe
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Re
Okhotsk Sea
=
Pacific Ocean
Figure 1. Locality of fossils. Base map from “Kawaruppu’, original scale 1:25,000; topographical map published by the Geospacial
Information Authority of Japan.
DINOFLAGELLATE-CALIBRATED AGE OF THE
CALCAREOUS CONCRETION
The concretion yielded a number of dinoflagellate cysts
whose preservation was sufficiently good for identification.
Based on sixty-seven counted specimens, the dinoflagellate
cyst assemblage is characterized by abundant to common
occurrences of Areoligera volata, Operculodinium cen-
trocarpum, and Senegalinium microspinosum, with fewer
specimens of Areoligera coronata, Cannosphaeropsis uti-
nenis, Hystrichosphaeridium tubiferum, Lejeunecysta
granosa, Manumiella rotunda, Palaeocystodinium golzo-
wense, and Trithyrodinium evittii (Table 1). In addition,
presence of an acritarch (general name for organic-walled
microfossils of apparently unicellular organisms whose
biological affinity are not clear) species Paralecaniella
indentata was also recorded. The occurrences of Hys-
trichosphaeridium tubiferum, Palaeocystodinium golzo-
WENSE, Senegalinium microspinosum, and Trithyrodinium
evittti, as well as the acritarch species Paralecaniella
indentata, confirm correlation with the Palaeocystodinium
golzowense Biozone defined by Kurita (2004). This zone
was established in the same area in Hokkaido. According
to the original age calibration (Kurita, 2004), this biozone
indicates a late Selandian age. Other recorded species,
including Cannosphaeropsis utinensis, Lejeunecysta
granosa and Manumiella rotunda, are consistent with
this age.
SYSTEMATICS
Family Cuspidariidae Dall, 1886
Genus Myonera Dall and Smith in Dall, 1886
Type Species: Myonera paucistriata Dall, 1886 by
original designation.
Remarks: The genus Myonera closely resembles Bath-
yneaera Scarlato and Strabogatov, 1983 in having a
rostrate shell outline and both commarginal and radial
ribs. However, Myonera species usually has one or two
strong radial ribs and a short rostrum (Krylova, 1993;
Coan et al., 2000; Coan and Valentich-Scott, 2012).
Myonera species are also similar to Thermomya Chen,
Okutani, Watanabe, and Kojima, 2018 from a hydro-
thermal vent site in the southern Mariana Trough in
having some commarginal ribs and a short rostrum
without commarginal ribs. However, as Chen et al.
(2018) pointed out, Myonera species have more rounded
commarginal ribs and distinct radial ribs. Species in the
kK. Amano and H. Kurita, 2020
Page 53
Table 1. List of dinoflagellate cysts and acritarchs associated with the molluscan fossils. Relative abundance of each dinoflagellate cyst
taxon is expressed as VA (very abundant, 20 % and more of the total specimen count), A (abundant, 20-10 %), C (common, 10-8 %), R
(rare, 8-5 %) and VR (very rare, less than 5 %).
Species Abundance
DINOFLAGELLATA
Achomosphaera ramulifera (Deflandre,1937) Evitt,1963 VR
Areoligera coronata (Wetzel,1933 ex Deflandre, 1937) Lejeune-Carpentier, 1938 R
Areoligera volata Drugg, 1967 VA
Cannosphaeropsis utinensis Wetzel, 1933 VR
Hystrichosphaeridium tubiferum (Ehernberg, 1838) Deflandre, 1937, emend. Davey and Williams, 1966 VR
Lejeunecysta granosa Biffi and Grignani, 1983 VR
Manumiella rotunda Wilson, 1988 VR
Operculodinium centrocarpum (Deflandre and Cookson, 1955) Wall, 1967 A
Palaeocystodinium golzowense Alberti, 1961 R
Phelodinium sp. indet. VR
Senegalinium microspinosum (Boltenhagen, 1977) Lentin and Williams, 1980 A
Spiniferites sp. VR
Trithyrodinium evitti Drugg, 1967 VR
ACRITARCHA
Paralecaniella indentata (Deflandre and Cookson, 1955) Cookson and Eisenack, 1970, emend. Elsik, 1977 VR
Jurassic genus Neuquemya Damborenea, 2019 have a
small, inflated shell, a short, smooth rostrum, and some
very flat radial ribs with narrow interspaces behind some
commarginal ribs on the anterior half of disc. Flat radial ribs
are not present in Myonera. Neaeroporomya Cossmann,
1886 of the family Poromyidae is similar to Myonera in
having a short rostrum, two radial ribs and commarginal
ribs on the anterior part of the disc. However, the type
species of Neaeroporomya has an inner nacreous layer and
one hinge tooth, whereas Myonera species lack a nacreous
layer and have no hinge teeth.
Myonera inouei Amano new species
(Figures 2-4)
Diagnosis: Small Myonera species with a rather short
rostrum; main disc sculptured with 14 to 25 raised
commarginal ribs with deep, narrow interspaces; rostrum
smooth, separated from main disc by sharp radial ridge.
Description: Shell small (to 8.8 mm long), elongate ovate,
longer than high (H/L= 0.64 to 0.80), thin, subequilateral
(AL/L= 0.44 to 0.47), subdivided into anterior main disc
and rather short rostrum by posteriorly oblique, sharp
radial ridge extending from beak. Antero-dorsal margin
broadly arcuate; antero-ventral margin well-rounded; postero-
ventral margin of rostrum slightly concave before postero-
ventral corner; postero-dorsal margin nearly straight, gently
sloping; posterior margin narrowly subtruncated. Surface of
main disc sculptured with 14 to 25 closely spaced, raised
commarginal ribs. Rostrum smooth or sculptured with a few
obsolete commarginal ribs, and one weak blunt radial ridge
extending from beak to postero-ventral comer. Inner ventral
margin smooth. As shell material of rostrum of holotype
dissolved, inner part of shell observable. Posterior adductor
muscle scar rather large and elongate along dorsal margin.
Pallial sinus shallow and bluntly pointed.
Holotype: Right valve (NMNS PM no. 28357), length
8.4 mm, height 5.4 mm.
Paratypes: Left valve (NMNS PM nos. 28358), length
5.5 mm, height 4.4 mm; left valve (NMNS PM nos.
28359), length 8.8 mm+, height, 6.4 mm.
Type Locality: 550m upstream of small creek of
Mokawaruppu River, Urahoro Town; Tomikawa Sand-
stone and Conglomerate Member of Tomikawa Forma-
tion; late Selandian.
Material Examined: Three specimens from the type
locality.
Remarks: The senior author, Kazutaka Amano, is the
single author of the new species. Occurrences of fossil
Myonera species are very rare. Goedert (1995) described
Myonera sp. from the lower Oligocene Makah Formation
in Washington State as the first fossil record. As he noted,
this specimen looks like the Recent species Myonera
tillamookensis Dall, 1916 (= Bathyneaera tillamookensis )
in having at least four radial ribs on the rostrum and rough,
prominent commarginal ribs on the anterior main disc.
Another fossil species, Myonera osawanoensis (Tsuda,
1959) had been recorded from the lower Miocene Kur-
osedani Formation and middle Miocene Arakawa For-
mation, both in central Honshu, Japan (Kurihara, 1999).
Myonera osawanoensis is characterized by a very short
rostrum and a main disc ornamented with weak com-
marginal ribs; it resembles the Recent species Myonera
dautzenbergi Prashad, 1932. Myonera inouei new
species is the oldest record of this genus.
Myonera inouei new species surprisingly resembles the
Recent Myonera angularis (Jeffreys, 1876), which lives in
deep water (530-4715m) in the North Atlantic and the
Mediterranean Sea (Salas, 1996; Janssen and Krylova,
2014). The two species share a rather short as well as
Page 54
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Figure 2-4. Myonera inouei new species. 2. Paratype, left valve, NUNS PM 28358. 3. Holotype, right valve, NMNS PM 28357;
PS, pallial sinus; PAMS, posterior adductor muscle scar. 4. Paratype, left valve, NUNS PM 28359.
smooth rostrum and many distinct commarginal ribs.
However, Mionera inouei new species has a sharper
ridge between the main disc and the rostrum. Moreover,
the point at the end of the ridge is sharp, extending
beyond the ventral margin in M. angularis.
Myonera inouei new species is also similar to the
Recent species Myonera paucistriata Dall, the type
species of the genus Myonera, living in the deep water
(166-3806 m) of the western Atlantic from North Carolina
to Brazil and Hawaiian Islands (Allen and Morgan, 1981;
Oliveira and Absalao, 2009). However, two sharp radial ribs
of M. paucistriata easily enable us to separate from the new
species.
Distribution: Known only from the type locality.
Etymology: Named for Mr. Kiyokazu Inoue in Obihiro
City, who collected this species.
DISCUSSION
According to Nishijima’s (1964) description and our ob-
servations, the ill-sorted conglomerates of Nishijima’s
Tomikawa Member can be interpreted as submarine
debris-flow deposits in upper bathyal depths. The asso-
ciated bivalve Parathyasira species now lives in depths of
50-2000 m (Higo et al., 1999). An associated Paleocene
species of Procardia possibly inhabited the upper bathyal
zone, because Procardia inouei Amano, 2019 was de-
scribed from a Paleocene upper bathyal deposit (Amano,
2019). Myonera angularis which, as described above, is
very similar to M. inouei, lives in depths of 530-4715m.
Based on these data, Myonera inouei new species
possibly lived in upper bathyal depths.
As mentioned above, Myonera inouei new species is
the oldest-known species of this genus at present. Pre-
viously, Goedert (1995) recorded Myonera sp. from the
Oligocene Makah Formation in Washington State as
oldest-known species in the genus. However, as men-
tioned above, this species actually belongs to Bathy-
neaera. This implied that the oldest unequivocal Myonera
up to now had been M. kurosedaniensis from the lower
Miocene Kurosedani Formation. With the discovery of M.
inouei, the fossil record of Myonera has been extended
back to the late Selandian.
Some genera of bivalves first appeared in the Paleocene
deep-water deposits in eastern Hokkaido (Amano and
Jenkins, 2017; Amano et al., 2015, 2016, 2018). These are
the tindariid Tindaria, the arcid Bentharca, the poromyid
Poromya, the naticid Neverita, and the cancellariid Admete.
As a result of this study, Myonera has been added to these
genera. Our estimate is supported by the bathyal origin
assessment of Cuspidariidae including Myonera proposed
by Krylova (1989), based on the vertical distribution of the
Recent cuspidariid species.
Previously, major evolution was considered to have
occurred in shallow marine waters and then to have in-
vaded deep water through geological time (Jablonski et al.,
1983; Jablonski and Bottjer, 1991). However, it has re-
cently been suggested that some deep-sea organisms such
as corals, echinoderms, and mollusks originated in the
deep sea and some have moved to shallow water (Pante
et al., 2012; Thuy et al., 2012; Hryniewicz et al., 2017).
The above six genera from the Paleocene in eastern
Hokkaido support the deep-water origin theory for those
organisms. Although many deep-water benthonic fora-
minifers became extinct at the Paleocene-Eocene Ther-
mal Maximum (PETM) (Kaiho, 1994), some molluscs
including the above six genera were able to survive the
deep-sea anoxic event at the PETM.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to Alan G. Beu (GNS Science) for his
critical reading of the manuscript and useful suggestions.
We thank Kiyokazu Inoue (Obihiro City) for kindly do-
nating the concretion including fossils to us and Elena
Krylova (P. P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, RAN)
kindly giving us useful information. We also thank Eugene
Coan (Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History) and
Sven Nielsen (Universidad Austral de Chile) for their
K. Amano and H. Kurita, 2020
review and useful comments. This study was partly sup-
ported by a Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the
Japan Society for Promotion of Science to KA (C,
17K05691, 2017—2019).
LITERATURE CITED
Adams, A. 1864. On the species of Neaera found in the seas of
Japan. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 13: 206-
209.
Alberti, G. 1961. Zur Kenntnis mesozoischer und alttertiirer
Dinoflagellaten und Hystrichosphaerideen von Nord- und
Mitteldeutschland sowie einigen anderen europiaischen
Gebieten. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A 116: 1-58.
Allen, J.A. and R.E. Morgan. 1981. The functional morphology
of Atlantic deep water species of the families Cuspidariidae
and Poromyidae (Bivalvia): an analysis of the evolution of
the septibranch condition. Royal Society of London,
Philosophical Transactions (B) 294: 413-546.
Amano, K. 2019. A Paleocene species of Procardia (Bivalvia:
Anomalodesmata: Parilimyidae) from the Katsuhira For-
mation in Urahoro Town, eastern Hokkaido, Japan. The
Nawtilus: 133; 22-25.
Amano, K. and R.G. Jenkins. 2017. Paleocene protobranch
bivalves from Urahoro Town in eastern Hokkaido, northern
Japan. Journal of Conchology 42: 283-297.
Amano, K., R.G. Jenkins, and H. Kurita. 2018. New and
Mesozoic-relict mollusks from Paleocene wood-fall com-
munities in Urahoro Town, eastern Hokkaido, northern
Japan. Journal of Paleontology 92: 634-647.
Amano, K., R.G. Jenkins, and K. Nishida. 2015. A new Paleocene
species of Bentharca (Bivalvia; Arcidae) from eastern
Hokkaido, with remarks on evolutionary adaptation of
suspension feeders to the deep sea. Paleontological Re-
search 19: 128-138.
Amano, K., A. Oleinik, and R. G. Jenkins. 2016. A new species of
Admete (Gastropoda: Cancellariidae: Admetinae) from the
Paleocene of eastern Hokkaido. The Nautilus 130: 116-121.
Biffi, U. and D. Grignani. 1983. Peridinioid dinoflagellate cysts
from the Oligocene of the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Micro-
paleontology 29: 126-145.
Boltenhagen, E. 1977. Microplancton du Crétacé supérieur du
Gabon. Cahiers de Paléontologie, 1977, unnumbered:
150,
Chen, C., T. Okutani, H.K. Watanabe, and S. Kojima. 2018. The
first cuspidariid bivalve associated with a hydrothermal vent
discovered from the southern Mariana Trough. Venus
(Journal of the Malacological Society of Japan) 76: 39-44.
Coan, E.V. and P.H. Valentich-Scott. 2012. Bivalve Seashells of
Tropical West America: Marine Bivalve mollusks from Baja
California to Northern Peru. Santa Barbara Museum of
Natural History, Monographs 6: 1—1258.
Coan, E.V., P.H. Valentich-Scott, and F.R. Bernard. 2000.
Bivalve Seashells of Western North America: Marine Bi-
valve Mollusks from Arctic Alaska to Baja California. Santa
Barbara Museum of Natural History, Monographs 2:
7G
Cookson, I.C. and A. Eisenack. 1970. Die Familie der Lecaniellaceae
n. fam. - fossile Chlorophyta, VolvocalesP Neues Jahrbuch ftir
Geologie und Paliontologie, Monatshefte 6: 321-325.
Cossman, M. 1886. Catalogue illustré des coquilles fossiles de
l’Eocéne des environs de Paris. Annales de la Société
Royale Malacologique de Belgique 21: 17-184.
Page 55
Dall, W.H. 1886. Reports on the results of dredging, under the
supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico
(1877-78) and in the Caribbean Sea (1879-80), by the U.S.
Coast Survey steamer "Blake", Lieut.-Commander C.D.
Sigsbee, U.S.N. and Commander J.R. Bartlett, U.S.N.
commanding. XXIX. Report on the Mollusca. Part 1,
Brachiopoda and Pelecypoda. Bulletin of the Museum of
Comparative Zodlogy at Harvard College 12: 171-318.
Dall, W.H. 1916. Diagnoses of new species of marine bivalve
mollusk from the northwest coast of America in the col-
lection of the United States National Museum. Proceedings
of the United States National Museum 52: 393-417.
Damborenea, S. E. 2019. New bivalve genus from the Early
Jurassic of Neuquén Basin, Argentina, and its bearing on
the Cuspidariidae (Poromyida) fossil record. Journal of
Paleontology 93: 25-36.
Davey, R.J. and G.L. Williams. 1966. V. The genus Hys-
trichosphaeridium and its allies. In: Davey, R.J., C. Downie,
W.A.S. Sarjeant, and G.L. Williams (eds.) Studies on Me-
sozoic and Cainozoic dinoflagellate cysts. British Museum
(Natural History) Geology, Bulletin, Supplement 3: 53-106.
Deflandre, G. 1937. Microfossiles des silex crétacés. Deuxiéme
partie. Flagellés incertae sedis. Hystrichosphaeridés.
Sarcodinés. Organismes divers. Annales de Paléontologie 26:
ett.
Deflandre, G. and I. C. Cookson. 1955. Fossil microplankton
from Australian Late Mesozoic and Tertiary sediments.
Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 6:
Val,
Drugg, W. S. 1967. Palynology of the Upper Moreno Formation
(Late Cretaceous-Paleocene) Escarpado Canyon, California.
Palaeontographica, Abteilung B 120: 1-71.
Ehrenberg, C. G. 1838. Uber das Massenverhiltniss der jetzt
lebenden Kiesel-Infusorien und iiber ein neues Infusorien-
Conglomerat als Polierschiefer von Jastraba in Ungarn.
Koéniglich Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin,
Abhandlungen, 1836 1: 109-135.
Elsik, W.C. 1977. Paralecaniella indentata (Defl. & Cooks. 1955)
Cookson & Eisenack 1970 and allied dinocysts. Palynology
1: 95-102.
Evitt, W.R. 1963. A discussion and proposals concerning fossil
dinoflagellates, hystrichospheres, and acritarchs, I. Pro-
ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington
49: 158-164.
Fensome, R.A., R.A. MacRae, and G. L. Williams. 2008.
DINOFLAJ2, Version 1. American Association of Strati-
graphic Palynologists, Data Series no. 1.
Goedert, J.L. 1995. First fossil record for Myonera (Bivalvia:
Cuspidariidae). The Veliger 38: 271-272.
Harper, E.M., T.J. Palmer, and J.D. Hudston. 2002. The middle
Jurassic bivalve ‘Cuspidaria’ ibbetsoni: A corbulid not a
septibranch. Palaeontology 45: 759-769.
Heinberg, C. 1979. Bivalves from the white chalk (Maas-
trichtian) of Denmark, III: Cuspidariidae. Bulletin of the
Geological Society of Denmark 28: 39-45.
Hickman, C.S. 2014. Paleogene marine bivalves of the deep-
water Keasey Formation in Oregon, part IV: The anom-
alodesmatans. PaleoBios 31:1—21.
Higo, S., P. Callomon, and Y. Goto. 1999. Catalogue and Bib-
liography of the Marine Shell-bearing Mollusca of Japan.
Elle Scientific Publications, Yao, 749 pp.
Hryniewicz, K., K. Amano, R.G. Jenkins, and S. Kiel. 2017.
Thyasirid bivalves from Cretaceous and Paleogene cold
seeps. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 62: 705-728.
Page 56
Jablonski, D. and D.J. Bottjer. 1991. Environmental patterns in
the origins of higher taxa: the post-Paleozoic fossil record.
Science 252: 1831-1833.
Jablonski, D., J.J. Sepkoski, D.J. Bottjer, and P.M. Sheehan.
1983. Onshore offshore patterns in the evolution of
Phanerozoic shelf communities. Science 222: 1123-1125.
Janssen, R. and E.M. Krylova. 2014. Deep-sea fauna of Euro-
pean seas: An annotated species check-list of benthic in-
vertebrates living deeper than 2000 m in the seas bordering
Europe. Bivalvia. Invertebrate Zoology 11: 43-82.
Jeffreys, J.G. 1876. New and peculiar Mollusca of the Kellia,
Cyprina and Corbula families, procured in the Valorous ex-
pedition. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 4: 18-490.
Kaiho, K. 1994. Planktonic and benthic foraminiferal extinction
events during the last 100 m.y. Palaeogeography, Palae-
oclimatology, Palaeoecology 111: 45-71.
Krylova, E.M. 1989. Distribution of Cuspidariidae and pec-
ularities of their deep-water representatives. Transactions
of the Institute of Oceanology, Academy of Sciences, USSR
123: 102-114 (in Russian.)
Krylova, E. 1993. Bivalve molluscs of the genus Bathyneaera
(Septibranchia, Cuspidariidae) of the World Ocean.
Ruthenica 3: 51-59.
Kurihara, Y. 1999. Middle Miocene deep-water molluscs from the
Arakawa Formation in the Iwadono Hills area, Saitama Pre-
fecture, central Japan. Paleontological Research 3: 225-233.
Kurita, H. 2004. Paleogene dinoflagellate cyst biostratigraphy of
northern Japan. Micropaleontology 50 supplement 2: 3-50.
Lejeune-Carpentier, M. 1938. L’étude microscopique des silex.
Areoligera: nouveau genre d’ Hystrichosphaeridée. (Sixiéme
note.) Annales de la Société géologique de Belgique 62:
B1l63-B E74.
Lentin, J.K. and G.L. Williams. 1980. Dinoflagellate provin-
cialism with emphasis on Campanian _peridiniaceans.
American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists, Con-
tributions Series 7: 1-47.
Morton, B. and F.M. Machado. 2019. Chapter 1. Predatory
marine bivalves: A review. In: Sheppard, C. Advances in
Marine Biology 84: 1-98. Academic Press, Elsevier, Lon-
don, Oxford, San Diego and Cambridge.
Nardo, G.D. 1840. Sopra un nuovo genere di conchiglie de mare
Adriatico. Annali delle Scienze del Regno Lombardo-
Veneto 10: 49-51.
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
Nishijima, S. 1964. Stratigraphy of the uppermost Cretaceous
system in the border region of Tokachi and Kushiro Dis-
trict, Hokkaido, Japan. Journal of the Japanese Association
of Petroleum Technologists 29: 1-7 (in Japanese with
English abstract.)
Oliveira, C.D.C. and R.S. Absalao. 2009. The genera Myonera,
Octoporia, and Protocuspidaria (Pelecypoda, Cuspidar-
iidae) from deep waters of Campos Basin, Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil with descriptions of two new species. American
Malacological Bulletin 27: 141-156.
Pante, E., S.C. Fraance., A. Couloux, C. Cruaud, C.S. McFadden,
S. Samadi, and L. Watling. 2012. Deep-sea origin and in-situ
diversification of chrysogorgiid octocorals. PlosONE 7:
e38357.
Prashad, B. 1932. The Lamellibranchia of the Siboga expedition.
Systematic part II (exclusive of the Pectinidae). Siboga
Expeditie 53c: 1-351.
Runnegar, B. 1974. Evolutionary history of the bivalve subclass
Anomalodesmata. Journal of Paleontology 48: 904-939.
Salas, C. 1996. Marine bivalves from off the southern Iberian
Peninsula collected by the Balgim and Fauna 1 expeditions.
Haliotis 25: 33-100.
Scarlato, O.A. and Starobogatov, Ya.I. 1983. System of the bi-
valve molluscs of the superorder Septibranchia. In: Likarev,
I. M. (ed.) Molluscs. Their systematics, ecology, and natural
distribution. Seventh Soviet Conference on Molluscan
Studies: 7-14. Nauka, Leningrad.
Thuy, B., A.S. Gale, A. Kroh, M. Kucera, Numberger-Thuy, M.
Reich, and S. Stéhr. 2012. Ancient origin of the modern
deep-sea fauna. PlosONE 7: e46913.
Tsuda, K., 1959. New Miocene molluscs from the Kurosedani
Formation in Toyama Prefecture, Japan. Journal of the
Faculty of Science, Niigata University, Series II 3:
6/-110)
Wall, D. 1967. Fossil microplankton in deep-sea cores from the
Caribbean Sea. Palaeontology 10: 95-123.
Wetzel, O. 1933. Die in organischer Substanz erhaltenen
Mikrofossilien des baltischen Kreide-Feuersteins mit
einem sediment-petrographischen und stratigraphischen
Anhang. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A 78: 1-110.
Wilson, G. J. 1988. Paleocene and Eocene dinoflagellate cysts
from Waipawa, Hawkes Bay, New Zealand. New Zealand
Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin 57: 1-96.
THE NAUTILUS 134(1):57-59, 2020
Research Note
Page 57
Unusual shaping: The defecation behavior
in Cochlorina aurisleporis (Bruguiére,
1792) (Gastropoda: Bulimulidae)
Despite the perception of fecal waste as repugnant and
noxious, behaviors associated with disposal of waste ma-
terials go beyond the simple elimination of unwanted
metabolic residuals. The process of eliminating waste may
have contributed significantly to evolutionary trends in
some groups, such as the development of sociality among
termites (Nalepa et al., 2001). Also, defecation behavior
has important consequences for the ecological interac-
tions in a large number of contexts: protection by dis-
couragement against natural enemies, building structures
using feces as the main construction material, frass
ejection, and camouflage to blend in with the environ-
ment are some examples (Vencl et al., 1999; Weiss,
2003; Caveney et al., 1998; McMahan, 1982). Never-
theless, apart from a few studies (see Weiss, 2006 for a
major revision of defecation behavior in arthropods),
descriptions of this intriguing behavior have been
neglected through the years and available data in litera-
ture is still scarce or entirely missing for most groups of
animals.
For mollusks, there seems to be a gap in the knowledge
about defecation behavior, with most studies focused on
aquatic species and with an emphasis on the physiology of
digestion (Lopez and Cheng, 1983), diet composition
(Dekinga and Piersma, 2009), and shape of fecal pellets
(Moore, 1932; Manning and Kumpf, 1959; Arakawa,
1970), with stress on the importance of fecal pellets in
biodeposition (Haven and Morales-Alamo, 1966) and
phylogenetic inferences (Abbott, 1954; Kornicker, 1962).
Cochlorina aurisleporis (Bruguiére, 1792) is an arbo-
real gastropod with a purported (and unexpected) disjunct
distribution: it was originally described from a bamboo
forest on the island of Madagascar, but is commonly found
in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, more specifically in the
states of Rio de Janeiro (Nunes and Santos, 2004), Minas
Gerais and Espirito Santo (Lanzieri and Almeida, 1964).
One specimen of C. aurisleporis was hand-collected in the
Figures 1-5. Defecation behavior in Cochlorina aurisleporis. 1. Snail directing stools to the foot sole (yellow arrow). 2-4. Shaping the
fecal pellet. 5. Fecal pellet on the ground. Scale bar = 5mm. Shell length 45 mm.
Page 58
Guapiac¢u Reserve (REGUA) 22°28'6.20” S: 42°45/38.70”
W, 41 m above sea level, in Cachoeiras de Macacu, Rio de
Janeiro State. The animal was kept alive for observation at
the Malacological Laboratory of the Biological Institute of
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, in a 40-liter ter-
rarium, for a period of 30 days, with leaf-litter and small
tree trunks to simulate its natural environment. At an
average ambient temperature of 25°C, the snail was fed
lichen, fruits, and vegetables.
Contrary to the defecation process typically observed
in terrestrial gastropods, where the animals just discard
the fecal mass, the individual of Cochlorina aurisleporis
directed it stool to the foot sole (Figure 1), and engaged
muscle movements to shape it (Figures 2-4) into a more
or less spherical fecal pellet (Figure 5). This process
usually lasted for 20-30 minutes, during which the
animal seemed completely concentrated, restricting
body movements to the muscles around the fecal pellet.
Once formed, the pellet is released, falling onto the
substrate.
The potential evolutionary advantages brought by such
unusual behavior are rather puzzling. It seems unlikely
that the gastropod uses their own fecal pellet to achieve
protection from natural enemies, such as fecal coverings,
physical/chemical camouflage, and fecal shields or refuge
(Miiller and Hilker, 2003; Olmstead, 1994: Vencl et al.,
1999). The use of the fecal pellet as a stock of resource
with nutritional benefits brought by coprophagy is also
unlikely. None of the pellets were observed being
ingested by the animal.
Hypotethically, the use of this defecation behavior
could be related to water resorption or chemical signal-
ization. Prior (1985) demonstrated that contact rehydra-
tion in some slugs is accomplished entirely by absorbing
water through the surface of the foot. Additionally, the
presence of chemical compounds in feces has been de-
scribed with different usages for distinct groups, including
location of resting sites (Chikayoshi et al., 1974) and
promotion of aggregative behavior (Dillon et al., 2000).
Alternatively or concurrently, Cochlorina aurisleporis
may use this defecation behavior as a strategy to prevent
location by confusing the predators. By ensuring that their
stools will be deposited far away, falling from high on the
tree to the forest floor, this terrestrial gastropod with
limited locomotion ability may use this behavior as a
distinctive way to protect itself from chemically oriented
predators.
The importance of defecation behavior for terrestrial
gastropods is still poorly known and experimental ma-
nipulations are still needed to evaluate which selective
pressures might have driven the unusual shaping of fecal
pellets by Cochlorina aurisleporis.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to Raquel Figueira for a critical review of
manuscript, to Renner Baptista and Gabriel Oliveira for
collecting the specimen, to Gustavo La Pasta for support
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 134, No. 1
and maintenance of the terrarium at the laboratory during
the observation period, and to the reviewers Aydin Orstan
and Timothy Pearce, whose criticisms and suggestions
helped improve and clarify this manuscript.
LITERATURE CITED
Abbott, R.T. 1954. Review of the Atlantic periwinkles, Nodi-
littorina, Echininus, and Tectarius. Proceedings of the United
States National Museum 103(3328): 449-464.
Arakawa, K.Y. 1971. Scatological studies of the Bivalvia (Mollusca).
In: Advances in Marine Biology vol. 8. Academic Press.
p. 307-436e.
Bruguiére, J.G. 1789-1792. Encyclopedie Methodique. Histoire
Naturelle des Vers. Paris et Liége. Tome I, part 1 (1789):
1-344. Tome II, part 2 (1792): 345-758.
Caveney, S., H. McLean, and D. Surry. 1998. Faecal firing in a
skipper caterpillar is pressure-driven. Journal of Experi-
mental Biology 201(1): 121-133.
Chikayoshi, K., H-S. Koh, and S. Ishii. 1974. Possible role of
feces for direction orientation of the German cockroach,
Blattella germanica L. (Orthoptera: Blattellidae). Applied
Entomology and Zoology 9: 271-272.
Dekinga, A. and T. Piersma. 2009. Reconstructing diet com-
position on the basis of faeces in a mollusc-eating wader, the
knot Calidris canutus. Bird study 40(2): 144-156.
Dillon, R.J., C.T. Vennard, and A.K. Charnlet. 2000. Exploi-
tation of gut bacteria in the locust. Nature 403: 851.
Haven, D.S. and R. Morales-Alamo. 1966. Aspects of bio-
deposition by oysters and other invertebrate filter feeders.
Limnology and Oceanography 11: 487-498.
Kornicker, L.S. 1962. Evolutionary trends among mollusk fecal
pellets. Journal of Paleontology 36: 829-834.
Lanzieri, P.D., and G.L. Almeida. 1964. Contribuicdo ao con-
hecimento dos Bulimulidae: Cochlorina aurisleporis
(Bruguiére, 1792) (Gastropoda, Pulmonata). Memorias do
Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 62: 25-36.
Lopez, G.R., and I.J. Cheng. 1983. Synoptic measurements
of ingestion rate, ingestion selectivity, and absorption
efficiency of natural foods in the deposit-feeding mol-
luses Nucula annulata (Bivalvia) and Hydrobia totteni
(Gastropoda). Marine Ecology Progress Series 11: 55-
62,
Manning, R.B. and H.E. Kumpf. 1959. Preliminary investigation
of the fecal pellets of certain invertebrates of the South
Florida area. Bulletin of Marine Science 9: 291-309.
McMahan, E.A. 1982. Bait-and-capture strategy of a termite-
eating assassin bug. Insectes Sociaux 29(2): 346-351.
Moore, H.B. 1932. The faecal pellets of the Trochidae. Journal
of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
16s 2352241)
Miiller, C. and M. Hilker. 2003. Ecological relevance of fecal
matter in Chrysomelidae. In: Jolivet, H., Santiago-Blay, J.,
Schmitt, M., editors. New Contributions to the Biology of
Chrysomelidae. SPC Academic Publishers, The Hague,
Netherlands, pp. 693-705.
Nalepa, C.A., D.E. Bignell, and C. Bandi. 2001. Detritivory,
coprophagy and the evolution of digestive mutualisms in
Dictyoptera. Insectes Sociaux 48: 194-201.
Nunes, G.K.M. and S.B. dos Santos. 2004. Marcas de provavel
predacao em Cochlorina aurisleporis (Gastropoda, Buli-
mulidae). Biociéncias 12: 55-56.
T. Carvalho de Lima and C. Dilnei de Castro Oliveira, 2020 Page 59
Olmstead, K.L. 1994. Waste products as chrysomelid defenses. In: Tarcilla Carvalho de Lima
Jolivet P., Cox M., Petitpierre E., editors. Novel Aspects of the Museu Nacional
Biology of Chrysomelidae. Kluwer, Amsterdam, pp. 311-318. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Prior, D.J. 1985. Water-regulatory behaviour in terrestrial Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
gastropods. Biological Reviews 60: 403-424. [email protected]
Vencl, F.V., T.C. Morton, R.O. Mumma, and J.C. Schultz. 1999.
Shield defense of a larval tortoise beetle. Journal of Chemical Cléo Dilnei de Castro Oliveira
Ecology 25: 549-566. Laboratério de Malacologia
Weiss, M.R. 2003. Good housekeeping: Why do shelter-dwelling Departamento de Zoologia
caterpillars fling their frass? Ecology Letters 6: 361-370. Instituto de Biologia
Weiss, M.R. 2006. Defecation behavior and ecology of insects. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Annual Review of Entomology 51: 635-661. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
THE NAUTILUS 134(1):60, 2020 Page 60
Notice
The 2020 R. Tucker Abbott Visiting Curatorship
The Bailey-Matthews National Shell Museum is pleased to invite applications for the 2020 R. Tucker Abbott Visiting
Curatorship. The Curatorship, established originally in accordance with Tucker Abbott’s wishes, is awarded to enable
malacologists to visit the museum for a period of one week. Tucker Abbott Fellows are expected, by performing collection-
based research, to assist with the curation of portions of the Museum’s collection. The Museum collection consists of
marine, freshwater, and terrestrial specimens. The entire collection has been digitally catalogued and the catalogue via
iDigBio at http://ipt.idigbio.org/resource?r=bmnsm-shell. The R. Tucker Abbott Visiting Curatorship is accompanied by a
stipend of $1,500.
Interested? Send a copy of your curriculum vitae and a letter detailing your areas of taxonomic expertise and research
objectives to:
Dr. José H. Leal, Science Director & Curator
The Bailey-Matthews National Shell Museum
P.O. Box 1580
Sanibel, FL 33957 USA
[email protected]
Applications for the 2020 Visiting Curatorship should be sent electronically to the above e-mail address no later than May
15, 2020, or postmarked by that date if sent by regular mail. The award will be announced by mid-June 2020.
Sponsored in part by the State of
Florida, Department of State,
Division of Cultural Affairs and the
Florida Council on Arts and Culture
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT of STATE
DIVISION of CULTURAL AFFAIRS
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
The Nautilus publishes articles on all aspects of the bi-
ology, paleontology, and systematics of mollusks. Manu-
scripts describing original, unpublished research and
review articles will be considered. Brief articles, not ex-
ceeding 1000 words, will be published as Research Notes
and do not require an abstract.
Manuscripts: Each original manuscript and accompanying
illustrations should be submitted to the editor via e-mail.
Authors should follow the general recommendations of
Scientific Style and Format—The CSE Manual for Au-
thors, Editors, and Publishers, available from the Council
of Science Editors at http:/Avww.scientificstyleandformat.
org/Home.html.
The first mention of a scientific name in the text should
be accompanied by the taxonomic authority, including
year. Metric, not English, units are to be used. The se-
quence of sections should be Title, Author(s) and Affili-
ations, Abstract, Additional Keywords, Introduction,
Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions,
Acknowledgments, Literature Cited, Tables, Figure
Captions, Figures. If the author for correspondence is not
the senior author, please indicate in a footnote. The ab-
stract should summarize in 250 words or less the scope,
main results, and conclusions of the article. Abstracts
should be followed by a list of additional keywords. All
references cited in the text must appear in the Literature
Cited section and vice-versa. Please follow a recent issue
of The Nautilus for bibliographic style, noting that journal
titles must be unabbreviated. Information on plates and
figures should be cited only if not included within the
pagination of cited work. Tables must be numbered and
each placed on a separate page. If in doubt, please follow
a recent issue of the journal for sequence of sections and
other style requirements.
Illustrations: Illustrations are rendered either at full-
page width (maximum width 17 cm) or column width
(maximum width 8.2 cm). Please take these dimensions
into consideration when preparing illustrations. Page-
width illustrations ideally should span the entire width of
printed page (17 cm). “Tall” page-width illustrations
should be avoided, square or “landscape” formats work
better. Please design plates accordingly, such that there
will be enough space left at the bottom of printed page for
plate caption. (Digital technology has made this task much
easier. )
All line drawings must be in black, clearly detailed, and
completely labeled. Abbreviation definitions must be
included in the caption. Line drawings must be high
resolution fi les at least 600 dpi (dots per inch) resolution
at actual size. Standard digital formats for line drawings
include .tif, .bmp, .psd, .eps, and .pdf.
Photographs may be submitted in black-and-white or
color, preferably in RGB mode if in color. Standard digital
formats for photographs include tif, -psd, .jpg, or .pdf.
Photographs must be high resolution files at least 300 dpi
resolution at actual (printed) size.
If more than one figure is included in an illustration, —
all figures are to be consecutively numbered (Figures
1,3; ky NOT Figures 1A; 15,105. NOR Plate 1,
Figure 1, .. .). In illustrations with more than one
figure, make sure that blank areas between figures
should be kept to a minimum, thereby allowing for
more area for each individual figure.
Compressed (e.g., .jpg) or other low-resolution file
formats may be used to facilitate original submission and
the review process, but may not be acceptable at final
submission (see below).
Types and Voucher Specimens: Deposition of the
holotype in a recognized institutional, public collection is
a requirement for publication of articles in which new
species-level taxa are described. Deposition of paratypes
in institutional collections is strongly recommended, as is
the deposition of representative voucher specimens for all
other types of research work.
The Editorial Process: Upon receipt, all manuscripts _
are assigned a number and acknowledged. The editor
reserves the right to return manuscripts that are sub-
standard or not appropriate in scope for journal. Manu-
scripts deemed appropriate for the journal will be sent for
critical review to at least two reviewers. The reviewers’
recommendations will serve as basis for rejection or
continuation of the editorial process. Reviewed manu-
scripts will be sent back to authors for consideration of the
reviewers comments. The revised version of the manu-
script may at this point be considered accepted for
publication by the journal.
Final Submission: Authors of accepted manuscripts are
required to submit a final version to the editor at jleal@
shellmuseum.org. High-resolution image files may be sent
to the editor at this stage.
Proofs: After typesetting, proofs will be sent to the author.
Author should read proofs carefully and send corrections to
the editor within 48 hours. Changes other than typesetting
errors will be charged to the author at cost.
Offprints: An order form for offprints will accompany the
proofs. Offprints will be ordered directly from the editor.
Authors with institutional, grant, or other research sup-
port will be asked to pay for page charges at the rate of $60
per page.
More information at http://shellmuseum.org/learn/the-
nautilus.
This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39,.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper)
SMITHSONIAN LIBRARIES
3 9088 019735919