THE NAUTILUS
QL
4o\
iz
Volume 130, Number 4
December 8, 201 6
ISSN 0028-1344
A quarterly devoted
to malacology.
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Dr. Jose H. Leal
The Bailey- Matthews National
Shell Museum
3075 Sanibel-Captiva Road
Sanibel, FL 33957
EDITOR EMERITUS
Dr. M. G. Harasewych
Department of Invertebrate Zoology
National Museum of
Natural History
Smithsonian Institution
Washington, DC 20560
CONSULTING EDITORS
Dr. Rudiger Bieler
Department of Invertebrates
Field Museum of
Natural History
Chicago, IL 60605
Dr. Arthur E. Bogan
North Carolina State Museum of
Natural Sciences
Raleigh, NC 27626
Dr. Philippe Bouehet
Laboratoire de Biologie des
Invertebres Marins et Malacologie
Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle
55, rue Buffon
Paris, 75005 France
Dr. Robert H. Cowie
Center for Conservation Research
and Training
University of Hawaii
3050 Maile Way, Gilmore 409
Honolulu, HI 96822
Dr. Robert T. Dillon, Jr.
Department of Biology
College of Charleston
Charleston, SC 29424
Dr. Eileen H. Jokinen
8234 E. North Shore Road
Sault Ste. Marie, MI 49783
Dr. Douglas S. Jones
Florida Museum of Natural History
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611-2035
Dr. Harry G. Lee
4132 Ortega Forest Drive
Jacksonville, FL 32210
Dr. Charles Lydeard
Biodiversity and Systematics
Department of Biological Sciences
University of Alabama
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
Dr. Bruce A. Marshall
"Museum of New Zealand
Te Papa Tongarewa
P.O. Box 467
Wellington, NEW ZEALAND
Dr. Paula M. Mikkelsen
Paleontological Research
Institution
1259 Trumansburg Road
Ithaca, NY 14850
Dr. Diarmaid O Foighil
Museum of Zoology and Department
of Biolog}'
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079
Dr. Gustav Paulay
Florida Museum of Natural History
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611-2035
Dr. Gary Rosenberg
Department of Mollusks
The Academy of Natural Sciences
1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Dr. Angel Valdes
Department of Malacology
Natural History Museum
of Los Angeles County
900 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90007
Dr. Geerat J. Vermeij
Department of Geology
University of California at Davis
Davis, CA 95616
Dr. G. Thomas Watters
Aquatic Ecology Laboratory
1314 Kinnear Road
Columbus, OH 43212-1194
SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION
The subscription rate for volume
131 (2017) is US $65.00 for
individuals, US $102.00 for
institutions. Postage outside the
United States is an additional US
$10.00 for regular mail and US
$28.00 for air delivery.. All orders
should be accompanied by payment
and sent to: THE NAUTILUS, P.O.
Box 1580, Sanibel, FL 33957, USA,
(239) 395-2233.
Change of address: Please inform
the publisher of your new address at
least 6 weeks in advance. All
communications should include both
old and new addresses (with zip
codes) and state the effective date.
THE NAUTILUS (ISSN 0028-1344)
is published quarterly by The Bailey-
Matthews National Shell Museum,
3075 Sanibel-Captiva Road, Sanibel,
FL 33957.
Periodicals postage paid at Sanibel,
FL, and additional mailing offices.
POSTMASTER: Send address
changes to: THE NAUTILUS
P.O. Box 1580
Sanibel, FL 33957
THE0NAUTILUS
Volume 130, Number 4
December 8, 2016
ISSN 0028-1344
CONTENTS
Sarah Leiner The family Pinnidae (Bivalvia) in the Philippine archipelago:
David Combosch observations on its distribution and phylogeography . 137
Don Dumale
Filipina Sotto
Victor Soliman
Gonzalo Giribet
Jeffrey H.R. Goddard Distribution, seasonality, and prey specificity of Flabellina goddardi
Craig Hoover Gosliner, 2010 (Gastropoda: Nudipleura: Aeolidina) . 146
Kennia Morales A multiple microsatellite assay to evaluate the mating behavior of the
Roland Sanchez intensively exploited marine gastropod Concholepas concholepas
Paulina Bruning (Bruguiere, 1789) (Gastropoda: Muricidae) . 153
Leyln Cardenas
Patricio H. Manriquez
Antonio Brante
Kazutaka Amano Ancistrolepidin gastropods (Buccinidae) from the upper Eocene
Anton Oleinik hydrocarbon seep deposits in Hokkaido, northern Japan . 158
G. Thomas Watters Parachondria joyeuse : a peculiar new species of Hispaniolan Annulariidae
(Gastropoda: Littorinoidea) . 164
In Memoriam . 166
Book Review . 168
Author Index
171
STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT AND CIRCULATION
1. Publication Title, THE NAUTILUS.
2. Publication No., 0028-1344.
3. Filing Date, October 26, 2016.
4. Issue Frequency, Quarterly.
5. No. of Issues Published Annually, Four.
6. Annual Subscription Price, US $102.00.
7. Complete Mailing Address of Known Office of Publication, 3075 Sanibel-Captiva Road, Sanibel, FL 33957 USA
8. Complete Mailing Address of Headquarters, same as 7.
9. Full Names and Complete Mailing Addresses of Publisher, The Bailey- Matthews Shell Museum, 3075 Sanibel-Captiva Road,
Sanibel, FL 33957 USA
Editor, Dr. Jose II. Leal, address as above.
10. Owner, Shell Museum and Educational Foundation, Inc., address as above.
11. Known Bondholders, Mortgagees, and Other Security Holders Owning or Holding 1 Percent or More of Total Amount
of Bonds, Mortgages, or Other Securities, None.
12. The purpose, function, and nonprofit status of this organization and the tax exempt status for federal income tax purposes has
not changed during the preceding 12 months.
13. Publication Name, T HE NAUTILUS.
14. Issue Date for Circulation Data Below, September 02, 2016
16. Electronic Copy Circulation
a. Paid Electronic Copies
b. Total Paid Print Copies + Paid Electronic Copies
c. Total Print Distribution + Paid Electronic Copies
d. Percent Paid (Both Print & Electronic Copies)
THE NAUTILUS 130(4): 137-145, 2016
Page 137
The family Pinnidae (Bivalvia) in the Philippine archipelago:
observations on its distribution and phylogeography
Sarah Leiner1
David Combosch
Museum of Comparative Zoology
Department of Organismic and
Evolutionary Biology
Harvard University
26 Oxford Street
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Filipina Sotto
Marine Biology Section
Department of Biology
University of San Carlos
Cebu City PHILIPPINES
Gonzalo Giribet
Museum of Comparative Zoology
Department of Organismic and
Evolutionary Biology
Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Don Dumale
National Museum
Manila. PHILIPPINES
Victor Soliman
Bieol University, Tabaeo Campus
Tabaco City, PHILIPPINES
ABSTRACT
The Philippine archipelago, located in the northern apex of the
Coral Triangle, is known for its high diversity and endemism,
both caused by a complex physical setting modelled by the long
tectonic history of the archipelago and by the more recent
Pleistocene sea-level fluctuations. In order to assess the influ¬
ences of the complex Philippines geography on benthic marine
species, we conducted phylogenetic and phylogeographic
analyses on 71 specimens (out 112 originally collected) often
species of Pinnidae, sequencing two mitochondria] and two
nuclear markers. Our results suggest that the Philippines is a
diversity hotspot for pinnids, with all sampling sites hosting
three or more species, but with marked differences in species
composition in each site, indicating that most pinnids have a
patchy distribution. Our data also suggest that most species
exhibit high levels of genetic connectivity even over large geo¬
graphical distances. As previouly suggested, our data also sup¬
port the idea that the nominal taxon Pinna atropurpurea
includes at least 2 cryptic species in the Philippines.
Additional Keywords: pen shell, cryptic species, diversity
hotspot, biogeography
INTRODUCTION
The Coral Triangle is recognized as a global center of
marine species biodiversity (e.g., Hughes et ah, 2002;
Veron et ah, 2009; Carpenter et ah, 2011; Bellwood
et ah, 2012; Briggs and Bowen, 2013), and is thus
relatively well studied from a biological perspective
( reviewed in Hoeksema, 2007). Within the Coral Triangle
1 Author for correspondence: sarahlemer@g. harvard.edu
region, complex marine currents and successive sea level
fluctuations are thought to have given rise to vicariant
barriers promoting genetic divergence among marine
populations (Briggs, 1999a; Briggs, 1999b; Mora et ah,
2003). Located at the intersection of six tectonic plates,
the Coral Triangle lies between the Pacific and Indian
Oceans, encompassing both sides of a major marine bio-
geographical break known as the Sunda Shelf barrier
(Lourie et ah, 2005), which favors genetic divergence
among populations. Finally the very diverse and exten¬
sive habitats found in the region can also be responsible
for its high biodiversity by creating a refuge from extinc¬
tion for various marine species (Wilson and Rosen, 1998;
Bellwood and Meyer, 2009). The Philippine archipelago
is located at the northern apex of the Coral Triangle,
which also encompasses the Indo-Malay region, New
Guinea, and the Solomon Islands (Figure 1), and is espe¬
cially known for its high species diversity and endemism
(Jones and Kennedy, 2008). The complex physical envi¬
ronment of the Philippine archipelago is a result of its
old and convoluted tectonic history (Hall, 2002), recent
changes in coastlines and basin boundaries associated
with Pleistocene sea-level fluctuations (Sathiamurthy
and Voris, 2006), and present-day oceanographic circula¬
tion patterns (e.g., seasonal currents; Han et ah, 2009).
As a result, this region has shown to strongly influence
dispersal and isolation of marine organisms over evolu¬
tionary and ecological timescales and to shape genetic
structure and species distribution (Juinio-Menez et ah,
2003; Ravago-Gotanco and Juinio-Menez, 2004; Lourie,
et ah, 2005; Ravago-Gotanco et ah, 2007; Payo et ah,
2013). However, most phylogeographic studies con¬
ducted in the area focused mainly on single species and
little has been done to simultaneously study multiple taxa
Page 138
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 130, No. 4
Figure 1. (A) Phylogenetic relationships of Philippine Pinnidae species inferred from the combined maximum likelihood analysis
of four genetic markers (COl 16S rRNA, 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA). Black squares represent nodes supported by both ML and
Bayesian analyses (>90% bootstrap support or >1.0 posterior probability). (B) Map of sampled localities. The total number of species
and of specimens per species is represented as pie charts for each locality.
or higher taxonomic levels (i.e., genera or families, but
see review in Carpenter et ah, 201 1 ).
Members of the family Pinnidae are commercially
important, large fan-shaped bivalves often found buried
in muddy or sandy substrates of mangroves or seagrass
beds, but also embedded in coral heads. Pinnids are
widely distributed in temperate to tropical waters in the
Indo-Pacific, Atlantic, and Mediterranean Sea. Many
species are commonly found in the Philippine archipel¬
ago, where some are popular food items, e.g., Atrina
pectinata (Linnaeus, 1767) and Atrina inflata (Dillwvn,
1817). Pinnids have a considerable amount of meat
(mostly the adductor muscle) and their extraction is not
regulated in the Philippines, causing them to become a
target economic species that can potentially be overfished.
The family contains two currently recognized genera and
55 accepted species (Turner and Rosewater, 1958;
Rosewater, 1961; Schultz and Huber, 2013; Lemer et ah,
2014). At least 15 species are found in the archipelago
(Poppe, 2010; Schultz and Huber, 2013), which renders
the Philippines the region with the highest known pinnid
diversity in the world. A recent phylogenetic analysis
based on four genetic markers (Lemer, et ah, 2014) iden¬
tified cryptic species in several morphospecies known to
display a wide Indo-Pacific distribution, including Pinna
muricata Linnaeus, 1758; P. saccata Linnaeus, 1758,
P atropurpurea G.B. Sowerby I, 1825, Atrina assimilis
(Reeve, 1858), A. exusta (Gmelin, 1791), and A. pectinata
(Linnaeus, 1767). However, no study has focused on the
Philippine pinnid diversity using genetic markers, despite
the fact that the region may host multiple cryptic species.
Within this context, the major goal of this study is to
provide insights into the pinnid species diversity in the
Philippine archipelago and to compare evolutionary and
life history strategies among species.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Specimens were collected by SL and DC during a field
trip to the Philippines in May 2013. A total of 112
specimens from ten morphospecies were sampled by
snorkelling and SCUBA diving or obtained from fisher¬
men (samples from Panay) in 5 sites in the vicinities of
Puerto Galera (Mindoro), Panay, Cebu, Panglao (Bohol)
and Bicol (Tables 1, 2; Figure 1). For each locality, we
surveyed both a sandy bay and a coral reef area to opti¬
mize habitat and species diversity. In total, three locali¬
ties were surveyed in the Cebu region, four in Puerto
Galera, two in Panglao and three in Bicol (Table 2).
Due to difficult sea conditions, only 18 specimens were
obtained from fishermen at two localities in Panay.
The 112 specimens reported in Table 1 were used to
describe species composition at each site. Molecular
S. Lemer et al., 2016
Page 139
05 « 00 W 05 (M
M H M H ^
<D
C/5
_aj
o
CD
<D
o
o
CD
Co
X
X C (M O CO cc
CO
analyses were conducted on 71 samples out of the
1 12 specimens (Table 2), due to export permit difficul¬
ties with specimens from some locations. The 71 speci¬
mens used for genetic analyses are deposited in the
Malacology collection of the Museum of Comparative
Zoology, with relevant data accessible through MCZbase
(mczbase.rncz.harvard.edu; Table 2). Molecular markers
consisted of two nuclear ribosomal genes: the nearly com¬
plete 18S rRNA (1.7 Kb) and a ea. 2 Kb fragment of 28S
rRNA; and two mitochondrial fragments for 16S rRNA
(510 bp) and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (650 bp;
hereafter COI). DNA extraction, amplification, sequenc¬
ing, primers, and protocols are as detailed in Lemer et al.
(2014). Sequence data were visualized and edited in
Geneious Pro 5.3.4 (Drummond et al., 2010) and
aligned with muscle (Edgar, 2004) as implemented in
Geneious. All new sequences have been deposited in
GenBank and all new and previously analyzed sequences
(Lemer et al. 2014) are listed in Table 2. Outgroup
sequences were obtained from Bieler et al. (2014).
Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were conducted
using RAxML v. 7.2.7 (Stamatalds, 2006) on the four
concatenated genes — the goal of these analyses being to
test the membership of individual specimens to a partic¬
ular species, and not for reconstructing the phylogeny of
the familiv Pinnidae, since this has already been done
elsewhere (Lemer et al. 2014). For the ML searches, a
General Time Reversible model with a discrete gamma
distribution of site-rate heterogeneity (GTR + T) was
specified for each individual data partition (i.e., gene).
Nodal support was estimated via 1000 replicates of a
rapid bootstrap algorithm (Stamatakis et al., 2008) using
tlie GTR-GAMMA model, via the Cyberinfrastructure
for Phylogenetic Research (CIPRES) portal (Miller
et al., 2010). Bootstrap resampling frequencies were
thereafter mapped onto the optimal tree from the inde¬
pendent searches.
Bayesian phylogenetic analyses were conducted in
Beast vl.61 (Drummond and Rambaut, 2007) on the
four concatenated genes, under the GTR+ T substitu¬
tion model for each of 18S rRNA, 16S rRNA and COI
and under the HKY + Y model for 28S rRNA, as recom¬
mended by /ModelTest 2 (Darriba et al., 2012). COI
sequences were partitioned into two sets by codon posi¬
tions, separating third positions from the set of first and
second positions. A relaxed uncorrelated lognormal clock
model was inferred for each partition. The Yule specia-
tion model was assumed for the tree prior and the
starting tree was randomly generated. Markov chains
were run for 10,000,000 generations, sampling every
1000th generation, until convergence. Convergence diag¬
nostics were assessed using TRACER vl.5 (Rambaut and
Drummond, 2007). Five independent runs were sub¬
sequently conducted and combined using LogCombiner
(http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/LogCombiner). Phylogenetic trees
were summarized as maximum elade credibility trees
(MCCT), with branch lengths in substitutions per site
after a burn-in of 10,000 in Tree Annotator v. 1.6.2. in
the Beast package (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer).
Page 140
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 130, No. 4
c
o
N
U
2
0)
>
bjO
C/5
C/5
_aj
o -
C/5
CD
CAi c/5
C
CD CD
O —
CD ^
CD
O
o
£ £
■ r
c/5 A
CD _
c/5 'Tl
j>^ c
CD iZ
bJO c
J2 S
C/0
C- A
o o
CD
--th C/5
X CD
.b bJD
C/5 ~
CD •
<M Jr
CD
^ -D
2 g
£ §
u
bJO
CD
. cc
— l°
A lo
lo CL
£ A
CD .
<D
.3 CD
A U
CC
CD
OO
CD
lc Lc Lo
£ § £ g
OC A QO A
© A © A
A A
A A
l —
LO
CD
co
l-
LO
CD
CO
LO
CM
LO
LO
CD
co
CM
CD
00
GO
A
CD
- LO CO
g£ LO CD
CD ^
[g CO
© ^T©
a A
GO
CD
I-
l-
00
GO
A
CO
CD
LO
LO
CD
CO
LO
CD
GO
GO
A
LO
LO
CD
CO
CD
CD
oo
GO
A
i>
CD
00
GO
A
i-
LO
CD
CO
30 S3 20 ^
N 3! [t 3> "
ioDioD
tc ^ 1C ;>
CO CO
l-
CC
t-
00
OO
D
U5
Jj JK
.O c -2
O H
O 5 “ <u •
~ i:^, ~ ^ ~ - s-
05 Qj ^ ^ Q — CC — . — — feC p
ffi:ccsc2o:o«.Si
S o- -g -Eoffi -c U *3 U «* =0
o
O "5
p .y
G ro
Oo — - “
Cb ~ —
o a c
U -tbcc
£ </5 c3 A
— — l“""' C/5
C/5 — _ <
P- _(D ^ C
b/jt-
JD JD
o -o
JD
— j
o
bJO 2
C (D
G ^
Sf
o G —
w CD ^
^ £ &- £ j_
jj G J2 G 0 G
lC •— < r-\ — ■ : >— :
bjO-
A A; A
c/o
vj
G
CC
©
2
G
U
Z
CJ
‘P*
bX
*C
H
A r-
s ^
§ II
Co ~i
Q _ _ _
H
S. Lemer et al., 2016
Page 141
Cl
v
£
x
x
U
v
P
x
0)
o
o
<
CJ
N
t"
oo
oj
CO t"
N**
io 2: 2?
io D J
X ^ ^
CO
ST
w
u
i £>
>N
LO
05
00
CD
CD
CD
05
05
l-
LO
CD
CD
CD i — O i ^
^ GO 05 Q0
£ * £ »
X 00 ■— 1
a> u; o> ^
D D
u: US
x
x
“ x ^
® S c
Cl 22 CJ
x 3
rr k t
CD
CD
, . •£)
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
ST
CD
CM
CD
LO
LO
CD
CD
or
oo
00
05
D
I " t^-
S 00
05
s X S
^ 31
D
US
05
. X
■O £
2 =e
~ X 2
I- 22 t-
io 3 io
x ^ x
r'"' o^
3 x
t ~
3
us
X
S’
X 3 x
05 oi
D
US
D
U
ci
LO
LO
X
X
US
05
D
us
CJ
Cl
O
i- 3 x
o ? -r
x D x
x ■> x
X X
ST £T
tu
Cl
cr
r ci
ci
p< 05
x 3
O
US
x
x o;
3 c3
x
05
D
US
US
CD
CM
CD
CD
CD
CD
2 SP £
aj o qj
Oj ,
CD
rv-
2>0
Q c-
cd ^ CD ^ ^
O *“ “ x" 1—1 .2
'C
■4—
£
*C
CJ
C
05
D
'£
CD LO l- D" 't 05 05
CM CM CM CM CD CO cm
'O' OT OT OT OT QC OT
05 05 05 05 05 l- 05
CM O] CM CM CM lo CM
T 'T’f *T t | - 1"
U U U U U H U
— ^ — - — — i ^ i— k— . j~s — —
3 1 -
3 -t
05
Cl
T
u
us
X
<
X
O
-a
r
< <
X X
3 D
S V> ‘X 'rt
— ~ r-
U. x < 3 x
"C
x —it
Cl 05 1^* *— 1
— l'- Cl —
-J
i
X
. , , eg
JJJ j
ooo3
< < < <
oo xx xx xx ro xx xx
~2 Cx
£°
u
tl
bJD C
O ^5
' ~ V ~ Cx
2=-. p ^ P
5 H U O
Page 142
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 130, No. 4
Sequences of COI and 16S rRNA were collapsed into
haplotypes using DnaSP and treated as alleles for the
subsequent intra-species analyses. The genealogical rela¬
tionships among haplotypes for each species with 4 or
more haplotypes per marker were assessed by construct¬
ing haplotype networks using a median joining algorithm
as implemented in the software NETWORK 4.6.1. 1
(http://www.fluxus-engineering.com). A parsimony algo¬
rithm was subsequently applied to represent the
most parsimonious intraspecific phylogenies (Polzin and
Daneshmand, 2003).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Although Pinnidae is a relatively diverse family, encom¬
passing about 55 accepted species found in all of the
worlds warm oceans, local species diversity is usually
low (Rosewater, 1961). The majority of pinnid species
inhabit sandy bottoms or mudflats in shallow waters,
mangroves or coral reefs (although some deeper species
exist: Rosewater, 1961; Schultz and Huber, 2013). How¬
ever, more than one species rarely occur in die same site.
This contrasts with the Philippines, where in four sam¬
pled regions (Puerto Galera, Cebu, Panglao and Bicol) at
least three different species of pinnids coexist. Although
most sites have a comparable number of species, species
composition varies among sites (based on the 1 12 speci¬
mens reported in Table 1), indicating that pinnid species
tend to have patchy distributions. This was corroborated
by our field observations, which revealed that most spe¬
cies are represented by small clusters of individuals.
A common pattern was found for Pinna muricata,
P. atropurpurea , Atrina pectinata, and A. inflata ; when
these species were present at a site, they were usually the
most abundant, with only a few representatives of one or
more additional species found among them. For exam¬
ple, our sampled site in the Cebu region was dominated
by P. atropurpurea (12 specimens) and P. muricata
(7 specimens), complemented by a few specimens of
other species (1 specimen of P. trigonium, 1 of A. hystrix ,
2 of A. exusta, 3 of A. vex ilium, and 1 of P. saccata;
Table 1). Similarly, the Bicol region was dominated by
A. inflata , A. pectinata , and A. exusta (10, 8, and 8 spec¬
imens, respectively) with only a few representatives of
other species (1 specimen of Pinna sp. , 1 of P. muricata ,
and 1 of P. saccata). A similar pattern of species distribu¬
tion has been previously observed in a study assessing
the biodiversity and distribution of Pinnidae in Malaysia
(Idris et ah, 2008) and might indicate inter-species com¬
petition for habitat and resources in each site and/or
different reproductive strategies (e.g., low larval recruit¬
ment). A broader sampling in the Philippines would
allow confirming this hypothesis by estimating species
richness, evenness, and diversity indices.
The ML analyses of the four concatenated genes
(-lnL=28, 492. 9666) and the Bayesian analysis produced
nearly identical trees (Figure 1). As previously observed
by Lemer et al. (2014), Atrina and Pinna are reciprocally
monophyletic. Within each genus, the relationships
among species match previous findings based on molec¬
ular data including additional species (Lemer et ah,
2014), with A. inflata being the sister species to a group
identified as “A. pectinata” (although A. pectinata has
recently been attributed to the Indian Ocean only
(Schultz and Hnber, 2013). Atrina hystrix (Hanley,
1858) is the sister species to a clade composed of
A. exusta and A. vexillum. Pinna muricata appears as
the sister species to a clade composed of Pinna sp.,
P trigonium and P. atropurpurea. Pinna saccata is the
most basal clade within the represented Pinna , appearing
as sister group to all other represented species — but it
nests within Pinna in more comprehensive pinnid phylog¬
enies (Lemer et al., 2014). All nodes are well supported
with bootstrap support values >90% and posterior proba¬
bility (pp) values of 1.00. Both the ML and Bayesian trees
show a deep split between two main subclades within
P. atropurpurea (Figure 1). Most haplotype networks obtained
for each analyzed species, except for P. atropurpurea,
display a star-like pattern with one main central haplo-
type shared by multiple localities, and numerous unique
haplotypes separated bv one or two mutational steps
(Figure 2). This pattern, commonly found in popula¬
tions that have undergone a recent demographic expan¬
sion, is not as clear for A. inflata due to the small sample
size, and is absent in the well-sampled P. atropurpurea,
which may constitute more than one species (see Lemer
et al., 2014).
None of the networks obtained display clear geo¬
graphical structure among the sampled sites. On the
contrary, in several instances distant localities shared
identical haplotypes (Figure 2; observed for P. muricata,
A. pectinata , A. exusta and A. vexillum). This result tends
to indicate that despite the complex and fragmented
basins of the Philippines, Pinnidae species show high
levels of genetic connectivity. Habitat fragmentation usu¬
ally tends to limit dispersal capacity and thus lowers
connectivity among populations, even for broadcast¬
spawning bivalves with long pelagic larval duration
(PLD) (Benzie et al., 2002; Kenchington et al., 2006;
Lind et al., 2007a; Lind et al., 2007b). However, low or
absent genetic structure has been previously observed in
other pteriomorphian bivalves with a long PLD inhabiting
fragmented habitats. For example, in a study conducted
with hypervariable microsatellite loci, the black-lipped
pearl oyster Pinctada margaritifera showed little indi¬
cation of genetic structure across French Polynesia
(Lemer and Planes, 2014). Very little is known about the
reproductive strategies and the pelagic larval duration of
most pinnid species, with some exceptions for commer¬
cially important species. Most species are believed to be
gonochoristic, to reproduce annually and to produce
larvae with a long planktotrophic phase with trocho-
phore and veliger stages, such as Pinna atropurpurea,
Atrina pectinata, and Atrina maura (Sowerby I,
1835) (Beer and Southgate, 2006; Mendo et al.,
2011). The potentially long PLD of pinnid species
could thus enable the observed high dispersal capacity,
S. Lemer et al., 2016
Page 143
Figure 2. Haplotype networks for species with four or more samples, using COI (above) and IBS rRNA (below). Lines between
haplotypes are proportional to the number of mutational steps, unless indicated by a number.
even in the highly fragmented habitat context of the
Philippine archipelago.
The haplotype networks obtained for P. atropurpurea
for COI and 16S rRNA show unique haplotypes sepa¬
rated by up to 21 mutational steps. Both the phyloge¬
netic and the non star-like haplotype networks observed
for P. atropurpurea support our previous conclusion:
P. atropurpurea is non-monophyletic in the Pacific
Ocean (Lemer et ah, 2014). In addition, at least two
cryptic species exist in the Philippines. Further work
should thus be conducted to unravel the complexity
of this taxon. In fact, P. atropurpurea appears to be
an intricate species complex composed of cryptic spe¬
cies. Since Rosewater’s (1961) taxonomical revision,
P. atropurpurea, which was initially described with
a distribution limited to the Central Pacific Ocean
(Indonesia, Japan, and the Philippines; Winckworth,
1929), was lumped with P. bicolor (from the Red Sea),
P. dolabrata Lamarck, 1819 (from Southwest Australia),
P. menkei Reeve, 1858, and P. rnadida Reeve, 1858 (from
Northeast Australia) into a single species with a wide
Indo-Pacific distribution, under the name P. bicolor.
Recent morphological (Schultz and Huber, 2013) and
molecular (Lemer, et ah, 2014) work reattributed or sup¬
ported the original name for each of the former species
in each region of the Indo-Pacific.
To conclude, in this study we aimed at assessing
the species and genetic diversity of the commercially
Page 144
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 130, No. 4
important family Pinnidae in the Philippine archipelago,
where pinnids reach their known peak of diversity. For
this purpose we obtained 1 12 specimens, representing 10
of the 15 species known to be present in the region, from
which 71 were genotyped. Our results suggest that the
Philippines is indeed a diversity hotspot for the family
with all sampled sites hosting three or more species but
with marked differences in species composition in each
site (Table l). As previously suggested by Lemer et al.
(2014), it appears that Pinna atropurpurea is a non-
monophyetic species including at least 2 cryptic species
in the Philippines.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are indebted to Dr. Yirgilio Palpal-Latoe and
Ms. Vivian Ang of the National Museum, Manila, who
greatly facilitated this collaboration, permit acquisitions,
and the organization of the trip to Puerto Galera. We are
very thankful to the Mayor of Puerto Galera, Hubbert
Christopher A. Dolor, and the Municipal Administrator,
Rafael C. Cataquis, for their welcome and their coop¬
eration. Agricultural Technologist Graeita G. Pelino’s
effort to introduce us to local communities, thus
facilitating the collecting in local area, was priceless.
Alexandra Bagarinao, Liezel Cordel Paraboles, and
Dr. Wilfredo Campos’ help in Panay Island collection were
invaluable. We are indebted to Benjamin Pangatungan
and the University of San Carlos for the use of thejr
laboratory, transportation, and diving facilities. We are
thankful to Renan Bobiles and the Bicol University Tabaco
Campus for their warm welcome, which rendered the trip
in Bicol very comfortable and to Ronnel R. Dioneda from
Bicol University for his help on the field. We would like to
acknowledge all the fishermen, local communities, and
boat owners with whom we interacted during this trip and
who kindly offered their help and cooperation, facilitating
our transportation to various sampling sites. The sampling
and export permits were issued by the National Museum
of Manila and the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic
Resources in Cebu. Peter Marko, David Reid, and
Rudiger Bieler provided comments on an earlier version
of this paper. The collecting trip was funded by a Putnam
Expedition Grant from the Museum of Comparative
Zoology. SL was financially supported by a grant from the
Bettencourt-Schuller Foundation. This material was
supported by NSF BivAToL Grant #0732903 to GG.
LITERATURE CITED
Beer, A.C. and P.C. Southgate. 2006. Spat collection, growth
and meat yield of Pinna bicolor (Gmelin) in suspended
culture in northern Australia. Aquaculture 258: 424-429.
Bellwood, D.R. and C.P. Meyer. 2009. Searching for heat in a
marine biodiversity hotspot. Journal of Biogeography 36:
569-576.
Bellwood, D.R., W. Renema, and B.R. Rosen. 2012 Biodiver¬
sity hotspots, evolution anti coral reef biogeography: a
review. Biotic Evolution and Environmental Change in
Southeast Asia. (Gower, D.J., K.C. Johnson, J.E. Richardson,
B. R. Rosen, L. Ruber and S.T. Williams, eds). Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, pp. 216-245.
Benzie, J.A.H., E. Bailment, A.T. Forbes, N.T. Demetriades,
K. Sugama, M.S. Haryanti and S. Moria. 2002. Mitochon¬
drial DNA variation in Indo-Pacific populations of the
giant tiger prawn, Penaeus monodon. Molecular Ecology
11: 255:3-2569.
Bieler, R., P. M. Mikkelsen, T. M. Collins, E. A. Glover, V. L.
Gonzalez, D. L. Graf, E. M. Harper, J. M. Healy, G. V.
Kawauchi, P. P. Sharma, S. Staubach, E. E. Strong, J. D.
Taylor, I. Temkin, J. D. Zardus, S. Clark, A. Guzman,
E. McIntyre, P Sharp, and G. Giribet. 2014. Investigating
the Bivalve Tree of Life - an exemplar-based approach
combining molecular and novel morphological characters.
Invertebrate Systematic^ 28: 32-115.
Briggs, J.C. 1999a. Coincident biogeographic patterns: Indo-
West Pacific Ocean. Evolution 53: 326-335.
Briggs, J.C. 1999b. Modes of speciation: marine Indo-west
Pacific. Bulletin of Marine Science 65: 645-656.
Briggs, |.C. and B.W. Bowen. 2013. Marine shelf habitat: bio¬
geography and evolution. Journal of Biogeography 40:
1023-1035.
Carpenter, K.E., PH. Barber, E.D. Crandall, M.C.A. Ablan-
Lagman, G.N. Mahardika, B.M. Manjaji-Matsumoto,
M. A. J uinio-Menez, M.D. Santos, C.J. Starger and
A. II. A. Toha. 2011. Comparative phylogeography of the
Coral Triangle and implications for marine management.
Journal of Marine Biology 2011: 396982.
Darriba, D., G.L. Taboada, R.N. Doallo and D. Posada. 2012.
jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel
computing. Nature Methods 9: 772-772.
Drummond, A., B. Ashton, S. Buxton, M. Cheung, A. Cooper,
C. Duran and M. Field. 2010. Geneious pro. Geneious
Biomatters Ltd, Auckland.
Drummond, A.J. and A. Rambaut. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian
evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary
Biology 7: 214.
Edgar. R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment
with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids
Research, 32: 1792-1797.
Hall. R. 2002. Cenozoic geological and plate tectonic evolution
of SE Asia and the SW Pacific: computer-based recon¬
structions, model and animations. Journal of Asian Earth
Sciences 20: 353-431.
Han, W., A.M. Moore, J. Levin, B. Zhang, H.G. Arango, E.
Curchitser, E. Di Lorenzo, A. I,. Gordon and J. Lin. 2009.
Seasonal surface ocean circulation and dynamics in the
Philippine Archipelago region during 2004-2008. Dynamics
of Atmospheres and Oceans 47: 114-137.
Hoeksema, B.W. 2007. Delineation of the Indo- Malayan
centre of maximum marine biodiversity: the Coral Trian¬
gle. Biogeography, time, and place: distributions, bar¬
riers, and islands. (W, R., ed). Springer, Netherlands,
pp. 117-178.
Hughes, T.P., D.R. Bellwood, and S B. Connolly. 2002. Bio¬
diversity hotspots, centres of endemicity, and the conser¬
vation of coral reefs. Ecology Letters 5: 775-784.
Idris, M IL, A. Arshad, J.S. Bujang, M.A. Ghaffar, and S.K.
Daud. 2008. Moqrhometric analysis as an application tool
to differentiate three local pen shells species. Pertanika
Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science 31: 287-298.
S. Lemer et al., 2016
Page 145
Jones, A.W. and R.S. Kennedy. 2008. Evolution in a tropical
archipelago: comparative phylogeography of Philippine
fauna and flora reveals complex patterns of colonization
and diversification. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
95: 620-639.
Juinio-Menez, M.. R. Magsino, R. Ravago-Gotanco and E. Yu.
2003. Genetic structure of Linckia laevigata and Tridacna
crocea populations in the Palawan shelf and shoal reefs.
Marine Biology 142: 717-726.
Kenehington, E.L., M.U. Patwary, E. Zouros, and G.J. Bird.
2006. Genetic differentiation in relation to marine land¬
scape in a broadcast-spawning bivalve mollusc ( Placopecten
magellanicus) . Molecular Ecology 15: 1781-1796.
Lemer, S., B. Buge, A. Bemis, and G. Giribet. 2014. First
molecular phylogeny of the cireumtropieal bivalve family
Pinnidae (Mollusca, Bivalvia): Evidence for high levels of
cryptic species diversity. Molecular Phylogenetics and
Evolution 75: 11-23.
Lemer, S. and S. Planes. 2014. Effects of habitat fragmentation
on the genetic structure and connectivity of the black¬
lipped pearl oyster Pinctada margaritifera populations in
French Polynesia. Marine Biology 161: 2035-2049.
Lind, C.E., B.S. Evans, J.J.U. Taylor, and D.R. Jerry. 2007a.
Population genetics of a marine bivalve, Pinctada maxima,
throughout the I ndo- Australian Archipelago shows differ¬
entiation and decreased diversity at range limits. Molecu¬
lar Ecology 16: 5193-5203.
Lind, C.E., D.R. Jerry, B.S. Evans, J.J.U. Taylor, and J. Knauer.
2007b. Genetic structure and diversity of a high dispersal
mollusc, Pinctada maxima, throughout Northern Australia and
the Indo-West Pacific region. Aquaculture 272: S285-S286.
Lourie, S., D. Green and A. Vincent. 2005. Dispersal, habitat
differences, and comparative phylogeography of Southeast
Asian seahorses (Syngnathidae: Hippocampus). Molecular
Ecology 14: 1073-1094.
Mendo, T., V. Koch, M. Wolff, F. Sinsel and C. Ruiz-Verdugo.
2011. Feasibility of intertidal bottom culture of the
penshell Atrina maura in Bahia Magdalena, Baja California
Sur, Mexico. Aquaculture, 314: 252-260.
Miller, M.A., W. Pfeiffer and T. Schwartz. 2010. Creating the
CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phyloge¬
netic trees. Gateway Computing Environments Workshop
(GCE), 2010), IEEE., pp. 1-8.'
Mora, C., PM. Chittaro, P.F. Sale, J.P. Kritzer and S.A. Ludsin.
2003. Patterns and processes in reef fish diversity. Nature
421: 933-936.
Payo, D.A., F. Leliaert, H. Verbruggen, S. D’hondt, H.P
Calumpong and O. De Clerek. 2013. Extensive cryptic
species diversity and fine-scale endemism in the marine
red alga Portieria in the Philippines. Proceedings of the
Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280: 20122660.
Polzin, T. and S.V. Daneshmand. 2003. On Steiner trees and
minimum spanning trees in hypergraphs. Operations
Research Letters 31: 12-20.
Poppe, G.T. 2010. Philippine Marine Mollusks Vol. Ill
Conch Books, Hackenheim, Germany.
Rambaut, A. and A. Drummond. 2007. Tracer vl. 5. Available
from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
Ravago-Gotanco, R.G. and M.A. Juinio-Menez. 2004. Popula¬
tion genetic structure of the milkfish, Chanos chanos,
based on PCR-RFLP analysis of the mitochondria] control
region. Marine Biology 145: 789-801.
Ravago-Gotanco, R.G., R.M. Magsino and M.A. Juinio-Menez.
2007. Influence of the North Equatorial Current on the
population genetic structure of Tridacna crocea (Mollusca:
Tridacnidae) along the eastern Philippine seaboard. Marine
Ecology Progress Series 336: 161-168.
Rosewater, J. 1961. The family Pinnidae in the I ndo- Pacific.
Indo-Pacific Mollusca L 175-226.
Sathiamurthy, E. and H .K. Voris. 2006. Maps of Holocene sea
level transgression and submerged lakes on the Sunda
Shelf. The Natural History Journal of Chulalongkorn Uni¬
versity, Supplement 2: 1 — 43.
Schultz, P.W.W. and M. Huber. 2013. Revision of the world¬
wide recent Pinnidae and some remarks on fossil euro-
pean Pinnidae. Acta Conchyliorum, Ohringen, Germany.
Stamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-
based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and
mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688-2690.
Stamatakis, A., P. Hoover and J. Rougemont. 2008. A rapid
bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. System¬
atic Biology 57: 758-771.
Turner, R.D. and J. Rosewater. 1958 The family Pinnidae in the
Western Atlantic. Jolmsonia 3: 328-385.
Veron, J., L.M. Devantier, E. Turak, A.L. Green, S.
Kininmonth, M. Stafford-Smith, and N. Peterson. 2009.
Delineating the coral triangle. Galaxea, Journal of Coral
Reef Studies, 11: 91-100.
Wilson, M E. and B.R. Rosen. 1998 Implications of paucity of
corals in the Paleogene of SE Asia: plate tectonics or
centre of origin. In: Hall, R. and J.D. Holloway, (eds)
Biogeography and Geological Evolution of SE Asia.
Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 165-195.
Winckworth, R. 1929. Marine mollusca from south India and
Ceylon. Ill: Pinna. With an index to the recent species of
Pinna. Journal of Molluscan Studies 18: 276-297.
THE NAUTILUS 130(4):146-152, 2016
Page 146
Distribution, seasonality, and prey specificity of Flabellina
goddardi Gosliner, 2010 (Gastropoda: Nudipleura: Aeolidina)
Jeffrey H. R. Goddard
Marine Science Institute
University of California
Santa Barbara, CA 93106-6150 USA
Craig Hoover
Biological Sciences Department
California State Polytechnic University
Pomona, CA 91768 USA
ABSTRACT
The aeolid nudibranch sea slug Flabellina goddardi Gosliner,
2010 was described from a single specimen found intertidally
at Tarpits Beef, Carpinteria, California, in 2008. Recently, it
has also been found subtidally at Anacapa Island and two sites
off Malibu, California. We sampled for this species at the type
locality intermittently from November 2008 to June 2016 and
here report on its seasonality, microhabitat, and diet. We found
38 total individuals of die aeolid, all from April to Julv, with die
highest number found in May and June. Most specimens were
observed underneath small ledges, on a tangled faunal mat
consisting mainly of arborescent bryozoans and hydroids.
Laboratory feeding trials and examination of nematocysts in the
aeolid cnidosac indicated that F. goddardi was preying on a
Bougainvillia-Fke, filiferan anthomedusan hydroid. Unlike die
type specimen, many individuals of F. goddardi found since
2008, including subtidal specimens, possessed three white lines
on the body and superficially resembled Flabellina trilineata
(O’Donoghue, 1921), with which F. goddardi may form a mim¬
icry complex. Flabellina goddardi is known only from the
northern half of the Southern California Bight, a geographic
distribution unique among Northeastern Pacific nudibranchs.
Additional Keywords: Aeolid, nudibranch, gastropod, geographic
distribution, northeastern Pacific Ocean, Southern California
Bight, seasonality, diet, hydroid, intertidal, subtidal, mimicry
INTRODUCTION
The aeolid nudibranch Flabellina goddardi Gosliner,
2010 was described based on a single specimen collected
in May 2008 from Tarpits Reef (34.3869,-119.5166) in
Carpinteria, California (Figure 1). The type specimen
was found crawling on macroalage in a low intertidal
pool, providing few clues to its prey and preferred micro¬
habitat, but did lay an egg mass in captivity, allowing for
observations of its embryonic development and hatch¬
ing planktotrophic larvae (Gosliner, 2010; Goddard and
Green, 2013). During sampling trips, since 2008, we
have observed additional specimens of F. goddardi at
the type locality, and in April 2014 the junior author
observed the first specimen found outside the type local¬
ity', at 9 m depth in Las Flores Canyon, off Malibu,
California (Goddard and Hoover, 2014) (Figure 1). More
recently, additional specimens have been observed sub¬
tidally at 18 m depth on the south side of West Anacapa
Island, California (King, 2016a, b; D. Klug, personal
communication to JG, 12 May 2016) and at 9 m depth
off Point Dume, Malibu (Hoover 2016) (Figure 1).
Here, we describe the seasonality and microhabitat of
F. goddardi , present evidence that it preys on a filiferan
anthomedusan (athecate) hydroid, and based on our
examination of the above specimens, supplement the
original description of the color pattern of this delicate
and distinctive species. We also discuss a potential
mimicry complex involving F. goddardi.
STUDY SITE AND METHODS
Tarpits Reef is a sedimentary bench cut by shallow chan¬
nels, pocketed with scattered pools, and short under¬
cut ledges (Figure 2; and see images in Goddard and
Hoover, 2014). The bench extends from the low inter¬
tidal into the shallow subtidal and has an intertidal area
of approximately 2800 m2. Landward it is backed by a
sandy beach approximately 65 m wide and behind that a
marine terrace 2 m high fronted bv sandstone rip-rap
and natural outcrops of asphalt (giving the reef its name).
Sand levels on the beach build through the summer and
can partially fill in low spots on the reef, but then decline
in winter, exposing underlying bedrock and cobble.
To assess the seasonality of F. goddardi we searched
tidepools and the undersides of ledges on Tarpits Reef,
counting all individuals we found during 29 total monthly
trips made from November 2008 to June 2016. After
finding numerous specimens under three small ledges
(e.g., Figure 2) near the landward edge of the reef in
May 2011, we included those ledges in all subsequent
sampling. Combining the samples by month across all years
we conducted at least one search in each calendar month.
Most flabellinids feed on Hydrozoa (Thompson 1976;
McDonald and Nvbakken 1997), so we focused on
J.H.R. Goddard and C. Hoover, 2016
Page 147
Figure 1. Map of Southern California Bight, with small
arrows indicating localities where Flabellina goddardi has
been found. Type locality indicated by asterisk (*).
members of this taxon in determining the prey of
F. goddardi. We collected small samples of the organisms
underlying the slugs at Tarpits Reef and isolated the
different species of hydroids found using a dissection
microscope. In a round of preliminary behavioral trials
conducted in May and June 2011, we cut individual
polyps from the four filiferan hydroids observed, and
holding a polyp by its stalk with watch-maker’s forceps,
tested the reaction of individual slugs to contact on the
anterior part of the head and cephalic tentacles by the
polyps of each of these species. In these trials we noted
the reaction of the slugs as repelled (slug quickly turned
away following contact with a polyp), neutral (no obvious
reaction), or attracted and tried to consume. In four
feeding trials conducted separately in May 2011, June
2011, June 2012, and April 2015, we held 1^4 slugs in
250 ml glass dishes with fresh seawater for up to four
days. Small pieces of each of the filiferan hydroids we
Figure 2. Rock ledge at Tarpits Reef, Carpinteria where many Flabellina goddardi (top inset) have been found. Lower inset shows
two F. goddardi (inside red ovals) stranded at low tide on mixed hydrozoan and bryozoan biota underneath the ledge.
Page 148
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 130, No. 4
had found were placed wi tl i the slugs and checked twice
daily to see which species the slugs associated with
and, as judged bv missing polyps and (or) coenosarc,
appeared to have preyed upon. During these trials we
changed the seawater in the dishes daily and kept the
fragments of the different species of hydroids separated
from each other. Finally, we compared the cnidome of
the hydroid consumed by the slugs in the feeding trials
with the nematocysts in the cnidosacs of two of the slugs.
We did this by making squashes of fresh individual
polyps and individual cnidosacs on microscope slides,
and comparing the tvpes and size of the component
nematocysts using a compound microscope with a cali¬
brated ocular micrometer. Four specimens of F. goddardi
collected in May 201 1 and one in June 2012 were used
in some of the above trials and were deposited in
the Invertebrate Zoology Collection at the California
Academy of Sciences (CAST/ 186806, 186807, 195985).
RESULTS
Seasonality: Including the type specimen, we have
found a total of 39 specimens of F. goddardi at Tarpits
Reef, mainly during the spring (Figure 3). Specimens
were found from April to July, with the highest total
number of individuals hv month observed in May and
June (28 and 7 individuals, respectively). The highest
number of individuals found per sampling trip was 12 in
Figure 3. Seasonality of occurrence of Flabellina goddardi at
Tarpits Reef. Data collected November 2008 to June 2016
combined by season, across all years, and also include the
finding of the type specimen in May 2008 for an overall total
of 30 sampling trips. Bars indicate mean (+ 1 SE) number of
individuals found per monthly sampling trip, with total number
of trips per season shown in parentheses. Winter = January -
March, Spring = April - June, Summer = July - September.
Fall = October - December.
May 2011, followed by 11 in May 2014. However, no
specimens were found in May 2012 and May 2013, and
no specimens were found from August to March in any
of the years sampled. Subtidally, Flabellina goddardi has
been found off Malibu in May (Goddard and Hoover,
2014; Hoover, 2016) and at Anacapa Island in April and
May (King 2016a, h). One specimen of F. goddardi , until
recently identified as F. trilineata (see Discussion), was
found at Anacapa Island in January 2006 (Segal 2011),
indicating the presence of adults subtidally during at
least some winters. Egg-laying has been observed in the
field and lab in April and May.
Microhabitat and Prey Specificity: All specimens of
F. goddardi found at Tarpits Reef since discovery of the
type specimen were found underneath overhanging
ledges (Figure 2) on a tangled mat consisting of erect
bryozoans and hydrozoans, as well as a tubular cal¬
careous sponge, the stoloniferous octoeoral Clavularia
sp., and the slender, sand-encrusted social ascidian
Euherdmania clavifomiis (Ritter, 1903) (Figure 2, lower
inset). When exposed at low tide, F. goddardi appeared
as small, but distinct semi-translucent white and red
blobs on the surface of this mat (Figure 2, lower inset).
Seven species of hydrozoans were isolated out of the
substrate found under F. goddardi. These included two
leptothecate species: Halecium sp. and the diminutive,
epibiotic Calycella syringa (Linnaeus, 1767), and five
species of filiferan Anthoathecata. The latter included
Eudendrium sp., Bougainvillia- like species A and B
(both with a detritus and particle-encrusted perisarc),
one Cordijlophora- like species, and one unidentified
species. Bougainvillia- like species B was the least abun¬
dant of the filiferan hydroids, and we did not observe
it until June 2012.
In the behavioral trials, F. goddardi was repelled
by contact near the mouth with individual polyps of
Eudendrium sp., the Cordijlophora dike species, and the
unidentified filiferan hydroid, and showed no obvious
reaction to Bougainvillia-like species A (as mentioned
above, we had not found Bougainvillia -like species B
when these trials were conducted).
In the feeding trials, F. goddardi crawled onto and
remained and fed only on Bougainvillia -like species B
(Figures 4, 5, 7), which after three days had lost its polyps
and a significant amount of coenosarc. Additionally, one
specimen of Flabellina goddardi which was isolated with
this species for three days and then held without food for
an additional six days grew from 8.5 mm to 12.5 mm
(total crawling length measured with digital calipers)
and also regenerated a cluster of posterior cerata that
had been missing at the time of collection.
Comparison of the cnidome of Bougainvillia-like spe¬
cies B with F. goddardi cnidosacs (Figure 8) revealed
matching microbasic eurvteles (Figures 6, 9). In addi¬
tion, the hydroid polyps (Figure 5) contained smaller
desmonemes (Figure 6). The microbasic eurvteles from
one cnidosae of a F. goddardi that had been feeding
on Bougainvillia -like species B for 48 hours averaged
J.H.R. Goddard and C. Hoover, 2016
Page 149
Figures 4-9. Hydrozoan prey of Flabellina goddardi. 4. Boug&invillia- like species B. 5. Polyp of Bougainvillia-\iVe species B.
6. Photomicrograph of squash of polyp of BougainvilliaAdke species B with arrows indicating microbasic euryteles. 7. Flabellina
goddardi on Bougainvillia-like species B. 8. Tip of a ceras of F. goddardi, showing cnidosac and subapical red-orange band.
9. Photomicrograph of squash of ceras tip of F. goddardi , with arrows indicating microbasic euryteles.
Page 150
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 130, No. 4
10.7 jam long (SD = 1.9 pm, n = 16), not significantly
different from those from one polyp of its prey, which
averaged 1 1.9 pm long (SD = 2.0 pm, n = 11) (2 tailed
t-test assuming equal variances, p = 0.13, MS Excel 2013).
We did not observe gonophores or other reproductive
structures on Bougainvillia-\ilm species B. Therefore,
although it resembles Bouaainvillia muscus illustrated
in fig. 40A of Marques et al. (2007), it could be in other
genera of the Bougainvilhidae, or even the Pandeidae,
all of which have cnidomes consisting of mierobasie
eurvteles and desmonemes (P Sehuehert, personal
communication to JG, 20 April 2015). The tentacles of
B ( mga i nvillia-like species B lacked pigment, but the
hypostomes were salmon-colored. The coenosarc of
the hydroid was obscured by the particle-encrusted
perisarc, but did not appear to have much pigmentation
(Figures 4, 5).
Color Pattern: All specimens of F. godclardi found to
date have cerata with bright orange cnidosacs, a sub-
apical red band, and milky to pale olive digestive diver¬
ticula (Figures 2, upper inset; 7, 8). In the specimens
from Anacapa Island, the subapical red band blends into
bright orange which extends halfway or more down each
ceras (Figure 10). The body, head, cephalic tentacles,
rhinophores, and tail are all translucent white. While
the type specimen of F. g oddardi lacked encrusting
white pigment (Gosliner, 2010), many specimens found
since 2008 have possessed broken to relatively complete,
encrusting white lines, one dorsal and medial, running
from the tail to the head, where it bifurcates and con¬
tinues dorsally along each cephalic tentacle, and one
along each side of the body, just below the cerata, which
converge at the tail (Figure 10; Goddard and Hoover,
2014). In some specimens these white lines were incom¬
plete (e.g., see https://www.flickr.eom/photos/34486353@
N07/5744824564), or were represented by mere traces
and fragments. Additionally, some of the subtidal speci¬
mens had a white line running up the posterior side of each
rhinophores (e.g.. Figure 10).
Figures 10-13. Flabellina goddardi and other nudibranchs with similar color patterns found at Anacapa Island, California, spring
2016. 10. Flabellina goddardi. 11. Flabellina trilineata. 12. southern form of Limacia cockerelli. 13. Austraeolis steamsi. .All images
by Douglas King.
[.H.R. Goddard and C. Hoover, 2016
Page 151
DISCUSSION
In the eight years since its discovery, F. goddardi has been
observed at a single intertidal locality and three snhtidal
localities, all in the northern half of the Southern
California Bight (SCB) (Figure 1), which is at the south¬
ern extent of the California Transition Zone, part of the
Oregon Biogeographic Province (Briggs and Bowen, 2012).
A few other Northeastern Pacific nudibranchs appear
to have even more restricted geographic distributions
(e.g., Cuthona hamanni Behrens, 1987 and Eubranchus
sp. 2 of Behrens and Hermosillo (2005), both known only
from La Jolla, California), but none is known solely from
the northern SCB like F. goddardi (see range informa¬
tion in Behrens and Hermosillo, 2005).
Flabellina goddardi appears to specialize on colonies
of a single species of Bougainvillia -like hydrozoan, and,
indeed, the regeneration of cerata and overall growth of
the specimen we held for six days following a bout of
feeding on this hydroid suggests this species is high
quality prey for the aeolid. Other aeolid nudibranchs,
including species of Flabellina, have been previously
recorded feeding on species of Bougairivillia (McDonald
and Nybakken, 1997).
The occurrence of F. goddardi in the spring to early
summer matches that of other small aeolid and dendro-
notacean nudibranchs in California and Oregon (Bertsch
et ah, 1972, Table 5; Nybakken, 1974; personal observa¬
tions) and corresponds with seasonal new growth of many
hydroid species in the region (personal observations).
The three specimens of F. goddardi found at Anacapa
Island in April, 2016 were found in an area of 0.09 m“,
along with two specimens of F. trilineata (Figure 11), and
owing to the similarities in color pattern, were initially
identified as the latter species (D. King, personal commu¬
nication to JG, 1 1 May 2016). Reasoning that F. goddardi
could have been identified as F. trilineata before, we
searched on Google for “ Flabellina trilineata , Anacapa
Island,” and found not only an additional example of the
same misidentification, but that the specimen photographed
had been found more than two years prior to the discovery
of the type specimen of F. goddardi in May 2008 (Segal,
2011). Additional searches for images of F. trilineata from
southern California, including on die Sea Slug Forum
(http://www.seaslugfomm.net/showall/flahtril), Divebums
Species Database (http://speoies.diveburns.eoni/index.phpPD
sciname&n=Flabellina%20trilineata), and Flickr (https://
www.flickr.com/search/?text=flabellina%20trilineata&view_
all = 1 ) did not reveal any more specimens identified as
F. goddardi (nor any additional locality records).
The most obvious external differences between
F. goddardi and F. trilineata are that F. goddardi has
smooth rhinophores, a longer and much more extensible
tail than F. trilineata, and longer cephalic tentacles. These
morphological differences aside, the similarity in color
pattern between the two species is striking, especially at
Anacapa Island, where the subapical red band on the
cerata of F. goddardi grades into orange and extends far¬
ther down the cerata than seen in most specimens from
the mainland (Figure 10). This resemblance raises the
possibility of mimicry between the two species. Two other
nudibranchs found subtidally at Anacapa Island, the
do rid Liniacia cockerelli (MacFarland, 1905) (Figure 12)
and the aeolid Austraeolis steamsi (Cockerell, 1901)
(Figure 13), have dorso-lateral appendages (papillae and
cerata, respectively) similar in color to the cerata of
F. goddardi and F. trilineata, and their rhinophores
are also similar in coloration to those of F. trilineata
(Figure 1 1). Some or all of these four species may form a
Mullerian mimicry complex as a defensive adaptation
against predatory fish.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Peter Schuchert for his assistance in identify¬
ing the nematocysts and hydrozoan prey of Flabellina
goddardi, Liz Kools for her assistance at the California
Academy of Sciences, and Douglas Klug for permission
to use the images in Figure 5. Comments by Hans
Bertsch and an anonymous reviewer improved the
manuscript, and we thank them for their reviews.
LITERATURE CITED
Behrens, D. W. and A. Hermosillo. 2005. Eastern Pacific
nudibranchs. Sea Challengers, Monterey, 137 pp.
Bertsch, H., T. Gosliner, and R. Wharton. 1972. Natural history
and occurrence of opisthobranch gastropods from the
open coast of San Mateo County, California. The Veliger
14: 302-314.
Briggs, J.C. and B.W. Bowen. 2012. A realignment of marine
biogeographic provinces with particular reference to fish
distributions. Journal of Biogeography 39: 12-30.
Goddard, J.H.R. and B. Green. 2013. Developmental mode
in opisthobranch molluscs from the northeast Pacific
Ocean: additional species from southern California and
supplemental data. Bulletin of the Southern California
Academy of Sciences 112: 49-62.
Goddard, J.H.R and C. Hoover. 2014. Flabellina goddardi,
The Slug Site, Opisthobranch of the week (5/12/2014).
Available from: http://slugsite.us/bow2007/nudwk874.htm.
Accessed 7 March 2016.
Gosliner, T.M. 2010. Two new species of nudibranch mollusks
from the coast of California. Proceedings of the California
Academy of Sciences 61: 623-631 .
Hoover, C. 2016. Branching with Ari. [image 1 of 12 is of
F. goddardi] Available from: https://www.facebook.com/
photo. php?fbid= 1 1789661 12136974&set=a. 1 1 789657754
7034 1 . 1 07374 1 840. 1 00000707906493&type=3&theater
Accessed 1 September 2016.
Klug, D. 2016a. Flabellina goddardi Anacapa Island
(nudibranch5Aprl6-16). Available from: https://www
.flickr.eom/photos/8735619@N06/263 1 4263470 Accessed
25 August 2016.
Klug, D. 2016b. Flabellina goddardi Anacapa Island
nudibranch 1 May7-16. Available from: https7Avww.flickr.com/
photos/diverdoug/26390681213 Accessed 26 August 2016.
Marques, A.C., A.E. Migotto, D.R. Calder, and C.E. Mills.
2007. Key to the polypoid stages of Hydrozoa. In: J.T.
Page 152
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 130, No. 4
Carlton (ed.) The Light and Smith Manual. University of
California Press. Berkeley, pp. 124-137.
McDonald, G.R. and J.W. Nybakken. 1997. A list of the worldwide
food habits of nudibranchs. Available from: http://escholar
ship.org/uc/item/0g75hlq3. Accessed 9 February 2016.
Nybakken, J.W. 1974. A phenology of die smaller dendronotaeean,
arminacean and aeolidacean nudibranchs at Asilomar
State Beach over a twenty-seven month period. The
Veliger 16: 370-373.
Segal, M. 2011. Flabellina goddarcli. Available from: http://www
.carbonos.com/gallery/photo.phpPphoto =907 Accessed
26 August 2016.
Thompson, T.E. 1976. Biology of opisthobranch molluscs,
Vol. I. Bay Society, London, 207 pp.
THE NAUTILUS 130(4):153-157, 2016
Page 153
A multiple microsatellite assay to evaluate the mating behavior
of the intensively exploited marine gastropod Concholepas
concholepas (Bruguiere, 1789) (Gastropoda: Muricidae)
Kennia Morales
Roland Sanchez
Paulina Bruning
Leyla Cardenas 1
Instituto de Ciencias Ambientales y Evolutivas
Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad
Austral de Chile
Isla Teja S/N, Casilla 567
Valdivia, CHILE
Patricio H. Mann'quez
Laboratorio de Eeologfa y Conducta de la
Ontogenia Temprana (LECOT)
Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Aridas
(CEAZA)
Avenida Ossandon 877
Coquimbo, CHILE
Antonio Brante
Departamento de Eeologfa
Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad Catolica de la
Santfsima Concepcion
Alonso de Ribera, 2850
Concepcion, CHILE
and
Centro de Investigation en
Biodiversidad y Ambientes
Sustentables (CIBAS)
Universidad Catolica de la
Santfsima Concepcion
Concepcion, CHILE
ABSTRACT
The study of reproduction and mating beahavior constitutes a
main issue in biology, ecology and evolution, given its relation
with fitness traits. Here, we developed a simple microsatellite
multiple assay to evaluate the mating strategy and male reproduc¬
tive success of the marine gastropod Concholepas concholepas
(Bruguiere, 1789), an important fishery resource and a key pred¬
ator species of Chilean rocky shore communities. Concholepas
concholepas is a dioecious species with internal fertilization,
encapsulation, and long larval phase. In laboratory, adult males
and females were cultivated in tanks, and 37 larvae from 5 dif¬
ferent clutches were genotyped to run paternity analyses using
seven microsatellite loci. Results showed that promiscuity is
a common mating behavior in C. concholepas displaying an
exceptionally high level of nmltipaternity and males participat¬
ing as fathers in clutches from more than one female. This
microsatellite multiple assay helped to improve our under¬
standing of the reproductive beahavior of this ecological key
species with high economic importance.
INTRODUCTION
Given its importance in determining fitness, studying
reproductive success is crucial to understanding an organ¬
ism’s biology (Stearns, 2000; Avise et aL, 201 1). Also, the
study of the reproductive strategies of commercially
1 Author for correspondence:
[email protected]
relevant species is crucial for developing appropriate
conservation and management policies (Defeo and
Castilla, 2005; Hobday et al., 2010). One of the main
challenges in estimating reproductive success in sexual
species is determining an accurate method to quantify
reproductive success; this is especially challenging for
males. Here, we developed a simple multiple microsatel¬
lite assay to study the reproductive strategy and the repro¬
ductive success of the marine gastropod Concholepas
concholepas (Bruguiere, 1789) (Figure 1). Concholepas
concholepas is locally known as “loco” and is one of the
main target species of small-scale artisanal fisheries oper¬
ating along the southeastern coast of Chile (Defeo and
Castilla, 2005). We first tested a set of previously devel¬
oped microsatellite loci for use in paternity analyses. Sec¬
ondly, we inferred some general aspects of the mating
behavior of this species.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Analyses were run on mature adult individuals obtained
from a single 50 L tank containing an experimental aggre¬
gation of 18 females and 35 males. Individuals were sexed
following methodologies described by Castilla (1974). All
of the reared individuals used in this study were sexually
mature and capable of mating (Manrfquez et al., 2008).
From this experimental aggregation, five clutches laid by
five females identified as potential mothers were studied.
Between five and 1 1 veliger larvae pre-hatching from one
or two ovicapsules were collected at random, and the pater¬
nity of each clutch analyzed. When two ovicapsules were
sampled, larvae from the two capsules were mixed before
Page 154
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 130, No. 4
Figures 1-5. Concholepas concholepas. 1. Group of several individuals (n=l 1 ) laying egg capsules on the rocky shore during low
tide in nothern Chile. 2. Group of three females laying egg capsules on the inside of a glass aquarium. 3. Clutch of newly laid egg
capsules close to the gonadal pore. 4. Newly hatched veliger larvae leaving the apical aperture of a mature egg capsule. 5. Group of
newly hatched larvae 5 min after being released. Abbreviations: Hl-3: female individuals; GP: gonadal pore; NEC: newly laid egg
capsules; NHL: newly hatched larvae.
choosing which would be analyzed. Simultaneously, a
small piece of the muscular foot tissue (less than 1 cm3)
was removed from each adult individual of the experi¬
mental aggregation.
DNA extraction for adults was performed using the
E.Z.N.A.® Tissue DNA kit (OMEGA) following the man¬
ufacturers protocol. To each larva we added 200 pL of 5%
Chelex solution and 2 pL of proteinase K (0.2 mg/mL).
Then, this mixture was incubated at 56°C for 2 hours
followed by 8 minutes at 100°C. A total of 37 veliger
larvae (from 6 ovicapsules) were successfully genotyped.
We selected seven microsatellite loci (Cc2Al 1-1, CclD8,
K. Morales et al., 2016
Page 155
Table 1. Summary statistics of the microsatellite loci used for the paternity analysis of Concholepas concholepas. Locus name,
number of individuals genotyped at the specific locus (N), number of observed alleles (Na), and unbiased expected genetic diversity
(He) are indicated for each locus; adults and larvae were used for calculations. The table shows the probability ol the exact test for
Hardy- Weinberg equilibrium (PHW) and the probability of exclusion (Poxci of 95% confidence level) defined as the probability of
excluding a randomly chosen unrelated candidate parent from the parentage analysis.
Cc21E5, Cc2A5, CelH2, Cc709 and CcQVC) previously
developed to study the spatial population genetics of loco
(Cardenas et al., 2007, 2011). The criteria to select loci
were: (1) level of polymorphism, (2) repeat motif and
(3) amplification pattern. Although amplification patterns
were unambiguous, we checked the microsatellite data for
evidence of null alleles and technical artifacts such as
stuttering and huge allele dropout using MICRO¬
CHECKER 2.2,3 (Van Oosterhout et al., 2004). Genetic
diversity analyses of larvae and adults were performed
using Genetix v. 4.05 (Belkhir et al., 2004). Tests for geno¬
typic linkage disequilibrium and genetic differentiation
were computed using Genepop v. 3.3 (Raymond and
Rousset, 1995).
Paternity analyses as well as estimations of the expected
probability of exclusion of each locus and across loci were
performed using the software CERVUS 2.0 (Marshall et al.,
1998). This procedure employs maximum likelihood
calculations previously proposed by Meagher (1986).
Given the genotypes of the embryos and the known geno¬
type of the mother, paternity was assigned to the male in
the tank with the highest log-likelihood ratio (LOD). In
order to take into account potential misidentifications of
sex, the remaining 53 individuals in the aquarium were
considered as potential fathers. One advantage of using
CERVUS 2.0 is the possibility to evaluate the statistical
significance of the LOD through computer simulations
(here 95% confidence level; Marshall et al., 1998). Com¬
putations were carried out using 10,000 iterations of the
population allelic frequencies estimated using the geno¬
types of the 53 adults studied. We estimated the number
of potential fathers per clutch and whether or not a single
male individual participated in more than one brood. Pos¬
teriorly, we estimated the level of relatedness between all
of the adults (males and females) in the tank using die ML
relate software (Kalinowsld et al., 2006).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Throughout the entire dataset, we found that none of the
loci showed preferential amplification of short alleles or
any evidence of scoring errors or linkage disequilibrium.
All loci were highly polymorphic with 159 alleles
detected in the 53 adults inspected and 112 alleles
detected in the 37 larvae analyzed (Table 1). After
Bonferroni corrections, no significant deviations from
Hardy- Weinberg equilibrium were observed. Altogether,
the probability of exclusion of the seven loci was 0.999,
and the probability of exclusion was high for each of the
seven loci analyzed (Table 1).
From a total of 37 larvae examined, 34 (91.9%) were
unequivocally assigned to only one adult present in the
aquarium. In the remaining cases, analyses could not
discriminate between two males as potential fathers.
The paternity analysis showed that a total of 18 out of
35 males (51.4%) participated in the clutches as fathers
(Table 2). The number of sires per clutch ranged from
three to seven, and the number of fertilized females
per sire ranged from one to three (Table 2); additionally,
sire M19 had the highest percentage of assignments, and
this was achieved with two different female mates
(Table 2). In general, the relatedness analysis indicated
a wide range of kinship between adults in the aquarium.
Most adults were not related (relatedness level = 0).
However, some pairs of individuals were identified
as potential half siblings (relatedness level close to
0.25), and in two cases, some evidence of parental rela¬
tionship was detected (relatedness level close to 0.5).
With the exception of one case in which half siblings
were identified, the potential mates assigned by parent¬
age were not related.
In summary, the seven loci selected here were highly
useful to perform parentage analyses in C. concholepas.
We found evidence of promiscuity and a high level of
multiple paternity in this species which is in concordance
with reports for other gastropod species (Dupont et al.,
2006; Maldnen et al., 2007; Brante et al., 201 1; Xue et al.,
2014). In addition, 94.4% of males that participated as
fathers contributed in more than one brood. From the
information presented here, it wall be possible to design
new experiments using the present multiplex microsatel¬
lite assay to fully understand the mating behavior and
reproductive strategy of C. concholepas.
Page 156
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 130, No. 4
CD
N
>v
£
r> i
ZJ
H
(D
So
t/:
P
c. /;
Q
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
LC acknowledges funding from die Millennium Nucleus
Center for supporting the Study of Multiple Drivers of
Marine Soeio-Eeological Systems (MUSELS) via the
MINECON Project NC120086 and Program FONDAP,
Project N° 15150003. The FOND EC YT 1080023 Project
to PHM supported the establishment and maintenance
of the experimental brood-stock. During the writing of
this article PHM was supported by FONDECYT
1130839. AB thanks FONDECYT 1130868.
LITERATURE CITED
Avise, J.C., A. Tatarenkov, and J.X. Liu. 2011. Multiple mating
and clutch size in invertebrate brooders versus pregnant
vertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci¬
ences of the United States of America 108: 11512-11517.
Belkhir, K., P. Borsa, L. Chikhi, N. Raufaste, and F. Bonhomme.
2004. GENETIX 4.05, Lxrgiciel sous Windows TM pour la
genetique des populations. Laboratoire genome, popula¬
tions, interactions, CNRS UMR, 5000, 1996-2004. Popula¬
tion genetics software for Windows TM. Universite de
Montpellier 11. Montpellier.
Brante, A., M. Fernandez, and F. Viard. 2011. Microsatellite
evidence for sperm storage and multiple paternity in the
marine gastropod Crepidula coquimbensis . Journal of
Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 396: 83-88.
Cardenas, L., C. Daguin, J.C. Castilla and F. Viard. 2007.
Isolation and characterization of 1 1 polymorphic micro¬
satellite markers for the marine gastropod Concholmas
concholepas (Brugiere, 1789). Molecular Ecology Notes
7: 464^466.
Cardenas, L., R, Sanchez, D. Gomez, G. Fuenzalida, C.
Gallardo- Escarate and A. Tanguy. 201 1 . Transcriptome anal¬
ysis in Concholepas concholepas (Gastropoda, Muricidae):
Mining and characterization of new genomic and molecular
markers. Marine Genomics, 4: 197-205.
Castilla, J.C. 1974. Notes on mating behaviour of Concholepas
concholepas (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Muricidae) from
Chile. The Veliger 16: 291-292.
Defeo, O. and J.C. Castilla. 2005. More than one bag for the
world fishery crisis and keys for co-management successes
in selected artisanal Latin American shellfisheries. Reviews
in Fish Biology and Fisheries 15: 265-283.
Dupont, L., J. Richard, Y.M. Paulet, G. Tliouzeau, and F.
Viard. 2006. Gregariousness and protandry promote repro¬
ductive insurance in the invasive gastropod Crepidula
fomicata : evidence from assignment of larval paternity.
Molecular Ecology 15: 3009-3021.
Kalinowsld, S.T., A.P Wagner, and M.L. Taper. 2006.
ML-Relate: a computer program for maximum likelihood
estimation of relatedness and relationship. Molecular
Ecology Notes 6: 576-579.
Manrfquez, P.H., A.P. Delgado, M E. Jara, and J.C. Castilla.
2008. Field and laboratory experiments with early ontoge¬
netic stages of Concholepas concholepas. Aquaculture
279: 99-107.
Marshall, T.C., J.B.K.E. Slate, L.E.B. Kruuk and J.M.
Pemberton. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-
based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular
Ecology 7: 639-655.
K. Morales et al„ 2016
Page 157
Meagher, T. R. 1986. Analysis of paternity within a natural pop¬
ulation ol Chamaelirium luteum. 1 Identification of most-
likely male parents. American Naturalist 128: 199-215.
Raymond, M. and F. Rousset. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2):
population genetics software for exact tests and ecumeni-
cism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248-249.
Stearns, S.C. 2000. Life history evolution: successes, limita¬
tions, and prospects. Naturwissenschaften 87: 476-486.
Van Oosterhout, C., W.E. Hutchinson, D P Wills and P.
Shipley. 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identify¬
ing and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite
data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 535-538.
CV
Xue, D., T. Zhang, and J.X. Liu. 2014. Microsatellite evidence
for high frequency ol multiple paternity in the marine
gastropod Rapana venosa. PLoS ONE 9(1): e86508.
THE NAUTILUS 130(4): 158-163, 2016
Page 158
Ancistrolepidine gastropods (Buccinidae) from the upper Eocene
hydrocarbon seep deposits in Hokkaido, northern Japan
Kazutaka Amano
Department of Geoscience
Joetsu University of Education
1 Yamayashiki
Joetsu 943-8512, JAPAN
Anton Oleinik
Department of Geosciences
Florida Atlantic University
777 Glades Road
Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
ABSTRACT
Two ancistrolepidine gastropods, Ancistrolepis modestoideus
(Takeda) and Bathyancistrolepis mikasaensis new species are
described from the upper Eocene seep carbonates of the
Poronai Formation in Mikasa City, central Hokkaido. One
specimen of Ancistrolepis sp. resembling A. g rammatus (Dali)
co-occurred with Conchocele bisecta (Conrad) is also described
from the upper Eocene Sakasagawa Formation in Tomamae
Town, northwestern Hokkaido. These species constitute
the oldest to date record of the genera Ancistrolepis and
Bathyancistrolepis. Time of the first appearance of ancistro¬
lepidine gastropods in the North Pacific corresponds with the
increasing number of hydrocarbon seep sites, which could have
affected to accelerated diversification of deep-sea buccinids in
the North Pacific.
Additional Keywords: Eocene, Gastropoda, new species,
Ancistrolepidinae
INTRODUCTION
Most Recent ancistrolepidine gastropods are deep-
shell dwellers and distribution of fossil and modern spe¬
cies is confined to the northern Pacific, except for one
Recent species Ancistrolepis vietnamensis Sirenko and
Goryachev, 1990 from the South China Sea (Tiba
and Kosuge, 1981, 1982; Titova, 1993, 1994; Egorov and
Barsukov, 1994; Higo et al., 1999; Kantor and Sysoev,
2006; Gulbin, 2009). Habe and Sato (1973) origi¬
nally included five genera into the subfamily “Aneistro-
lepisinae”: Ancistrolepis Dali, 1895; Bathyancistrolepis
Habe and Ito, 1968; Clinopegnia Grant and Gale, 1931;
Neancistrolepis Habe and Sato, 1973; and Pseudo-
liomesus Habe and Sato, 1973. However, the generic
composition and status of Ancistrolepidinae remains
somewhat controversial (see Amano et ah, 1996 for
discussion). Moreover, the genus Ancistrolepis was
subdivided into A. eucosmius and A. gramniatus stocks,
based on their size and condition of spiral cords
(Gladenkov et al., 1988; Titova, 1993; Amano et ah, 1996).
In this paper, we adopt the systematic treatment of genera
following Amano et ah (1996).
Genera Ancistrolepis and Bathyancistrolepis first
appeared in the late Eocene and constitute the oldest
record among the subfamily (Titova, 1993). These earli¬
est representatives of the subfamily are important for the
reconstruction of the evolution of the entire subfamily
Ancistrolepidinae. Currently, two species of the genus
Ancistrolepis and one species of the genus Bathyancis¬
trolepis species have been recovered from the upper
Eocene deposits in central and northwestern Hokkaido,
northern Japan. At least one of the Bathyancistrolepis
species is new to science. This article describes these
species and discusses their evolutionary significance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Five specimens of Ancistrolepis modestoideus (Takeda,
1953) and two specimens of Bathyancistrolepis mikasaensis
new species were obtained from the seep carbonates
included in mudstones of the upper Eocene Poronai
Formation located at 200 m west of the mouth of
Vayoi Banno Creek, Yayoi Town in Mikasa City, central
Hokkaido (Figure 1, Loc. 1; 43°15'34" N, 141°55'54" E).
The thyasirid Conchocele bisecta (Conrad, 1849), the
vesicomyid Hubertschenckia ezoensis (Yokoyama, 1890),
the carditid Cyclocardia tokudai (Takeda, 1953) were also
recorded by Amano and Jenkins (2007) from the same
locality. One specimen of Ancistrolepis sp. was collected
from the upper Eocene Sakasagawa Formation at the
cliff along the Kotanbetsu River, 2 km west of Seiryu
Bridge in Kiritaehi, Tomamae Town, northwestern
Hokkaido (Figure 1, Loc. 2 = Loc. SK 15 of Noda, 1992;
44°13'22" N,‘ 141°53'8" E) by Mr. Futoshi Akamatsu
(Shunan City, Yamaguchi Prefecture). The same silty
sandstone also contains multiple articulated specimens
of Conchocele bisecta. Abbreviation used is: JUE,
Joetsu University of Education, Joetsu, Niigata Prefec¬
ture, Japan.
K. Amano and A. Oleinik, 2016
Page 159
Figure 1. Locality map of the ancistrolepidine gastropods
examined in this study.
SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY
Class Gastropoda Cuvier, 1797
Order Neogastropoda Wenz, 1938
Superfamily Buccinoidea Rafinesque, 1815
Family Buecinidae Rafinesque, 1815
Subfamily Ancistrolepidinae Habe and Sato, 1973
Remarks: The subfamily name was originally pro¬
posed as Ancistrolepisinae. This was still used as the
original name by Bouchet and Rocroi (2005), Kantor
and Sysoev (2006) and Gulbin (2009). However, the stem
of the word Ancistrolepis is Ancistrolepid- and should
be correctly used as Ancistrolepidinae (see Goryachev,
1987). Although the paper by Habe and Sato (1972) was
actually published in February, 1973, not in November,
1972 (see Habe, 1973), some authors have mistaken
the date of this publication as 1972 (Gladenkov et ah,
1988; Titova, 1993; Egorov and Barsukov, 1994; Amano
et ah, 1996).
Genus Ancistrolepis Dali, 1895
Type Species: Chrysodomus eucosmius Dali, 1891
Ancistrolepis modestoideus (Takeda, 1953)
(Figures 2-4, 6)
Neptunea nwdestoideci Takeda, 1953: 53-54, pi. 3, 1-7,
pi. 5, fig. 8; Matsui, 1958: 6, pi. 30, figs. la, b; Honda,
1989: 102.
Ancistrolepis modestoideus (Takeda). — Oyama et ah, I960:
60, pi. 8, figs.5a-d.
Ancistrolepis ( Ancistrolepis ) modestoideus (Takeda).—
Titova, 1993: fig. 21.
Material Examined: Among five specimens from the
Poronai Formation, three specimens are deformed (JUE
no. 15941, 15942). All specimens lack early whorls.
Remarks: The type locality of this species was from
the Maoka Group in southwestern Sakhalin, correlated
with the upper Eocene Poronai Formation in Hokkaido
(Takeda, 1953). Titova (1993, p. 4, Fig 21) illustrated one
specimen as A. (A.) modestoideus from the upper Eocene
Takaradai Formation along the Tomari River in south¬
western Sakhalin. Although Oyama et al. (1960) allo¬
cated this species to the genus Ancistrolepis, Honda
(1989) assigned it to the genua Neptunea Roding 1798.
However, when Honda (2000) described a new species
of Ancistrolepis from the lower Oligocene Iwaki Forma¬
tion in Fukushima Prefecture, he mentioned this species
as Ancistrolepis (A.) modestoideus. A Paratype specimen
of A. modestoideus was illustrated from the Yayoi coal
mine near the locality from where we collected the spec¬
imens described herein.
Specimens of A. modestoideus collected by the senior
author are characterized by smaller shells (up to 32.3 mm
in height), four rounded whorls with five to eight spiral
cords on the penultimate whorl and more than ten cords
on body whorl. Spiral cords are prominent, but rounded
and separated by wider interspaces. Overall shape and
details of spiral sculpture are consistent with other authors'
description of this species from Japan and Sakhalin.
Distribution: Upper Eocene Maoka Group and
Takaradai Formation in southwestern Sakhalin, Poronai
Foramtion in central Hokkaido. Lower Oligocene Charo
and Nuibetsu Formations in eastern Hokkaido.
Ancistrolepis sp.
(Figure 5)
Material Examined: One incomplete and deformed
specimen (JUE no. 15943) from the Sakasagawa Forma¬
tion at Kiritachi is examined. The specimen is missing
early whorls.
Description: Shell slightly deformed, moderate in size
(shell height, 53.2 mm+; diameter, 38.6 mm), more than
four whorls. Shoulder angulated with flat area above
shoulder. Shell material mostly dissolved, but surface
sculptured with five prominent spiral cords on penulti¬
mate whorl and more than ten cords on last whorl, sepa¬
rated by wider interspaces.
Remarks: This species resembles the Recent species,
A. grammatus (Dali, 1907) in having a sharply angulated
shoulder, a flat subsutural area above shoulder, similar
number of prominent spiral cords (five to six cords on
penultimate whorl and nine to twelve on body whorl in
A. grammatus-, Okutani, 2000). However, this species is
much smaller than the Recent species. Recent specimen
from off Kurile Islands deposited at JUE attains 128 mm
in shell height.
Page 160
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 130, No. 4
Figures 2-8. Ancistrolepidine gastropods studied in the paper. 2-4, 6. Ancistrolepis modestoideus (Takeda, 1953).
2, 6. adapertural view, JUE no. 15942, Loc. 1; 3. apertural view, JUE no. 15491. 4. adapertural view of the silicon rubber cast of JUE
no. 15941, Loc. 1. 5. Ancistrolepis sp., adapertural view, |UE no. 15943, Loc. 2. 7, 8. Bathyancistrolepis mikasaensis new species.
7. Holotype, adapertural view, JUE no. 15944, Loc. 1. 8. Paratvpe, adapertural view, JUE no. 15945, Loc. 1.
Ancistrolepis jimgoederti Moore, 1984 from the upper
Oligocene part of the Lincoln Creek Formation in south¬
western Washington is similar to the Kiritachi species in
having a flat subsutural area above the shoulder. How¬
ever, A. jimgoederti differs from Ancistrolepis sp. iu
being larger (up to 70 mm in height) and having fewer
T-shaped spiral cords (only four on penultimate whorl).
Distribution: Upper Eocene Sakasagawa Formation
in northwestern Hokkaido.
Genus Bathyancistrolepis Habe and Ito, 1968
Type Species: Chrysodomus trochoideus Dali, 1907
Remarks: Species in this genus can easily be sepa¬
rated from Ancistrolepis by their small and ovate shell
with low spire. However, some authors treated this genus
as a subgenus of Ancistrolepis (Tiba, 1981; Titova, 1993;
Egorov and Baruskov, 1994). Its representatives live in
deep water (100 to 2000 m; Okutani, 2000) from
Kumano-nada to the southern Kurile Islands (Okutani,
2000; Kantor and Sysoev, 2006).
Bathyancistrolepis mikasaensis new species
(Figures 7, 8)
Diagnosis: A small-sized Bathyancistrolepis species
sculptured with three spiral cords on the penultimate
whorl and eleven on last whorl.
Description: Shell small-sized, attaining 12.5 mm in
height, thin, ovate, with three whorls, protoconch and
juvenile whorls missing. Subsutural groove very narrow
and deep; shoulder rounded. Last whorl is inflated,
occupying approximately 86% of shell height; spire very
low. Surface of penultimate whorl is sculptured with
three sharp spiral cords and separated by very wade
interspaces; last whorl above shoulder with three sharp
cords and base with eight cords separated bv wider
interspaces. Siphonal canal short and rather straight,
without fasciole.
Type Material: Holotype, [UE no. 15944 (Shell
height 12.5 mm + ; diameter 10.0 mm); Paratvpe, JUE
no. 15945 (Shell height 8.0 mm+; diameter 8.3 mm)
Type Locality: The cliff along the Ikushunbetsu River
at 200m west of the mouth of Yayoi Banno Creek, Yayoi
Towm in Mikasa City, central Hokkaido.
Remarks: The new species differs from the Eocene
species, Bathyancistrolepis sitakaraensis (Matsui, 1958)
in having a smaller size (maximum shell height of
B. sitakaraensis, 38 mm), lower spire, and in lacking
interstitial threads between cords.
The Recent species, B. trochoideus (Dali, 1907) can
be easily separated from the new species by its larger
shell (up to 36 mm in height) with some interstitial
threads between main spiral cords and a strongly twisted
siphonal canal.
K. Ainano and A. Oleinik, 2016
Page 161
Etymology: The new species is named for the eitv
from where the type material was collected.
Distribution: Known only from the type locality,
upper Eocene Poronai Formation, Mikasa City, eastern
Hokkaido.
DISCUSSION
The three described species probably lived at or in the
vicinity of methane seeps. In the Poronai site (Loc. 1),
two ancistrolepidine gastropods occurred in the carbonate
indicating relatively low 5n ,JC value (+5.8 to — 44.7%o;
Amano and Jenkins, 2007). Moreover, they are co-occurring
with abundant bivalve species with living counter¬
parts known to host symbiotic chemoautotrophic
bacteria and living at or in the vicinity of methane
seeps, such the thyasirids Conchocele bisecta (Conrad,
1849) and the vesicomyid Hubertschenckia ezoensis
(Yokoyama, 1890). In the Kiritaehi site, although no iso¬
topic data is available, multiple C. bisecta co-occurred
gregariously with Ancistrolepis sp. The occurrence of
Ancistrolepis in association with inferred methane seep-
dwelling mollusks is not unique in the North Pacific.
A North American species, Ancsitrolepis teglandae
(Weaver, 1942) was found in the same assemblage with
the vesicomyid Calyptogena katallaensis (Kiel anti
Amano, 2010) in the lower Oligocene Kulthieth Forma¬
tion in Katalla district, southern Alaska (Kiel and Amano,
2010). These Paleogene occurrences are very' similar to
well-documented Miocene seep sites in Japan. From the
middle Miocene Akanuda Limestone (Bessho Forma¬
tion, Nagano Prefecture, central Honshu), Ancistrolepis
koyamai (Kuroda, 1931) was described by Tanaka
(1959), originally as a species of Buccinum, and was
found co-occurring with Conchocele nipponica (Yabe
and Nomura, 1925), and Adulomya uchimuraensis
Kuroda, 1931. Clinopegma aff borealis Tiba, 1969 has
been recorded from the seep carbonates of the upper
Miocene Morai Formation, co-occurring with Conchocele
bisecta and Calyptogena pacifica Dali, 1891 (Amano,
2003). Very recently, the modem species A. grammatus
has been found from the deep sea (778 m) off the
Paramushir Island, close to the methane seep site with
C. bisecta (Gulbin and Ivin, 2015). Judging from the iso¬
tope record and associated fauna, the Paleogene occur¬
rences of ancistrolepidine gastropods are similar to both
modern and Miocene.
As mentioned above, the genus Ancistrolepis was
subdivided into two stocks: A. eucosmius (Dali, 1891)
and A. grammatus (Dali, 1907) by Titova (1993). More¬
over, two groups were recognized by Titova (1993)
within the A. grammatus stock: A. modestoideus-A.
macneili and A. grammatus groups. The first group is
characterized by a rounded shoulder and absence of the
T-shaped spiral cords while the second group, including
A. grammatus has a flat or concaved area above the
shoulder and T-shaped cords. The oldest known species
of the second group was A. jimgoederti Moore, 1984
from the upper Oligocene part of Lincoln Creek Forma¬
tion (See Titova, 1993). However, Ancistrolepis sp. from
the upper Eocene Sakasagawa Formation at Kiritaehi
belongs to the A. grammatus species group as described
above. Titova (1993) included A. aff. modestoideus as the
oldest species of A. grammatus stock from the upper
Eocene Takaradai Formation in southwestern Sakhalin
into A. modestoideus-A. macneili group. As A. grammatus
group appeared at the same time as A. modestoideus-A.
macneili group, it is possible to separate these groups as
independent stocks.
Titova’s classification of Bathy ancistrolepis is some¬
what confusing. Some of the species should be included
in Ancistrolepis on the basis of their high spire and mod¬
erately inflated last whorl. The following species should
be included in Ancistrolepis grammatus stock: the Oligo¬
cene species, A. chikuzenensis (Nagao, 1928), the Mio¬
cene species, A. togariensis Naruse, 1952 and A. miensis
Araki, 1960. The Miocene species, A. striatus Kanno,
1958 and the Plio-Pleistoeene species, A. masudaensis
Nomura, 1937 should be in the A. eucosmius stock, as
pointed out by Amano et al. (1996). Consequently, the
currently known species of Bathy ancistrolepis include B.
sitakaraensis , B. eguchii (Kamada, 1962), B. trochoideus,
and Bathyancistrolepis mikasaensis new species. As sug¬
gested by Kantor and Sysoev (2006), B. trochoideus
tokoyodaensis Ozaki, 1958 and B. trochoideus ovoideus
(Habe and Ito, 1965) are synonyms of B. trochoideus.
The earliest species of the genus Bathyancistrolepis are
B. sitakaraensis and B. mikasaensis new species from the
upper Eocene formations in Hokkaido.
Buccinid gastropods including the family Ancistro-
lepidinae had rapidly diversified and spread geographi¬
cally within the North Pacific since the late Eocene
(Titova, 1993, 1994). The proposed reason for that
change, traditionally involved climatic deterioration that
started at the end of the Eocene (Titova, 1993). Shallow-
marine gastropods in general were changing stepwise,
from predominantly cosmopolitan to more locally dis¬
tributed tax a (Oleinik and Marincovich, 2003). How cli¬
matic cooling accelerated the diversification and spread
of the Buccinidae remains uncertain. It is at the same
time, during the late Eocene, when Ancistrolepidinae
are found associated with the hydrocarbon seep sites.
The Cenozoic-type seep taxa such as vesicomyids and
bathvmodiolines first appeared in the middle Eocene of
the northern Pacific and significantly expanded their
geographic ranges in the late Eocene (Amano and Kiel,
2007; Amano and Jenkins, 201 1; Kiel and Amano, 2013).
From the middle Eocene onward, the number of seep-
bearing formations suddenly and significantly increased
(Kiel, 2009). The origin of Cenozoic-type seep molluscan
taxa was, therefore, attributed to the increase of a sulfate
concentration in the ocean at the middle Eocene (Kiel,
2015). The ancistrolepidine gastropods examined in this
study have been found in upper Eocene hydrocarbon
seep deposits. Ancistrolepidinae are carnivorous gastro¬
pods and probably fed on the fauna in the seep sites, just
Page 162
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 130, No. 4
like their modern counterparts do. Recent buccinids such
as Ancistrolepis grammatus, Neptimea spp., Buccinum
spp., Calliloncha spp., Eosipho spp., and Kryptos spp.
have been found in modern seep sites (e.g. Waren and
Bouchet, 2001; Okutani and Lvasaki, 2003; Levin, 2005;
Fujikura et ah, 2008; Fraussen and Sellanes, 2008). As
opportunistic feeders, species from these genera were
also found at modem non-seep localities. In fact, the
majority of the late Eocene and Oligocene occurrences
of Ancistrolepidinae from Kamchatka and Sakhalin are
also from non-seep deposits. The earliest occurrence of
the genera Ancistrolepis and Bathijancistrolepis at the
late Eocene hydrocarbon seep sites suggests that they
adapted seeps as their habitat shortly after their first
appearance in the fossil record. Similar rapid adaptation
for hydrothermal seep habitats were recorded for
serpulid polychates (Vinn et al., 2013). Moreover, mod¬
em species of Ancistrolepidinae are larger than the
Eocene species. Similar trends are observed within
vesicomyids and bathymodiolins (see also Amano and
Kiel, 2007; Kiel and Amano, 2013). These observations
may indicate that the documented late Eocene increase
in the seep sites in the North Pacific and worldwide,
provided ancistrolepidine gastropods with an additional
food resource and helped facilitate their dispersal in the
northern eircum-Pacific.
AC K N O WEE D C M E NTS
We thank Futoshi Akamatsu (Shunan City, Yamaguchi
Prefecture) who kindly offered ancistrilepidin specimen
to KA. We also thank Geerat |. Vermeij (University of
California, Davis) and Steffen Kiel (Swedish Museum of
Natural History) for their useful and constructive
reviews of the manuscript. This study was partly
supported by a Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research
from the Japan Society for Promotion of Science
(C, 26400500, 2014-2016) to KA.
LITERATURE CITED
Amano, K. and R.G. Jenkins. 2007. Eocene drill holes in cold-
seep bivalves of Hokkaido, northern Japan. Marine Ecology
28:108-114.
Amano, K. and R.G. Jenkins. 2011. New fossil Bathymodiolus
(s. 1.) (Mvtilidae, Bivalvia) from Oligocene seep-carbonates
in eastern Hokkaido, Japan - with remarks on the evolution
of Bathymodiolus (s. 1.). The Nautilus, 125:29-35.
Amano, K. and S. Kiel. 2007. Fossil vesicomyid bivalves from
the North Pacific region. The Veliger 49: 270-293.
Amano, K., M. Uldta, and S. Sato. 1996. Taxonomy and distri¬
bution of the subfamily Ancistrolepidinae (Gastropoda:
Buccinidae) from the Plio-Pleistoeene of Japan. Transac¬
tion and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of
Japan, New Series 176: 467^177.
Araki, Y. 1960. Geology, paleontology and sedimentary struc¬
ture (including Problematical of the Tertiary formations
developed in the environs of Tsu City, Mie Prefecture,
Japan. Bulletin of Liberal Arts Department, Mie Univer¬
sity, Special Volume 1: 1-118.
Bouchet, P. and J.-P. Rocroi. 2005. Classification and nomen-
clator of gastropod families. Malacologia 47: 1-397.
Conrad, T.A. 1849. Fossils from northwestern America. In:
Dana J. D., United States exploring expedition during the
years 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842 under the command of
Charles Wilkes, U.S.N. Atlas. Geology. Vol 10. C. Sherman,
Printer, Philadelphia, pp. 722-728.
Dali, W.H. 1891. Scientific results of explorations by the U.S.
Fish Commission Steamer Albatross. XX. On some new or
interesting West American shells obtained from dredgings
of the U.S. fish commission steamer Albatross in 1888.
Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 14: 174-191.
Dali. W.H. 1895. Scientific results of explorations by the U.S.
Fish Commission Steamer “Albatross”. XXXIV. Report on
Mollusca and Brachiopoda dredged in deep water, chiefly
near the Hawaiian Islands, with hitherto unfigured species
from northwest America. Proceedings of the U.S. National
Museum 17: 675-733.
Dali, W.H. 1907. Descriptions of new species of shells, chiefly
Buccinidae, from the U.S.S.“Albatross”collected during
1906, in the northwestern Pacific, Bering, Okhotsk and
Japan Seas, Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection 50:
139-173.
Egorov, R.V. and S. L. Barsukov. 1994. Recent Antcistro-
lepidinae (Buccinidae). Colus-Doverie LTD. Moscow,
47 pp. (Title and introduction in Russian)
Fraussen, K. and J. Sellanes. 2008. Three new buccinid species
(Gastropoda: Neogastropoda) from Chilean deep-water,
including one from a methane seep. The Veliger 50: 97-106.
Fujikura, K., T. Okutani, and T. Maruyama. 2008. Deep-sea life
- Biological observations using research submersibles.
Tokai University Press, Hadano, 487 pp.
Cladenkov, Yu.V., V.N. Sinelnikova, and L.V. Titova. 1988.
Stages in the evolution of the fauna of Kamchatka Neo¬
gene shelf basins (on the example of Buccinidae). In:
Timofeev, P. P. and Cladenkov, Yu.V. (eds.). Lithology and
Stratigraphy of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic of the eastern
Regions of USSR: 58-135. Geological Institute Moscow,
(in Russian)
Goryachev, V.N. 1987. On the revision of the gastropod super-
family Buccinoidea (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Hemiglossa).
The nontropical zones of the northern Hemisphere. In:
Mollusca. The Results of Research and Prospects of the
Investigations: 31-35. Zoological Institute, Leningrad.
Grant, U.S. and H R. Gale. 1931. Catalogue of marine Plio¬
cene and Pleistocene Mollusca of California and adjacent
regions. Memoir of San Diego Society of Natural History
1: 1-1036.
Gulbin, V.V. 2009. Review of the shell-bearing gastropods
in the Russian water of the East Sea (Sea of Japan).
III. Caenogastropoda: Neogastropoda. Korean Journal of
Malacology: 51-70.
Gulbin, V.V. and V.V. Ivin. 2015. Rare and interesting deep-sea
finds of the buccinid gastropods (Gastropoda: Buccinidae)
from the Sea of Okhotsk. Bulletin of the Russian Far
East Malacological Scoiety 19: 7-16. (in Russian with
English abstract)
Habe, T. 1973. Introduction of “Habe, T. and Sato, J: A classi¬
fication of the family Buccinidae from the North Pacific.
Proceedings of the Japan Society of Systematic Zoology, 8,
pp. 1—8, pis. 1—2 (1973)”. Venus 32: 98. (in Japanese)
Habe, T. and K. lto. 1965. Shells of the world in color. Vol. 1.
Northern Pacific. Hoikusha, Osaka, 176 pp. (in Japanese)
K. Arnano and A. Oleinik, 2016
Page 163
Habe, T. and K. lto. 1968. Buccinid species from Rausu,
Hokkaido. Venus 27:1—8. (in Japanese and English)
Habe, T. and J. Sato. 1973. A classification of the family
Buccinidae from the North Pacific. Proceedings of the
Japan Society of Systematic Zoology 8: 1—8.
Higo, S., P. Callomon, and Y. Goto, 1999. Catalogue and bibli¬
ography of the marine shell-bearing Mollusca of Japan
Elle Scientific Publications, Yao, 749 pp.
Honda, Y. 1989. Paleogene molluscan faunas from the Kushiro
coal field, eastern Hokkaido. Science Reports of the
Tohoku University, Second Series (Geology) 60: 1-137.
Honda, Y. 2000. A new species of Ancistrolepis (Gastropoda:
Buccinidae) from the Iwald Formation (lower Oligocene)
of the Joban coal field, northern Japan. Paleontological
Research 4: 89-94.
Kamada, Y. 1962. Tertiary marine Mollusca from the Joban
coal-field, Japan. Special Papers, Palaeontological Society
of Japan 8: 1-187.
Kail no, S. 1958. New Tertiary mollusks from the Chichibu
basin, Saitama Prefecture, Japan. Science Reports of the
Tokyo Kyoiku Daigaku, Section C 6: 157-229.
Kantor, Yu. I. and A.V. Sysoev. 2006. Marine and brackish water
Gastropoda of Russia and adjacent countries: an illus¬
trated catalogue. KMK Scientific Press Ltd., Moscow, 371
pp. (in Russian and English)
Kiel, S. 2009. Global hydrocarbon seep-carbonate precipitation
correlates with deep-water temperatures and eustatic sea-
level fluctuations since the Late Jurassic. Terra Nova 21:
279-284.
Kiel, S. 2015. Did shifting seawater sulfate concentrations drive
the evolution of deep-sea vent and seep ecosystems? Pro¬
ceedings of the Royal Society B 282 (1804). DOI: 10.1098/
rspb. 2014.2908
Kiel, S. and K. Amano. 2010. Oligocene and Miocene
vesicomyid bivalves from the Katalla District, southern
Alaska. The Veliger 51: 76-84.
Kiel, S. and K. Amano. 2013. The earliest bathymodiolin mus¬
sels: An evaluation of Eocene and Oligocene taxa from
deep-sea methane seep deposits in western Washington
State, USA. Journal of Paleontology 87: 589-602.
Kuroda, T. 1931. Fossil Mollusca. In: Homma, F. (ed.). Geology
of the central part of Shinano, part 4, pp.1-90. Kokon
Shoin, Tokyo, (in Japanese)
Levin, 1.. A. 2005. Ecology of cold seep sediments: Interactions
of fauna with flow, chemistry and microbes. Oceanography
and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 43: 1-46.
Matsui, M. 1958. Species of the genus Neptunea from the
Paleogene formations in the Kushiro coal field, Hokkaido,
Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontlogical
Society of Japan, New Series 30: 201-210.
Moore, E. J. 1984. Molluscan paleontology and biostratigraphy of
the lower Miocene upper part of the Lincoln Creek Forma¬
tion in southwestern Washington. Contributions in Science,
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County 351: 1 — 42.
Nagao, T. 1928. Paleogene fossils of the Island of Kyushu,
Japan. Part 2. Science Reports of the Tohoku Imperial
University, Second Series (Geology) 12: 1 1-140.
Naruse, Y. 1952. New species of genus Ancistrolepis with the
specific key to the Japanese fossil and Recent Ancistrolepis.
Cenozoic Research 12: 204-206. (in Japanese)
Noda, Y. 1992. Neogene molluscan faunas from the Haboro
Coal-field, Hokkaido, Japan. Science Reports of the Tohoku
University, Second Series (Geology) 62: 1-141.
Nomura, S. 1937. On some Neogene fossils from along the
upper course of the Nikko-gawa, Akumi-gun, Yamagata-
ken, Northeast Honshu, Japan. Saito Ho-on Kai Museum,
Research Bulletin 13: 173-178.
Okutani, T. 2000. Buccinidae. In: Okutani, T. (ed.). Marine
Mollusks in Japan. Tokai University Press, Hadano,
pp. 452-499. (in Japanese and English)
Okutani, T. and N. Iwasaki. 2003. Noteworthy abyssal mollusks
(excluding vesicomyid bivalves) collected from the Nankai
Trough off Shikoku by the ROV Kaiko of the Japan
Marine Science & Technology Center. Venus 62: 1-10.
Oleinik, A. and L. Marincovich Jr. 2003. Biotic response to the
Eocene-Oligocene transition: Gastropod assemblages in
the high latitude North Pacific. In: Prothero, D. R., Ivany,
L. C. and Nesbitt, E. A. (eds.). From greenhouse to Ice¬
house. The Marine Eocene-Oligocene transition. Columbia
University Press, New York, pp. 36-56.
Oyama, K., A. Mizuno, and T. Sakamoto. 1960. Illustrated
handbook of Japanese Paleogene mollusks. Geological
Survey of Japan, Kawasaki, 244 pp.
Ozaki, H. 1958. Stratigraphieal and paleontological studies on
the Neogene and Pleistocene formations of the Tyosi dis¬
trict. Bulletin National Science Museum, Tokyo, New
Series, 4: 1-182.
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la nature ou tableau de
l'univers de des corps organises. Barravecchia, Palermo,
224 pp.
Sirenko, B. I. and V. N. Goryachev 1990. A new species of the
genus Ancistrolepis (Gastropoda, Buccinidae) from the
South-China Sea. Zoologicheskiy Zhurnal 69: 137-140.
(in Russian)
Takeda, H. 1953. The Poronai Formation (Oligocene Tertiary)
of Hokkaido and South Sakhalin and its fossil fauna. Studies
on Coal Geology, the Hokkaido Association of Coal Mining
Technologists 3: 1-103.
Tanaka, K. 1959. Molluscan fossils from central Shinano,
Nagano Prefecture, Japan (Part 1). Fossils from Akanuda
Limestone. Journal of Shinshu University, Faculty of Edu¬
cation 8: 1 15-133.
Tiba, R. 1969. New species of the genus Clinopegma, Clinopegma
borealis n. sp. (Buccinidae). Venus 28: 135-136.
Tiba, R. and S. Kosuge. 1981. North Pacific shells (11). Genus
Ancistrolepis. Occasional Publication of the Institute of
Malacology of Tokyo: 11.1-1 1.13.
Tiba, R. and S. Kosuge. 1982. North Pacific Shells (12). Genus
Clinopegma Grant and Gale. Occasional Publication of
the Institute of Malacology of Tokyo: 12. 1-12.50.
Titova, L.V. 1993. The early history of the North Pacific
Ancistrolepidinae (Gasrtopoda: Buccinidae). Ruthenica 3:
1-16.
Titova, L.V. 1994. Cenozoic history of Turritelloidea and
Buccinoidea (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the North Pacific.
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 108:
319-334. "
Vinn, O., E. Kupriyanova and S. Kiel. 2013. Serpulids (Annelida,
Polychaeta) at Cretaceous to modem hydrocarbon seeps:
Ecological and evolutionary patterns. Palaeogeography,
Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 390: 35-41.
Waren, A. and P. Bouchet. 2001. Gastropoda and Mono-
placophora from hydrothermal vents and seeps; new taxa
and records. The Veliger 44: 1 16-231 .
Yabe, H. and S. Nomura. 1925. Notes on the Recent and Ter¬
tiary species of Thyasira from Japan. Science Reports of
the Tohoku Imperial University, Second Series (Geology)
7: 83-95.
Yokoyama, M. 1890. Versteinerungen aus der japanischen
Kreide. Palaeontographica 36: 159-202.
THE NAUTILUS 130(4): 164-165, 2016
Page 164
Parachondria joyeuse : a peculiar new species of Hispaniolan
Annulariidae (Gastropoda: Littorinoidea)
G. Thomas Watters
Department of Evolution, Ecology & Organismal Biolog)'
The Ohio State University
1315 Kinnear Road
Columbus, Ohio 43212 USA
watters. 1 @osu.edu
ABSTRACT
Parachondria joyeuse is described from the eastern Dominican
Republic. The new species is characterized by a thin, high-
spired, nearly smooth shell and a peculiar color pattern. It is
placed in Parachondria with reservation.
INTRODUCTION
Bartseh’s 1946 review of the Hispaniolan Annulariidae is
the most comprehensive account of the family thus far
published. However, examination of his sites reveals that
Bartsch and the many collectors from whom he obtained
material had very few collections from the eastern third
of the island. In the 1960s and 1970s, Fred Thompson
and his colleagues from the Florida Museum of Natural
History made numerous collections in these unstudied
areas. The results of these efforts are now being pub¬
lished (Watters, 2013; 2016; and others). They indicate
an unexpected wealth of new taxa and morphological
diversity largely endemic to small areas of the island.
Abbreviations used are: GTW: G. Thomas Watters
collection; UF: Florida museum of Natural History,
Gainesville, Florida.
SYSTEM ATICS
Family Annulariidae Henderson and Bartsch, 1920
Genus Parachondria Dali, 1905
Type Species: Turbo fascia Wood, 1815, by original
designation.
Parachondria joyeuse new species
(Figures 1-7)
Description: Shell thin, fragile, high-spired for family;
spire ca. 3 x the length of aperture. Holotype 14.1 mm
length. Largest adult specimen seen: 16.7 mm length
including lip (paratype 1), smallest 14.1 mm length includ¬
ing lip (holotype). Protoconch wholly or partially lost in
most adults, consisting of 1.5 minute, smooth whorls, not
clearly delimited from teleoconch, white with tan spot on
apex. Teleoconch of ca. 5.75 rounded whorls. Axial sculp¬
ture of teleoconch present only as microscopic, close-set
ridges on first 3-4 whorls, becoming much weaker to
obsolete on remainder of whorls; numerous fine, close-set
growth lines apparent. Spiral sculpture of ca. 30 very
weak, low, subequal, rounded cords. Umbilicus bounded
by weak ridge with smaller cord or ridge within umbilicus.
Suture simple, without tufts or serrations, not channeled.
Aperture teardrop-shaped. Lip single, narrowly expanded,
narrowest facing the umbilicus, weakly auriculate posteri¬
orly, scarcely solute from previous whorl. Color pattern
variable: from white and unpattemed to. boldly patterned.
Pattern of ca. 7 brown, smudged, spiral bands broken
into axially aligned blotches. One band bounds umbilicus,
another broader band may occur within umbilicus. Early
teleoconch whorls usually not banded. Bands persist
over both sides of lip. Operculum paucispiral and corne¬
ous with outer granular, calcareous deposit. Radula and
anatomy unknown.
Type Material: Holotype, UF 216406, 14.1 mm
length; four paratypes, all UF 505262: paratype 1,
16.7 mm length; paratype 2, 15.9 mm length; paratype 3,
15.9 mm length (subadult); paratype 4, 10.6 mm length
(subadult); all from type locality.
Other Material Examined: Total of 35 specimens
distributed as: UF 505263, 19 specimens, including type
material, all from type locality; UF 21641S, one speci¬
men, from type locality; UF 216731, 10 specimens,
13 km NW of Sabana Grande de Boya, Monte Plata
Province; GTW 16522a, five specimens, 321 m elevation,
mesie limestone bluffs behind cemetery. Las Flores
(suburb of Majagual), Monte Plata Province, 19.0397° N,
-69.8390° W.
G.T. Watters, 2016
Page 165
Figures 1-7. Parachondria joyeuse new species. All from type locality. 1, 2. Holotype, UF 216406, 14.1 mm length.
3-6. Paratypes, UF 505262. 3. Paratype 1, 16.7 mm length. 4. Paratype 3, 15.9 mm length. 5-6. Paratype 2, 15.9 mm length.
7. Operculum.
Type Locality: 200 m elevation, 1 km W of Majagual,
Monte Plata Province, Dominican Republic.
Distribution: Known only from the region of
Majagual. This area is in the Sierra tie El Seibo, a
detached portion of the Cordillera Central, in the Los
Haitises Limestone.
Habitat: Specimens have been found at the base of
limestone knolls in mesic vegetated areas and pastures.
None of the specimens were collected alive and only
one still retained an operculum.
Etymology: “joyeuse” (French, joyous) was the sword
of Charlemagne, a reference to the shape and beauty of
the shell and its variability of color. In the IIth century
poem La Chanson de Roland Joyeuse is described as “never
was there a sword to match it; its colour changed thirty
times a day.” “Joyeuse” is used as a noun in apposition.
Remarks: The “polka dot” pattern on a high-spired shell
is shared by several otherwise unrelated and geographi¬
cally distant Hispaniolan annulariids: the Chondropoma
( Wetniorepoma ) complex from the Barahona Peninsula,
Crossepoma emilianum (Weinland, 1S62) from the western
Tiburon Peninsula of Haiti, and particularly Diplopoma
laferrierense ( Bart sell, 1946) from La Ferriere, Haiti, and
Diplopoma elegantissimum (Bartsch, 1946) from Saltrou
(now Belle-Anse), Haiti. All of these substantially differ
from P. joyeuse in sculpture and apertural details, particu¬
larly in the absence of sutural tufts in P. joyeuse. Diplopoma
also differs in having a spiral lamella on the operculum.
The sculpture is somewhat similar to that found in
Samanicola , another veiy unusually sculptured genus,
but the features of the aperture are very different. In
Samanicola the lip is double, widely expanded, and adnate;
in P. joyeuse it is single, narrowly expanded, and solute.
Samanicola is associated with the Samana Peninsula and
P. joyeuse occurs at adjacent Majagual in the Sierra de
El Seibo.
This species is placed in Parachondria with reservation.
That genus (with a Jamaican type species) is currently a
catch-all grouping that undoubtedly contains numerous
distinct phylogenetic groups. Parachondria joyeuse is
similar in its overall sculpture to the Chondropomorus
subgenus of Parachondria. the Hispaniolan members of
which were reviewed by Watters (2016). But the sculpture
of P. joyeuse is microscopic and lacks any evidence of
sutural tufts; the peculiar color pattern does not occur
in other members of Chondropomorus. Further study,
including phylogenetic work, will probably necessitate
the recognition of a separate genus for this species.
AC K N OWLEDGM E NTS
John Slapcinsky (UF) kindly gave me access to that
invaluable collection. The manuscript was significantly
improved by the comments of two anonymous reviewers.
LITERATURE CITED
Bartsch, P. 1946. The operculate land mollusks of the family
Annulariidae of the island of Hispaniola and the Bahama
Archipelago. Bulletin of the U.S. National Museum 192,
264 pp., 38 pis.
Watters, G.T. 2006. The Caribbean land snail family
Annulariidae. Baekhuys Publishers, Leiden, 557 pp.
Watters, G.T. 2013. New taxa and distributional notes on
Ahbottella and related taxa (Gastropoda: Littorinoidea:
Annulariidae). Z ootaxa 3646(1): 1-22.
Watters, G.T. 2016. Review of the Hispaniolan Parachondria
(Chondropomorus) complex (Gastropoda: Littorinoidea:
Annulariidae). Zootaxa 4127(2): 245-275.
William K. Emerson (1925-2016)
William K. Emerson, photo courtesy of AMNH Photo¬
graphic Collection
On October 19, 2016, malacology lost one of its most
respected senior members. William ‘Bill” Emerson died
in New York City at the age of 91, following a 50-year
career mainly spent at the American Museum of Natural
History. It was there that he built a legacy of research,
curation, and public ser\ice, including supervising world-
class exhibitions and serving as President of most of this
country’s major malaeologieal societies. His accolades
include honorary life memberships and other tributes in
recognition of his career achievements.
William Keith Emerson was born in San Diego,
California, on May 1, 1925. He received a Bachelors
degree in zoology from San Diego State University in
1948, followed by a Master’s in zoology from University
of Southern California in 1950, and a Ph.D. in inver¬
tebrate paleontology from University of California at
Berkeley in f 956.
His career at the American Museum of Natural
History began in 1955, when he became Collection
Manager of Quaternary Invertebrates and Assistant
Curator. He was promoted to full Curator in 1966, and
served as Chair of the Department of Living Inver¬
tebrates from 1960 to 1974. During his time at the
Museum, he studied marine gastropods and scaphopods
from the Pacific region, with a focus on systematies and
biogeography. The malacology collection expanded from
74,000 to 275,000 cataloged lots, in which he was assisted
by two exceptional collection managers — William E.
Old, Jr. (at AMNH 1960-1982), and Walter E. Sage III
(1983-1995) — well -respected experts in their own right.
Although Bill often professed that he delegated all shell
club interactions to his collections managers, he fre¬
quently added to their activities personally. For example,
his publications list shows how often he wrote for the
New York Shell Club News; based on their writings about
Bill, he was clearly revered by its members.
Early in his career. Bill participated in extensive expe¬
ditionary work in the Pacific, focusing on mollusean
communities on Pacific Islands that experienced atomic
bomb testing in the early 1950s, such as Bikini Atoll.
In 1957, he led the Puritan-Ameriean Museum of
Natural History Expedition to western Mexico. The
Puritan expedition produced approximately 5,000 lots
of mollusks for the AMNH collection, and resulted in
20 published expedition reports in American Museum
Novitates. Harry Lee, well-known avocational malacolo-
gist from the Jacksonville Shell Club, assisted in curating
the material while a medical school freshman in New
York in 1962. "I was set to work on the shells taken on
the Puritan-Ameriean Expedition (western Mexico),
but I’m not sure I did justice to the task as there were
recurrent distractions such as eonchological conversa¬
tions with the Bills (Old), various other visitors, e.g., Nick
Katsaras (weekly from NJ), Arieh Hadar (Israel), post¬
doctoral fellow Henry Coomans (Netherlands), and
Tucker Abbott, now all likewise free of this mortal coil.
The sessions very often continued into the tearoom of
the Excelsior Hotel, across the street from the northern
rampart of the AMNH, after which we'd all go our sepa¬
rate ways” (H. G. Lee, in litt., 27 October 2016).
Among Bills accomplishments at AMNH was his
documentation of Indo-Pacific mollusks on the eastern
side of the Pacific Ocean. He reasoned that the larvae of
these animals must have dispersed across deep-water
barriers during anomalous warm periods, now known
as El Nino events. Bill also investigated the effects of
oceanic upwelling of cold water on local mollusean pop¬
ulations living along the western coast of North America.
Using these insights about modern biogeography, he
elucidated the distribution of Pleistocene mollusean
communities. He was author or co-author of more than
P. M. Mikkelsen and N.H. Landman, 2016
Page 167
150 research papers on molluscan taxonomy and bio¬
geography (mainly on neogastropods and scaphopods),
and of seven books, notably the popular The American
Museum of Natural History Guide to Shells: Land,
Freshwater, and Marine from Nova Scotia to Florida
(Alfred A. Knopf, 1976), co-authored with Morris “Karl"
Jacobson, a local shell enthusiast.
Bill was an active participant in the creation of quality
exhibitions at AMN'll during bis career. Most notably,
Bill was Chairman of the Planning Committee for
“MoIInsks and Mankind” (later “Mollusks and Our
World,” on display 1975-2000). This exhibit combined
natural history, anthropology, and art, explaining the
habitat and life histories of mollusks as well as their use
bv various cultures.
Bill served malacology as President of the Council of
Systematic Malacologists (1988-1991); President of the
American Malacological Union (1961-1962); President
of the Western Society of Malacologists (WSM; 1968-
1969); Council member of the Society of Systematic
Zoology (1960-1963; 1970-1972); Trustee of the
Delaware Museum of Natural History (1989-1993), and
on many editorial boards. He held research associate
positions at the San Diego Society of Natural History
(1962-1980) and Santa Barbara Museum of Natural
History (1991-2016). Although he spent his career on
the East Coast, his West Coast roots ran deep; "Bill
was part of the “WSM family,” a treasured member of
the malacologists who met annually, supported and
nurtured students and others” (J. Terry Smith, in litt.,
31 October 2016).
As President of the American Malacological Union
(now Society), Bill organized its 28th annual meeting
in 1962 in St. Petersburg, Florida, assisted bv the
O’ 7 J
St. Petersburg Shell Club. Resurrecting his paleonto¬
logical roots, the logo of the meeting included the
Florida Pleistocene gastropod Hijstrivasum horridum
(Heilprin, 1886).
Bill’s many career honors include: Western Society of
Malacologists Award (1972); American Malacological
Union, Honorary Life Member (1987); California Acad¬
emy of Sciences, Honorary Fellow (1987); and Western
Society of Malacologists, Honorary Life Member (1994).
Bill retired in 1995 as Curator Emeritus in the
Department of Invertebrates (later Division of Inverte¬
brate Zoology) after more than 40 years of service. Fol¬
lowing retirement, Bill continued to visit the Museum
daily, to lunch with colleagues, keep up with the literature,
and answer correspondence. He was an avid fan of the
New York Yankees professional baseball team, and could
frequently be seen sporting a Yankees baseball cap. Bill
lost his life partner, Warren Osterwald, in 1995. He is
survived by his brother James Emerson of Colorado
and his nephew Jeffrey Emerson from New York City.
Paula M. Mikkelsen
Integrative Research Center
Field Museum of Natural History
1400 South Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60605, U.S.A.
Neil H. Landman
Division of Paleontology
American Museum of Natural History
Central Park West at 79th Street
New York, New York 10024-5192, U.S.A.
Mans Bertsch and Luis E. Aguilar Rosas. 2016.
Invertebrados Marinos del Noroeste del Mexico -
Marine Invertebrates of Northwest Mexico.
Universidad Autonoma de Baja California, Institute) de
Invetigaciones Oceanologiqas, Ensenada, Mexico, 432 pp.
ISBN 978-0-692-76682-8, $75 (Contact: hansmarvida@
sbcglobal.net) [In English and Spanish.]
Given my lack of familiarity with the region covered in
this bilingual book, I hesitated for a couple of heartbeats
before accepting to review it. However, I was genuinely
curious and thrilled by the concept of an international
cooperation of this type, particularly one involving the
invertebrate fauna of Baja California, the Gulf of California,
and neighboring areas. The senior author, Hans Bertsch,
is a well-known marine biologist and sea-slug specialist
from southern California who lias also published on some
of the cultural aspects of mollusks from the region. Luis
Aguilar Rosas is a respected marine biologist from the
Universidad Autonoma de Baja California in Ensenada.
/^^rgfdciotfor,
Invertebrados Marinos del
Noroeste de Mexico
II am Bertsch & Luis L. Aguilar Rosas
Universidad Autbnoma de Baja California
Institute) de Investigaciones Oceanoldgicas
Knowing previous productions by the authors, I knew
what to expect in terms of choice of subjects and accu¬
racy in their reporting. However, an aspect in particular
stood out during my initial examination of the book, one
that expands the scope of the work into a different realm,
beyond that of a traditional identification guide. The
authors' unique arrangement includes precious cultural
information within the treatment of many species, and in
particular of mollusks. This is not at the expense of accu¬
rate and relevant taxonomic information. The biological
and identification value of the book is augmented by
addition of data on traditional customs of local people,
including uses of some species as food, their spiritual
importance, medicinal and pharmaceutical values, and
others. In many cases, there is also information on the local
nomenclature and the indigenous take on the folk taxon¬
omy of those species. A typical species entry contains
(in addition to the scientific and common names and great
color illustrations) the subsections Description, Size,
Habitat, [geographic] Distribution, and Remarks (cultural
and ethnographic information, when available, is included
in this latter subsection). Entries in the section on mol¬
lusks, in most cases, include an image of the live animal.
The section on Mollusks comprises 390 species, for a total
of 806 species (48 %) treated in the book (hence the
relevance of this review in The Nautilus). There is a glossary
and separate literature sections for the different groups
(the literature section for Mollusca alone spans 7.5 pages).
The volume also includes essays by Jose Luis Carballo,
Donald Potts, Jesus Angel de Leon-Gonzalez, Paul
Valentich-Scott, and Francisco A. Solis-Marin. The indi¬
vidual sections benefitted from the taxonomic expertise
and contributions of a large cadre of international special¬
ists in the different phyla. Spot checks reveal that the
taxonomy and binominal nomenclature is up to the most
recent standards compiled in the World Register of
Marine Species (WoRMS Editorial Board, 2016.)
Did the authors aim to provide a complete guide
of regional marine invertebrates for northwestern
Mexico? They didn’t, but this doesn’t detract from the
usefulness of their production. For instance, from the
standpoint of mollusks, there are gaps in the taxonomic
coverage of the phylum, with lack of a more compre¬
hensive coverage for some families of microgastropods
and small bivalves. It is not a purpose of the book,
however, to include the entire representation of inver¬
tebrates for the covered area, but to present a selection
of the most conspicuous and relevant taxa that fit in a
handy book format.
This production by Bertsch and Aguilar Rosas is
symbolic of a much-desired type of cooperation between
J.H. Leal, 2016
Page 169
the two great North American nations. No dividing wall
separates the complementary interests and important
contributions from these two authors. On the contrary,
there is a clear synergistic component in their work.
Beyond its efficacy as an invertebrate field guide,
Bertsch and Aguilar Rosass stimulating volume tran¬
scends its regional-guide aspect to become a very read¬
able narrative of the taxonomy, natural history, ecology,
and cultural aspects of the species it covers.
LITERATURE CITED
WoRMS Editorial Board. 2016. World Register of Marine
Species. Available from http://www.marinespecies.org at
VLIZ. Accessed 2016-10-22. doi:10. 14284/170
Jose H. Leal
Bailey- Matthews National Shell Museum/The Nautilus
Sanibel, FL 33957 USA
THE0NAUTILUS
Volume 130
2016
Amano, K .
Amaral, V.S .
Bhave, V. .
Brante, A .
Breure, A.S.H. .
Bruning, P. .
Cabrera, F. .
Cardenas, L .
Coan, E.V. .
COMBOSCH, D .
DeVries, T.J .
Dumale, D .
Fields, A .
Garcia, E.F. .
Giribet, G .
Goddard, |.H.R.
Hickman, C.S. ...
Hoover, C .
Hovestadt, A .
Jenkins, B.G .
Kabat, A.R .
Landman, N.H. .
Leal, J.H .
Lemer, S .
AUTHOR INDEX
116,158 Lyons, W.G . 127,134
. 53 Manri'quez, P.H . 153
. 72 Martinez, S . 5
. 153 Medrano, S . 72
. 27 Mikkelsen, PM . 166
. 153 Morales, K . 153
. 5 Norbis, W. . 5
. 153 Oleinik, A. 0 . 116,158
. 17 Portell, R.W. . 13
. 137 Robinson, D.G . 27
. 101 Sanchez, R . 153
. 137 Schmelz, G.W . 13
. 27 Simone, L.R.L . 53
79, 127 Snyder, M.A . 122, 127, 134
. 137 Soliman, V. . 137
. 146 Sotto, F . 137
. 83 Valdes, A . 72
. 146 Vermeij, C.J . 122
. 27 Watters, G.T. . 23, 164
. 116 Wicksten, M.K . 132
. 17 Zhang, | . 1
. 166 Zhang, Sh . 1
. 168 Zhang, Sr . 1
. 137
NEW TAXA PROPOSED IN VOLUME 130
GASTROPODA
Achnete katsurihaensis Amano and Oleinik, 2016, new species (Cancellariidae, fossil) . 1 17
Batlujacmaea lactea Zhang, Zhang, and Zhang, 2016, new species (Pectinodontidae) . 3
Bathyancistrolepis mikasaensis Amano and Oleinik, 2016, new species (Buccinidae, fossil) . 160
Calliotropis andamanensis Hickman, 2016, new species (Calliotropidae) . 88
Calliotropis enantioserrata Hickman, 2016, new species (Calliotropidae) . 86
Calliotropis locolocoensis Hickman, 2016, new species (Calliotropidae) . 93
Calliotropis lumuluensis Hickman, 2016, new species (Calliotropidae) . 94
Calliotropis tabakaensis Hickman, 2016, new species (Calliotropidae) . 92
Calliotropis tominiensis Hickman, 2016, new species (Calliotropidae) . 90
Chondropoma bellavittatum Watters, 2016, new species (Annnlariidae) . 23
Cuthona luciae Valdes, Medrano, and Bhave, 2016 new species (Tergipedidae) . 74
Fasciolaria delicatissima Garcia, Lyons, and Snyder, 2016, new species (Faseiolariidae) . 128
Hesperaptyxis Snyder and Vermeij, 2016, new genus (Faseiolariidae) . 122
Hesperaptyxis negusi Snyder and Vermeij, 2016 (Faseiolariidae) . 124
Misifulgur DeVries, 2016, new genus (Buccinidae, fossil) . 103
Misifulgur dockeryi DeVries, 2016, new genus (Buccinidae, fossil) . 104
Misifulgur macneili DeVries, 2016, new genus (Buccinidae, fossil) . 106
Misifulgur montemarensis DeVries, 2016, new genus (Buccinidae, fossil) . Ill
Parachondria joyeuse Watters, 2016, new species (Annulariidae) . 164
Truncatella andymurrayi Schmelz and Portell, 2016, new species (Truncatellidae, fossil) . 14
Truncatella chipolana Schmelz and Portell, 2016, new species (Truncatellidae, fossil) . 14
Truncatella sarasotaensis Schmelz and Portell, 2016, new species (Truncatellidae, fossil) . 15
REVIEWERS FOR VOLUME 130
Beck, Lothar
Behrens, David
Bertsch, Hans
Bieler, Riidiger
Breure, A.S.H.
Cadien, Don
Eernisse, Douglas
Fallon, Philip
Fraussen, Koen
Gerber, Jochen
Giribet, Gonzalo
Harasewych, M.G.
Herbert, David G.
Hickman, C.S,
Kiel, Steffen
Kohn, Alan
Laurent, Charles
Lee, Harry C.
1 in, Jin Xian
Mikkelsen, Paula M.
Millen, Sandra
Nekola, Jeff
Nielsen, Sven
Oleinik, Anton
Padula, Vinicius
Pearce, Timothy
Poulin, Eric
Robinson, D.G.
Rosenberg, Gary
Roth, Barry
Sigwart, Julia
Slapcinskv, John
Thiengo, Silvana
Verhecken, A.
Vermeij, Geerat |
Vilvens, C.
Watters, G. Thomas
Sponsored in part by the State of
Florida, Department of State,
Division of Cultural Affairs and the
Florida Council on Arts and Culture
CULTURE
BUILDS
FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT o/STATE
DIVISION of CULTURAL AFFAIRS
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
THE NAUTILUS publishes articles on all aspects of the
biology, paleontology, and systeniatics of mollusks.
Manuscripts describing original, unpublished research
and review articles will be considered. Brief articles, not
exceeding 1000 words, will be published as notes and do
not require an abstract. Notices of interest to the mala-
cological community wall appear in a notices section.
Manuscripts: Each original manuscript and accompa¬
nying illustrations should be submitted to the editor pref¬
erably via e-mail or as hardcopy in triplicate.
Text must conform to the dimensions of 8lA x 11-inch
paper, double-spaced, and single-column throughout (in¬
cluding literature cited, tables, and figure captions).
Authors should follow the general recommendations of
Scientific Style and Format — The CSE Manual for Authors,
Editors, and Publishers, available from the Council of
Science Editors at www.eouncilscienceeditors.org. The
first mention of a scientific name in the text should be
accompanied by the taxonomic authority, including
year. Metric, not English, units are to be used. Geo-
chronologic modifiers should be capitalized only when
units are formally recognized: for instance, use Late Cre¬
taceous but early Miocene. Likewise, only modifiers of
formally recognized chronostratigraplnc units are capi¬
talized: use Lower Jurassic but upper Oligocene.
The sequence of sections should be title page, ab¬
stract, introduction, materials and methods, results, dis¬
cussion, acknowledgments, literature cited, tables, figure
captions, figures. The title page should include the title,
author’s name(s) and address(es). If corresponding au¬
thor is not the senior author, please indicate. The ab¬
stract should summarize in 250 words or less the scope,
main results, and conclusions of the article. Abstracts
should be followed by a list of additional key words. All
references cited in the text must appear in the Literature
Cited section and vice-versa. Please follow a recent issue
of THE NAUTILUS for bibliographic style, noting that
journal titles must be unabbreviated. Information on
plates and figures should be cited only if not included
within the pagination of cited work. Tables must be num¬
bered and each placed on a separate page. If in doubt,
please follow a recent issue of the journal for sequence of
sections and other style requirements.
Illustrations: Illustrations are rendered either at full-
page width (maximum width 17 cm) or column width
(maximum width 8.2 cm). Please take these dimensions
into consideration when preparing illustrations. Page-
width illustrations ideally should span the entire width of
printed page (17 cm). “Tali’’ page-width illustrations
should be avoided, square or “landscape” formats work
better. Please design plates accordingly, such that there
will be enough space left at the bottom of printed page
for plate caption. (Digital technology has made this task
much easier.)
All line drawings must be in black, clearly detailed,
and completely labeled. Abbreviation definitions must
be included in the caption. Line drawings must be high
resolution files at least 600 dpi (dots per inch) resolution
at actual size. Standard digital formats for line drawings
include .tif, .bmp, .psd, .eps, and .pdf.
Photographs may be submitted in black-and-wTite or
color, preferably in RGB mode if in color. Standard digi¬
tal formats for photographs include .tif, .psd, .jpg, or .pdf.
Photographs must be high resolution files at least 300 dpi
resolution at actual size.
If more than one figure is included in an illustration,
all figures are to be consecutively numbered (Figures 1,
2, 3, ... , NOT Figures 1A, IB, 1C, . . . , NOR Plate 1,
Figure 1, . . .). In illustrations with more than one figure,
make sure that blank areas between figures is kept to a
minimum, thereby allowing for more area for each indi¬
vidual figure.
Compressed files (e.g., .jpg) may be used to facilitate
transmission of files during original submission, but may
not be acceptable at final submission (see below).
Voucher Specimens: Deposition of the holotype in a
recognized institutional, public collection is a require¬
ment for publication of articles in which new species-
level taxa are described. Deposition of paratypes in in¬
stitutional collections is strongly encouraged, as is the
deposition of representative voucher specimens for all
other types of research w'ork.
The Editorial Process: Upon receipt, all manuscripts are
assigned a number and acknowledged. The editor reserves
the right to return manuscripts that are substandard or
not appropriate in scope for THE NAUTILUS. Manu¬
scripts deemed appropriate for the journal will be sent
for critical review to at least two reviewers. The review¬
ers’ recommendations will serve as basis for rejection or
continuation of the editorial process. Reviewed manu¬
scripts will be sent back to authors for consideration of
the reviewers’ comments. The revised version of the
manuscript may at this point be considered accepted for
publication by the journal.
Final Submission: Authors of accepted manuscripts are
required to submit a final version via e-mail to the editor
[email protected]. Please do not send low-resolu¬
tion or compressed illustration files at this stage. Send any
files larger than 20 Mb on a CD or DVD to the editor.
Proofs: After typesetting, proofs will be sent to the au¬
thor. Author should read proofs carefully and send cor¬
rections to the editor within 48 hours. Changes other than
typesetting errors will be charged to the author at cost.
Offprints: An order form for offprints will accompany the
proofs. Offprints will be ordered through the editor. Authors
with institutional, grant, or other research support will be
asked to pay for page charges at the rate of $60 per page.
© This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39. 48-1 992 (Permanence of Paper)
SMITHSONIAN LIBRARIES